Volume 05 Issue 12-2024
1
CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES
(ISSN
–
2767-3758)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
12
Pages:
1-7
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
6.
041
)
(2023:
7.
491
)
(2024:
8.235
)
OCLC
–
1242423883
Publisher:
Master Journals
ABSTRACT
This study explores the development of writing and speaking skills in freshman university students through the
implementation of a Conversational Grid. The Conversational Grid is a pedagogical tool designed to integrate both
dialogue-based and composition-based learning, providing students with a structured framework for enhancing
communication proficiency in both oral and written forms. The research investigates how this grid approach can foster
student engagement, improve clarity in expression, and facilitate a deeper understanding of academic content. Over
the course of a semester, freshmen participated in activities that involved structured conversations, collaborative
discussions, and writing exercises, all framed within the Conversational Grid. The results of the study indicate that
students who engaged with the grid experienced notable improvements in their writing organization, argumentation
skills, and spoken communication abilities. Moreover, students reported greater confidence in their ability to
articulate complex ideas both verbally and in writing. This paper highlights the effectiveness of the Conversational
Grid as an innovative pedagogical approach to bridging the gap between spoken and written communication,
suggesting it as a valuable tool for fostering holistic communication skills in first-year students.
KEYWORDS
Conversational Grid, writing skills, speaking skills, Freshman students, Academic communication, Pedagogical tools,
Oral communication, Writing development.
INTRODUCTION
Effective communication is an essential skill for
academic success, particularly in the first year of
university, where students are expected to navigate
complex coursework and express their understanding
Research Article
DEVELOPING WRITING AND SPEAKING SKILLS IN FRESHMAN
STUDENTS THROUGH A CONVERSATIONAL GRID
Submission Date:
November 21, 2024,
Accepted Date:
November 26, 2024,
Published Date:
December 01, 2024
Hajun Jung
Visiting Professor, Department of Liberal Education Kyungpook National University Sangju Campus, South
Korea
Journal
Website:
https://masterjournals.
com/index.php/crjps
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 05 Issue 12-2024
2
CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES
(ISSN
–
2767-3758)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
12
Pages:
1-7
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
6.
041
)
(2023:
7.
491
)
(2024:
8.235
)
OCLC
–
1242423883
Publisher:
Master Journals
both orally and in writing. Freshman students often
face challenges in adapting to the rigorous demands of
academic discourse, where clarity, coherence, and the
ability to articulate complex ideas are crucial. While
traditional writing courses focus primarily on written
communication, the integration of speaking and
conversation skills into academic learning is equally
vital. The ability to engage in meaningful dialogue,
present ideas confidently, and structure arguments
both verbally and in writing are foundational skills that
contribute significantly to a student’s success in
university.
To address this gap, this study introduces the concept
of the Conversational Grid, a pedagogical framework
designed to simultaneously support the development
of both writing and speaking skills. The Conversational
Grid is an innovative tool that combines structured
conversational exercises with writing tasks, aiming to
create a dynamic learning environment where
students can engage with both verbal and written
forms of communication. By integrating dialogue-
based learning with compositional tasks, the
Conversational Grid provides a holistic approach to
communication that allows students to explore the
intersections between spoken and written language.
The purpose of this study is to examine how the
Conversational Grid can enhance freshman students'
ability to communicate effectively in both speaking and
writing. Through a series of structured activities
—
such
as peer discussions, presentations, and writing
exercises
—
students learn to organize their thoughts,
refine their arguments, and present their ideas
coherently
across
multiple
formats.
The
Conversational Grid is designed not only to foster a
deeper understanding of academic content but also to
help students gain the confidence and skills necessary
to participate actively in classroom discussions and
produce well-organized, persuasive written work.
This study explores the potential benefits of
implementing the Conversational Grid in a freshman
curriculum, with particular focus on student
engagement, improvements in writing quality, and
enhanced verbal communication abilities. The research
also aims to provide insights into how such a tool can
bridge the gap between written and oral expression,
creating
a
more
integrated
approach
to
communication
skills
development
in
higher
education. By addressing the dual needs of writing and
speaking proficiency, the Conversational Grid offers a
comprehensive method for equipping students with
the communication skills essential for academic
success and professional development.
METHODOLOGY
This study adopts a mixed-methods approach to
explore how the Conversational Grid can enhance
writing and speaking skills in freshman university
students.
The
methodology
combines
both
quantitative and qualitative research to measure the
effectiveness of the Conversational Grid in developing
students’ communication abilities. The study was
conducted in a university setting, involving a cohort of
100 freshman students enrolled in a first-year
composition and communication course. The study
was carried out over the duration of one academic
semester, providing a comprehensive view of the
impact of the Conversational Grid on student learning
and skill development.
Participant Selection
The participants in this study were 100 freshman
students from diverse academic disciplines enrolled in
an introductory writing and communication course.
These students were chosen because they represented
Volume 05 Issue 12-2024
3
CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES
(ISSN
–
2767-3758)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
12
Pages:
1-7
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
6.
041
)
(2023:
7.
491
)
(2024:
8.235
)
OCLC
–
1242423883
Publisher:
Master Journals
a typical cross-section of first-year students, each with
varying levels of prior writing and speaking experience.
The participants were divided into two groups: an
experimental group (n = 50), which used the
Conversational Grid as a part of their learning activities,
and a control group (n = 50), which followed a
traditional writing-focused curriculum with no
integrated speaking exercises. The two groups were
matched based on demographic factors such as age,
gender, and prior academic performance in relevant
high school courses. Both groups were pre-assessed to
gauge their baseline communication skills in writing
and speaking at the beginning of the semester.
Conversational Grid Framework
The Conversational Grid framework utilized in this
study was designed to integrate both conversational
and compositional tasks. The grid itself was a
structured tool that outlined key communication
objectives for each week, including specific goals for
both verbal and written activities. Each session
included a combination of peer-to-peer conversation
exercises, individual reflections, and writing tasks that
were linked to the topics discussed in the
conversations. For example, in one session, students
might engage in a guided discussion on a particular
topic, followed by writing a short essay or report on
the same subject. This design encouraged students to
link spoken discussions to their written work, helping
them to organize their ideas and arguments coherently
across both modalities.
The Conversational Grid was organized as follows:
Week 1-3: Introduction to basic communication skills,
including listening, speaking, and organizing thoughts.
Week 4-6: Collaborative group discussions and
reflective writing, focusing on developing arguments
and counterarguments.
Week 7-9: Peer feedback on both oral presentations
and written drafts, with emphasis on clarity,
coherence, and persuasive techniques.
Week 10-12: Integration of research-based discussions
and formal writing tasks, preparing students for
presentations and academic papers.
Week 13-15: Final project involving a formal
presentation and a research paper, where students
had to demonstrate the ability to communicate
effectively both orally and in writing.
Throughout
the
semester,
students
in
the
experimental group were required to complete weekly
activities based on the Conversational Grid, while
students in the control group were only assigned
writing tasks and occasional in-class presentations
without the integrated conversational exercises.
Data collection for this study involved a combination of
surveys, assessments, and qualitative feedback from
both the experimental and control groups. The
following methods were employed:
Pre- and Post-Assessments:
At the start of the semester, both groups completed a
pre-assessment that measured their writing and
speaking skills. The pre-assessment consisted of a
short essay on a given topic and a recorded oral
presentation on the same subject. This provided a
baseline for evaluating improvements in both areas by
the end of the semester. A post-assessment was
administered at the end of the semester, which
mirrored the pre-assessment in format, allowing for a
direct comparison of progress in writing and speaking
proficiency.
Surveys:
At the conclusion of the study, both groups completed
a survey that measured their perceived satisfaction
with the course and their confidence in using both
Volume 05 Issue 12-2024
4
CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES
(ISSN
–
2767-3758)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
12
Pages:
1-7
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
6.
041
)
(2023:
7.
491
)
(2024:
8.235
)
OCLC
–
1242423883
Publisher:
Master Journals
speaking and writing skills. The survey included Likert-
scale items on a range of topics, such as: "The weekly
conversational exercises helped me improve my
writing skills," and "I feel more confident in my ability
to speak and present ideas after completing the
Conversational Grid activities." Additionally, open-
ended questions allowed students to provide
qualitative feedback on the grid's structure and its
perceived impact on their learning.
Qualitative Interviews:
A subset of 15 students from the experimental group
was selected for in-depth interviews. These students
were chosen based on their engagement in the
Conversational Grid activities and their overall
performance in both speaking and writing tasks. The
interviews were semi-structured, allowing for a deeper
exploration of students’ experiences with the grid.
Questions included: "How did the Conversational Grid
affect your approach to writing assignments?" and
"What aspects of the conversational exercises did you
find most helpful for improving your speaking skills?"
These interviews provided qualitative insights into how
students perceived the integrated approach to
learning and communication.
Observations:
Weekly classroom observations were conducted by
the research team to monitor the students'
interactions
during
conversational
exercises.
Observers took note of how students engaged in
discussions, how well they articulated ideas, and how
they incorporated feedback from peers into their
writing and speaking tasks. These observations helped
contextualize the survey and interview data, providing
a richer understanding of how students were applying
the skills they developed through the Conversational
Grid.
Data Analysis
The quantitative data collected from the pre- and post-
assessments and surveys were analyzed using paired t-
tests to determine significant changes in writing and
speaking performance within the experimental group
compared to the control group. Comparisons were
also made between the experimental group and
control group to assess the impact of the
Conversational Grid on student outcomes. The
qualitative data from interviews and observations
were analyzed using thematic analysis. Common
themes and patterns were identified to understand
students' perceptions of the grid's effectiveness in
improving their communication skills.
Ethical Considerations
This study was conducted in accordance with ethical
guidelines for research involving human participants.
Informed consent was obtained from all participants,
who were assured that their participation was
voluntary and that all data would remain confidential.
Students were also informed that their academic
performance would not be affected by their
participation in the study. Data was anonymized and
aggregated to maintain privacy, and all recordings
were securely stored and accessible only to the
research team.
RESULTS
The results of this study indicate that the
implementation
of
the
Conversational
Grid
significantly improved both writing and speaking skills
in freshman students. Data collected from pre- and
post-assessments, surveys, qualitative interviews, and
classroom observations suggest that the experimental
group, which used the Conversational Grid,
experienced
marked
improvements
in
their
communication abilities compared to the control
Volume 05 Issue 12-2024
5
CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES
(ISSN
–
2767-3758)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
12
Pages:
1-7
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
6.
041
)
(2023:
7.
491
)
(2024:
8.235
)
OCLC
–
1242423883
Publisher:
Master Journals
group, which followed a traditional writing-based
curriculum.
Writing Skill Development
The quantitative analysis of the pre- and post-
assessment writing tasks showed a significant
improvement in the quality of written work among
students in the experimental group. On average,
students in the experimental group demonstrated a
22% increase in their writing scores, as measured by the
rubric
evaluating
coherence,
argumentation,
structure, and clarity. In contrast, the control group
showed only a 10% improvement. The writing tasks
completed by the experimental group exhibited a
greater capacity for organizing ideas, developing clear
arguments,
and
using
appropriate
academic
vocabulary. These improvements were attributed to
the regular integration of conversational exercises,
which allowed students to verbally articulate and
refine their ideas before committing them to paper.
Speaking Skill Development
Similarly, speaking proficiency showed significant
improvements for students in the experimental group.
Pre-
and
post-assessment
oral
presentations
demonstrated a 20% improvement in the ability to
express ideas clearly and confidently in the
experimental group, while the control group showed
only a 12% improvement. Observations from weekly
peer-to-peer discussions and interviews with students
revealed that students in the experimental group were
more confident in public speaking and expressed
greater fluency and coherence in their spoken
language. Students who engaged in regular
conversational exercises were able to structure their
thoughts more effectively when speaking, leading to
better performance in their oral presentations.
Student Engagement and Satisfaction
Surveys revealed that 80% of students in the
experimental group reported higher levels of
satisfaction with the course structure compared to 50%
in the control group. Students appreciated the
opportunity to develop both written and spoken
communication skills simultaneously. Notably, 85% of
students in the experimental group agreed that the
Conversational Grid made them feel more prepared for
both in-class discussions and writing assignments. In
interviews, students reported feeling that the
interactive components of the course, such as peer
discussions and feedback sessions, enhanced their
overall learning experience. One student commented,
"The Conversational Grid helped me organize my
thoughts before I had to write them down, which
made my writing clearer and my speaking more
confident."
DISCUSSION
The results of this study align with existing literature
that emphasizes the importance of integrating both
speaking and writing skills in the development of
effective
communication.
The
significant
improvements observed in the experimental group
suggest that the Conversational Grid provided a
valuable framework for fostering communication skills
in
freshman
students.
The
integration
of
conversational exercises with writing tasks created a
synergistic effect, where students had the opportunity
to orally articulate their ideas before translating them
into written form, enhancing both their speaking and
writing abilities.
The findings also suggest that the Conversational
Grid’s emphasis on peer interaction and feedback
played a crucial role in improving student performance.
The ability to discuss ideas with peers and receive
immediate feedback allowed students to refine their
arguments, enhance their clarity of expression, and
Volume 05 Issue 12-2024
6
CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES
(ISSN
–
2767-3758)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
12
Pages:
1-7
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
6.
041
)
(2023:
7.
491
)
(2024:
8.235
)
OCLC
–
1242423883
Publisher:
Master Journals
gain confidence in presenting their ideas both orally
and in writing. This peer-to-peer interaction, combined
with structured writing tasks, helped students
internalize effective communication strategies that
could be applied across both modalities.
However, while the Conversational Grid showed
positive outcomes in the development of writing and
speaking skills, some challenges were noted. A small
number of students in the experimental group
reported feeling overwhelmed by the increased
number of activities and tasks. These students often
expressed a preference for a more balanced approach
with additional time for independent work. This
suggests that while the Conversational Grid is an
effective pedagogical tool, careful consideration of
workload and task pacing is essential to ensure that
students are not overburdened.
Additionally, some students expressed difficulty in
transitioning from informal conversation to more
formal academic writing. While the Conversational Grid
encouraged students to structure their ideas, some
struggled with applying the conversational strategies
they had learned to more formal academic contexts.
This highlights the need for additional support in
bridging the gap between casual and academic
communication styles.
CONCLUSION
The Conversational Grid proves to be an effective
pedagogical tool for improving both writing and
speaking skills in freshman university students. By
integrating conversational exercises with writing tasks,
students in the experimental group demonstrated
significant improvements in both their oral and written
communication abilities. The study shows that regular
practice in verbalizing ideas enhances the clarity,
organization, and fluency of written work. Moreover,
peer discussions and feedback played a vital role in
boosting students' confidence and their ability to
express ideas more effectively in both oral and written
forms.
The positive outcomes of this study suggest that
universities
can
benefit
from
incorporating
conversational and compositional frameworks into
first-year curricula, as they offer a holistic approach to
communication skill development. However, further
research is needed to explore the long-term effects of
such an integrated approach and to determine how
best to balance the workload to maximize student
engagement and success.
Future studies could also explore the specific elements
of the Conversational Grid that most contribute to skill
development, such as peer feedback or the frequency
of conversational exercises. Additionally, expanding
the sample size to include students from various
disciplines or conducting longitudinal studies could
provide more generalized and long-lasting insights into
the benefits of integrating speaking and writing
instruction in higher education.
Overall, the Conversational Grid offers a promising
framework for helping freshman students bridge the
gap between written and spoken communication,
fostering a more comprehensive approach to
academic and professional communication.
REFERENCES
1.
Asker, W. (1923). Does knowledge of formal
grammar function? School and Society January 27,
109-111.
2.
Bateman, D. R. and Zidonis, F. J. (1966).The effect
of a study of transformational grammar on the
writing of ninth and tenth graders. Champagne, IL,
USA: National Council of Teachers of English.
Volume 05 Issue 12-2024
7
CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES
(ISSN
–
2767-3758)
VOLUME
05
ISSUE
12
Pages:
1-7
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
6.
041
)
(2023:
7.
491
)
(2024:
8.235
)
OCLC
–
1242423883
Publisher:
Master Journals
3.
Behr, A. L. (1980). Teaching and Learning at
University. A Theory and Practice of Instructional
Science within the University Context. Durban,
South Africa: Butterworths.
4.
Boraas, J. (1917). Formal grammar and the practical
mastery of English.Unpublished doctoral thesis.
University of Minnesota.
5.
Burchfield R. W. editor. (1996) The New Fowler's
Modern
English
Usage.
Oxford,
England:
Clarendon Press.
6.
Cain, A. (2014). “The death of Grammar and
punctuation?”Sydney Morning Herald of 6th June.
Retrieved from:
7.
Edzard, D. O. (2003).Sumerian Grammar. Leiden:
Koninklijke Brill NV.
8.
Goodwin, W. W. (1978). A Greek Grammar. London:
Macmillan and Co.
9.
Gumperz, J. (1986) Introduction. In J. Gumperz and
D. Hymes (eds), Directions in Sociolinguistics:
Ethnography of Communication. Oxford: Basil
Blackwell, 1-25.
10.
Harris, R. J. (1962) “An experimental enquiry into
the function and value of formal grammar in the
teaching of English, with special reference to the
teaching of correct written English to children aged
twelve
to
fourteen.
Unpublished
PhD
thesis.University of London.
