Authors

  • Niyazova Gulnorakhon Gulyamovna
    Associate professor (PhD), Renaissance Educational University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue06-97

Keywords:

Cultural cognition private discourse cognitive linguistics

Abstract

This article investigates the role of cultural cognition in shaping private discourse within Uzbek detective fiction. By analyzing how linguistic structures and narrative strategies reflect culturally influenced cognitive processes—such as collective reasoning, emotional decision-making, and gender-specific strategies. Drawing on cognitive linguistics and cultural studies, it examines the use of propositional, schematic, metaphorical, and metonymic models. The analysis underscores how Uzbek cultural values, such as collectivism and loyalty, shape narrative cognition, distinguishing it from Western detective fiction. The findings contribute to understanding the cultural dimensions of cognitive processes in literary discourse.


background image

American Journal Of Philological Sciences

370

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps

VOLUME

Vol.05 Issue06 2025

PAGE NO.

370-372

DOI

10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue06-97


Cultural Cognition in Uzbek Detective Fiction: The Role
of Private Discourse

Niyazova Gulnorakhon Gulyamovna

Associate professor (PhD), Renaissance Educational University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Received:

30 April 2025;

Accepted:

28 May 2025;

Published:

30 June 2025

Abstract:

This article investigates the role of cultural cognition in shaping private discourse within Uzbek detective

fiction. By analyzing how linguistic structures and narrative strategies reflect culturally influenced cognitive
processes

such as collective reasoning, emotional decision-making, and gender-specific strategies. Drawing on

cognitive linguistics and cultural studies, it examines the use of propositional, schematic, metaphorical, and
metonymic models. The analysis underscores how Uzbek cultural values, such as collectivism and loyalty, shape
narrative cognition, distinguishing it from Western detective fiction. The findings contribute to understanding the
cultural dimensions of cognitive processes in literary discourse.

Keywords:

Cultural cognition, private discourse, cognitive linguistics, mental models, collective reasoning, gender

strategies, cultural narratives.

Introduction:

Uzbek detective fiction, as exemplified by

Tohir Malik’s “Shaytanat”, “Qorako‘z Majnun”, and
“So‘nggi o‘q”, and Ulugbek Hamdam’s “Mukaddas
Kitobning Sirlari”, is deeply rooted in cultural

cognition

the interplay of cognitive processes shaped

by cultural norms. Private discourse, characterized by
intimate character interactions, serves as a key
mechanism for expressing cognitive processes like
deduction, emotional reasoning, and collective
problem-solving. This article explores how cultural
cognition influences narrative construction in Uzbek
detective fiction, focusing on how linguistic and
narrative strategies reflect Uzbek values such as
collectivism, loyalty, and respect. By comparing these
works with Western detective fiction, such as Arthur

Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes series, the study

highlights the unique cultural dimensions of Uzbek

narratives, enriching the genre’s cognitive and

emotional appeal.

Theoretical Background

: Cultural cognition refers to

the ways in which cultural norms and values shape
cognitive processes, including perception, reasoning,
and

decision-making.

Cognitive

linguistics,

as

developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson,
provides a framework for understanding how language
reflects these processes through propositional (logical
statements), schematic (structured frameworks),
metaphorical (conceptual mappings), and metonymic
(associative substitutions) models (Lakoff & Johnson,
1980; Lakoff, 1988). In detective fiction, these models
shape how characters process clues and interact within

narratives. V.N. Teliya’s work

on linguistic culture

emphasizes that cultural norms, such as Uzbekistan’s

emphasis on collectivism and community, influence
linguistic expressions and cognitive frameworks (Teliya,
1996). M.L. Makarov highlights the communicative role
of literary texts, which convey cultural and cognitive

insights to readers (Makarov, 2003). Olga Yokoyama’s

transactional discourse model further underscores the
role of shared cultural knowledge

informational and

meta-informational

in

narrative

comprehension

(Yokoyama, 2005). These theories inform the analysis
of how cultural cognition shapes private discourse in
Uzbek detective fiction.

Scholarly Discussions

: Scholars have long explored the

intersection of culture and cognition in literature. T.A.
van Dijk and Walter Kintsch argue that situational


background image

American Journal Of Philological Sciences

371

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps

American Journal Of Philological Sciences (ISSN

2771-2273)

models, constructed from textual and cultural
knowledge, enable readers to interpret narratives (Dijk,
1988; Kintsch, 1989). In detective fiction, these models
facilitate the processing of clues embedded in private
discourse. A.V.

Kirilina’s research on gender and

cognition highlights how cultural expectations shape
cognitive strategies, with Uzbek male characters often
employing deductive reasoning and female characters

relying on intuitive insights (Kirilina, 2012). I.I. Xaleeva’s

work on emotional-cognitive interplay suggests that
emotions, influenced by cultural norms, shape
decision-making in narratives (Xaleeva, 1995). Yulia

Kristeva’s concept of literature as a global knowledge

system

integrates

cultural

and

psychological

dime

nsions, relevant to Uzbek detective fiction’s

emphasis on collective values (Kristeva, 2004). These
perspectives provide a lens for analyzing how cultural
cognition manifests in Uzbek literary discourse,
particularly in contrast to the individualistic focus of
Western detective fiction.

METHODOLOGY

The study employs a qualitative methodology
combining cultural analysis, cognitive linguistics, and
narrative analysis. The primary corpus includes Tohir

Malik’s Shaytanat, Qorako‘z Majnun, and So‘nggi o‘q,

and

Ulug‘bek Hamdam’s Muqaddas Kitobning Sirlari,

with comparative references to Western works like

Conan Doyle’s The Hound of the Baskervilles. The

methodology includes:

1.

Cultural Analysis

: Examining how Uzbek

cultural norms, such as collectivism and loyalty, shape
cognitive processes in private discourse, drawing on

Teliya’s framework.

2.

Cognitive Linguistic Analysis

: Identifying

propositional,

schematic,

metaphorical,

and

metonymic models in dialogues and narrative

structures, based on Lakoff’s theories.

3.

Narrative Analysis

: Analyzing plot progression

and character interactions to uncover cognitive
patterns influenced by cultural context.

4.

Comparative Analysis

: Contrasting Uzbek and

Western detective fiction to highlight cultural
differences in cognitive approaches.

Close reading is used to analyze textual examples,
focusing on cultural and gender influences on cognitive
processes.

Analytical Examples and Results. Example 1: Collective
Reasoning in Shaytanat

. In Shaytanat, Inspector

Alimardon’s dialogue

with a group of witnesses (Malik,

1995, p. 127) reflects collective reasoning, a hallmark of
Uzbek cultural cognition. Using a propositional model,
Alimardon integrates multiple perspectives into a

logical hypothesis about a theft, aligning with Dijk’s

macropropositional analysis (Dijk, 1978). The metaphor

“weaving truth from many threads” embeds Uzbek

collectivist imagery, reinforcing cultural cognition
(Teliya, 1996). The result is that, collective reasoning,
supported by propositional models, distinguishes
Uzbek detective fiction, enhancing narrative coherence
through cultural lenses.

Example 2: Emotional Reasoning in Qorako‘z Majnun

.

In Qorako‘z Majnun, the protagonist’s dialogue about a

moral conflict (Malik, 1995, p. 203) employs a
schematic model to frame emotional reasoning. The

metaphor “my heart is a scale balancing loyalty and
justice” reflects Uzbek values of loyalty, aligning with
Lakoff’s metaphorical model and Xaleeva’s emotional

-

cognitive interplay (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980; Xaleeva,
1995). As a result, we can say, that emotional
reasoning, shaped by cultural values, enriches the
narrative, engaging readers through culturally resonant
cognitive models.

Example 3: Gender-

Specific Cognition in So‘nggi o‘q

. In

So‘nggi o‘q, a dialogue between detecti

ve Rustam and

witness Gulnor (Malik, 1995, p. 89) highlights gender-

specific cognitive strategies. Rustam’s deductive
approach contrasts with Gulnor’s intuitive metonymy,
“his silence screamed danger,” reflecting cultural

gender norms (Kirilina, 1997). This interplay diversifies

the narrative’s cognitive framework. The result shows,

that gender-specific cognition, rooted in cultural
expectations, adds depth to private discourse,
reflecting Uzbek societal dynamics.

Example 4: Cultural Metaphors in Muqaddas
Kitobning Sirlari

. In Muqaddas Kitobning Sirlari,

characters’ collaborative dialogue to solve a mystery

(Hamdam, 2001, p. 145) uses a schematic model,

integrating cultural knowledge. The metaphor “truth
lies in the heart of the community” reflects Uzbek

collectivism, contrasting with the individualistic focus

of Western works like Christie’s Murder on the Orient

Express (Teliya, 1996). The result is that, cultural
metaphors and collective cognition highlight the
distinctiveness of Uzbek detective fiction, enriching its
narrative structure.

CONCLUSION

Cultural cognition in Uzbek detective fiction, as seen in

the works of Tohir Malik and Ulug‘bek Hamdam, shapes

private discourse through cognitive models that
integrate universal and culturally specific processes.
Propositional,

schematic,

metaphorical,

and

metonymic models facilitate collective reasoning,
emotional decision-making, and gender-specific
strategies, reflecting Uzbek values like collectivism and
loyalty. These narratives stand in contrast to the


background image

American Journal Of Philological Sciences

372

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps

American Journal Of Philological Sciences (ISSN

2771-2273)

individualistic focus of Western detective fiction,
offering a culturally rich perspective. Future research
could explore cultural cognition in other Central Asian
literatures to deepen understanding of narrative
diversity in global detective fiction.

REFERENCES

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live
By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. (1988). Cognitive Semantics. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.

Makarov, M.L. (2003). Osnovy teorii diskursa. Moscow:
Gnozis.

Teliya,

V.N.

(1996).

Russkaya

frazeologiya:

Semanticheskiy,

pragmaticheskiy

i

lingvokulturologicheskiy aspekty. Moscow: Shkola
"Yazyki russkoy kultury".

Yokoyama, O. (2005). Discourse Situation and Cognitive
Models. Moscow: Linguistic Center.

Dijk, T.A. van. (1978). Text and Context: Explorations in
the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London:
Longman.

Dijk, T.A. van. (1988). News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kintsch, W. (1989). The Role of Knowledge in Discourse
Comprehension. Psychological Review, 96(1), 163

182.

Xaleeva, I.I. (1995). Vtorichnaya yazykovaya lichnost as
a recipient of inofonnogo teksta. Moscow: MGU.

Kirilina, A.V. (1997). Genderniye aspekti kognitivnix
protsessov v diskurse. Moscow: Linguisticheskiy sentr.

Kristeva, Y. (2004). Revolution in Poetic Language. New
York: Columbia University Press.

Malik, T. (1995). Shaytanat. Tashkent: Sharq nashriyoti.

Hamdam, U. (2001). Muqaddas Kitobning Sirlari.
Tashkent: Yangi Asr Avlodi.

Niyazova, G.G. (2024). Contextual discourse: public and

private

communication

evolution.

“Zamonaviy

tilshunoslikning dolzarb masalalari” respublika ilmiy

-

amaliy konferensiyamaqolalar to’plami. M. Ulug’bek
nomidagiO’zbekiston Milliy universiteti, Aprel 2024

-yil,

pp. 99-105.

Niyazova G.G. (2025). The development of literary
thought and the detective genre. American Journal of
Philological Sciences/ 2025.Volume 05 Issue 03.

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps

Niyazova G.G. (2025). Fictional discourse and private

communication.

“Ijtimoiy

bilimlar

va

texnik

muhandislik turk dunyosi” The collection of

proceedings of International Symposium. Renessans
Education University. May 5-6, Tashkent, pp.507-517.

References

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. (1988). Cognitive Semantics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Makarov, M.L. (2003). Osnovy teorii diskursa. Moscow: Gnozis.

Teliya, V.N. (1996). Russkaya frazeologiya: Semanticheskiy, pragmaticheskiy i lingvokulturologicheskiy aspekty. Moscow: Shkola "Yazyki russkoy kultury".

Yokoyama, O. (2005). Discourse Situation and Cognitive Models. Moscow: Linguistic Center.

Dijk, T.A. van. (1978). Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.

Dijk, T.A. van. (1988). News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kintsch, W. (1989). The Role of Knowledge in Discourse Comprehension. Psychological Review, 96(1), 163–182.

Xaleeva, I.I. (1995). Vtorichnaya yazykovaya lichnost as a recipient of inofonnogo teksta. Moscow: MGU.

Kirilina, A.V. (1997). Genderniye aspekti kognitivnix protsessov v diskurse. Moscow: Linguisticheskiy sentr.

Kristeva, Y. (2004). Revolution in Poetic Language. New York: Columbia University Press.

Malik, T. (1995). Shaytanat. Tashkent: Sharq nashriyoti.

Hamdam, U. (2001). Muqaddas Kitobning Sirlari. Tashkent: Yangi Asr Avlodi.

Niyazova, G.G. (2024). Contextual discourse: public and private communication evolution. “Zamonaviy tilshunoslikning dolzarb masalalari” respublika ilmiy-amaliy konferensiyamaqolalar to’plami. M. Ulug’bek nomidagiO’zbekiston Milliy universiteti, Aprel 2024-yil, pp. 99-105.

Niyazova G.G. (2025). The development of literary thought and the detective genre. American Journal of Philological Sciences/ 2025.Volume 05 Issue 03. https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps

Niyazova G.G. (2025). Fictional discourse and private communication. “Ijtimoiy bilimlar va texnik muhandislik turk dunyosi” The collection of proceedings of International Symposium. Renessans Education University. May 5-6, Tashkent, pp.507-517.