Authors

  • Mukaddas Kodirova
    Lecturer of Department of Philology, Termiz State Pedagogical Institute, Termez, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.eijps.43981

Keywords:

Business discourse pragmatics speech act

Abstract

This article offers a comprehensive view of business discourse as a series of illocutionary acts, drawing on key theories and examples to illustrate the concept’s relevance in business communication. Also, in this article, illocutionary acts of business discourse have been viewed as a series of assertives in business communication, directives and their role in business, commissives and commitments in business, expressives and corporate culture and declarations and changing business realities.


background image

EJJPS ISSN: 2751-1715

VOLUME04 ISSUE09

13


BUSINESS DISCOURSE AS AN ILLOCUTIONARY ACT

Mukaddas Kodirova

Lecturer of Department of Philology, Termiz State Pedagogical Institute, Termez, Uzbekistan

AB O U T ART I CL E

Key words:

B

usiness discourse, pragmatics,

speech act, locutionary act, illocutionary act,

perlocutionary act.

Received:

14.09.2024

Accepted

: 19.09.2024

Published

: 24.09.2024

Abstract:

This article offers a comprehensive view

of business discourse as a series of illocutionary
acts, drawing on key theories and examples to

illustrate the concept’s r

elevance in business

communication. Also, in this article, illocutionary

acts of business discourse have been viewed as a

series of assertives in business communication,
directives and their role in business, commissives

and commitments in business, expressives and

corporate culture and declarations and changing

business realities.

INTRODUCTION

Discourse is a text that is formed before the eyes of the speaker. As the Uzbek linguist
U.I. Shukurov said, discourse consists of words or sentences, and the content of the speech is often

gathered around the concept of “reference” called “speech topic” [6:12]. However, T.A.Shiryaeva
emphasizes that the typology of the field discourse, including “business discourse”, has not been

developed, that the business discourse has not yet been fully comprehensively analyzed from the point
of view of communication, and the systemic features have not been consistently studied [7: 54].
Therefore, we believe that it is important to conduct research on this topic.
Business discourse is a complex and multifaceted area of study that intersects linguistics,
communication, and management. Understanding the dynamics of business discourse is essential in a
globalized economy, where communication is a key driver of organizational success. One powerful way
to analyze business discourse is through the lens of speech act theory, particularly focusing on the
concept of illocutionary acts. This approach provides insights into how language functions not only to
convey information but also to perform actions within a business context.
Business discourse involves the language and communication practices within a business context,
including negotiations, meetings, emails, reports, and presentations [2: 9-13]. In this discourse,
language is not merely a tool for exchanging information but a medium through which actions are
performed. This concept is grounded in speech act theory, particularly in the notion of illocutionary

VOLUME04 ISSUE09

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-04-09-03

Pages: 13-16


background image

EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES

ISSN: 2751-1715

VOLUME04 ISSUE09

14

acts. Understanding business discourse as an illocutionary act provides insights into how language
functions beyond mere statements, influencing decision-making, persuasion, and relationships within
the business environment.
The pragmatic approach to business discourse emphasizes the context in which communication occurs
and the intended illocutionary force behind utterances [5: 43]. For instance, in a business meeting, when

a manager says, “We need to cut costs”, the illocutionary act might be a directive for the team to find

ways to reduce expenses. However, the effectiveness of this illocutionary act depends on how it is
interpreted by the listeners, their understanding of the context, and the power dynamics at play.

Speech act theory, originally developed by philosopher J.L. Austin in his seminal work “How to Do

Thi

ngs with Words” (1962), and later expanded by John Searle, distinguishes between three types of

acts performed when a sentence is uttered: locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts.
Locutionary Act: This refers to the actual act of saying something and involves the utterance itself,
including its phonetic, phatic, and rhetic aspects.
Illocutionary Act: This is the core of speech act theory. It refers to the intention behind the utterance
and the social action it performs. For example, when a manager says, "You are fired," the illocutionary
act is the act of dismissing the employee.
Perlocutionary Act: This refers to the effect the utterance has on the listener, such as persuading,
deterring, or inspiring.
In the business context, the illocutionary act is particularly significant because business communication
often involves not just conveying information but also executing actions such as making decisions,
giving orders, making promises, and negotiating deals.
The concept of illocutionary acts originates from the work of philosopher J.L. Austin in his seminal book

“How to Do Things with Words” (1962) [1: 37]. J.L. Austin proposed that when people speak, they do

not only say things but also do things with their words. For example, when a manager says,

“I approve

this project”, they are not merely making a statement but also performing the act of approving. This act

is called an illocutionary act, distinguished from locutionary acts (the act of saying something) and
perlocutionary acts (the effect on the listener).

John Searle further developed Austin’s ideas, categorizing illocutionary acts into five types: assertives,

directives, commissives, expressives, and declarations [4: 17]. Each category represents a different way
in which language can function as an action. In business discourse, these illocutionary acts are prevalent
and can significantly shape interactions and outcomes.
Business discourse can be viewed as a series of illocutionary acts that are embedded in the daily
communication practices of organizations. These acts include:

1) Assertives in Business Communication

. Assertives are statements that convey information,

beliefs, or descriptions of the world, such as reports, updates, and analyses. In business, assertive acts
are used to assert fac

ts or viewpoints, as seen in statements like “The market share has increased by

10% this quarter”. These acts serve to inform and build a shared understanding among stakeholders.

However, beyond merely informing, assertive acts can influence perceptions and decisions, thereby
functioning as strategic tools in business communication.

2) Directives and their Role in Business

. Directives are illocutionary acts that attempt to get the

listener to do something, such as requests, commands, or suggestions. In a business setting, directives

are crucial for coordination and action. For example, a directive like “Please submit the report by
Friday” not only communicates a request but also sets expectations and timelines. The effectiveness of


background image

EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES

ISSN: 2751-1715

VOLUME04 ISSUE09

15

directives in business discourse often relies on the power dynamics and relationship between the
speaker and listener.

3) Commissives and Commitments in Business

. Commissives are acts where the speaker commits to

a future course of action, such as promises, offers, or threats. In business, commissive acts play a critical

role in negotiations and agreements. When a company representative states, “We will deliver the
product by the end of the month”, it is not merely a prediction but a commitment that binds the company

to that timeline. The illocutionary force of commissives helps in building trust and accountability in
business relationships.

4) Expressives and Corporate Culture

. Expressives are acts that express the speaker's psychological

state or attitudes, such as apologies, congratulations, or condolences. In the business context,
expressives contribute to the maintenance of corporate culture and relationships. For instance, saying

“We appreciate your hard work on this project” goes beyond acknowledging effort; it reinforces posit

ive

behavior and boosts morale, aligning with the company’s values and culture.

5) Declarations and Changing Business Realities

. Declarations are acts that bring about a change in

the external situation through their utterance, such as appointments, resignations, or contract signings.
In business discourse, declarations are powerful illocutionary acts because they directly alter the state

of affairs. A CEO announcing, “I hereby appoint you as the new manager”, is performing an act that

changes the organizational structure instantaneously. Declarations are central to formal business
procedures and organizational changes.

The Illocutionary Force in Business Strategy

. Understanding business discourse as illocutionary acts

highlights the strategic use of language in achieving business objectives [3: 28]. The illocutionary force
of a speech act

the intention behind it and its effect on the listener

can be harnessed to persuade,

negotiate, manage conflicts, and build alliances. Effective business communicators are those who can
skillfully navigate these acts, aligning their language with the intended business goals and the context
of the interaction. For example, in negotiations, the choice of assertive or commissive acts can influence
the outcome. Assertive statements backed by data can establish credibility, while commissive acts can
build trust and commitment. Similarly, understanding the nuances of directives and expressives can
enhance leadership communication and employee engagement.
Misunderstandings in business communication often arise when the intended illocutionary force is not
correctly interpreted by the listener. This can be due to cultural differences, ambiguities in language, or
differing expectations. For example, a suggestion in one culture might be interpreted as a command in
another, leading to unintended consequences.
Moreover, the indirectness often used in business communication can lead to misinterpretation. For

instance, saying “It might be a good idea to revisit our budget” could be intended

as a directive to cut

costs, but it might be interpreted merely as a suggestion for future consideration.

CONCLUSION

Analyzing business discourse through the lens of illocutionary acts provides a deeper understanding of
how language functions within an organizational setting. It highlights the performative nature of
business communication, where utterances do not just convey information but also perform actions
that can have significant implications for business operations. By recognizing the illocutionary acts in
business discourse, managers and employees can improve their communication strategies, reduce
misunderstandings, and enhance the overall effectiveness of their interactions.

REFERENCES


background image

EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES

ISSN: 2751-1715

VOLUME04 ISSUE09

16

1.

Austin J.L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

168 pp.

https://silverbronzo.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/austin-how-to-do-things-
with-words-1962.pdf

2.

Bargiela-Chiappini F., Nickerson C. (1999). Business Discourse: Language at Work/Business
Communication Quarterly, 62(1), 9-13.

3.

Holmes J., Stubbe M. (2003). Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of
Talk at Work.

London: Routledge.

216 pp.

4.

Searle J.R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.

Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

203 pp.

5.

Yule G. (1996). Pragmatics.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

138 pp.

6.

Shukurov U.I. Siyosiy diskurs: nazariy asoslari va kommunikativ strategiyasi: Filol.fan.bo‘yicha

fal.dok-ri diss...avt-ti.

Andijon

2023.

50 b.

7.

Ширяева Т.А. Когнитивная модель делового дискурса: монография. –

Пятигорск: ПГЛУ, 2006.

-

256 с.

References

Austin J.L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. – Oxford: Oxford University Press. – 168 pp. https://silverbronzo.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/austin-how-to-do-things-with-words-1962.pdf

Bargiela-Chiappini F., Nickerson C. (1999). Business Discourse: Language at Work/Business Communication Quarterly, 62(1), 9-13.

Holmes J., Stubbe M. (2003). Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work. – London: Routledge. – 216 pp.

Searle J.R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. – 203 pp.

Yule G. (1996). Pragmatics. – Oxford: Oxford University Press. – 138 pp.

Shukurov U.I. Siyosiy diskurs: nazariy asoslari va kommunikativ strategiyasi: Filol.fan.bo‘yicha fal.dok-ri diss...avt-ti. – Andijon – 2023. – 50 b.

Ширяева Т.А. Когнитивная модель делового дискурса: монография. – Пятигорск: ПГЛУ, 2006. - 256 с.