Authors

  • Baxtiyor Jalilov
    Andijan state foreign languages instuti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijai.108085

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the precedent phenomenon in modern linguistics, particularly examining the scholarly perspectives of various linguists on precedent phenomena in English linguistics. In global linguistics, the study of thought and the formation, preservation, and functions of speech from different angles has become a distinct tradition, with cognitive-conceptual and linguocultural approaches holding particular significance. In this regard, the concept of precedents and their application in discourse, reflecting the national aspects of an individual’s worldview, occupies a specific place.

 

 

background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 2294

PRECEDENT PHENOMENA AS NATIONAL VALUES AND A SPIRITUAL-

MATERIAL FOUNDATION

Jalilov Baxtiyor Tulanovich

Andijan state foreign languages instuti, senior lecturer

b.jalilov1976@mail.ru +998902595424

ORCID ID 0009-0000-9013-1810

Annotation:

The article is devoted to the study of the precedent phenomenon in modern

linguistics, particularly examining the scholarly perspectives of various linguists on precedent

phenomena in English linguistics. In global linguistics, the study of thought and the formation,

preservation, and functions of speech from different angles has become a distinct tradition, with

cognitive-conceptual and linguocultural approaches holding particular significance. In this

regard, the concept of precedents and their application in discourse, reflecting the national

aspects of an individual’s worldview, occupies a specific place.

Keywords:

precedent phenomenon, precedent text, precedent situation, precedent utterance,

precedent name.

INTRODUCTION

Today, research focused on studying the aspects of linguistic worldviews related to

national mentality has become one of the most pressing areas in modern linguistics. The

existence of national peculiarities in the representation of the linguistic worldview was shaped

by the ideas of Wilhelm von Humboldt, the founder of comparative linguistics, who stated in

his scholarly works: "Different languages, due to their distinct existence, manifestation in

thought and consciousness, and variations in perception, reflect reality in different ways."

1

This

perspective remains relevant to this day, and many linguists continue to direct their research

toward analyzing the relationship between language and thought.

MATERIALS AND METODS

The term "precedent" was introduced into linguistics in the second half of the 20th

century by the Russian linguist Yu. N. Karaulov. Specifically, the term "precedent" initially

entered the Russian language from other European languages, namely English and French. This

term was borrowed into English during the Middle Ages from French, which, in turn, had

adopted it from the Latin forms "praecedent," "praecedens," and "praecedere."

2

RESULT AND DISCUSSIONS

The presence of national values and spiritual-material sources in precedent phenomena

has been extensively studied in numerous scholarly works. In this regard, the research of

Russian scholars such as G.G. Slyshkin, L.Yu. Fedorova, and E.A. Nakhimova holds particular

significance.

Precedent phenomena occupy a distinct place in the linguistic personality, reflecting in

various discourses not only individual perspectives of particular persons but also collective

views related to concepts and values within a worldview. This, in turn, enables us to understand

1

Гумбoльдт В. фoн. O различии стрoения челoвеческих языкoв и егo влиянии на духoвнoе развитие

челoвечества // Избранные труды пo языкoзнанию. М.: Прoгресс, 1984. – С 134.

2

Жалилов Б.Т. «Прецедент» термини ва унинг турли луғатлардаги изоҳи. Ўзбекистонда хорижий

тиллар, 2021, № 3(38), 31-40.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 2295

the formation of concepts and perspectives shaped by culture and values, revealing not only

their social nature but also how they manifest in individual lives, thereby influencing people's

personalities and worldviews. Such 'hierarchies' in the development of precedent phenomena

have been analyzed in the theoretical works of S.N. Dolets, who describes them as follows:

3

1 - Scheme. Hierarchy of Precedent

Events

I - Precedent event used within a

linguistic-cultural context.

II - Precedent event known to a broad

social group.

III - Precedent event used within a

narrow group/circle.

IV - Precedent event related to specific

individuals.

According to this "hierarchy,"

the first group includes precedent

events that are equally familiar to all representatives of a given linguo-cultural community.

Yu.N. Karaulov once characterized these as having a "simple" (хрестоматийные) nature.

In turn, the conceptual content of these precedent phenomena possesses

a diachronic quality—they must convey meaning not only to representatives of a specific era

but also remain intelligible across all historical periods.

The precedent events categorized in subsequent groups, however, are

considered peripheral units. Those in the second group are limited by era, social group, or

gender perspective, meaning their conceptual representations are relevant only to a specific

historical period or community.

For instance, the English proper name "

Samson

" historically served as a precedent

concept denoting "

a mighty, strong man

." However, due to shifting religious literacy and

perspectives, it has now largely become a historism (a term fading from active use). The

symbolic meanings it once conveyed have begun to be expressed through other linguistic units,

influenced by evolving culture, social attitudes, and ideologies. The same ways can be observed

in concepts “

Mary-wisdom, smart

”, “

Goliath- great, huge

”.

Matilda was a tall, thin, graceful fair girl, with a rather large nose. She was the

Mary

to

Emmie’s

Martha

: that is, Matilda loved painting and music, and read a good many.

4

"The precedent names “

Martha”

and “

Mary

” mentioned in the example represent

religious precedents connected to Biblical narratives, specifically referencing the sisters of

Lazarus who hosted Jesus Christ in this context. In Christian culture, “

Mary

” serves as an

embodiment of the contemplative, observant, and spiritually perceptive (созерцание) concept,

while “

Martha”

represents the archetype of a diligent, caring homemaker.

However, contemporary observations reveal significant shifts in these conceptual

associations and symbolic representations. Notably, in modern American culture, the name

3

Дoлевец С. Oб иерархии прецедентных фенoменoв в сoзнании языкoвoй личнoсти // Пoлитическая

лингвистика. 2005. № 16. – С. 51.

4

Lawrence D. H. England, my England and other stories: You Touched Me. Cambridge University Press. 1990. –

P.65


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 2296

“Mary”

has acquired new connotations, particularly referring to “drug addiction” or

“marijuana”.

He pulled a little package of

Mary

out of his pocket.

5

I can't live another day without

Mary.

6

We can observe a similar phenomenon in the symbolic representation of “

Goliath”

as

gigantic

” or “

colossal

”. In modern English, this term has largely lost its original impact, with

its symbolic associations now being conveyed through the word “Titan” instead.

The precedent concepts classified in the third group of the aforementioned hierarchy are

confined to small social circles - such as families, professional teams, or friendship groups - and

are comprehensible only to members within these limited communities. Such precedent units

often exhibit characteristics of slang or jargon. What distinguishes them is not their causal

semantics, but rather the presence of uniquely encoded symbolic representations within their

precedent meaning.

The phrase "

Old Bill

"

7

is defined in the Collins Dictionary as slang denoting "a police

officer." Two

Old Bill's

came up to me and told me they had a warrant for my arrest.

8

However,

as a precedent unit, it represents the symbolic image of the Old Bill

“mustachioed soldier”

from World War I, where the distinctive attribute in its meaning is precisely the Old Bill

“mustache."

Here comes

Old Bill

himself.

9

.

The fourth category comprises precedent phenomena that reflect concepts formed

exclusively within individual consciousness, being strictly confined to that person's worldview,

linguistic identity, and personal interests. It should be emphasized that the migration of

precedent phenomena between these categories - both from core to periphery and vice versa -

constitutes a frequently observed dynamic. During the transition from periphery to core, we

observe a gradual erosion of the expression's precedential status, which consequently leads to

modifications in its distinctive characteristic features. This transformation occurs when the

referenced attributes undergo semantic shifts during the process of broader cultural assimilation.

When communicators lack familiarity with the referenced characteristic, the precedent fails to

achieve its intended effect. Typically, precedent phenomena originate as individual conceptual

references that gradually gain wider circulation, eventually becoming embedded in the

periphery - or more precisely, imprinted in the collective consciousness of linguocultural

communities or even entire civilizations. This process is recognized by scholars as the most

prevalent mechanism of precedent unit formation. However, this process is mediated by several

crucial factors including: (1) the contemporary relevance of the referenced values, (2) their

degree of dissemination, and (3) the social standing of the originator. Consequently, research

confirms that precedent formation mechanisms vary significantly across historical periods. In

5

https://1735.slovaronline.com/11221-mary

6

https://1735.slovaronline.com/11221-mary

7

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/old-bill

8

Frank Norman. Bang to rights: an Account of Prison Life. Chatto & Windus. London: 1987. – P. 138

9

Herbert Hodge. Cab, Sir? M. Joseph, ltd. London. 1939. – P. 54


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 2297

our current era of advanced communication technologies and proliferating print/digital media,

we observe particularly robust dynamics in the emergence, development, and evolution of

precedent phenomena.

In conclusion, based on the collected and analyzed data regarding the subject, precedent

phenomena can be defined as communicative units that reference or are associated with

concepts reflecting cultural values specific to either individual persons or entire linguocultural

communities.

REFERENCES:

1. Frank Norman. Bang to rights: an Account of Prison Life. Chatto & Windus. London: 1987.

– P. 138

2. Herbert Hodge. Cab, Sir? M. Joseph, ltd. London. 1939. – P. 54

3. Lawrence D. H. England, my England and other stories: You Touched Me. Cambridge

University Press. 1990. – P.65

4. Gumboldt V. fon. O razlichii stroeniya chelovecheskix yazikov i yego vliyanii na duxovnoe

razvitiye chelovechestva // Izbrannie trudi po yazikoznaniyu. M.: Progres, 1984. – S 134

5. Doleves S. Ob iyerarxii pretsedentnix fenomenov v soznanii yazikovoy lichnosti // Politiche

skaya lingvistika. 2005. № 16. – S. 51.

6. Jalilov B.T. «Pretsedent» termini va uning turli lug‘atlardagi izohi. O‘zbekistonda xorijiy til

lar, 2021, № 3(38), 31-40.

7. https://1735.slovaronline.com/11221-mary

8. https://1735.slovaronline.com/11221-mary

9. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/old-bill

References

Frank Norman. Bang to rights: an Account of Prison Life. Chatto & Windus. London: 1987. – P. 138

Herbert Hodge. Cab, Sir? M. Joseph, ltd. London. 1939. – P. 54

Lawrence D. H. England, my England and other stories: You Touched Me. Cambridge University Press. 1990. – P.65

Gumboldt V. fon. O razlichii stroeniya chelovecheskix yazikov i yego vliyanii na duxovnoe razvitiye chelovechestva // Izbrannie trudi po yazikoznaniyu. M.: Progres, 1984. – S 134

Doleves S. Ob iyerarxii pretsedentnix fenomenov v soznanii yazikovoy lichnosti // Politicheskaya lingvistika. 2005. № 16. – S. 51.

Jalilov B.T. «Pretsedent» termini va uning turli lug‘atlardagi izohi. O‘zbekistonda xorijiy tillar, 2021, № 3(38), 31-40.