S Kariev
Currently, in the treatment of urolithiasis (UL) preference is given to herbal preparations. Despite the wide range of herbal medicines (HM) for the treatment of UL, none of those currently used are ideal for the treatment of patients with calcium urolithiasis and preurolithiasis. In this regard, the further research on the study of the properties of drugs from medicinal plants of the Hora of Uzbekistan is important.
The goal is to examine the relationship between the anti-lithogenic efficacy and the diuretic power of plant diuretics.
Material and methods. In 212 patients with the calcium type of urolithiasis, the diuretic and saluretic abilities of the infusions from seven medicinal plants of the flora of Uzbekistan were investigated. The selected HM are widely known among doctors and patients.
Results. Their diuretic ability of HM is different. The strong diuretics: Alhagi pseudoalhagi (+ 65.2%) and Herba Aervea Lanata a (+ 50.19%). The moderate diuretics: Stigmata Maydis (+ 42.12%), Achillea fllipendulina (41.34%) and Hypericum perforatum (+ 29.06%). The weak diuretics: Folia Menthae piperitae (+ 23.53%) and Friictus Rosae (+ 12.59%).
The calculation of the ion activity index revealed differences in the severity of the anti-litogenic effect. Infusions were distributed in the following sequence: Alhagi pseudoalhagi (-71.65%) - Achillea fllipendulina (-63.14%) -Herba Aervea Lanata (-49.86%) - Folia Menthae piperitae (-41.36%) - Stigmata Maydis (-33.08%) - Hypericum perforatum (-33.02%) - Fructus Rosae (-15.43%).
Conclusion. The strength of the diuretic effect should not be considered the primary factor in the change in the activity of stone formation. Therefore, when prescribing HM, this factor (diuretic effect) is not the main criterion for prevention and metaphy lax is.
