Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume04Issue09-17

Keywords:

Toponym topography topoformant

Abstract

The article examines the types of necrotoponyms in the Republic of Karakalpakstan according to their grammatical structure.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 09-2024

106


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

09

P

AGES

:

106-114

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

ABSTRACT

The article examines the types of necrotoponyms in the Republic of Karakalpakstan according to their grammatical

structure.

KEYWORDS

Toponym, topography, topoformant, affix, indicator, necrotoponym.

INTRODUCTION

There are opinions of linguists about the composition

and structure of toponyms in Russian linguistics. While

many linguists wrote about topography and formants,

V. Toporov and O. Trubachev gave initial information

about toponegis formed from topography and

topoformant . V.N. Toporov briefly touched on the

issue of toponesis in theoretical toponomastics and

specially explained topoformant, topography and

topobasis .

In fact, until now, in the field of toponymy, more

attention was paid to the processes of topography,

topoformant, indicator naming and toponymization.

There are different opinions among linguists about the

grammatical structure of toponyms.

METHODS

Prof. Z. Dosimov calls the classification of toponyms

according to their structure structural-typological

Research Article

TYPES OF NECROTOPONYMS IN KARAKALPAKSTAN ACCORDING TO
THEIR GRAMMATICAL STRUCTURE

Submission Date:

Sep 20, 2024,

Accepted Date:

Sep 25, 2024,

Published Date:

Sep 30, 2024

Crossref doi

:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume04Issue09-17


Yusupov San’at Shuxratovich

Independent researcher of Nukus State Pedagogical Institute, Uzbekistan

ORCID ID

:

https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2428-485X

Journal

Website:

https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajps

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 09-2024

107


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

09

P

AGES

:

106-114

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

classification and in this respect groups toponyms as

follows:

1. Toponyms and root names without affixes: Qala,

Alan, Boz, Jam, Adaq, etc.

2. Affixed toponyms or fake names: Tuyachi, Kosar,

Tasloq, Tangzor.

3. Prefix toponyms: Poyarik, Bevatan, Sardara.

4. Indicative toponyms or toponym-composites.

5. Combined toponyms.

Taking into account the above theoretical ideas, we

analyzed the necrotoponyms in Karakalpakstan on the

basis of our collected materials, dividing them into

three types according to their grammatical structure:

1)

simple

necrotoponyms;

2)

combined

necrotoponyms; 3) compound necrotoponyms.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Simple necrotoponyms

. A toponym is the basis of a

toponym, which is the basis for the creation of another

form. Many linguists call this simple root toponyms.

Such toponyms are also found among necrotoponyms.

For example:

Keneges

is located in Abat NCM of Kegeili district.

Ko

ʻ

kcha

is located in Kyzylkum NCM of Ellikkala

district.

Qiyat

is located in Kuskhanatov village of Bozatov

district.

Khoja

is located in Kumshungil NCM of Kegeili district.

37 necrotoponyms on the territory of Karakalpakstan

consist only of topography, that is, they are basic

necrotoponyms.

It is considered the nucleus of the formation of

toponyms in micro and macro toponyms that exist at

the same time in the territory of our country.

In the language, simple artificial toponyms are created

by adding formative suffixes or topoformants to basic

toponyms. Researcher G.S. Zhoraboyeva, while

researching the toponyms of the Fergana Valley from a

comparative-historical and anthropocentric point of

view, expresses the following opinions: "Simply made-

up toponyms are names consisting of a lexical base and

a formative affix. In the toponymy of the Fergana

Valley, it is observed that they are mainly formed by

means of the affixes -i, -lik, -chi, -cha, -ma, -iya:

Such as Kashkari (Baghd. d.), Kashkarlik (Izbosk. d.),

Karateginchi (Jalaq. d.), Naymancha (Torak. d.),

Ko'tarma (Khoja. d.).

Among the necrotoponyms in Karakalpakstan there

are also necrotoponyms formed by means of affixes.

They are mainly formed by means of the following

affixes:


background image

Volume 04 Issue 09-2024

108


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

09

P

AGES

:

106-114

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

by means of the affix -li:

Aqbasli (Nukus d.), Biydali (Chimboy d.), Borshekli

(Chimboy d.),

with the suffix -lik:

Birodarlik (Nukus d.),Jedlik (Kungirat d.), Shahidlik

(Tortkol d.)

With the help of

chi (in Karakalpak -shi)

Such as Savatchi (Amudarya d.), Garbizshi (Kegeyli d.);

-chik (in Karakalpak -shik):

Like Ko'gershik (Karaozak d.);

-chilik (in Karakalpak -shilik) means:

Like Seytshilik (Takhtakopir d.);

By means of the -bay affix:

Like Artiqbay (Kazakh) (Chimboy d.), Ayiobay

(Karaozak d.).

with the suffix -s:

Christians (Nukus d.), Koreans (Beruni d.)

By means of -mes/-bes affixes:

Like Eslemes (Karao'zak d.), Terbenbes (Karao'zak d.).

with the affix -da:

Like Amanda (Takhtakopir d.).

with the affix -laq:

Like Taslaq (Takhtakopir d.).

with the affix -sha:

Like Shorsha (Nukus d.).

Combined necrotoponyms.

There are both simple toponyms and compound

toponyms made from the combination of two words in

the modern Uzbek literary language. It is known that

words made up of more than one base are called

compound words in linguistics. Their formation is

called composition or syntactic method of word

formation. In linguistics, this way of forming words is

known by various terms, such as word addition, base

addition, morphological method, analytical method,

composition method.

A. Turobov, a linguist who studied the ethnonyms and

ethnonyms of Samarkand, writes: "The formation of

compound ethnonyms is one of the oldest ways of

forming words in the language, it ranks second in

terms of productivity after the morphological method,

and plays an important role in enriching the vocabulary

of the language.". In fact, in the Uzbek language word

formation, word formation using the method of

composition is one of the most productive ways.

However, there are not many joint toponyms among

the necrotoponyms, especially the necrotoponyms of

Karakalpakstan.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 09-2024

109


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

09

P

AGES

:

106-114

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

Most of the combined necrotoponyms look like a word

combination in the form of "determiner-defining". For

example, necrotoponyms such as Aqqum (Uzb.

Oqqum), Kokloki (Uzb. Ko

ʻ

klo

ʻ

ki) are a combination of

white and sand, blue and loki and a compound word. In

this case, a natural word is a word formed from the

union of two root morphemes, but from a genetic

point of view, it is two independent words that entered

into a grammatical relationship.

In toponymy, compound words consisting of two roots

become one toponym as a result of toponymization

and serve to indicate the name of a certain object.

The necrotoponymy of Qolbergan Ota (Amudaryo d.)

is composed in the form of noun+verb adjective form

and is formed by joining the parts of hand and gave. It

expresses the meaning of "He gave his hand to the Pir

to become a murid". Like the necrotoponymy of

Sheremgan (Ellikqal'a d.).

Compound noun necrotoponyms formed on the basis

of the demonstrative-observant syntagm pattern

reflect the noun+noun relationship. In this case, the

meaning of the first component is related to the

meaning of the second component. The first

component is in the unmarked nominative case, and

the second component is in the nominative case. For

example: Dermenqul (Takhtakopir district), Eshimqul

(Kegeili d.), Januqul Eshon (Qanlikol d.). There is also a

form in which the first component, based on this

template, takes the unmarked nominative case, and

the second component takes the possessive suffix in

the third person singular: Hakimquli ota (Kegeyli d.).

The necrotoponyms of Januquli Eshon and Hakimquli

Ota included eshon and ota indicators. There are

compound necrotoponyms in which both components

are unmarked, but the first component contains a

demonstrative case, and the second component has a

possessive affix. For example: Arazqal'a (Tortkol d.),

Eshonqal'a (Kegeyli d.). The indicated necrotoponyms

received the qal’a indicator. These originally

appeared

on the basis of Oikonim. Necrotoponymy is also called

oikonym, since the population entered the area of

residential address.

Qangliqum necrotoponymy (Takhtakopir d.) is also

based on the above pattern. It means "sand belonging

to the qangli clan". Kangli is the name of a clan of the

Turkic peoples, and the Karakalpaks also have this clan.

The necrotoponymy of Sheikhizamon Bobo (Ellikqal'a

d.) is based on the Tajik isofa. Both components belong

to the noun group and are formed in the noun+noun

pattern. The first component is the sheikh religious

title, which is often used as an indicator in

necrotoponyms.

The necrotoponymy of Javakhashar baba (Takhtakopir

d.) is composed in the form of noun + verb adjective

form.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 09-2024

110


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

09

P

AGES

:

106-114

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

The necrotoponym of Jigarband Baba (Beruniy d.) is

formed in the form of noun + adjective.

The necrotoponyms of Dagirata (Kungirot d.),

Janbobek (Chimboy d.), Shermanbaba (Kungirot d.)

are formed in the noun+noun pattern.

Religious degrees are compound necrotoponyms of

the noun+noun type, with the bobo and oxun

components, which are sometimes indicators:

Qazibaba (Shumanay d.), Eshimoxun (Qanlikol d.),

Sultanakhun (Khojayli d.), etc.

A joint necrotoponym formed in the form noun +hana:

Kuskhana (Nukus d.).

Combined necrotoponym with ethnonym+noun

component: Rusmozor (Beruniy d.).

Combined necrotoponym formed in zoonym+noun

form: Tulkibo‘get (Takhtakopir d.).

Combined necrotoponym formed in noun+verb form:

Jolimber (Chimboy d.).

The

first

component

of

some

compound

necrotoponyms consists of adjectives. The second

noun component added to it can express different

meanings.

Necrotoponyms that grew out of

oronym adjective+noun type: Aqqum Avliyo (Moynaq

d), Aqqum ota (Kegeyli d.), Aqqum (Chimboy d.),

Karaqum iyshan (Bozatov d.)., etc. There are also

necrotoponyms Aqkempir (Chimboy d.), Aqkesek

(Kegeyli d.) based on this template..

Combined

necrotoponym

with

blue+horse

component: Kokloki bobo (Beruniy d.), Koklikol eshon

(Kanlikol d.). The meaning of the loki component in the

first necrotoponym is obscured. Kokmanglai (Karaozak

d.).

Necrotoponym, which appeared on the basis of the

ethnonym with Kara + noun component:

Karamangit (Kegeyli d.). Representatives of this clan

are buried here.

Sari(q) + noun is the necrotoponym of father Sarikhoja

(Ellikqal'a d.).

Necrotoponymy with a new (in Karakalpak janga) +

noun

component:

Jangabazar

necrotoponymy

(Kegeyli d.).

Ayri (Ayir in Karakalpak) necrotoponyms with a noun

component: Ayirbakan (Koraozak d.), Ayirmakhan

(Chimboy d.).

The role of numbers in necrotoponymy is special. The

type "Number+noun" expresses the following

semantic relations:

"Count number + noun". When the numbers and nouns

are combined, they clearly indicate the number of the

geographical object:


background image

Volume 04 Issue 09-2024

111


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

09

P

AGES

:

106-114

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

Besboydaq (Kungirot d.), Koshterak (Chimboy d.),

Seksenkhoja (Khojayli d.), Tortkulak (Bozatov d.), etc.

Necrotoponyms are followed by necrotoponyms

formed by ordinal numbers.

Ordinal numbers are formed by adding -(i)th (in

Karakalpak -inshi//-inshi) affixes to the count numbers,

showing the specific order of the subject to which it is

connected: Sheyitlik-1 (Kegeyli d.), Sheyitlik-2 (Kegeyli

d.) are located.

Combined necrotoponyms.

There is also a type of toponym formation in Uzbek,

which is made by joining two or more units, and this

method is called syntactic method.

Among the necrotoponyms of Karakalpakstan there

are a number of compound necrotoponyms.

Necrotoponyms with appellative + defining + indicative

composition: Erohun Eshon Bobo (Amudarya d.).

The first component indicates a person's name, the

second a religious title, and the third is a

necrotoponymic indicator.

Also necrotoponyms with appellative + indicator

content:

Sa'd Waqqas Bobo (Ellikqal'a d.). Sultan-Uwais Bobo

(Beruni d.).

Necrotoponyms in the form of determining +

appellative + indicator:

Like Sheikh Abbas Vali (Beruni d.), Khoja Jabr Baba

(Beruni d.).

There

are

also

necrotoponyms

in

the

determiner+appellative form.

For example: Bibi Mushkul Kushod (Ellikqal'a d.). The

bibi component in this is used for women. The word

Mushkulkushad is explained in the dictionary as

follows: MUSHKULKUSHOD [a+f.t] religion. Prayers

and rites performed in order to make a person's

problem easier, to carry out his work" (O'TIL, I, 486).

There is another necrotoponymy with the same name,

which is located in Kokhna Tortkol NCM of Tortkol

district.

Necrotoponyms in the determiner+noun form:

There is also the necrotoponymy of Sheikh Jalil Baba

(Amudaryo d.), the third component of which is an

indicator.

There are also necrotoponyms consisting of all three

indicators. Often, the words haji, eshan and babo are

indicators. Necrotoponyms of Hodji Eshon Baba

located in Kipchak town of Amudarya District and

Khoja Eshon Baba located in Uyshin MFY of Amudarya

District were made based on such a pattern. The xoja

component in the second necrotoponym also often

serves as an indicator.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 09-2024

112


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

09

P

AGES

:

106-114

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

The necrotoponymy of Sari Eshon Baba (Takhiyatosh

d.) in the form of adjective+noun+indicator, denoting

the appearance of people. In this case, sari is a

Karakalpak word and is used in the Uzbek language in

the form of "sariq" (yellow). There is also the

necrotoponym Choloq Eshon Baba (located in Bozyop

Ovul, Amudarya district), which represents the physical

weakness of a person, and it was formed based on the

above pattern.

There is also a necrotoponymy of Malla Donli Baba

(Tortkol d.) composed of adjective+noun+indicator,

representing the color of a person's clothes.

There are also necrotoponyms with a numerical

component.

Necrotoponym Thousand and a half martyrs

(Amudaryo d.) formed in the form of number + martyr.

It was named so because of the burial of people who

died in the war with the Russians in the twenties of the

twentieth century.

There is a necrotoponymy of Qos Makhsim Khoja

(Kungirot

d.)

formed

in

the

form

number+noun+indicator exists, and (in Uzbek

language double makshum khoja) is named so because

two makshum khojas, famous among the people, were

buried in this cemetery.

There is a necrotoponym Ush kiz apay (Chimboy d.)

formed in the form number+noun+noun, which is used

in the Uzbek language as Uch kiz opa.

There is also a Necrotoponymy of Yuz Boshi Bobo

(Amudaryo d.), which is a word denoting a position

formed in the form of number+noun+indicator.

Necrotoponyms that are written separately and have

two components are also used.

Necrotoponyms formed in the form of a noun +

indicator. Some of them are used with grandfather

indicator:

Like Abdimalik baba (Uzbek grandfather) (in

Diykhanabat APJ of Shomanay d.), Ajinyoz baba

(Moynaq d.), Akpan baba (Uzbek grandfather)

(Shomanay d.).

Appellatives can also include formants: Alamli bobo

(Tortkol d.), Azizler bobo (Nukus d.), Imamjon bobo

(Ellikqa'la d.).

Some are used with the parent indicator. The

construction pattern is the same as above: Abdujalil

ota (Amudarya d.), Latifboy ota (Ellikqal'a d.), Miskin

ota (Amudarya d.).

Shaykh (Shayyq in Karakalpak) is also used with the

indicator. In this case, proper noun+indicator: Murat

shayiq (Karaozak d.).


background image

Volume 04 Issue 09-2024

113


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

09

P

AGES

:

106-114

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

The necrotoponymy of Four sheikhs (Ellikqal'a d.)

formed in the number+indicator pattern is also found.

There are also necrotoponyms with a proper noun +

maksum (maksim in Karakalpak) such as: Musa maksim

(Kungirot d.), Nasrulla maksim (Moynaq d.), Serimbet

maksim (Chimboy d.).

Necrotoponyms with a noun + akhun (Akhun in

Karakalpak) indicator: Nurimbet akhun (Kegeyli d.),

Qasimbet akhun (Chimboy d.), Suleymen akhun

(Takhtakopir d.), etc.

Necrotoponyms with noun + xoja indicator:

Nur Khoja (Amudaryo d.), Karshili Khoja (Amudaryo d.),

Qasim Khoja (Chimboy d.).

There is also a necrotoponymy of Piryor vali (Tortkol d.)

in the form of a proper noun + vali. There are also

necrotoponyms

made

by

adding

indicators

representing the quality of a person and profession to

a proper name.

There is a necrotoponymy of Otesh batir (Kanlikol d.)

with the proper noun + botir indicator.

Usta indicator + necrotoponym of Usta Absamet

(Bozatov d.) in the form of a proper noun. Number +

necrotoponym of Uch Terak (Kungirot d.) in the form

of a noun.

CONCLUSIONS

When studying the grammatical features of

necrotoponyms in the territory of the Republic of

Karakalpakstan, we can see that most of the original

necrotoponyms are clan names of the Karakalpak

nation, or necrotoponyms made with affixes occupy a

very

important

place.

We

find

that

joint

necrotoponyms in the territory of Karakalpakstan are

formed

in

different

patterns.

Among

the

necrotoponyms of Karakalpakstan there are a number

of compound necrotoponyms. We can see that

indicators play a very important role in the combination

of compound necrotoponyms of the studied area.

REFERENCES

1.

Топоров В.Н., Трубачев О.Н. Лингвистический

анализ гидронимов Верхнего Поднепровья. –

М.,

1962.

268 с.

2.

Топоров В.Н. Из области теоретической

топономастики // ВЯ. М., 1962. № 6. С. 3

-12.

3.

Дўсимов 3. Хоразм топонимлари. –Тошкент:

Фан, 1985. –С.37

-53.

4.

Gadoyev

O.Ya.

O

ʻ

zbek

tilida

toponegizlar

shakllanishining lingvistik xususiyatlari (Ishtixon va

Payariq tumanlari toponimlari misolida). Filol.f.b.

fals. dokt. diss. avtoref. Samarqand, 2023.

S. 7.

5.

Жўрабоева

Г.С.

Фар

ғ

она

водийси

топонимларининг

қ

иёсий

-

тарихий

ва

антропоцентрик

тад

қ

и

қ

и

.

Филол

.

ф

.

б

.

фалс

.

докт

дисс

.

автореф

.

Фар

ғ

она

2021

с

.23.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 09-2024

114


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

09

P

AGES

:

106-114

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

6.

Маматов Н. Ўзбек тилида

қ

ўшма

сўзлар

.

Тошкент

:

Фан

, 1982.

139 б

7.

Туробов

А.

Самар

қ

анд

этноним

ва

этноойконимлари

.

–Самар

қ

анд

, 2022.

–С

. 114.

References

Топоров В.Н., Трубачев О.Н. Лингвистический анализ гидронимов Верхнего Поднепровья. – М., 1962.– 268 с.

Топоров В.Н. Из области теоретической топономастики // ВЯ. М., 1962. № 6. С. 3-12.

Дўсимов 3. Хоразм топонимлари. –Тошкент: Фан, 1985. –С.37-53.

Gadoyev O.Ya. Oʻzbek tilida toponegizlar shakllanishining lingvistik xususiyatlari (Ishtixon va Payariq tumanlari toponimlari misolida). Filol.f.b. fals. dokt. diss. avtoref. Samarqand, 2023. –S. 7.

Жўрабоева Г.С. Фарғона водийси топонимларининг қиёсий-тарихий ва антропоцентрик тадқиқи. Филол. ф.б. фалс. докт дисс. автореф. Фарғона – 2021 с.23.

Маматов Н. Ўзбек тилида қўшма сўзлар. –Тошкент: Фан , 1982. – 139 б

Туробов А. Самарқанд этноним ва этноойконимлари. –Самарқанд, 2022. –С. 114.