European International Journal of Pedagogics
97
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
TYPE
Original Research
PAGE NO.
97-99
DOI
OPEN ACCESS
SUBMITED
23 February 2025
ACCEPTED
20 March 2025
PUBLISHED
22 April 2025
VOLUME
Vol.05 7ssue04 2025
COPYRIGHT
© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.
Neuro-Pedagogical
Diagnostic System for
Developing Logical
Thinking in Future
Educators
Urinova Nilufar Mukhammadovna
Candidate of pedagogical sciences, professor of the Department of
Pedagogy Fergana State University, Fergana, Uzbekistan
Xursanova Zilola Mirzaxolmatova
Teacher, Fergana State University, Fergana, Uzbekistan
Abstract:
This research explores the neuro-pedagogical
diagnostic mechanisms aimed at developing logical
thinking skills in future educators. The study examines
how the integration of neuroscience and pedagogy
enhances the efficiency of educational processes,
allowing for targeted observation, evaluation, and
support of students’ cognitive development. The paper
also presents diagnostic tools and strategies for
identifying and improving logical reasoning through
neuro-pedagogical approaches.
Keywords:
Neuro-pedagogy, logical thinking, diagnostic
system, future educators, neurodiagnostics, cognitive
development.
Introduction:
The study of the structural peculiarities of
the student's brain mobilizes educators to approach
educational challenges from a new perspective, moving
away from conventional concepts and contributing
creatively to the development of new pedagogical
technologies based on the study of types of thinking.
The process of thinking is considered the highest level of
human consciousness. The student's thinking, as the
most complex and advanced form of intellectual
activity, serves as a subject of research in psychology
and neurophysiology. From the viewpoint of
neuropsychologists or biologists, "thinking is the
activation of groups of neurons." Recently, scientific
disciplines such as neuropsychology, neurolinguistics, or
neuropsycholinguistics, and psycholinguistics, which
link educational processes to the structural peculiarities
European International Journal of Pedagogics
98
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
European International Journal of Pedagogics
of the student's brain, have been rapidly developing
worldwide.
American neuropsychologists referred to the 1990s as
the "Decade of the Brain," emphasizing the importance
of this topic to educators. They highlighted the
necessity for teachers to engage students in various
forms and contents of educational activities and to
utilize a wide range of teaching methods and
techniques.
The relationship between the structure of the brain
and the peculiarities of thinking processes has been
scientifically proven through research conducted by
scientists from over twenty countries.
In the 1980s, Y. Lotman conducted research in
semiotics and cultural studies based on the
achievements of neuroscience. He proposed the idea
of the sequential activation of competitive types of
consciousness, one excessively detached from essence
and the other integrated with external reality, serving
to reveal content and meaning.
Studying pedagogical processes from the perspective
of neurological changes occurring in the human brain,
i.e., the integration of neurology with pedagogy, led to
the emergence and formation of neuro-pedagogy as a
distinct discipline. The Organization for Economic Co-
operation and Development (OECD) established the
international scientific project "Brain and Learning"
through its Centre for Educational Research and
Innovation (CERI), involving over thirty countries'
neurobiologists, educators, psychologists, sociologists,
and medical professionals in scientific research.
In Russia, the Institute of Cognitive Neurology was
established under the Academy of Modern
Humanities, serving as an initial working platform for
neuro-pedagogy. The institute, in collaboration with
scientists from Moscow State University, the Institute
of the Human Brain of the Russian Academy of
Sciences, the Institute of Psychology, the Research
Institute of Neurocybernetics, and Rostov State
Universities, identified priority areas. These areas are
directly related to pedagogical tasks, such as applying
neuropsychological knowledge to solve learning
difficulties (T.V. Akhutina) and developing the
neuropsychology of individual differences (V.A.
Moskvin, Y.D. Khomskaya, I.V. Efimova). Researchers
like T.A. Dobrokhotova, N.N. Bragina, T. Khrizman, and
V. Yeremeyeva conducted studies explaining the
interaction between the functional processes of
cerebral hemispheric asymmetry and thinking activity
in students. The results of these studies significantly
influenced the formation of neuropsychological
pedagogy.
Since 1997, neuro-pedagogy (a term first used by V.A.
Moskvin) has developed as an "integrative direction"
(brain-based/compatible education), uniting all the
aforementioned studies.
Improving the neuro-pedagogical diagnostic system
aimed at developing logical thinking in students requires
clarifying the demands of this process and elucidating
the essence of its fundamental principles. The student's
brain functions as a "parallel processor," capable of
simultaneously
performing
various
processes:
memorizing pedagogical concepts, responding to the
teacher's questions, analyzing presented information,
and engaging in other types of intellectual activities.
In this process, the teacher must ensure students' active
participation in learning by involving them in diverse
forms and contents of educational activities and
effectively utilizing innovative teaching methods and
techniques.
An insufficient educational load, considered the
opposite of excessive, can negatively impact brain
development. Therefore, in developing logical thinking
in students, the teacher must adhere to this neuro-
pedagogical principle.
The student's brain seeks to understand the essence of
phenomena by identifying the causes and patterns of
reality. Disorder hinders the productive activity of the
brain. If the development of the human brain is
facilitated by overcoming intellectual difficulties under
conditions of identifying patterns, the effectiveness of
the educational system increases.
Neuro-pedagogy emphasizes the significant role of
emotions and feelings in developing logical thinking. As
V. Dilthey noted, "We understand facts related to
society only by internalizing them, accepting them as
our own. We contemplate the historical world through
love and hate, through the passionate play of our
emotions. Nature is mute to us; it is alien, external to us,
whereas society is our world." Emotions are among the
initial conditions for the effective functioning of the
brain. Educational material learned in a favorable
environment is better remembered and has a strong
connection with the corresponding emotional state. The
emotional factor enhances the learner's thinking and
logical, creative potential.
The brain can simultaneously analyze incoming
information and determine their interconnections,
working on the entire information or its parts.
According to neuropsychological research, the brain can
"see" an object both as a whole and in parts
simultaneously, possessing the ability to divide it into
parts and integrate them. Analysis and synthesis are
crucial, constantly interacting thinking processes in
education,
whose
joint
development
requires
European International Journal of Pedagogics
99
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
European International Journal of Pedagogics
appropriate support through adequate teaching
methods and techniques. Educational material should
always be presented in the interplay of whole and part,
analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction,
specification and generalization, argumentation, and
direct and inverse problem-solving methods.
The brain can perceive information simultaneously
under conditions of focused attention and unconscious
perception. If the educational process is correctly
organized, the characteristics of unconscious
perception can be used as an organizational factor in
learning. For example, multimedia can be used to fully
understand the content of historical events. However,
failing to transition from unconscious to conscious
perception.
REFERENCES
Aхутинa Т. В., Кaмaрдинa И. O., Пылaевa Н. М.
Нейрoпсихoлoг в шкoле. Индивидуaльный пoдхoд к
детям с труднoстями oбучения в услoвиях oбщегo
oбрaзoвaния.
–
М.:
Издaтельствo:
Секaчев
Влaдимир Юрьевич, 2013. –
57 с.
Выгoтский Л.С. Мышление и речь. –
М.: Лaбиринт,
1999.
–
352 с. Леoнтьев A.A. Деятельнoстный ум
(Деятельнoсть. Знaк. Личнoсть). –
М.: Смысл, 2001.
–
392 с.
Дoбрoхoтoвa
Т.A.
Нейрoпсихиaтрия.
–
М.:
Издaтельствo БИНOМ, 2006. –
304 с. Брaгинa Н.Н.
Левши. –
Мoсквa: Книгa Лтд, 1994. –
230 с.;
Еремеевa В.Д., Хризмaн Т.П. Мaльчики и девoчки –
двa рaзных мирa. Нейрoпсихoлoгии –
учителям,
вoспитaтелям, рoдителям, шкoльным психoлoгaм –
М.: ЛИНКA
-
ПРЕСС, 1998. –
184 с.
Кузьминa Т. Oптимизaция oбучения млaдших
шкoльникoв нa oснoве нейрoпедaгoгическoгo
пoдхoдa. –
Тaллин, 2010. –
C. 7. 248 с.
Кoрсaкoвa Н.К. Микaдзе Ю.В. Бaлaшoвa Е.Ю.
Неуспевaющие
дети:
нейрoпсихoлoгическaя
диaгнoстикa труднoстей в oбучении млaдших
шкoльникoв. –
М.: РПA, 1997. –
123 с.
Лoтмaн Ю. М. Aсимметрия и диaлoг. Семиoсферa. –
СПб., 2000. –
C 591. 603 с.
Лебединский
В.В.
Нaрушения
психическoгo
рaзвития в детскoм вoзрaсте. –
М.: Aкaдемия, 2003.
–
144 с.
Лурия A.Р. Oснoвы нейрoпсихoлoгии. –
М.
:
Aкaлемия, 2006. –
384 с
Мoсквин В.A. Прoблемa связи лaтерaльных
прoфилей
с
индивидуaльными
рaзличиями
челoвекa
(в
дифференциaльнoй
психo
-
физиoлoгии): Aвтoреф. дисс. дoк. псих. нaук. –
Уфa:
OГУ, 2002 –
50 с.
Семенoвич A.В. Нейрoпсихoлoгическaя диaгнoстикa
и кoррекция в детскoм вoзрaсте. –
М.: Aкaдемия,
2007.
–
232 с.
Хoмскaя Е.Д. Нейрoпсихoлoгия. –
СПб.: Питер, 2005.
–
496 с. Ефимoвa И.В. Межпoлушaрнaя aсимметрия
мoзгa и двигaтельные спoсoбнoсти // Физиoлoгия
челoвекa. –
1996.
–
Т. 22. –
№ 1. –
С. 35
-39.
