Volume 03 Issue 01-2023
19
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
01
Pages:
19-24
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
Linguistics is the scientific study of language, and its focus is the systematic investigation of the properties of particular
languages as well as the characteristics of language in general. The semantic view of concepts suggests that concepts
are abstract objects. In this view, concepts are abstract objects of a category out of a human's mind rather than some
mental representations.
KEYWORDS
The concept, linguistic status, linguistic expression, languages, semantic view, characteristics of language
INTRODUCTION
From a typological point of view, the individuation of
many concept universals differs from each other. The
following significant differences can be observed in
their semantic concept: 1) in "interdiscursive
metamorphoses", which defends the unity of the
concept and plays an important role in the
identification of kinship, and includes all the signs of
conceptual, rational-discursiveness: 2) in semantic
Research Article
THE CONCEPT AND ITS LINGUISTIC STATUS AND LINGUISTIC
EXPRESSION
Submission Date:
January 20, 2023,
Accepted Date:
January 25, 2023,
Published Date:
January 30, 2023
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume03Issue01-05
Nilufar G. Burieva
Lecturer, English
At The Chair Of “
Foreign Languages
”
Karshi Institute Of Engineering And Economics,
Uzbekistan
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajps
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 03 Issue 01-2023
20
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
01
Pages:
19-24
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
mobile models, abstract existence is represented by
metaphorical-imagery,
emotional-necessity
units
include; 3) forms "conceptual", "language cictemac"
units related to the forms covering the concept and its
verbalization points in a certain language . These
mentioned semantic prototypes can serve as
important sources in the typological comparison of
linguistic and cultural concepts between languages or
certain natural languages
1
.
THE MAIN RESULTS AND FINDINGS
In the comparative study of the linguistic and cultural
concept, the complex mental knowledge with "cultural
environment", "semantic primitives" is taken into
account, and the logical and moral forces of social
adaptation are taken into account. All individualized
concept universals are also different from each other.
The process of linguistic realization of the concept, its
nature and talking about the mechanisms that drive it,
Speech activity and linguistic creativity of N. Chomsky
about the internal and external structures that provide
it is impossible not to remember his opinion again. This
idea only the transition of the inner structure to the
outer structure that it allowed to be formally analyzed
and as a result, form prevails over content (semantics).
Continuously criticized for being left behind
1
Гaк В. Г.
К прoблeмe ceмaнтичecкoй
cинтaгмaтики
//
Прoблeмы
cтруктурнoй
despite coming, much for cognitive linguistics is
important. N. Chomsky is among the first in linguistics
(as L.S. Vygotsky did in psychology) speech creative
activity directly "outside" mental structures, that is, it
consists of the process of moving to linguistic
structures gave an idea, and this idea is the activity of
speech creation distinguish between the basis and the
result stages tried to prove with N. Chomsky
recognized as the greatest service in linguistics. This
idea is different from the information of psychologists
about the human brain about the multi-stage
"processing" in the shells.
The development of concepts, which are of great
importance in the development of certain aspects of
languages, the possibilities of verbalization of linguistic
and cultural concepts play an important role in
revealing the ethnospecific dynamics of linguistic
cultures. In the process of comparing these aspects,
the referential and pragmatic forces of semantics are
separated and their equivalents in the languages being
compared are obtained. In the comparative study of
the lexical system of languages, it is necessary to focus
on the functional semantic verbalization of certain
meanings that are common to each language in the
application of unambiguous lexical units and the
formation of "grammatical speech". G. Emphasized by
лингвиcтики. – М.: Нaукa, 1972. – C. 230.
Volume 03 Issue 01-2023
21
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
01
Pages:
19-24
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Gak. In spoken languages, the object taken for
speaking is also important. In particular, the object
taken for comparative typological research should be
conducted in a linguistic field in these languages. Of
course, the chosen object should have its own
theoretical significance. The well-known Uzbek
typologist, O'.Q. Yusupov expresses his opinion:
Comparison of languages in the lexical cath on the
theoretical basis includes the structure and inventory
of lexical paradigmatic groups with all connections,
semantic and associative fields, lexical-semantic
groups, synonymous lines, antonymic pairs and
equivalent words.
We can witness that the conceptual expression of
lexical units as a component of language activity and
speech activity has so far been implemented only in
lexical cath from a philological point of view. Now, the
activities of perceiving, knowing, understanding, and
analyzing conceptual units have expanded with the
categorization of conceptual metaphors. As a result,
the need for cooperation with cognitive sciences such
as logic, psychology, theory of knowledge, etc. has
increased. This cooperation introduced linguistics into
the field of cognitive science, which deals with the
problems of cognitive activity, and secondly, it
enriched the field of linguistics with the field of
cognitive linguistics.
The object of study of linguistic studies in all directions
is the same - the language system or, more precisely,
linguistic activity and its components. However, in all
of
them
(cictem-structural
linguistics,
psycholinguistics, cotsiolinguistics, pragmalinguistics,
text linguistics, etc.), the main focus is on the study of
the structure and composition of ready-made words,
word combinations, sentences and texts, as well as the
meaning forces in certain variants. In recent years,
attention has been paid to the study of speech
communication between incons, sociolinguistic,
psycholinguistic, pragmatic, linguocultural aspects of
this communication. From this point of view, a lot of
attention is paid to the conceptual development of the
language system and the comparative typological
study of the conceptualization of linguistic units in the
ethno-thinking of different linguistic and cultural
cultures. In particular, research is being carried out
related to the verbalization of certain concepts in
different linguistic cultures.
The logical understanding of the world is reflected in
concepts in Incon thinking, in cognitive linguistics it is
expressed by terms such as "cognitive image of the
world" (cognitive picture of the world) or "conceptual
image of the world" (kontseptualnaya kartina mira).
When there is a gap in the concept, there is no way to
dwell on the relations of meaning - concept.
There is debate as to the relationship between
concepts and natural language. However, it is
necessary at least to begin by understanding that the
concept "dog" is philosophically distinct from the
Volume 03 Issue 01-2023
22
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
01
Pages:
19-24
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
things in the world grouped by this concept
—
or the
reference class or extension. Concepts that can be
equated to a single word are called "lexical concepts".
The study of concepts and conceptual structure falls
into the disciplines of linguistics, philosophy,
psychology, and cognitive science.
In the simplest terms, a concept is a name or label that
regards or treats an abstraction as if it had concrete or
material existence, such as a person, a place, or a thing.
It may represent a natural object that exists in the real
world like a tree, an animal, a stone, etc. It may also
name an artificial (man-made) object like a chair,
computer, house, etc. Abstract ideas and knowledge
domains such as freedom, equality, science, happiness,
etc., are also symbolized by concepts. It is important to
realize that a concept is merely a symbol, a
representation of the abstraction. The word is not to
be mistaken for the thing. For example, the word
"moon" (a concept) is not the large, bright, shape-
changing object up in the sky, but only represents that
celestial object. Concepts are created (named) to
describe, explain and capture reality as it is known and
understood.
The method of such an approach to the comparative
study of languages provides an opportunity to study
the development of the language, the mutual
enrichment of the languages being studied, and inter-
language relations, their kinship and non-kinship levels,
to compare the linguistic, cultural, universal and ethno-
specific effects of certain concepts. Such an approach
can be useful not only in illuminating the theoretical
aspects of cross-sectional studies, but also in practical
terms. The fact is that certain concepts have a universal
status, and some of them have a strong linguistic and
cultural impact. Verbal units representing them,
speech expression units are always used in a weak
case. This is explained by the lack of clear equivalents
in the global differences found in the specific mentality
and emotions of different ethnos. When cross-
linguistic concepts are universalized, they differ not
only in the order of sentences, but also in their
structure. These communities interact by creating
conceptual blocks, and as a result, the concept has its
own ethnocultural specificity and this specificity is
realized in the mind of a certain nation as a certain
conceptual block. This approach is a valuable task in
determining the conceptualization of different
emotions, typological comparison and analysis.
Indeed, the appearance of metaphors in scientific
theories describing abstract concepts is linked to
philosophical views. This is the result of connecting the
perception and understanding of the world on the part
of the incons and the need for communication. In the
conceptualization of everyday realities, cognition
operates in an order that depends directly on the
passage of time. This eca enables evaluation in the
form of cognitive events that enriches the
conceptualization of events.
Volume 03 Issue 01-2023
23
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
01
Pages:
19-24
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Today, all cognitive linguists understand that the
concept is broader than the concept. If the concept
and its equivalent in the language, the meaning of the
word, express the most important features of the
object or object that distinguish it from other objects
and objects, then the concept reflects all its (subject-
object) known features, including the secondary
features, so the concept for can refer to an individual,
a collective, a nation, or even men, women, young and
old. The result of this opinion is the phrase "Is this your
personal opinion?" Is this your group's opinion? Is this
the opinion of the Uzbeks?" can be seen in the
questions. Cognitive linguistics, acocan, is interested in
concepts related to ethnoc, that is, nation.
In cognitive linguistics, cognitive signs and semantic
expressions are distinguished. Cema is a part of the
meaning of a word, which expresses a sign of an object
or event. According to the concept, it belongs to the
group of cognitive signs
2
.
Opinions about the representation of concepts in
language differ. A. P. Babushkin and C.G. According to
Vorkachev, the concept is always expressed through
words. According to another opinion, the concept
must be expressed through words. V. I. According to
2
Низомова М.Б. Инглиз ва ўзбек тилларида педагогикага оид
терминларнинг структур-семантик хусусиятлари ва таржима
муаммолари: Филол. фан. д-ри. … дисс. автореф. – Термиз: 2022.
– 40 б.
Bolotov, it is expressed in a text, and he calls such a
text cognema.
Concepts in the mind and their meanings are analyzed
with the help of semantics of language and speech
units. These units are words (root, compound,
compound and complex words), phraseological units,
word combinations, sentences, paremies, speech
clichés, complex syntactic units, texts, including
folklore texts, and others. Some linguists call these the
"nominative field of the concept"
3
. Linguistic activity is
the basis of the theory of cognitive analysis
summarizing and processing information with
concepts, knowledge stock, cognitive model,
conceptual system, etc it was mentioned. These
concepts are interrelated, for one of them was formed
for the fulfillment of the other should be. In fact, to
accumulate and store knowledge acquired knowledge
according to the cognitive pattern need to be
condensed. Cognitive patterns (concept, image) to
condense knowledge on this conceptual system units
(frame, script, scenario, gestalt etc.) the suffix is
needed.
The method of such an approach to the comparative
study of languages provides an opportunity to study
3
Амирова.З.O. Инглиз ва ўзбек тилларида “heart-юрак”
концептининг
вербаллашуви
ва
лингвокультурологик
хусусиятлари: Филол. фан. д-ри. … дисс. автореф. – Термиз: 2022.
– 40 б.
Volume 03 Issue 01-2023
24
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
01
Pages:
19-24
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
the development of the language, the mutual
enrichment of the languages being studied, and inter-
language relations, their kinship and non-kinship levels,
to compare the linguistic, cultural, universal and ethno-
specific effects of certain concepts. Such an approach
can be useful not only in illuminating the theoretical
aspects of cross-sectional studies, but also in practical
terms. The fact is that certain concepts have a universal
status, and some of them have a strong linguistic and
cultural impact. Verbal units representing them,
speech expression units are always used in a weak
case. This is explained by the lack of clear equivalents
in the global differences found in the specific mentality
and emotions of different ethnos . When cross-
linguistic concepts are universalized, they differ not
only in the order of sentences, but also in their
structure. These communities interact by creating
conceptual blocks, and as a result, the concept has its
own ethnocultural specificity, and this specificity is
realized in the mind of a certain nation as a certain
conceptual block. This approach is a valuable task in
determining the conceptualization of different
emotions, typological comparison and analysis.
CONCLUSION
Concepts are the same in all languages. Some of them
are heavy in some nations. As a result, lacunae appear.
Such lacunae clearly show the national-cultural
differences between peoples, the fact that languages
divide some parts of the world differently and
categorize or conceptualize them differently, and the
level of scientific and technical development of the
nation. National-cultural differences are also seen in
the differences in the cognitive symbols of the concept
or the meaning of the symbols. Macalan, the concept
of "afternoon" in English, has the same cognitive
features as "lunch time". In the Uzbek linguistic
culture, "afternoon" can be used in names such as
"afternoon", "noon", "when the sun sets". This
concept is used in English culture and Uzbek culture in
the sense of having lunch.
REFERENCES
1.
Aрутюнoвa Н.Д. Язык и мир чeлoвeкa. М.:
Языки руccкoй культуры, 1998.
2.
Апресян Ю.Д. Дейксис в лексике и
грамматике и наивная модель мира //
Семиотика и информатика
-
М., 1986. –
Вып.
28.
–С. 5
-33.
3.
Апресян Ю.Д. Образ человека по данным
языка: попытка системного описания // ВЯ.
-
95, -
№1,
-
С. 37
-67.
4.
Арутюнова Н.Д. Истина: фон и коннотации //
Логический анализ языка. Культурные
концепты. –
М.: Наука, 1991. –
С. 21
-30.
5.
Воркачев
С.Г.
Лингвокультурология,
языковая личность, концепт: становление
антропоцентрической
парадигмы
в
языкознании Филологические науки. –
2001.
–
С. 64
-71.
Volume 03 Issue 01-2023
25
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
01
Pages:
19-24
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
6.
Низомова М.Б. Инглиз ва ўзбек тилларида
педагогикага оид терминларнинг структур
-
семантик
хусусиятлари
ва
таржима
муаммолари: Филол. фан. д
-
ри. … дисс.
автореф. –
Термиз: 2022. –
74 б.
7.
Амирова.З.O. Инглиз ва ўзбек тилларида
“heart
-
юрак” концептининг вербаллашуви
ва
лингвокультурологик
хусусиятлари:
Филол. фан. д
-
ри. … дисс. автореф. –
Термиз:
2022.
–
40 б.
