The article explores the role of interactive teaching methods in developing students' writing skills using a linguocultural approach. The author analyzes the effectiveness of interactive methods such as group assignments, role-playing games, and project work within the Uzbek educational context. Special attention is given to the significance of this approach in Uzbekistan's education system. The implementation of interactive methods enables the development of students' communication, creative thinking, and collaboration skills, thus fostering their writing competence at the language and cultural levels. The study emphasizes that employing a linguocultural approach not only helps students acquire writing skills but also facilitates their understanding of the deep connections between language and culture, which is crucial for preserving and advancing Uzbek cultural and linguistic identity. Based on the research findings, the author recommends integrating interactive teaching methods grounded in the linguocultural approach into Uzbek educational programs. This integration will enhance the effectiveness of teaching students' writing competence and contribute to their linguocultural development, thereby holding significant value for Uzbekistan's educational system.
Alimov, A.M. (2019). The role of interactive methods in the development of students' written competence. Bulletin of the Uzbek State University of World Languages, (4), 45-50.
Assimakopoulou A. D . (2003). Foreign languages in the context of culture: cross-cultural communication for educational purposes. MGLU publishing house.
Beam, I. L. (2006). Culture of foreign language communication. Flint.
Guseva, V. A. (2011). Introduction of interactive forms and teaching methods into the system of the Russian language school course. Dissertation for the degree of candidate of pedagogical sciences.
Konstantinova, N. A. (2018). Development of students' written communication in English lessons using interactive teaching methods. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University. N. I. Lobachevsky, (4), 226-232.
Rakhimova, Sh. R., & Amirkhanova, M. T. (2016). The Development of Written Speech at Russian Language Lessons in the Conditions of Linguistic and Cultural Education. Bulletin of Karakalpak State University, (4), 59-63.
Tursunova, T.T. (2020). The impact of information and communication learning technologies on the development of students' written competence. Bulletin of the Tashkent State Pedagogical University, (3), 87-92.
Kholikova , D.M. (2018). The use of project work in teaching writing to university students. Journal of Educational Research, (2), 102-110.
Byram, M. (2008). From Foreign Language Education to Education for Intercultural Citizenship: Essays and Reflections. Multilingual Matters.
Kramsch , C. (1998). Language and Culture. Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-Based Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, JC, & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
Saville Troike , M. (2006). Introducing Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
Swain, M. (2000). The Output Hypothesis and Beyond: Mediating Acquisition Through Collaborative Dialogue. In JP Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford University Press.