Volume 03 Issue 02-2023
15
American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN
–
2771-2141)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
02
Pages:
15-21
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
993
)
(2022:
6.
015
)
(2023:
7.
164
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
The article analyzes the manifestation of self-control during the student period as a subject of empirical research. In
particular, the problem of self-control during the student period was explained in the researches of foreign
psychologists. Also, information on the empirical study of self-management during the student period is presented.
KEYWORDS
Student period, self-management, behavior, activity style, motivation, decision-making, self-control, planning,
modeling, typing, performance evaluation, flexibility, excellence, self-management level, self-management ability
INTRODUCTION
The development and formation of the ideas of self-
management took place in close connection with such
areas of psychological research as will, activity
management,
activity
style,
motivation,
self-
determination, responsibility and decision-making.
Among the works of foreign researchers on self-
control in behavior in the framework of the problem of
the general structure and dynamics of human activity,
Yu.Kul, I.Bekman, A.V.Kruglansky, G.Akomba, F.Irvin,
A.Kenney, K.Lambeka and others it is appropriate to
emphasize the model of self-management developed
by such authors.
The idea of managing behavior as a special
independent process was clearly formed in the works
Research Article
SELF-REGULATION AS A SUBJECT OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN
STUDENT DEPARTMENT
Submission Date:
February 01, 2023,
Accepted Date:
February 05, 2023,
Published Date:
February 10, 2023
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/Volume03Issue02-03
N.T. Ubaidullaev
Phd Student Of Tdpu Named After Nizomi, Uzbekistan
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajsshr
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 03 Issue 02-2023
16
American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN
–
2771-2141)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
02
Pages:
15-21
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
993
)
(2022:
6.
015
)
(2023:
7.
164
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
of K. Sherrington, who developed K. Bernard's position
on self-management. C. Sherrington believed that self-
control related to the human mind does not require a
special mental process called will and is carried out
through the activity of individual nerve centers
associated with conscious reflection [2]. In the studies
of many psychologists who analyzed the process of
motivation, the issues of self-control and self-
reinforcement were also raised.
Among Russian psychologists, important rules were
developed and formed, which are the fundamental
basis for the further development of research in the
field of self-management. I.M. Sechenov and I.P.
Pavlov's works laid the foundation for the formation of
his ideas about the nature of controlling the flow of
psychic events and processes. V. M. Bekhterev, as well
as his students and followers such as L. F. Lazursky, M.
Ya. Basov, V. N. Myasishchev, are considered to be a
great service in forming and revealing important
aspects of mental self-management problems. M. Ya.
Basov considered the will to be a unique psychic
mechanism, through which a person manages his
psychic functions. In the works of L. S. Vygotsky, the
ideas of arbitrary control of human behavior and
various mental processes were developed.
B.V. Zeigarnik considers self-management to be a
conscious process aimed at managing one's own
behavior. V. I. Selivanov included the management of
emotions and mental states, the creation of mental
stability that ensures the success of activities.
According to E.P. Ilin, voluntary management is carried
out through various voluntary actions. For them, the
manifestation of voluntary actions becomes important
and is associated with volitional behavior. L.M. Wecker
understands will as a special form of behavior control.
He distinguishes three forms of control: involuntary,
voluntary and volitional. In the concept of V.A.
Ivannikov, the role of a person in voluntary control is
manifested in the ability to feel formation with a lack
of motivation to perform or complete an action. O.A.
Konopkin understands conscious self-management as
a systematically organized process of internal mental
activity of a person to initiate, build, maintain and
control all types and forms of external and internal
activities aimed at achieving the goals accepted by the
subject [1].
According to S. L. Rubinstein [5], specific methods of
mental activity are "consciousness" and "movement".
"Mental self-management of a person's activity,"
writes O.A. Konopkin, "is the highest level of
behavioral activity management of biological systems
that reflects the qualitative characteristics of mental
means of reflecting and modeling reality, and itself, its
activity and activities, actions and their foundations".
According to A.O. Prokhorov, self-control mechanisms
already occur at the cellular level of human life
organization. The direction of human mental activity in
the study of self-management problems K.A.
Volume 03 Issue 02-2023
17
American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN
–
2771-2141)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
02
Pages:
15-21
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
993
)
(2022:
6.
015
)
(2023:
7.
164
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Abulkhanova-Slavskaya,
N.A.
Bernstein,
O.A.
Konopkin, A.N. Leontev, B.F. Lomov, G.S. Nikiforov, S.L
. Cited in the works of Rubinstein et al. Y. Ya. Golikov
and A. I. Kostin, according to the authors, a
combination
of
systemic
and
inter-systemic
approaches is used as the methodological basis of the
model reflecting the integrity and instability of the
control processes, and the development of a
generalized model of mental activity control. A.K.
Osnitsky proposes to separate self-management in the
process of personal and activity. In the system of
learning personal self-management, Yu.A. Mislavsky
shows that the structure and functional components
of a person's self-management system include: values
and goals, ideals and the image of "I", as well as the
level of requirements and self-esteem, etc. [4].
L.P. Grimak believes that the personal level of self-
control should be studied in a wide system of life
processes. Here life choice works as the main control
mechanism. Personal self-management is studied
within the framework of concepts that are voluntarily
mastered by a person's behavior (L.P. Basov, V.I.
Selivanov, V.A. Ivannikov, T.I. Shulga, A.V. Bykov, T. Kul
and others). Self-management is understood by V.I.
Morosanova as an integral system of encouraging and
managing the achievement of behavioral and activity
goals. The concept of an individual style of self-
management was proposed by V.I. Morosanova as a
means of implementing a subjective approach to the
study of individual typical forms of a person's voluntary
activity. V.I. Morosanova believes that the activities
and activities of a person cannot be subjective and
impersonal. The main characteristics of subjective
activity are its creative nature, ability to change the
surrounding world (activity) and independence, self-
management and self-organization [3].
Thus, in the style of self-management, the methods of
organizing his activities, which are characteristic of a
certain person, are collected. It is in this sense that the
features of stylistic control are a necessary condition
for the formation of an individual style of activity in
mastering its new types. The higher the level of
conscious self-management characteristic of a person,
the development and harmony of all its main links, the
fewer difficulties there are in choosing a profession
and the easier it is to adapt to new activities.
In order to study the manifestation of self-control in
behavior during the student period, V.I. Morosanova's
"Management of Self-Management" questionnaire
and A.K. Osnitsky's "Self-Management Ability
Determination" methods were conducted. In order to
clearly express the data obtained as a result of the
research, it is reflected in the following table.
Table 1
The relationship between self-regulation and self-efficacy in students
Volume 03 Issue 02-2023
18
American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN
–
2771-2141)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
02
Pages:
15-21
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
993
)
(2022:
6.
015
)
(2023:
7.
164
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
A
component of
self-control in
behavior
Plan
n
in
g
Mo
d
elin
g
T
y
p
in
g
E
v
alu
atio
n
o
f
th
e
resu
lt
Flex
ib
ilit
y
In
d
ep
en
d
en
ce
Self
-co
n
tr
o
l is a
step
Ab
ilit
y
to
m
an
ag
e
o
n
eself
Planning
1
-0,03
0,36**
-0,001
0,30**
0,37**
0,59**
0,23**
Modeling
-0,03
1
0,04
0,33**
0,23**
-0,14*
0,33**
0,19**
Typing
0,36**
0,04
1
0
0,44**
0,29**
0,58**
0,21**
Evaluatio
n of the result
-0,001
0,33**
0
1
0,20**
-0,05
0,30**
0,07
Flexibilit
y
0,30**
0,23**
0,44**
0,20**
1
0,31**
0,61**
0,31**
Independ
ence
0,37**
-0,14*
0,29**
-0,05
0,31**
1
0,47**
0,3399
Self-
control is a step
0,59**
0,33**
0,58**
0,30**
0,61**
0,47**
1
0,39**
Ability to
manage oneself
0,23**
0,19**
0,21**
0,07
0,31**
0,33**
0,39**
1
According to the results of the study, there is a
significant difference in typing (r=0.36; p≤0.
01),
flexibility (r=0.30; p≤0.01), flexibility (r=0.37; p≤0.01),
the presence of a correlational relationship with self-
management level (r=0.59; p≤0.01), self
-management
ability (r=0.23; p≤0.01) was noted. Moreover, the
formation of a person's ability to process activities in a
conscious way leads to the discovery of such skills as
adjusting one's own behavior pattern, being sensitive
Volume 03 Issue 02-2023
19
American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN
–
2771-2141)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
02
Pages:
15-21
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
993
)
(2022:
6.
015
)
(2023:
7.
164
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
to specific situations, taking a lot of responsibility, and
trying to improve one's self.
Evaluation of modeling results (r=0.33; p≤0.01),
flexibility (r=0.23; p≤0.01), self
-management level
(r=0.33; p≤0.01) , there was a positive correlation with
self-
control (r=0.19; p≤0.01) and a negative correlation
with self-
control (r=0.14; p≤0.05). As a
result, it is
known that the development of the ability of the
subject to determine the important situation in the
current situation and in the long-term future is
influenced by the ability to accurately assess the
availability of resources, control his own behavior. On
the other hand, it is possible to show that the
development of the other person, the vital experience
of the person, is more important than the formation of
the social response.
Typing speed (r=0.36; p≤0.01), flexibility (r=0.44;
p≤0.01),
multitasking
(r=0.29;
p≤0.01),
self
-
management level (r=0.58; p≤0.01), the presence of
coupling relationship with self-control ability (r=0.21;
p≤0.01) was noted. From the results, it is known that
the ability of a person to adapt his own behavior and
behavior to the desired goal, the ability to analyze the
perspective of the activity type is determined by the
level of identifying the problem in life, coping with
difficult situations, making a smart choice and self-
control.
Evaluation of the result with model
ing (r=0.33; p≤0.01),
flexibility (r=0.20; p≤0.01), self
-management scale
(r=0.30; p≤0.01) existence of copulation relationship
was noted. The concept of multiplicity means that in
the individual development and adequacy of the
assessment of the results of the subject's own activity
and behavior, factors such as the ability to close the
model of the individual's future work, adaptation to
typical situations, are of great importance.
Bending (r=0.30; p≤0.01), modeling (r=0.23; p≤0.01),
typing (r=0.44; p≤0.01
), evaluation of results (r =0.20;
p≤0.01), self
-
esteem (r=0.31; p≤0.01), self
-management
level (r=0.61; p≤0.01), self
-management ability (
presence of coupling relationship was noted with
r=0.31; p≤0.01). Moreover, the level of formation of
self-management skills, i.e. the ability to reorganize
and adjust the self-management system when external
and internal conditions change, in turn, to prepare a
plan of action to be implemented in the future, to set a
clear direction, to evaluate the results, to start
independent activities. It also leads to the
development of self-control.
Creativity (r=0.37; p≤0.01), typing (r=0.29; p≤0.01),
flexibility (r=0.31; p≤0.01), self
-management level A
positive correlation with (r=0.47; p≤0.01) and a
negative correlation with modeling (r=-
0.14; p≤0.05)
were noted. From the result, it is clear that the person
has integrity in organizing his activities, ability to
organize his own work and behavior in an efficient
Volume 03 Issue 02-2023
20
American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN
–
2771-2141)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
02
Pages:
15-21
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
993
)
(2022:
6.
015
)
(2023:
7.
164
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
manner, the ability to analyze and evaluate the
objective and final results of the activity, the ability to
organize personal activities, flexibility, self-direction,
clear and systematic work. has a direct positive
correlation with Similarly, focusing on a set goal leads
to incorrect assessment of the internal and external
interactions that are important for the organization of
work and the ability to monitor its completion.
The self-
management level of learning (r=0.59; p≤0.01),
modeling (r=0.33; p≤0.01), typing (r=0.58; p≤0.01),
assessment (r=0.30; p≤0.01), flexibility
(r=0.61; p≤0.01),
integrity (r=0.47; p≤0.01), self
-control ( presence of
coupling relationship was noted with r=0.39; p≤0.01). It
can be understood from this that the self-control,
acceptance and functioning of an organization is the
development of work-life, the formation of a
subjective criterion for the evaluation of the results,
the attachment to a specific form, a strong reflection,
the individualization of the idea in the context of
external and internal significant forms. It is found in the
form of a factor such as brewing.
Self-
directed learning (r=0.23; p≤0.01), modeling
(r=0.19; p≤0.01), typing (r=0.21; p≤0.01), flexibility
(r=0.31; p≤0.01), polygamy (r=0.33; p≤0.01), and the
existence of a coupling relationship with the level of
self-control (r=0
.39; p≤0.01) was recorded. Relying on
many examples, it is worth noting that individuals with
a high level of self-control have the ability to work
independently and tend to adjust their own behavior
patterns, are sensitive to specific situations, and are
oriented toward self-control and self-control.
Based on the mentioned points, based on the results of
the study of self-management during the student
period, the following conclusions can be made:
- the formation of independent thought, strong beliefs
and worldview during the student period leads to the
development of self-management in the field of ethics,
and this is more clearly visible in social behaviors,
relationships, self-control and sense of responsibility,
striving for independence, expansion of moral views;
- it is important to take into account the psychological
and physiological changes that occur at this age when
focusing on the formation of self-management during
the student period;
- taking into account the age-related characteristics of
the system of emotional and voluntary qualities when
using special exercises and trainings that serve to
increase the level of self-control in students increases
the effectiveness of practical measures.
REFERENCES
1.
Конопкин, О. А. Общая способность к
саморегуляции
как
фактор
субъектного
развития [Текст] / О. А. Конопкин // Вопросы
психологии. –
2004.
–
№ 2. –
С. 128 –
135.
Volume 03 Issue 02-2023
21
American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN
–
2771-2141)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
02
Pages:
15-21
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
993
)
(2022:
6.
015
)
(2023:
7.
164
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
2.
Леонтьев, А. Н. Проблемы развития психики
[Текст] / А.Н.Леонтьев –
М.: Просвещение, 1981.
–
325 с.
3.
Моросанова, В. И. Личностные аспекты
саморегуляции
произвольной
активности
человека [Текст] / В. И. Моросанова //
Психологический журнал. –
2002.
–
№ 6. –
С. 5 –
17.
4.
Прохоров, А. О. Саморегуляция психических
состояний:
феноменология,
механизмы,
закономерности [Текст] / А. О. Прохоров
.
–
М.:
ПЕР СЭ, 2005. –
352 с. 10. Рубинштейн, С. Л.
Проблемы Общей психологии [Текст] / С. Л.
Рубинштейн –
М., 1973. –
416 с
5.
Рубинштейн, С. Л. Проблемы Общей психологии
[Текст] / С. Л. Рубинштейн –
М., 1973. –
416 с
