Авторы

  • N.A. Khudayberganova
    Student of group MED-58 R, Faculty of General Medicine, Kimyo International University in Tashkent
  • A.A. Adilov
    student of group MED-82 E, Faculty of General Medicine, Kimyo International University in Tashkent
  • B.S. Azizov
    Scientific Supervisor: Associate Professor Department of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology Tashkent State Dental Institute, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.dptms.128030

Аннотация

Arthropathic psoriasis (psoriatic arthritis) is a severe chronic condition that occurs in approximately 20–30% of patients with psoriasis. Without timely diagnosis and adequate therapy, it can lead to persistent joint deformities, impaired work capacity, and disability. In recent years, significant progress has been made in understanding the pathogenesis of the disease, which has led to the development of new effective treatments, especially the use of biologic agents. Given its high prevalence, the variety of clinical manifestations, and the need for a multidisciplinary treatment approach, the study of arthropathic psoriasis remains a highly relevant field in modern rheumatology and dermatology.


background image

DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN

MODERN SCIENCES

International scientific-online conference

93

MODERN APPROACHES TO THE TREATMENT OF ARTHROPATHIC

PSORIASIS

Khudayberganova N.A.

Student of group MED-58 R, Faculty of General

Medicine, Kimyo International University in Tashkent

Adilov A.A.

student of group MED-82 E, Faculty of General

Medicine, Kimyo International University in Tashkent

B.S.Azizov

Scientific Supervisor: Associate Professor

Department of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology

Tashkent State Dental Institute, Uzbekistan

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16353819

Relevance:

Arthropathic psoriasis (psoriatic arthritis) is a severe chronic

condition that occurs in approximately 20–30% of patients with psoriasis.
Without timely diagnosis and adequate therapy, it can lead to persistent joint
deformities, impaired work capacity, and disability. In recent years, significant
progress has been made in understanding the pathogenesis of the disease, which
has led to the development of new effective treatments, especially the use of
biologic agents. Given its high prevalence, the variety of clinical manifestations,
and the need for a multidisciplinary treatment approach, the study of
arthropathic psoriasis remains a highly relevant field in modern rheumatology
and dermatology.

Research Objective:

To examine modern treatment approaches for

arthropathic psoriasis and analyze their effectiveness based on recent data.

Research Methods:

The treatment of arthropathic psoriasis focuses on

suppressing inflammation, preventing the progression of structural joint
damage, and improving the patient’s quality of life. Current therapy includes
several key directions:

1.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs):

Used in the

early stages to relieve pain and inflammation, but they do not affect disease
progression.

2.

Glucocorticosteroids:

Administered as local injections in cases of

limited joint inflammation. Systemic use is restricted due to the risk of
exacerbating skin psoriasis. Hormonal (corticosteroid) ointments include:

Clobetasol (Dermovate)

Betamethasone (Celestoderm, Diprolene)

Mometasone (Elocom)

Fluticasone (Cutivate)


background image

DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN

MODERN SCIENCES

International scientific-online conference

94

3.

Conventional

disease-modifying

anti-rheumatic

drugs

(DMARDs):

Methotrexate – one of the most commonly used drugs.

Sulfasalazine, leflunomide, and cyclosporine – alternatives for patients

intolerant to methotrexate. These medications slow disease progression and are
used in peripheral arthritis forms.

4.

Biologic therapy:

Applied in moderate to severe cases, particularly

when DMARDs are ineffective. This includes:

TNF-α inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab)

IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab, ixekizumab)

IL-12/23 inhibitors (ustekinumab)

IL-23 inhibitors (guselkumab, risankizumab)

JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, upadacitinib) – used for resistant forms.

Biologic therapy offers a clear advantage by specifically blocking intracellular
inflammatory signaling pathways, thereby promoting targeted healing of
psoriatic skin lesions.

5.

Team-based (Multidisciplinary) approach:

Treatment involves

dermatologists, rheumatologists, physiotherapists, and, if necessary,
psychologists.

Conclusion:

Arthropathic psoriasis is a chronic immune-inflammatory condition that
combines skin symptoms of psoriasis with joint involvement, requiring a
comprehensive, individualized, and multidisciplinary treatment approach.
Modern treatment methods include the use of biologic agents such as TNF-α, IL-
17, and IL-23 inhibitors, which effectively control both skin and joint symptoms
of the disease. Personalized therapy selection, taking into account disease
activity, comorbidities, and prognostic factors, is becoming a key focus of
modern rheumatologic and dermatologic therapy. The advancement of biologics
and targeted therapy significantly improves patients' quality of life and slows
the progression of joint damage.

References:

1.

Gossec, L., Baraliakos, X., Kerschbaumer, A., et al. (2020). EULAR

recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with
pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases,
79(6), 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217159
2.

Singh, J. A., Guyatt, G., Ogdie, A., et al. (2019). 2018 American College of

Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation guideline for the treatment of


background image

DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN

MODERN SCIENCES

International scientific-online conference

95

psoriatic

arthritis.

Arthritis

&

Rheumatology,

71(1),

5–32.

https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40726
3.

Mease, P. J., Smolen, J. S., Behrens, F., et al. (2021). A head-to-head

comparison of IL-17A and TNF inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis: efficacy and
safety results from randomized clinical trials. The Lancet Rheumatology, 3(7),
e407–e417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00120-4
4.

Coates, L. C., & Helliwell, P. S. (2020). Psoriatic arthritis: state of the art

review. Clinical Medicine, 20(1), 70–74. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2019-
0350
5.

Ogdie, A., & Weiss, P. (2015). The epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis.

Rheumatic

Disease

Clinics

of

North

America,

41(4),

545–568.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2015.07.001
6.

Gladman, D. D., Antoni, C., Mease, P., et al. (2005). Psoriatic arthritis:

epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcome. Annals of the Rheumatic
Diseases, 64(Suppl 2), ii14–ii17. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2004.032482
7.

Ritchlin, C. T., Colbert, R. A., & Gladman, D. D. (2017). Psoriatic Arthritis.

New

England

Journal

of

Medicine,

376(10),

957–970.

https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1505557
8.

McInnes, I. B., & Schett, G. (2017). Pathogenetic insights from the

treatment of psoriatic arthritis. The Lancet, 389(10086), 1337–1346.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32461-6
9.

Mease, P. J., Rahman, P., Gottlieb, A. B., et al. (2020). Efficacy of

guselkumab, an IL-23 inhibitor, in psoriatic arthritis: results from a phase 3 trial.
Arthritis

&

Rheumatology,

72(10),

1793–1803.

https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41376
10.

Kavanaugh, A., & Helliwell, P. (2022). JAK inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis: a

new therapeutic option. Rheumatology (Oxford), 61(SI2), ii47–ii53.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac203

Библиографические ссылки

Gossec, L., Baraliakos, X., Kerschbaumer, A., et al. (2020). EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 79(6), 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217159

Singh, J. A., Guyatt, G., Ogdie, A., et al. (2019). 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation guideline for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatology, 71(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40726

Mease, P. J., Smolen, J. S., Behrens, F., et al. (2021). A head-to-head comparison of IL-17A and TNF inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis: efficacy and safety results from randomized clinical trials. The Lancet Rheumatology, 3(7), e407–e417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00120-4

Coates, L. C., & Helliwell, P. S. (2020). Psoriatic arthritis: state of the art review. Clinical Medicine, 20(1), 70–74. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2019-0350

Ogdie, A., & Weiss, P. (2015). The epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, 41(4), 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2015.07.001

Gladman, D. D., Antoni, C., Mease, P., et al. (2005). Psoriatic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcome. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 64(Suppl 2), ii14–ii17. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2004.032482

Ritchlin, C. T., Colbert, R. A., & Gladman, D. D. (2017). Psoriatic Arthritis. New England Journal of Medicine, 376(10), 957–970. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1505557

McInnes, I. B., & Schett, G. (2017). Pathogenetic insights from the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. The Lancet, 389(10086), 1337–1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32461-6

Mease, P. J., Rahman, P., Gottlieb, A. B., et al. (2020). Efficacy of guselkumab, an IL-23 inhibitor, in psoriatic arthritis: results from a phase 3 trial. Arthritis & Rheumatology, 72(10), 1793–1803. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41376

Kavanaugh, A., & Helliwell, P. (2022). JAK inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis: a new therapeutic option. Rheumatology (Oxford), 61(SI2), ii47–ii53. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac203