American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
1
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajsshr
VOLUME
Vol.05 Issue01 2025
PAGE NO.
1-4
The hazards of irrational decision-making: a
comprehensive review of cognitive biases and risks
Babangida Adedeji
Department of Transport Technology and Economics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 1111 Budapest, Hungary;
Received:
18 October 2024;
Accepted:
20 December 2024;
Published:
01 January 2025
Abstract:
This comprehensive review examines the hazards of irrational decision-making, focusing on the
cognitive biases and risks that influence human choices. Despite advancements in decision theory, individuals
frequently make choices that deviate from rationality due to various psychological and cognitive biases. The
review explores key biases, including confirmation bias, anchoring bias, overconfidence, and loss aversion, and
investigates how these cognitive distortions affect decision-making processes in both personal and professional
contexts. Additionally, the review delves into the consequences of these irrational choices, such as suboptimal
decision outcomes, economic inefficiencies, and social implications. By synthesizing findings from behavioral
economics, psychology, and neuroscience, the paper highlights the mechanisms behind irrational decision-making
and proposes strategies for mitigating its effects. The goal is to offer a deeper understanding of how cognitive
biases shape human judgment and provide insights for improving decision-making through awareness and
intervention.
Keywords:
Irrational decision-making, Cognitive biases, Decision theory, Confirmation bias, Anchoring bias,
Overconfidence, Loss aversion, Behavioral economics, psychological influences.
Introduction:
The human capacity for decision-making
is one of our most defining traits. From the simplest
choices in our daily lives to complex, high-stakes
decisions in business, healthcare, and policymaking,
our ability to make choices shapes our individual and
collective destinies. Ideally, decisions should be
rational, guided by logic, and aimed at achieving the
best possible outcomes. However, a closer examination
of the decision-making process reveals a disconcerting
truth: humans are not always rational decision-makers.
Irrationality, in its many forms, lurks beneath the
surface of our decision-making processes, influencing
our choices in profound and often unexpected ways. It
is the subtle biases, the cognitive shortcuts, and the
emotional undercurrents that frequently lead
individuals and organizations astray, resulting in
suboptimal decisions and outcomes.
This comprehensive review embarks on an exploration
of the fascinating and complex terrain of decision-
making hazards, where rationality often takes a
backseat.
Drawing
insights
from
psychology,
economics, behavioral science, and a wealth of
empirical research, we unveil the hidden aspects of
irrationality that permeate decision-making in a variety
of domains.
Our journey through this landscape will involve
dissecting cognitive biases that skew our judgments,
uncovering the heuristic shortcuts that simplify
complex decisions but can lead us astray, and
illuminating the emotional factors that cloud our
reasoning. We will delve into the world of behavioral
economics, where deviations from rationality have
been rigorously documented and analyzed.
The objective of this review is not merely to expose the
pitfalls of irrational decision-making but to equip
readers with a deeper understanding of these hazards.
By shedding light on the mechanisms at play, we aim to
empower individuals and organizations to recognize
and mitigate the effects of irrationality in their
decision-making processes. In doing so, we aspire to
pave the way for more informed, rational, and effective
decision-making across a multitude of contexts.
American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
2
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajsshr
American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research (ISSN: 2771-2141)
As we embark on this journey to unveil the intricacies
of irrationality, we invite readers to critically examine
their own decision-making processes, recognize the
subtle traps that may lie ahead, and explore strategies
to navigate the complex terrain of choices with greater
insight and rationality.
METHOD
The comprehensive review titled "Irrationality
Unveiled: A Comprehensive Review of Decision-Making
Hazards" employs a systematic and structured
approach to synthesize existing literature and research
findings related to decision-making hazards and
irrationality. The methodology consists of the following
steps:
Literature Review
Identification of Relevant Sources: A systematic search
is conducted across academic databases, including
PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, and research
journals, using keywords such as "decision-making,"
"irrationality,"
"cognitive
biases,"
"heuristics,"
"behavioral economics," and related terms.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Studies, articles, and
literature relevant to the topic of irrational decision-
making are included. Exclusion criteria are applied to
filter out irrelevant or low-quality sources.
Data Collection:
Compilation of Research Findings: Information from
selected sources is compiled, including empirical
studies, theoretical frameworks, case studies, and
expert opinions.
Organizing Data: The collected data are categorized
into themes, such as cognitive biases, heuristics,
emotional factors, and decision-making domains (e.g.,
healthcare, finance, public policy).
Synthesis and Analysis:
Thematic Analysis: The data are subject to thematic
analysis to identify recurring patterns, key concepts,
and trends related to decision-making hazards and
irrationality.
Comparative Analysis: Comparative analysis is
conducted to explore variations in decision-making
hazards across different domains and populations.
Structuring the Review:
Organizing Sections: The review is structured into
sections that correspond to the identified themes and
domains, allowing for a systematic presentation of
findings.
Providing Context: Each section provides context by
discussing the theoretical underpinnings, empirical
evidence, and real-world implications of the decision-
making hazards discussed.
Integration and Discussion:
Interpreting Findings: The review integrates the
synthesized findings, drawing connections between
different aspects of irrationality and decision-making.
DISCUSSION
The discussion section critically evaluates the
implications of decision-making hazards on individual
and
organizational
decision-making
processes,
highlighting practical insights and potential areas for
improvement.
Recommendations and Mitigation Strategies:
Based on the review's findings, recommendations and
strategies for mitigating the effects of irrationality in
decision-making are presented.
The methodology employed in this review ensures a
rigorous and systematic examination of decision-
making hazards and irrationality across various
domains. It aims to provide readers with a
comprehensive understanding of the subject, drawing
from a wide range of academic and empirical sources
to unveil the intricacies of irrational decision-making.
RESULTS
The comprehensive review of decision-making hazards
and irrationality has uncovered a rich tapestry of
insights from diverse fields, shedding light on the often-
hidden factors that shape our choices and decisions.
The key results and findings from this review can be
summarized as follows:
Cognitive Biases: A multitude of cognitive biases
influence decision-making. These include confirmation
bias, anchoring bias, and overconfidence bias, among
others. These biases lead individuals to systematically
deviate from rational decision-making, often resulting
in suboptimal choices.
Heuristics: Decision-making is frequently guided by
mental shortcuts or heuristics, such as availability
heuristic and representativeness heuristic. While these
heuristics simplify complex decisions, they can also
introduce biases and errors.
Emotional Factors: Emotions play a significant role in
decision-making. Fear, anger, and optimism can cloud
judgment and lead to impulsive or suboptimal choices.
Emotional intelligence and emotional regulation are
crucial in mitigating these effects.
Behavioral Economics: The field of behavioral
economics has revealed numerous deviations from
rationality, including loss aversion, present bias, and
the endowment effect. These insights have practical
implications for economics, finance, and public policy.
American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
3
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajsshr
American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research (ISSN: 2771-2141)
Decision-Making Domains: Decision-making hazards
are pervasive across various domains, including
healthcare, finance, business, and public policy. Each
domain presents unique challenges and opportunities
for addressing irrationality.
DISCUSSION
The discussion of the review's findings explores several
key points and implications:
Influence
on
Decision-Making:
Decision-making
hazards, including cognitive biases and heuristics, are
omnipresent and exert a significant influence on
individual and organizational decisions.
Practical Implications: Understanding the effects of
irrationality is essential for improving decision-making
processes. Organizations can benefit from recognizing
these biases and implementing strategies to counteract
them.
Education and Training: Education and training
programs can play a pivotal role in enhancing decision-
makers' awareness of these hazards and equipping
them with the skills to make more rational choices.
Behavioral Interventions: Behavioral economics offers
insights into designing interventions that nudge
individuals toward better decisions, such as default
options and choice architecture.
Ethical Considerations: The review raises ethical
considerations, particularly in fields like marketing and
public policy, where knowledge of decision-making
biases can be leveraged to influence choices.
Future Research: The review identifies avenues for
future research, including the exploration of decision-
making hazards in emerging fields such as artificial
intelligence and neuroeconomics.
In unveiling the complexities of irrationality in decision-
making, this comprehensive review provides a
foundation for understanding and addressing these
hazards across diverse contexts. By recognizing the
pervasive influence of cognitive biases, heuristics, and
emotional factors, individuals and organizations can
take proactive steps to make more informed and
rational decisions, ultimately leading to improved
outcomes and better-informed choices.
CONCLUSION
The comprehensive review, "Irrationality Unveiled: A
Comprehensive Review of Decision-Making Hazards,"
has journeyed through the intricate landscape of
human decision-making, exposing the often-hidden
aspects of irrationality that shape choices and
outcomes. From cognitive biases that systematically
skew judgments to heuristics that simplify complex
decisions but can lead astray, and from the emotional
factors that cloud reasoning to the insights of
behavioral economics, the review has illuminated the
multifaceted nature of irrational decision-making.
Recognizing the pervasiveness of decision-making
hazards is paramount for individuals, organizations,
and policymakers. The practical implications of this
review are profound. It underscores the importance of
education, training, and awareness-building to equip
decision-makers with the tools to navigate the intricate
terrain of choices with greater insight and rationality.
Behavioral interventions and ethical considerations
must also be at the forefront of strategies to counteract
the effects of irrationality.
As we conclude this exploration of irrationality in
decision-making, we are reminded that the path to
more rational choices is not one of eradication but of
enlightenment. By unveiling the complexities of
irrationality, we empower individuals and entities to
make more informed, deliberate, and effective
decisions. This, in turn, has the potential to reshape
outcomes across diverse domains, from personal
finance and healthcare to public policy and business.
In a world where decisions wield considerable influence
over our lives and societies, understanding the hazards
of irrationality is not merely an academic pursuit but a
practical imperative. By peeling back the layers of
human decision-making and shedding light on the
subtle traps that lie in wait, we pave the way for a
future where choices are made with greater wisdom
and rationality, ultimately enhancing our collective
well-being.
REFERENCES
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar,
Straus and Giroux.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under
uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157),
1124-1131.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving
decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale
University Press.
Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden
forces that shape our decisions. HarperCollins.
Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect
in decision making. Handbook of affective sciences,
619-642.
Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Rabin, M. (Eds.).
(2011). Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton
University Press.
Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of
consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior &
Organization, 1(1), 39-60.
American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
4
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajsshr
American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research (ISSN: 2771-2141)
Hsee, C. K., & Hastie, R. (2006). Decision and
experience: Why don't we choose what makes us
happy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 31-37.
