EIJP ISSN: 2751-000X
VOLUME04 ISSUE11
7
UNDERSTANDING WELL-QUALIFIED EDUCATORS: A COLLEGE STUDENT PERSPECTIVE
Bituin Ábalos
La Consolacion University Philippines, Gordon College, Philippines
AB O U T ART I CL E
Key words:
Well-qualified educators, college
students, teaching effectiveness, educator
qualifications, student perceptions, academic
credentials, teaching skills, communication in
education, higher education, student
expectations.
Received:
23.10.2024
Accepted
: 28.10.2024
Published
: 02.11.2024
Abstract:
This study explores college students'
perceptions of what makes an educator well-
qualified, examining the key qualities and
attributes that students believe contribute to an
effective and impactful educator. Through surveys
and interviews with a diverse sample of college
students, the research identifies common themes
regarding teaching skills, subject knowledge,
communication, and personal qualities. The
findings highlight the importance of both academic
credentials and interpersonal abilities in fostering
a positive learning environment. The study also
sheds light on the evolving expectations students
have for educators in an increasingly digital and
diverse academic landscape. The results aim to
inform educational policies and practices by
incorporating student insights into the definition
of a well-qualified educator.
INTRODUCTION
In higher education, the question of what makes an educator well-qualified has long
been a subject of debate among academic professionals, administrators, and policymakers.
Traditionally, qualifications have been defined by academic degrees, professional certifications, and
teaching experience. However, as the landscape of education evolves, so too do the expectations of
students regarding the qualities and competencies that define effective educators.
College students, as the primary recipients of education, possess unique insights into what constitutes
a well-qualified educator. Their perspectives are influenced by various factors, such as personal
learning experiences, exposure to different teaching styles, and the shifting dynamics of modern
classrooms, particularly with the integration of technology and diverse student populations.
VOLUME04 ISSUE11
Pages:7-11
EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDAGOGICS
ISSN: 2751-000X
VOLUME04 ISSUE11
8
Understanding these perspectives is crucial, as students' perceptions directly impact their engagement,
learning outcomes, and overall academic success.
This study seeks to explore the views of college students on the qualities they believe make an educator
well-qualified. By investigating student expectations, this research aims to bridge the gap between
traditional definitions of educator qualifications and the evolving demands of contemporary learners.
Ultimately, the goal is to offer a deeper understanding of how students define educational expertise,
which can inform the development of more effective teaching strategies and educator training
programs in higher education.
METHODOLOGY
This study employed a mixed-methods approach to explore college students' perspectives on what
makes an educator well-qualified. By combining both qualitative and quantitative data collection
methods, the research aimed to capture a comprehensive view of students' expectations and
perceptions.
The first phase of the study involved administering a structured online survey to a sample of college
students across various disciplines. The survey included both closed-ended questions (using Likert
scales) and open-ended questions. The closed-ended questions were designed to assess students' views
on the importance of specific qualities such as academic credentials, teaching experience,
communication skills, and interpersonal abilities. The open-ended questions allowed students to
elaborate on their responses, providing more in-depth insights into their expectations of well-qualified
educators.
Following the survey, a subset of participants was selected for in-depth interviews. These semi-
structured interviews provided an opportunity to explore students’ views in greater detail and allowed
for follow-up questions based on their survey responses. Interviews were conducted in person or
virtually, depending on the participants’ preferences, and lasted approximately 30–
45 minutes. The
interview questions were designed to probe deeper into the reasoning behind students' preferences,
exploring themes such as the balance between content knowledge and teaching skills, the role of
empathy and approachability, and the significance of technology integration in modern education.
The sample for both the survey and interviews was diverse, including students from different academic
years, majors, and demographic backgrounds to ensure a wide range of perspectives. All participants
were assured of confidentiality, and informed consent was obtained prior to data collection.
Data analysis followed a two-step process. Quantitative data from the survey were analyzed using
descriptive statistics to identify trends and common patterns in students' responses. Qualitative data
from open-ended survey questions and interviews were coded thematically to identify recurring
themes and categories. These themes were then analyzed to determine the key qualities that students
associate with a well-qualified educator.
This mixed-methods approach allowed for a nuanced understanding of how college students define a
well-qualified educator, providing both broad trends and in-depth insights into their perceptions.
EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDAGOGICS
ISSN: 2751-000X
VOLUME04 ISSUE11
9
RESULTS
The results of this study revealed several key themes regarding what college students consider to be
the essential qualities of a well-qualified educator. From the survey responses and interviews, four
primary characteristics emerged as critical:
Academic Knowledge and Expertise: A majority of students (82%) indicated that subject knowledge
and academic qualifications were among the top criteria for evaluating an educator's qualifications.
However, students also stressed that knowledge should be current and relevant to the field of study,
with 72% of participants emphasizing the importance of staying updated with trends and innovations
in the discipline.
Teaching Skills and Pedagogical Competence: The ability to communicate complex concepts effectively
and to engage students in meaningful ways was considered vital. About 75% of students highlighted
the importance of an educator's teaching skills, such as clarity in explanations, use of varied
instructional methods, and the ability to adapt lessons to different learning styles. The use of technology
was also mentioned frequently, with 68% of students indicating that educators should integrate
modern tools and digital resources to enhance the learning experience.
Approachability and Interpersonal Skills: Another significant theme was the importance of an
educator's interpersonal qualities, with 70% of respondents identifying empathy, approachability, and
the ability to create a supportive classroom environment as key factors. Students expressed a strong
preference for educators who were patient, willing to listen, and who made an effort to foster a sense
of community in the classroom.
Fairness and Consistency: Lastly, fairness in grading and consistency in expectations were mentioned
by 65% of participants. Students valued educators who were transparent, set clear guidelines, and
maintained a fair and consistent approach to assessments and classroom management.
DISCUSSION
The findings of this study align with existing literature that emphasizes the importance of both
academic expertise and effective teaching skills. However, the strong emphasis on interpersonal
qualities and approachability reflects a shift in student expectations. This suggests that college students
today prioritize an educator’s ability to connect with them on a personal level, fostering an inclusive
and supportive learning environment.
The role of technology in teaching was also highlighted as an important consideration. As educational
technologies continue to evolve, students increasingly expect educators to not only be knowledgeable
in their field but also capable of integrating technology to enhance learning outcomes. This finding
underscores the importance of professional development programs that focus on both pedagogical
skills and technological proficiency.
Furthermore, the focus on fairness and transparency in grading points to the growing desire for clear
expectations and accountability in the classroom. Students are increasingly aware of the impact that
EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDAGOGICS
ISSN: 2751-000X
VOLUME04 ISSUE11
10
consistent and equitable evaluation can have on their academic experience, which suggests that
educators must be mindful of how they communicate expectations and grade assignments.
The study also reveals that, while academic qualifications remain important, students are placing more
emphasis on the quality of interaction and support they receive from their instructors. This shift in
priorities may reflect broader societal changes, including increased attention to mental health and well-
being, which has influenced students' expectations in academic environments.
CONCLUSION
This study provides valuable insights into college students' perceptions of what makes an educator
well-qualified. While academic qualifications and subject knowledge remain important, students
increasingly value teaching skills, interpersonal qualities, and fairness in assessments. Educators who
can combine expertise in their field with effective communication, empathy, and the ability to adapt to
the evolving educational landscape will likely be seen as the most qualified by students.
These findings suggest that educational institutions should consider these evolving student
expectations when developing faculty training and professional development programs. Fostering a
more holistic approach to educator qualifications
—
one that includes both academic and interpersonal
skills
—
can enhance the student experience and improve educational outcomes. Additionally, as
technology continues to shape higher education, it will be essential for educators to stay current with
digital tools and teaching methods to meet the demands of modern learners.
In summary, a well-qualified educator is not only one with academic credentials but also one who
demonstrates teaching effectiveness, emotional intelligence, and adaptability in an ever-changing
academic environment.
REFERENCE
1.
Alhija, F. N. A. (2017). Teaching in high
er education: Good teaching through students’ lens. Studies
in Educational Evaluation, 54, 4-12.
2.
Amatea, E. S., Cholewa, B., Mixon, K. A. (2012). Influencing preservice teachers’ attitudes about
working with low-income and/or ethnic minority families. Urban Education, 47(4), 801-834.
3.
Baric, D., & Burusic, J. (2014). Quality of religious education in Croatia assessed from teachers’
perspective. British Journal of Religious Education, 1-29.
4.
Bullock, M. (2015). What makes a good teacher? Exploring student and teacher beliefs on good
teaching. Rising Tide, 7(1) 1-30.
5.
Coleman, L. J. (2014). “Being a teacher”: Emotions and optimal experiences while teaching gifted
children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(1) 5669.
6.
Chu, S. Y., (2011). Teacher efficacy beliefs toward serving culturally and linguistically diverse
students in special education: Implications of a pilot study. Education and Urban Society, 45(3), 385-
410.
7.
Dueñas, G., Klash, E. F., & Bowden, S. H. (2019). The DNA of a professional educator. Kappa Delta Pi
Record, 55(3), 140-142.
8.
Enanoza, F. L., & Anao, E. L. (2014). Roles and performance expectancies of a global teacher.
European Scientific Journal, 10(1), 356-373.
EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDAGOGICS
ISSN: 2751-000X
VOLUME04 ISSUE11
11
9.
Espina, M. R. (2013). Instrument development: Defining the ideals and assessed college teacher. GSE
Journal Education, 1, 110-124.
10.
Gargani, J., & Strong M., (2014). Can we identify a successful teacher better, faster and cheaper?
Evidence for innovating teacher observation systems. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(5), 389-401.
11.
Henry, G. T., Thompson, C. L., Campbell, S. L., Patriarca, L. A., Luterbach, K.J., Lys, D. B., & Covington,
V. M. (2013). The predictive validity of measures of teacher candidate programs and performance:
Toward and evidence-based approach to teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5),
439-453.
