Remarks on The Place of Commercial Discourse in Society and Economy

Sobirjonov Ravshanbek Tolipjon o‘g‘li

doi:10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue05-86

Authors

Sobirjonov Ravshanbek Tolipjon o‘g‘li
2nd year student of Philology and Language Teaching, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue05-86

Keywords:

Discourse communication language

Abstract

Speech always affects other discourses and undergoes interaction and change during communication. The main content of speech is its social and cultural interactions. According to his theory, each discourse interacts with other discourses and undergoes changes during communication. The main content of speech is manifested in its social and cultural interactions. Communication is a complex activity of linguistic (discourse) thinking. As a result of this activity, discourse structures are formed, and the “traces” of the activity of linguistic thinking are preserved in the structure of these structures.

American Journal Of Philological Sciences

314

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps

VOLUME

Vol.05 Issue05 2025

PAGE NO.

314-315

DOI

10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue05-86

Remarks on The Place of Commercial Discourse in
Society and Economy

Sobirjonov Ravshanbek Tolipjon o‘g‘li

2nd year student of Philology and Language Teaching, Uzbekistan

Received:

31 March 2025;

Accepted:

29 April 2025;

Published:

31 May 2025

Abstract:

Speech always affects other discourses and undergoes interaction and change during communication.

The main content of speech is its social and cultural interactions. According to his theory, each discourse interacts
with other discourses and undergoes changes during communication. The main content of speech is manifested
in its social and cultural interactions. Communication is a complex activity of linguistic (discourse) thinking. As a

result of this activity, discourse structures are formed, and the “traces” of the activity of linguistic thinking are

preserved in the structure of these structures.

Keywords:

Discourse, communication, communication, language, thought.

Introduction:

Various scholars, according to their

scientific approaches and methods, have expressed a
number of different opinions about the definition of
speech. The following authors have defined speech
based on their theoretical and scientific conceptual
approaches and analyzed it in various aspects:

According to Noam Chomsky, “Speech is a linguistic

system, the main function of which is to express
thoughts and communicate with each other through

the use of language and grammar”

. He considered

speech as one of the main functions of language,
through its syntactic structure, information is
transmitted. In contrast to previous structuralist
approaches that viewed language as a mechanical
process, he considered language as a product of deep
cognitive abilities of the human mind. The analysis of
speech not only in terms of external expression, but
also through the rules and structures existing in the
human mind is the basis of Chomsky's theory.
Chomsky's theory encouraged the view of language
learning as a psycholinguistic process. Language is
considered not only as a means of external
communication, but also as a means of organizing and
organizing knowledge in the human brain. According to
him, in the process of language acquisition, a child
acquires an innate "language ability", which allows him

to intuitively learn the basic rules of language. This is
explained by the concept of a Language Acquisition
Device (LAD). Mikhail Bakhtin defines speech not only
as a means of information transmission, but also as a
dialogical process. According to him, speech always
influences other speech and undergoes interaction and
change during communication. The main content of
speech is its social and cultural interactions. According
to his theory, each speech interacts with other speech
and undergoes changes during communication. The
main content of speech is manifested in its social and
cultural interactions. Bakhtin's theory of dialogism
emphasizes the interdependence of language and
social relations. According to him, each speech act
arises as a response to other speech acts and expects
future responses. During this process, speech contents
change and become richer. Bakhtin calls this state
"dialogical imagination". The scientist also emphasizes
the dependence of speech on social and cultural
context. In his opinion, each speech act occurs in
specific social and cultural conditions and is shaped by
these conditions. This affects the content and form of
speech. Bakhtin's theory of dialogism is important in
linguistics, literary studies, and the social sciences,
contributing to a deeper understanding of speech and
communication processes. Lev Vygotsky describes

American Journal Of Philological Sciences

315

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps

American Journal Of Philological Sciences (ISSN

–

2771-2273)

speech as a means of forming thinking and
consciousness.

According to him, speech is not only a means of
communication, but also a fundamental element that
organizes human social interaction and the thinking
process. Speech is considered the main mechanism
that develops thinking. According to his theory of
cultural-historical development, human cognitive
development occurs through social communication,
and speech plays a central role in this process.
According to the scientist, initially speech appears as a
means of external (social) communication. However,
over time, it turns into internal speech, guiding the
human thinking process and contributing to the
formation of consciousness. He calls this process "inner
speech". Vygotsky also introduced the concept of the
"zone of proximal development", This refers to the
range of tasks that a child cannot perform
independently, but can perform with the help of
qualified individuals (for example, teachers or parents).
Speech mediates this process and ensures the child's
cognitive development.