Mualliflar

  • N.Kh.Ganieva
  • A.K.Nuridinov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ustozlar.89188

Kalit so‘zlar:

organ of vision eye injury forensic medical examination severity of harm to health.

Annotasiya

Isolated injuries of the visual organ are one of the complex forms of damage that require accurate forensic medical assessment. In Uzbekistan, this area is of particular importance in the context of the development of national legislation and reform of the health care system. The article examines the legal and methodological aspects of forensic medical examination of eye injuries, analyzes regional forensic medical practice, and suggests ways to improve the quality of expert opinions.


background image

Ustozlar uchun

pedagoglar.org

71-son 2 –to’plam May 2025

Sahifa: 394

"ANALYSIS OF ISOLATED EYE INJURIES IN LIVING INDIVIDUALS:

FORENSIC MEDICAL PRACTICE IN UZBEKISTAN"

N.Kh.Ganieva

A.K.Nuridinov

Hyunjeong Kang. Hyunji Kang.

Tashkent Medical Academy, Uzbekistan.

Annotation:

Isolated injuries of the visual organ are one of the complex forms of

damage that require accurate forensic medical assessment. In Uzbekistan, this area is of

particular importance in the context of the development of national legislation and reform

of the health care system. The article examines the legal and methodological aspects of

forensic medical examination of eye injuries, analyzes regional forensic medical practice,

and suggests ways to improve the quality of expert opinions.

Keywords:

organ of vision, eye injury, forensic medical examination, severity of

harm to health.

Introduction.

Isolated injuries to the eye and its accessory apparatus are common

in domestic, industrial and criminal injuries. The specifics of diagnostics, legal

qualification and expert assessment of such injuries necessitate a comprehensive

interdisciplinary approach. In Uzbekistan, forensic medical practice needs to adapt

international standards to the national healthcare and law enforcement system.

Purpose of the study.

The purpose of this article is to analyze the features of

forensic medical examination of isolated injuries of the visual organ in living individuals

in the conditions of the Republic of Uzbekistan, taking into account current regulatory

documents, regional expert practice and international standards, as well as identifying key

problems and proposals for improving the quality of expert opinions.

Materials and research methods.

94 cases of forensic medical examination of

isolated injuries to the visual organ, conducted in forensic medical bureaus of Tashkent,

Samarkand and Andijan regions for the period from 2021 to 2024, were analyzed. Clinical

reports of ophthalmologists, expert reports and regulatory documents of the Ministry of


background image

Ustozlar uchun

pedagoglar.org

71-son 2 –to’plam May 2025

Sahifa: 395

Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan were used.

Table 1

Distribution of types of isolated injuries to the visual organ and their classification

according to the severity of harm to health (n = 94)

Type

of

injury

Number of

cases (n)

% of total

Qualificatio

n of damage to

health

Eyeball

contusion

34

36.2%

Mostly minor

harm

Damage to

the eyelids and

conjunctiva

19

20.2%

Minor harm

Penetrating

corneal injury

20

21.3%

Moderate

severity, in some

cases severe

Hyphema

(hemorrhage into

the

anterior

chamber)

14

14.9%

Moderate

severity

Retinal

detachment, tears

7

7.4%

Predominantl

y serious harm

Total

94

100%

Table 2

Comparison of clinical and forensic assessment

severity of visual impairment (n = 94)

Severity

(clinical)

Cases

(n)

The

forensic

medical

SME

underestimat

ed*

SME

overestimated

**


background image

Ustozlar uchun

pedagoglar.org

71-son 2 –to’plam May 2025

Sahifa: 396

examination

confirmed

Light

52

46

(88.5%)

-

6

(11.5%)

Moderat

e severity

30

24

(80.0%)

4

(13.3%)

2 (6.7%)

Heavy

12

9

(75.0%)

3

(25.0%)

-

Total

94

79

(84.0%)

7

(7.4%)

8

(8.6%)

Note:

* By "Forensic medical examination underestimated" we mean cases where the expert

assessment determined a lesser degree of severity than in the clinical diagnosis (for

example, persistent visual impairment was underestimated).** By "Forensic medical

examination overestimated" we mean cases where the expert assessment turned out to be

stricter than the clinical conclusion (for example, due to incorrect interpretation of

temporary loss of function as persistent).

Research results and discussion.

The most common injuries were: eyeball

contusions (36%), penetrating corneal wounds (21%), hemorrhages into the anterior

chamber (hyphema) (15%), retinal detachment and ruptures (8%), and eyelid injuries

(20%). In 64% of cases, the harm to health was classified as minor, in 28% - moderate, and

in 8% - severe. Problems arose due to insufficient recording of residual effects, lack of

dynamic observation, and discrepancies between the clinical assessment and the forensic

medical opinion.

In the conditions of Uzbekistan, forensic medical examination of the visual organ

requires: unification of criteria for assessing the reduction of visual acuity; interaction of

experts with specialized ophthalmologists; consideration of the specifics of the

employment of victims (for example, in persons whose profession is related to precise

vision); implementation of international classifications (for example, ICD-11) and


background image

Ustozlar uchun

pedagoglar.org

71-son 2 –to’plam May 2025

Sahifa: 397

adaptation of foreign methods. In addition, it is necessary to train specialists in forensic

ophthalmology and regularly update regulatory documents governing the assessment of

bodily injuries.

Conclusions.

Forensic medical examination of isolated eye injuries in Uzbekistan

requires a systematic approach, including improvement of the regulatory framework,

development of human resources and introduction of modern diagnostic standards. This

will increase the objectivity of health damage assessment and avoid expert errors.

References.

1.

Баранов П.А., Котова И.Н. Экспертиза телесных повреждений органа

зрения: современные подходы //Судебно-медицинская экспертиза, 2022; 65(2): 27-

33. Baranov P.A., Kotova I.N.Examination of bodily injuries to the organ of vision:

modern approaches // Forensic medical examination, 2022; 65(2): 27-33.

2.

Қўшчиева Н.А., Жўраев У.Б. Судебно-медицинская экспертиза

повреждений органа зрения //Медицинский журнал Узбекистана, 2022, №2, С. 47-

52. Kushchieva N.A., Zhuraev U.B.Forensic medical examination of damage to the visual

organ // Medical Journal of Uzbekistan, 2022, No. 2, pp. 47-52.

3.

Нормативно-методическое руководство по определению степени

тяжести телесных повреждений, Ташкент, 2019. Normative and methodological

guidelines for determining the severity of bodily injuries, Tashkent, 2019.

4.

David DB, Sandinha MT, Hodgkins PROcular trauma: principles of

assessment and management //JR Soc Med. 2006; 99(7): 351-354.

5.

Kuhn F., Morris R., Witherspoon CD, et al.Serious eye injury: epidemiology

and prognosis //Eye (Lond). 2006; 20(12): 1231-1238.

6.

Negrel AD, Thylefors B.The global impact of eye injuries //Ophthalmic

Epidemiol. 1998; 5(3): 143-169.

7.

World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of

Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11). Geneva: WHO; 2019.

Муаллифнинг (муаллифоарнинг) энг кўп ўқилган мақолалари