Authors

  • Nigina Akhmedova
    Assistant-teacher of the Department of Teaching Languages at Samarkand institute of economics and service, Uzbekistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.aijmr.63179

Keywords:

concept youth verbalization phraseological units assessments cognition phenomena proverbial fund figurative meaning.

Abstract

The aim of the article is to study the content structure of the concept “youth” represented by phraseological and paremic units as some integral constructs in the English language pictures of the world and reveal the cultural-specific features of their verbalization.


background image

Acumen:

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research

Volume 1, Issue 4

334

Acumen: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research

THE CONCEPT “YOUTH” IN THE VIEW OF PROVERBS AND

METAPHORS IN ENGLISH LINGUACULTURAL SYSTEM

Akhmedova Nigina Ikhtiyarovna,

Assistant-teacher of the Department of Teaching Languages at Samarkand institute

of economics and service, Uzbekistan.

e-mail:

akhmedovanigina0@gmail.com

Annotation.

The aim of the article is to study the content structure of the concept

“youth” represented by phraseological and paremic units as some integral constructs in

the English language pictures of the world and reveal the cultural-specific features of

their verbalization.

Key words:

concept, youth, verbalization, phraseological units, assessments,

cognition, phenomena, proverbial fund, figurative meaning.

The term “concept” is widely used in various fields of linguistic science. The

authors of the “Concise Dictionary of Cognitive Terms” interpret concepts as ideal

abstract units, meanings that a person operates in the process of thinking, and which

reflect the content of experience and knowledge, the content of the results of all human

activity and the processes of cognition of the world around him in the form of certain

units, “quanta of knowledge”.

At the same time, it is noted that the content of the concept includes information

about what the individual knows, assumes, thinks, imagines about this or that fragment

of the world. Concepts reduce the whole variety of observed phenomena to something

unified, structuring the information received into certain categories and classes

developed by society [1, 56p].

The set of views of the people as a whole and of each person individually on the

surrounding reality, embedded in the concepts, is a national concept sphere, and the

formation of which the proverbial fund of the language plays an important role.

Proverbs, sayings, phraseological units are a kind of exponents of cultural knowledge

and, as part of the language system, act as a repository of cultural traditions, most

clearly reflecting the views, assessments and observations of the reality of

representatives of a certain linguistic society.

Among the many concepts that reflect the perception of reality by speakers of

different languages, the concept of “age” occupies a special place, representing a

universal component of human culture.

We have tried to analyze the totality of ideas about “youth” as one of the

components of the concept of “age” presented in English proverbs and phraseological

units. In the research we have identified the characteristics of this concept in the

English-speaking lingua society. The proverb is considered by us as a clichéd sentence

(closed structure) that has a direct, direct and figurative or only figurative meaning.


background image

Acumen:

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research

Volume 1, Issue 4

335

Acumen: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research

The material for this study was selected by the method of continuous sampling

from various lexicographic works [7].

Examples were selected according to the principle of the presence of the lexeme

youth or their cognates in the proverbial unit.

From the selected corpus of examples, we have excluded the thematic group

“opposition of youth-old age”, since we are interested in the ethno cultural idea of

“youth” regardless of its comparison with other life stages, which is qualified as a

stereotype of the corresponding culture.

According to the explanatory dictionary of S.I. Ozhegov “Youth is the age between

adolescence and maturity; period of life at that age”. Ushakov's dictionary defines

“youth” as follows: “young age, age from adolescence to adulthood”. At the same time,

both of the above-mentioned dictionaries define “youth” as a synonym for

“juvenescence”: “Age intermediate between adolescence and maturity; period of life at

that age; young age, young years of life”. The “Big Academic Dictionary of the

Russian Language” (Большой академический словарь русского языка) defines

“juvenility” rather as a “sub-period” of “youth”: “Juvenility is youth, early youth”. [8]

Thus, at the level of the dictionary definitions given above, it becomes obvious that,

unlike the previous definitions, the English one includes not only the age period, but

also the qualities inherent in young people. In the proverbial picture of the world of the

English language, the concept of “youth” has the following connotations.

Youth is associated with lack of life experience, naivety and stupidity:

“The young will sow their wild oats”;

“Youth has a small head”;

“Youth is easily deceived because it's quick to hope”;

“In youth and beauty, wisdom is but rare”.

Within this thematic group, a subgroup is clearly distinguished, characterizing the

recklessness inherent in young people due to a lack of knowledge of life:

“Youth is the brother of madness”;

“Youth never casts for peril”;

“What would a young cat do but eat mice”;

“Youth doesn't mind where it sets its foot”.

Note that this is the most numerous of the thematic groups we have identified.

It is impossible not to note the paradoxical nature of the assessment of this age

stage. What is found in the presence of the idea of the independence of the mind and

wisdom of a person from the number of years he has lived:

“Young folks think old folks to be fools, but old folks know young folks to be

fools”;

“An old head on young shoulder”.

The idea of the malleability of the young mind to learning:

“Soft wax will take any impression”;

“A tree must be bent while young”;

“Throw the wand while it is green”. [6, 617 p]

It is noted that youth does not yet have formed views on life and the surrounding

reality and needs support and encouragement to move and develop further in the


background image

Acumen:

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research

Volume 1, Issue 4

336

Acumen: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research

chosen direction: “Praise youth and it will prosper”. The analyzed period is associated

with the stage when moral guidelines are laid and a coordinate system for later life is

formed: “What is learned in youth is carved in stone”. [5, 345 p]

A thematic group that combines proverbs characterizing the way of life of young

people, associated with fun and carelessness, is characterized by a positive connotation:

“Youth will have its course”;

“Youth will have its fling”,

“Youth likes to wander”;

“Youth will be served”.

There is also a group of proverbs expressing the idea of the transient nature of

youth:

“Youth sheds many a skin”;

“You are only young once”;

“The young are not always with their bow bent”;

“The steed does not retain its speed forever”.

Note also the idea of the potentially negative and destructive influence of money

on youth: “On fat land grow foulest weeds”; “An abundance of money ruins youth”,

which may be related to the idea of malleable mind and attitudes characteristic of

young people [3,310 p].

Finally, a group is fixed, represented by proverbs-ethical dogmas, peculiar moral

maxims, instructions to youth:

“Look after honor from your youth”;

“Guard your honor from your youth, and your weapons once you've got them in

hand”;

“Cherish your honor from a tender age”.

A necessary characteristic of any concept is not only the nominative density, but

also metaphorical diffuseness, since it also embodies the value priorities of linguistic

culture [4,73p]. We will analyze the metaphorical diffuseness of the age concept

“youth” through textual implementation.

In American youth linguistic culture, appeals to the concept of “immature

behavior” are expressed through the characteristics of a given age period: immature,

youngest. For example:

Some people may be too immature, but sometimes you have to grow up and realize

you need to be more mature to be recognized in life.

The associative connection of the concept of “youth” with the concept of

“immature behavior” is also carried out through comparison. For example:

In the American youth linguistic culture, appeals to the concept of “immature

behavior” are also carried out through a set expression. For example:

A comparative analysis showed that the American youth lingua-culture is

characterized by the presence of associative links between the concept of “youth” and

the concepts of “tenderness” and “education” expressed in catachresis. [2, 146 p]

Appeals to the concept of “tenderness” are carried out through catachresis,

represented by addressing guys to parents:


background image

Acumen:

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research

Volume 1, Issue 4

337

Acumen: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research

The time has come: I thank you both for all your help during these 18 years. I still

remember when you guys used to say.

To conclude, the following definition of the concept “youth” is the most

accurate “the stage of a person's life, which occupies the period of life after the age of a

teenager and up to middle age”. According to explanatory dictionaries, mature age

begins at the age of forty (the period of life between youth and old age, usually

considered to be from 40 to 60 years of age. Therefore, based on the definitions of

young, adolescence and adulthood, we come to the conclusion that youth occupies the

period of a person's life from twenty to forty years. The specified age limits are rather

conditional, due to the fact that the concept of “youth” is not a clearly structured mental

entity, but is a continuum in which neighboring zones intersect and overlap each other.

References:

1.Слышкин Г.Г. Лингвокультурные концепты и метаконцепты: монография. –

Волгоград: Перемена, 2004. – С. 54.

2.Фомина Ж.Б. Фигуры речи, используемые для апелляции к концептосфере

«возраст» в русской и американской молодёжных лингвокульту-рах // Наука и

образование в современном обществе: сб. науч. тр. по материалам Междунар.

науч.- практ. конф. 31 мая 2015 г.: в 2 ч. Ч. II. – Смоленск: НОБАЛЕНСО, 2015. –

С. 146.

3.Bickerton D. Language & species / D.Bickerton. – Chicago: The University of

Chicago Press, 1990. – 310 p.

4.Cram D. The linguistic status of the proverb / D. Cram // Wise words. Essays on

the proverb / [ed. by W. Mieder]. – N.Y., 1994. – 73p.

5.Johnson M. Philosophical implications of cognitive semantics / M. John-son //

Cognitive linguistics. -1992. -Vol. 3. – 345p.

6.Sapir E. Selected writings in language, culture and personality / [ed. by D.G.

Mandelbaum]. – Los Angeles, 1973. – 617p.

7.

https://www.gramota.net/materials/2/2016/9-2/37.html

8.

http://www.abdn.ac.uk/cоps/prоfilеs/b.d.macgrеgоr/?publicatiоns&rs=50

References

Слышкин Г.Г. Лингвокультурные концепты и метаконцепты: монография. – Волгоград: Перемена, 2004. – С. 54.

Фомина Ж.Б. Фигуры речи, используемые для апелляции к концептосфере «возраст» в русской и американской молодёжных лингвокульту-рах // Наука и образование в современном обществе: сб. науч. тр. по материалам Междунар. науч.- практ. конф. 31 мая 2015 г.: в 2 ч. Ч. II. – Смоленск: НОБАЛЕНСО, 2015. – С. 146.

Bickerton D. Language & species / D.Bickerton. – Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1990. – 310 p.

Cram D. The linguistic status of the proverb / D. Cram // Wise words. Essays on the proverb / [ed. by W. Mieder]. – N.Y., 1994. – 73p.

Johnson M. Philosophical implications of cognitive semantics / M. John-son // Cognitive linguistics. -1992. -Vol. 3. – 345p.

Sapir E. Selected writings in language, culture and personality / [ed. by D.G. Mandelbaum]. – Los Angeles, 1973. – 617p.

Most read articles by the same author(s)