American Journal Of Philological Sciences
290
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps
VOLUME
Vol.05 Issue06 2025
PAGE NO.
290-292
10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue06-76
The Study of Onomastic Units in Uzbek Linguistics and
Their Degree of Significance in Literary Works
Hamroyeva Maftuna Rasulovna
PhD in Philological Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Uzbek Linguistics and Journalism at Faculty of Philology at
Bukhara State University, Uzbekistan
Received:
27 April 2025;
Accepted:
23 May 2025;
Published:
25 June 2025
Abstract:
As a means of communication for the Uzbek people, the Uzbek language continues to fulfill a social
function even today. This, in turn, serves to ensure comprehensive communication among members of the nation.
The onomastic system of the Uzbek language is a vast, multifaceted linguistic phenomenon rich in content, with
its components intricately interconnected. The study of onomastic units found in literary texts is one of the
pressing issues in linguistics. In this regard, it is important to analyze the lexical-semantic and stylistic features of
anthroponyms used in literary texts.
Furthermore, the contribution of Uzbek linguists, writers, and poets to the current development of the Uzbek
language is invaluable. Thanks to their efforts, strict linguistic norms are established in many areas of the Uzbek
language, and examples of linguistic usage in communication processes are provided.
This article discusses the role of onomastic units used in the style of literary works written in the Uzbek literary
language. It examines the semantic types and distinctive features of such units.
Keywords:
Anthroponym, onomastics, literariness, work, stylistics, literary style, language, literary language,
emotional, text, name.
Introduction:
In Uzbek linguistics, onomastics
—
the
study of names
—
is considered an integral part of
language and culture. Onomastic units, such as
personal names, place names, historical names, and
other types of names, reflect the historical experience,
cultural heritage, and linguistic richness of the people.
Their role in literary works is highly significant, as they
not only help define characters but also deepen the
meaning of the text. The study of onomastic units, their
degree of significance in literary works, and their place
in linguistics contributes to a better understanding of
the language’s lexical system, semantic characteristics,
and the cultural context.
METHOD
Onomastic units can be classified into the following
categories:
1.
Personal Names: Uzbek personal names, their
meanings, history, and formation processes. These
names are often connected to family traditions,
national customs, and religious beliefs. For example,
the name Dilshod is derived from the words dil (heart)
and shod (happy), and it expresses a desire for the
bearer to be a person full of positive feelings or
someone who brings joy to others.
2.
Place Names: Names representing the
geographic locations of Uzbekistan and their
etymology. These names are often based on
geographical features, historical events, or local
traditions adopted by the population. For example, if
we analyze the toponyms Yangiyer, Yangiobod,
Yangiyo
‘l, Yangiturmush, we find that the root yangi is
defined in the “Explanatory Dictionary of the Uzbek
Language” as follows:
1.
Something that did not exist before; newly
emerged (or emerging, about to emerge). New
irrigation canal. New technology. New wall. New
factory. New road. New academic direction. New
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
291
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps
American Journal Of Philological Sciences (ISSN
–
2771-2273)
enterprise. New house. New city. New variety.
–
A. Qahhor, Qoʻshchinor chiroqlari
2.
Not yet used or rarely used; in its original
condition; opposite of old.
New clothes. New car.
3.
Recently begun or initiated activity/life; newly
appointed.
He is new to this job and needs support.
4.
The next in a sequence; the current or
upcoming.
New director. New position.
5.
Related to the current year or season; recently
harvested.
New potatoes were added to the soup. Bread from new
wheat.
As seen, the word yangi in these toponyms corresponds
to the first definition
—
“something that did not exist
before; newly emerged.”
Yangiturmush refers to a newly begun life;
Yangiobod
—
a newly built or recently developed area;
Yangiyer
—
a newly opened region or area.
It is also important to note that the spelling of such
toponyms varies. In written speech, both separated
and compounded forms are encountered. For instance,
when the toponym is derived from an adjective +
derivative noun or adjective + obod structure, it is
written together (e.g., Yangiyer, Yangiobod). However,
if the second component is a proper noun, the name is
written separately: Yangi Zelandiya (New Zealand),
Yangi O‘zbekiston (New Uzbekistan).
3.
Historical and Cultural Names: Names
representing historical figures, events, and cultural
landmarks. These names emdiv the historical
memory of the people and express the cultural
heritage. For example, the name Alisher Navoi not only
refers to a historical figure but also symbolizes the peak
of Uzbek classical literature.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In literary works, onomastic units
—
especially
anthroponyms
—
perform important functions. Their
significance can be demonstrated through the
following aspects:
1.
Character Definition: In literary works, the
names of characters can reflect their personality traits,
social status, and emotional state. For example, in the
novel “O‘tkan kunlar” (Days Gone By), the name
Otabek suggests strength, courage, and noble
character, reflecting the qualities associated with beks
(nobles). A character’s name can be used to reveal their
inner world.
2.
Cultural Context: Onomastic units provide
insight into the culture, traditions, and customs of a
people. For example, place names often reflect
historical past and geographic features. The name
Bukhara not only refers to a geographical location but
is also associated with the culture and history of the
people who lived there.
It is well known that the Uzbek people have always
been a child-loving nation. This characteristic is
reflected in their culture. Alongside sustenance, they
pray to God for children and their health. In this
context, in Normurod Norqobilov’s story “Ayriliq
quvonchi” (The Joy of Separation), the character
Norboy Chol asks God for a child and names him Bozor
(meaning “market” in Persian
-Tajik), either because the
child was born on a market day or as a wish for the
house to be filled with children, like a bustling market.
This naming highlights features of the Uzbek national
mentality and identity.
Furthermore, when we think of skilled professionals at
a market, we imagine resilient, powerful, agile, and
competent individuals with serious expressions
—
qualities that are embodied in the character as well:
“At times, Uncle Bozor would
come up the hill stomping
and grumbling.” “You see, Uncle Bozor is a short
-
tempered man.” “Is a father only needed by me, huh?
—
he shouts, clenching his fists.
—
Look at your
daughter too! Always dressing up and going from one
wedding to another! Your sister-in-
law can’t do it all
alone, can she? That poor woman is exhausted!”
3.
Enrichment of Meaning: Onomastic units in
literary works often serve to deepen meaning. Through
them, the author can express ideas more profoundly.
For instance, the name Yulduz (Star) symbolizes
brightness and hope. In Abdulla Qahhor’s story
“Bemor” (T
he Patient), the anthroponym Sotiboldi is
chosen to symbolically express that the character is a
victim of the times, conveying this through a heavily
emphasized semantic load.
4.
Emotional Impact: Through names, authors can
evoke emotional responses in th
e reader. A character’s
name may create symbolic associations and feelings.
For example, in Oybek’s novel “Qutlug‘ qon” (Blessed
Blood), the name Gulnora suggests beauty and
elegance, evoking positive emotions in the reader.
Similarly, in Alisher Navoi’s “Farhod and Shirin”, the
name Shirin also has an emotional effect on the reader.
Many examples can be found in Uzbek literature that
illustrate the use of onomastic units in literary texts. In
“O‘tkan kunlar”, the author’s choice of the name
Kumushbibi for one of the characters aims to reveal her
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
292
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps
American Journal Of Philological Sciences (ISSN
–
2771-2273)
inner world. The name reflects her personality and
helps the reader form a connection with the character.
CONCLUSION
The study of onomastic units in Uzbek linguistics is
important not only for the development of the
language but also for a deeper understanding of the
content and structure of literary works. Their degree of
significance in literary texts is reflected through aspects
such as character development, cultural context, and
emotional impact. Thus, literary onomastics is an
inseparable part of both literature and linguistics.
Therefore, its research holds significance not only from
a linguistic perspective but also in analyzing the
language and style of literary works.
In the works of some authors, anthroponyms are used
merely for naming the character, while in others, they
serve as tools to reflect relationships between the
individual and society. Proper use of these names
brings the language of the work closer to the living
vernacular, making them a powerful marker of national
identity.
Anthroponyms are linguistic units that have a rightful
place in literary texts, and authors employ them with a
specific purpose. Through these names, the writer
expresses ideas more deeply and helps the reader
emotionally connect with the characters.
The study of onomastic units remains relevant in Uzbek
linguistics, as this field plays an important role in
preserving and developing the cultural heritage of our
people.
REFERENCES
Бегматов Э.А. Номлар ва одамлар. –
Т.: Фан,
1966.
–
бет 12.
Бегматов Э.А. Ҳозирги ўзбек адабий тилининиг
лексик қатламлари. –
Т.: Фан, 1965.
бет 6.
Бегматов Э.А. Ўзбек исмлари. 2
-
нашри. –
Т.: «ЎзМЕ»,
2007. Б. 604.
Бегматов Э.А. Ўзбек тили антропонимикаси. –
Тошкент: Фан, 2013. –264 б.
Бегматов Э. Кенжаева С. Ўзбек антропонимиясида
исм ясалишининг бир усули ҳақида // “Қазақтану”
журнали. 2010 йил 3
-4-
сон. –
Б. 45
-47.
Қиличев Э.Ўзбек тили ономастикаси. –
Т.: «Бухоро»,
2004.
Hamroyeva M. BADIIY ASAR MATNIDAGI ONOMASTIK
BIRLIKLARNING USLUBIY XUSUSIYATLARI TAHLILI
//ЦЕНТР НАУЧНЫХ ПУБЛИКАЦИЙ (buxdu. uz). –
2023.
–
Т. 41. –
№. 41.
Hamroyeva M. TOHIR MALIK BADIIY ASARLARIDA QO
‘LLANILGAN
ANTROPONIMLARNING
YASALISH
STRUKTURASI //ЦЕНТР НАУЧНЫХ ПУБЛИКАЦИЙ
(buxdu. uz).
–
2023.
–
Т. 41. –
№. 41.
Hamroyeva
M.
BADIIY
ASARLARDAGI
ANTROPONIMLARNING
LUG
‘AVIY
QATLAM
MASALASIGA DOIR LINGVISTIK TAHLIL VA XULOSALAR
//ЦЕНТР НАУЧНЫХ ПУБЛИКАЦИЙ (buxdu. uz). –
2023.
–
Т. 41. –
№. 41.
Hamroyeva M. R. LEBY LAYERS OF NAMES USED IN THE
ARTISTIC WORKS OF TAHIR MALIK //Innovative
Development in Educational Activities.
–
2023.
–
Т. 2. –
№. 9. –
С. 367
-373.
Hamroyeva
M.
МЕТОДОЛОГИЧЕСКО
-
СЕМАНТИЧЕСКИЕ
ФУНКЦИИ
АНТРОПОНИМИЧЕСКИХ ФОРМ, ИСПОЛЬЗУЕМЫХ В
ПОВЕСТИ ТАХИРА МАЛИКА «ЧАРХПАЛАК» //ЦЕНТР
НАУЧНЫХ ПУБЛИКАЦИЙ (buxdu. uz). –
2023.
–
Т. 27.
–
№. 27.
