Authors

  • Kamildjan Mamadaliyev
    Andijan State Pedagogical Institute
  • Baxtiyor Mamadaliyev
    Andijan State Pedagogical Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijai.77688

Abstract

This article explores the importance of using predicate algebra formulas in teaching students how to prove theorems and solve inequalities. The examples and theorems presented in the article can be used not only for teaching students the applications of predicate algebra, but also for working with students with creative abilities and organizing group lessons in mathematics.

 

 

background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 03,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1760

USING PREDICATES TO CONSOLIDATE THEORETICAL KNOWLEDGE OF

INEQUALITIES FOR FUTURE PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHER

Mamadaliyev Kamildjan Bazarbayevich,

Mamadaliyev Baxtiyor Kamildjanovich

Andijan State Pedagogical Institute

Annotation:

This article explores the importance of using predicate algebra formulas in teaching

students how to prove theorems and solve inequalities. The examples and theorems presented in

the article can be used not only for teaching students the applications of predicate algebra, but

also for working with students with creative abilities and organizing group lessons in

mathematics.

Key words:

Inequalities, predicate, range of truth of a predicate, equivalent formulas, theorem,

proof of a theorem, methods of proof.

The science of mathematics is studied and developed based on the laws of mathematical

logic. However, mathematical logic is not taught as a separate subject in secondary schools.

Although the elements of mathematical logic are partially included in mathematics textbooks,

their applications are not sufficiently covered. As a result, students face many difficulties in

studying the theoretical foundations of mathematics in depth, solving equations and inequalities,

and especially in proving theorems. Taking this into account, in this article we will consider the

applications of predicate algebra to solving inequalities and systems of inequalities and proving

theorems.

When studying the applications of predicate algebra, it is important to know its

equivalence formulas. Let us recall the main equivalence formulas of predicate algebra:

P(x)⋀(S x ⋁Q x ) ≡ P(x)⋀S(x)⋁P(x)⋀Q(x)

(1)

P(x)⋁S x ⋀Q x ≡ (P x ⋁S x )⋀(P x ⋁Q x )

(2)

P(x)⋀S(x) ≡ P(x)⋁S(x)

(3)

P(x)⋁S(x) ≡ P(x)⋀S(x)

(4)

P(x) ⟹ S(x) ≡ P(x)⋁S(x)

(5)

P(x) ⟹ S(x) ≡ S(x) ⟹ P(x)

(6)

P(x) ⟺ S(x) ≡ P(x)⋀S(x)⋁P(x)⋀S(x)

(7)

P(x) ⟺ S(x) ≡ (P x ⋁S x )⋀(S x ⋁P x )

(8)


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 03,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1761

Since inequalities consist of predicates, the problem of solving an inequality comes down

to finding the truth domain of the predicate. Let P(x) and S(x) be predicates defined on some set

. We denote the truth domains of these predicates by E

p

and E

s

, respectively, the negation of

the predicate P(x) by

P(x)

, and the set

ℳ \ E

p

by

E

p

.

P(x)

,

P(x)⋁S(x)

,

P(x)⋀S(x)

,

P(x) ⟹ S(x)

and

P(x) ⟺ S(x)

We use the following

theorems to find the truth domains of the predicates.

1- theorem.

(∀x ∈ R)(x

2

≤ x ⟹ x ≤ x)

.

Proof. We use the converse method: that is, instead of the given theorem, we prove the

following theorem

(∀x ∈ R)(x ≤ x ⇒ x

2

≤ x)

, which is equally strong. Let

(x ≥ x ⟹

x

2

≥ x) x ≥ x

. Then x≥1. We multiply both sides of this inequality by x (Since the value of x

is positive, the inequality sign does not change).

x ∙ x ≥ x ∙ 1

means that the inequality

x ≥ x

implies the inequality

x

2

≥ x

. Thus, the formula

(∀x ∈ R)(x ≤ x ⇒ x

2

≤ x)

is a theorem.

Therefore, the formula

(∀x ∈ R)(x

2

≤ x ⟹ x ≤ x)

, which is equally strong as this formula, is

also a theorem.

2- theorem.

(E

p

= E

s

) ⟹ (∀x ∈ ℳ)(P x ⟺ S x )

Proof. Let

E

p

= E

s

. Then the element

x belonging to

E

p

also belongs to

E

s

.

At this value of x, P(x) and S(x) are true statements. Therefore, based on the definition of

the equivalence operation, the formula

P x ⟺ S x

is also a true statement. Therefore, from the

equality

E

p

= E

s

it follows that the formula

∀x ∈ ℳ)((P x ⟺ S x )

is a true statement.

The theorem is proved.

Let R be the set of real numbers.
Example 1. Given a predicate x

2

-7x+12<0 in the set R. Find its truth domain.

Solving. We denote the given predicate by P(x) and its truth domain by E

p

. Then,

P(x) ≡

(x

2

− 7x + 12 < 0) ≡ ( x − 3 x − 4 < 0) ≡

≡ (x − 3 < 0) ∧ (x − 4 > 0) ∨ (x − 3 > 0) ∧ (x − 4 < 0) ≡
≡ (x < 3) ∧ (x > 4) ∨ (x > 3) ∧ (x < 4)

.

E

p

= −∞; 3 ∩ 4; ∞ ∪ 3; ∞ ∩ −∞; 4 = ∅ ∪ 3; 4 =

= (3; 4)

. Answer:

E

p

= (3; 4)

.

Example 2. Given a predicate P(x)=(x

2

-x-20>0) defined on a set R. Find its truth domain

E

p

.

Solving.

P x ≡ x

2

− x − 20 > 0 ≡ ( x + 4 ⋅ x − 5 > 0) ≡

≡ (x + 4 < 0) ∧ (x − 5 < 0) ∨ (x + 4 > 0) ∧ (x − 5 > 0) ≡


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 03,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1762

≡ (x <− 4) ∧ (x < 5) ∨ (x >− 4) ∧ (x > 5)

,

E

p

= x ∈ R x <− 4 ∩ {x ∈ R|x < 5} ∪

∪ x ∈ R x >− 4 ∩ x ∈ R x > 5 = ( − ∞; − 4) ∩ ( − ∞; 5) ∪
∪ −4; ∞ ∩ 5; ∞ = ( − ∞; − 4) ∪ (5; ∞)

.

Answer:

E

p

= ( − ∞; − 4) ∪ (5; ∞)

.

Example 3. Given a predicate

P x =

2x+6

5x−10

≤ 0

in a set R, find its truth domain E

p

.

Solving.

P x =

2x+6

5x−10

≤ 0 ≡ (2x + 6 ≤ 0) ∧ (5x − 10 > 0) ∨

∨ (2x + 6 ≥ 0) ∧ (5x − 10 < 0) ≡ (x ≤− 3) ∧ (x > 2) ∨ (x ≥− 3) ∧ (x < 2)

.

E

p

= x ∈ R x ≤− 3 ∩ x ∈ R x > 2 ∪

∪ x ∈ R x ≥− 3} ∩ {x ∈ R x < 2 = −∞; − 3 ∩ 2; ∞ ∪ −3; ∞ ∩
∩ −∞; 2 = ∅ ∪ −3; 2 = [ − 3; 2)

. Answer:

E

p

= [ − 3; 2)

.

Example 4. Given a predicate P(x)=(|x-2|<3) in the set R. Find its truth domain E

p

.

Solving.

P x = ( x − 2 < 3) ≡ (x − 2 < 3) ∧ (x − 2 >− 3) ≡

≡ (x < 5) ∧ (x >− 1)

.

E

p

= x ∈ R x < 5 ∧ x >− 1 = x ∈ R x < 5} ∩ x ∈ R x >− 1 =

= −∞; 5 ∩ −1; ∞ = ( − 1; 5)

. Answer:

E

p

= (1; 5)

.

Example 5. Given a predicate

P x = (|2x + 6| ≥ 4)

in the set R. Find its truth domain

E

p

.

Solving.

P x = (|2x + 6| ≥ 4) ≡ (2x + 6 ≥ 4) ∨ (2x + 6 ≤− 4) ≡

≡ (2x ≥− 2) ∨ (2x ≤− 10) ≡ (x ≥− 1) ∨ (x ≤− 5)

.

E

p

= x ∈ R x ≥− 1 ∨ x ≤− 5 = x ∈ R x ≥− 1 ∪ x ∈ R x ≤− 5 =

= −1; ∞ ∪ −∞; − 5 = −∞; − 5 ∪ [ − 1; ∞)

.

Answer:

E

p

= −∞; − 5 ∪ [ − 1; ∞)

.

Example 6. Given the predicates

P x = (x

2

− x ≤ 0)

and

S x = (x ≤ x)

defined on a

set R, find

E

p

= ?

,

E

s

= ?

,

E

p∧s

= ?

,

E

p∨s

= ?

,

E

p⟹s

= ?

,

E

s⟹p

= ?

,

E

p⟺s

= ?


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 03,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1763

Solving.

E

p

= x ∈ R x

2

− x ≤ 0 = x ∈ R x x − 1 ≤ 0 = {x ∈ R|(x ≤ 0) ∧

∧ (x − 1) ≥ 0} ∨ (x − 1 ≤ 0) ∧ (x ≥ 0)} = {x ∈ R|x ≤ 0} ∩ {x ∈ R|x ≥ 1} ∪
∪ x ∈ R x ≤ 1 ∩ x ∈ R x ≥ 0 = −∞; 0 ∩ 1; ∞ ∪ −∞; 1 ∩ 0; ∞ =
= ∅ ∪ 0; 1 = [0; 1]

;

E

p

= [0; 1]

.

E

s

= x ∈ R x ≤ x = x ∈ R x ≥ 0 ∧ x

2

≤ x = x ∈ R x ≥ 0 ∩

∩ x ∈ R x x − 1 ≤ 0 = 0; ∞ ∩ 0; 1 = [0; 1]

.

E

s

= [0; 1]

.

E

p∧s

= E

p

∩ E

s

= 0; 1 ∩ 0; 1 = [0; 1]

E

p∨s

= E

p

∪ E

s

= 0; 1 ∪ 0; 1 = [0; 1]

E

p⟹s

= E

p

∪ E

s

= −∞; 0 ∪ 1; ∞ ∪ 0; 1 = ( − ∞; ∞)

.

E

s⟹p

= ( − ∞; ∞)

.

E

p⟺s

= E

p⟹s

∩ E

s⟹p

= ( − ∞; ∞)

.

The following theorems can be used to teach students how to solve proof problems using

equivalence formulas of predicate algebra.

3- theorem.

(∀x ∈ R)(x ≤ x ⟹ x

2

≤ x)

.

4- theorem.

(∀x ∈ R)(x ≤ x ⟺ x

2

≤ x)

.

5- theorem.

(∀x ∈ ℳ)(P x ⟹ S x ) ⟹ (E

p

⊂ E

s

)

.

6- theorem.

E

p

⊂ E

s

⟹ (∀x ∈ ℳ)(P x ⟹ S x )

.

7- theorem.

(E

p

= E

s

) ⟹ (∀x ∈ ℳ)(P x ⟺ S x )

[6].

The examples and problems discussed above can be used to teach students the

applications of predicate algebra. When students are taught the laws of mathematical logic, rules

of induction, equivalence formulas, and their applications in depth and in detail, their ability to

solve mathematical problems in the simplest ways, quickly, and without errors, will develop.

References:

1.

Kamildjanovich,

M.

B.

(2021).

BO’LAJAK

BOSHLANG’ICH

SINF

O’QITUVCHISINING KASBIY KOMPETENTLIGINI RIVOJLANTIRISH. TA'LIM VA

RIVOJLANISH TAHLILI ONLAYN ILMIY JURNALI, 1(5), 1-7.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 03,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1764

2.

Mamadaliyev, B. K. (2018). SIGNIFICANCE OF CREATIVE TASKS IN PREPARING

CREATIVE-PERFECT STUDENTS. EASTERN EUROPEAN SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL,

(2).

3.

Bazarbaevich, M. K., & Kamildjanovich, M. B. (2021). SOLVING PROBLEMS OF

APPLICATIONS OF COLLECTION THEORY.

4.

Мамадалиев,Б.К.

(2025).

СОВЕРШЕНСТВОВАНИЕ

ПРОГРАММНОГО

ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЯ ДЛЯ РАЗВИТИЯ ТВОРЧЕСКИХ СПОСОБНОСТЕЙ БУДУЩИХ

УЧИТЕЛЕЙ НАЧАЛЬНЫХ КЛАССОВ. JOURNAL OF NEW CENTURY

INNOVATIONS, 71(1), 234-237.

5. Ахунджанов, И. М. (2025). ГЕЙМИФИКАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАНИИ: СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ

ТЕНДЕНЦИИ. Global Science Review, 2(1), 87-91.

6. Ахунджанов, И. М. (2025). ГЕЙМИФИКАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАНИИ: ВНЕДРЕНИЕ НА

УРОКАХ

НАЧАЛЬНОГО

ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ.

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ

НАУКА

И

ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ, 64(1), 298-302.

7. Maratovich, A. I. (2025). BOSHLANG ‘ICH TA'LIM TALABALARINI TA'LIMIY

GEYMIFIKATSIYA ELEMENTLARIDAN FOYDALANISH KO ‘NIKMALARINI

SHAKLLANTIRISH

TEXNOLOGIYASI.

JOURNAL

OF

NEW

CENTURY

INNOVATIONS, 72(1), 144-146.

8. Qodirjon o’g’li, S. I. (2025). MILLIY TARBIYA ASOSLARI. ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И

ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ, 64(2), 38-42.

References

Kamildjanovich, M. B. (2021). BO’LAJAK BOSHLANG’ICH SINF O’QITUVCHISINING KASBIY KOMPETENTLIGINI RIVOJLANTIRISH. TA'LIM VA RIVOJLANISH TAHLILI ONLAYN ILMIY JURNALI, 1(5), 1-7.

Mamadaliyev, B. K. (2018). SIGNIFICANCE OF CREATIVE TASKS IN PREPARING CREATIVE-PERFECT STUDENTS. EASTERN EUROPEAN SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL, (2).

Bazarbaevich, M. K., & Kamildjanovich, M. B. (2021). SOLVING PROBLEMS OF APPLICATIONS OF COLLECTION THEORY.

Мамадалиев,Б.К. (2025). СОВЕРШЕНСТВОВАНИЕ ПРОГРАММНОГО ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЯ ДЛЯ РАЗВИТИЯ ТВОРЧЕСКИХ СПОСОБНОСТЕЙ БУДУЩИХ УЧИТЕЛЕЙ НАЧАЛЬНЫХ КЛАССОВ. JOURNAL OF NEW CENTURY INNOVATIONS, 71(1), 234-237.

Ахунджанов, И. М. (2025). ГЕЙМИФИКАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАНИИ: СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ. Global Science Review, 2(1), 87-91.

Ахунджанов, И. М. (2025). ГЕЙМИФИКАЦИЯ В ОБРАЗОВАНИИ: ВНЕДРЕНИЕ НА УРОКАХ НАЧАЛЬНОГО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ. ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ, 64(1), 298-302.

Maratovich, A. I. (2025). BOSHLANG ‘ICH TA'LIM TALABALARINI TA'LIMIY GEYMIFIKATSIYA ELEMENTLARIDAN FOYDALANISH KO ‘NIKMALARINI SHAKLLANTIRISH TEXNOLOGIYASI. JOURNAL OF NEW CENTURY INNOVATIONS, 72(1), 144-146.

Qodirjon o’g’li, S. I. (2025). MILLIY TARBIYA ASOSLARI. ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ, 64(2), 38-42.