Авторы

  • Maftuna Bo’riyeva
    Chirchik Stаtе Pеdаgоgicаl Univеrsity Tоurism fаculty Fоrеign lаnguаgе аnd litеrаturе
  • Saida Gaziyeva
    Sciеntific supеrvisоr: Еnglish tеаchеr, Chirchik Stаtе Pеdаgоgicаl Univеrsity

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.yosc.97959

Ключевые слова:

Phraseological units idioms set expressions classification semantics pragmatics intercultural communication linguistic competence translation language structure.

Аннотация

This article explores the nature, classification, and functional role of phraseological units in modern language use. Phraseological units, also known as idioms or set expressions, represent a significant aspect of linguistic richness and cultural identity. The study outlines the main types of phraseological units, their structural and semantic characteristics, as well as their pragmatic functions in communication. Special attention is given to the translation and interpretation challenges they pose across languages. The analysis is supported by examples from English and other languages to highlight cross-cultural nuances. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of phraseology as a vital component of linguistic competence and intercultural communication.


background image

YOSH OLIMLAR

ILMIY-AMALIY KONFERENSIYASI

in-academy.uz/index.php/yo

56

PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS

Bo’riyeva Maftuna Rustam qizi

maftunaboriyeva350@gamil.com

Chirchik Stаtе Pеdаgоgicаl Univеrsity

Tоurism fаculty Fоrеign lаnguаgе аnd litеrаturе

Sciеntific supеrvisоr:

Gaziyeva Saida

saykagaziyeva@gmail.com

Еnglish tеаchеr, Chirchik Stаtе Pеdаgоgicаl Univеrsity.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15533336

Abstract:

This article explores the nature, classification, and functional role of

phraseological units in modern language use. Phraseological units, also known as idioms or
set expressions, represent a significant aspect of linguistic richness and cultural identity. The
study outlines the main types of phraseological units, their structural and semantic
characteristics, as well as their pragmatic functions in communication. Special attention is
given to the translation and interpretation challenges they pose across languages. The
analysis is supported by examples from English and other languages to highlight cross-
cultural nuances. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of phraseology as a
vital component of linguistic competence and intercultural communication.

Keywords:

Phraseological units, idioms, set expressions, classification, semantics,

pragmatics, intercultural communication, linguistic competence, translation, language
structure.


The richness and diversity of a language's expressive means reflect its cultural heritage,

historical background, and the worldview of its speakers. In this context, phraseological
units—also known as idiomatic expressions or fixed phrases—are among the most vivid and
culturally loaded elements of language. These expressions often carry figurative meanings
that go beyond the literal definitions of their individual components, making them a vital tool
for adding color, emotion, and nuance to both spoken and written communication. Language
is not only a means of expressing thoughts, but also a reflection of culture and national
identity. Among its most vivid and colorful elements are phraseological units, which are stable
word combinations with a figurative meaning. These units, also referred to as idioms or set
expressions, enrich the language and make speech more expressive, emotional, and culturally
nuanced.

Phraseological units differ from free word combinations in that they are fixed and carry

a meaning that is not directly inferred from the individual words. For example, the English
idiom “kick the bucket” means “to die,” which cannot be deduced from the literal meanings of
“kick” or “bucket.” Such expressions often originate from historical events, folklore, literature,
or daily life, and over time become ingrained in everyday speech.

These units typically consist of two or more words that are used together as a single

semantic unit. Their stability and figurative nature make them a distinct part of the lexicon,
separate from freely constructed phrases.

Linguists have proposed various classifications of phraseological units based on their

structure and meaning. Academician V.V. Vinogradov categorized them into: phraseological
fusions – units with completely non-transparent meaning (e.g., “red tape”); phraseological
unities – expressions with partially transparent meaning (e.g., “to lose one’s head”); and


background image

YOSH OLIMLAR

ILMIY-AMALIY KONFERENSIYASI

in-academy.uz/index.php/yo

57

phraseological combinations – collocations where the meaning of one element is bound (e.g.,
“make a decision”).

Structurally, these units can be noun phrases (e.g., “a piece of cake”), verb phrases (e.g.,

“break the ice”), or even full sentences (e.g., “the early bird catches the worm”).

Phraseological units play a crucial role in pragmatic communication. They convey

attitudes, emotions, irony, and cultural references. Understanding idioms requires not only
knowledge of vocabulary and grammar, but also cultural competence. Misinterpretation of
idioms often leads to communication breakdowns in cross-cultural settings.

In language teaching, phraseological units help learners acquire fluency and a deeper

understanding of native speaker norms. However, teaching them requires careful explanation
of their usage, connotation, and cultural background.

One of the most difficult tasks in translation is handling idiomatic expressions. A literal

translation often fails to convey the intended meaning or emotional tone. For instance, the
Russian idiom “вешать лапшу на уши” (literally: "to hang noodles on someone’s ears") is
best translated into English as “to pull someone’s leg.” Finding appropriate equivalents
demands both linguistic and cultural sensitivity.

Phraseological units are indispensable tools for expressive, vivid, and culturally rich

communication. Their study contributes to a better understanding of how language reflects
cultural values and cognitive processes. As globalization continues, the importance of
mastering such expressions in intercultural communication and language education grows
ever more significant.

CONCLUSION

Modern educational technologies play an essential role in the learning process,

enhancing the quality and efficiency of education. Interactive and flexible teaching methods
make the learning process effective and enjoyable for students. Therefore, developing and
broadly implementing modern educational technologies within the education system is an
essential task. This contributes to creating a knowledgeable, innovative, and creative future
generation.

References:

Используемая литература:

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar:

1.

Vinogradov, V.V. (1977). The Main Types of Phraseological Units in the Russian

Language. Moscow: Nauka.
2.

Cowie, A.P., Mackin, R., & McCaig, I.R. (1983). Oxford Dictionary of English Idioms.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.

Fernando, C. (1996). Idioms and Idiomaticity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4.

Gläser, R. (1988). The Stylistic Potential of Phraseological Units in the Light of Genre

Analysis. In W. Hüllen & R. Schulze (Eds.), Understanding the Lexicon. Tübingen: Max
Niemeyer Verlag.
5.

Baker, M. (2011). In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation (2nd ed.). London:

Routledge.
6.

Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.


background image

YOSH OLIMLAR

ILMIY-AMALIY KONFERENSIYASI

in-academy.uz/index.php/yo

58

7.

Moon, R. (1998). Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-Based Approach.

Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Библиографические ссылки

Vinogradov, V.V. (1977). The Main Types of Phraseological Units in the Russian Language. Moscow: Nauka.

Cowie, A.P., Mackin, R., & McCaig, I.R. (1983). Oxford Dictionary of English Idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fernando, C. (1996). Idioms and Idiomaticity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gläser, R. (1988). The Stylistic Potential of Phraseological Units in the Light of Genre Analysis. In W. Hüllen & R. Schulze (Eds.), Understanding the Lexicon. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Baker, M. (2011). In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Moon, R. (1998). Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-Based Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Наиболее читаемые статьи этого автора (авторов)