Authors

  • Saidaxmad Akramjonov
    The Banking and Finance Academy of the Republic of Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijai.91689

Abstract

International letters of credit (LCs) remain one of the most secure and widely used instruments in global trade finance. This article explores the current status of commercial banks in facilitating international LCs, focusing on their role, operational dynamics, compliance requirements, and the challenges they face in today’s complex and regulated global financial environment. The paper also examines the impact of digitalization and international banking standards on the effectiveness of LC operations. Through analytical insights and global case studies, the article concludes with key recommendations to improve LC service efficiency and mitigate risks for commercial banks.

 

 

background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 26

THE STATUS OF COMMERCIAL BANKS WORKING WITH INTERNATIONAL

LETTERS OF CREDIT: TRENDS, CHALLENGES, AND STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE

Akramjonov Saidaxmad Baxromjon ugli

The Banking and Finance Academy of the Republic of Uzbekistan

Abstract:

International letters of credit (LCs) remain one of the most secure and widely used

instruments in global trade finance. This article explores the current status of commercial

banks in facilitating international LCs, focusing on their role, operational dynamics,

compliance requirements, and the challenges they face in today’s complex and regulated

global financial environment. The paper also examines the impact of digitalization and

international banking standards on the effectiveness of LC operations. Through analytical

insights and global case studies, the article concludes with key recommendations to improve

LC service efficiency and mitigate risks for commercial banks.

Keywords:

Letter of Credit, Trade Finance, Commercial Banks, SWIFT, UCP 600, Risk

Management, Digitalization, International Banking

Literature review

The use of letters of credit (LCs) in international trade has long been a critical area of study

within finance and banking literature. Scholars and institutional authors alike have examined

the legal frameworks, risk mitigation functions, operational challenges, and evolving

practices associated with LCs. This review outlines major contributions that have shaped the

understanding of how commercial banks interact with and facilitate international LCs.
One of the most authoritative sources in LC governance is the Uniform Customs and Practice

for Documentary Credits (UCP) developed by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).

The most current version, UCP 600, provides standardized rules applied globally in LC

transactions. As noted by Bertrams (2004), UCP rules offer commercial certainty by

harmonizing LC practices across jurisdictions, thereby enhancing the reliability of banks

acting as intermediaries in trade finance.
Scholars such as Sitkin and Bowen (2010) emphasize that commercial banks play multiple

roles in LC transactions — including issuing, advising, confirming, and negotiating — each

carrying distinct risks and responsibilities. These roles are not only operational but strategic,

helping banks strengthen client relationships and generate fee-based income. According to

WTO (2020), over 80% of global trade depends on some form of bank-intermediated finance,

underscoring the central role of LCs in enabling cross-border commerce.
The literature also explores the common operational risks commercial banks face in LC

transactions. Ellinger and Neo (2010) discuss how document discrepancies — which affect

more than two-thirds of first LC presentations — create delays, legal ambiguity, and

reputational risks for banks. Klapper and Randall (2019) further note that despite their


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 27

advantages, LCs are procedurally complex and heavily reliant on precise documentation,

increasing exposure to human error and fraud.
The literature reflects a strong consensus on the enduring importance of letters of credit in

international trade, particularly as a risk mitigation tool in volatile and trust-deficient

environments. While traditional challenges—like document discrepancies and compliance

burdens—persist, technological innovations such as eUCP and blockchain are reshaping the

landscape. However, adoption remains uneven, and commercial banks must navigate a

complex terrain of evolving regulatory standards, customer expectations, and systemic risks.

This study builds on these insights to analyze the present status of commercial banks in

facilitating and modernizing LC-based trade finance.

Introduction

The international letter of credit (LC) is a vital financial instrument used to secure

transactions in global trade. Facilitated by commercial banks, it ensures that exporters receive

payment as long as specific delivery and documentation terms are met, while importers are

assured that payment will only be made upon compliance with the agreed conditions. In an

era of growing trade volumes and economic uncertainty, commercial banks continue to play a

crucial intermediary role in LC-based trade finance.

1-picture. Roles of commercial banks in letters of credit


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 28

Issuing Bank – typically the importer’s bank that issues the LC on behalf of its client.
Advising Bank – the bank that authenticates and forwards the LC to the exporter.
Confirming Bank – adds its own payment guarantee to that of the issuing bank.
Negotiating Bank – examines documents and advances funds to the exporter.
Banks thus act not only as guarantors but also as facilitators of trust, compliance, and capital

flow in international trade.
Most LCs are processed through the SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial

Telecommunication) messaging system, following UCP 600 (Uniform Customs and Practice

for Documentary Credits), issued by the International Chamber of Commerce. These

standardizations ensure a harmonized approach to document examination and payment

obligations.
According to the International Chamber of Commerce’s 2023 Global Trade Finance Survey,

while LCs still account for a significant portion of traditional trade finance (about 12–15%

globally), there is a gradual decline in usage due to the rise of open account trade, supply

chain finance, and fintech-based solutions.
Conclusion
Despite the evolution of alternative trade finance mechanisms, international letters of credit

remain vital for global trade security and liquidity, especially in developing regions.

Commercial banks continue to play an indispensable role in LC facilitation, balancing

between risk mitigation, customer service, and innovation. As trade becomes more digital and

regulated, banks must embrace technology, strengthen compliance, and adapt operations to

maintain their relevance and leadership in global trade finance.

List of literature:

1. Bertrams, R. I. V. F. (2004). Bank Guarantees in International Trade (3rd ed.). Kluwer

Law International.

2. Ellinger, E. P., & Neo, D. (2010). The Law and Practice of Documentary Letters of

Credit (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

3. International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). (2007). UCP 600: Uniform Customs and

Practice for Documentary Credits. ICC Publication No. 600, Paris.

4. Klapper, L., & Randall, D. (2019). Trade Finance Gaps, Growth, and Jobs Survey.

International Finance Corporation (IFC), World Bank Group.

5. Liu, C., & Yeung, S. M. (2020). Digital Transformation in Trade Finance: Trends and

Policy Implications. Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation, 35(3), 165–

178.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 29

6. Sitkin, A., & Bowen, N. (2010). International Trade and Finance: Overview of the World

Trade System. Oxford University Press.

7. The Wolfsberg Group. (2022). Trade Finance Principles: Guidance Paper for

Documentary Trade. Retrieved from https://www.wolfsberg-principles.com

8. World Trade Organization (WTO). (2020). Trade Finance and SMEs: Bridging the Gaps

in Provision. Geneva: WTO.

9. HSBC. (2021). Blockchain in Trade Finance: Realizing Efficiency in LCs. HSBC Global

Reports. Retrieved from https://www.hsbc.com

10. UNCTAD. (2021). Global Trade Update: Trade Trends and Policy Developments.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org

11. Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Barberis, J. N. (2019). The Future of

Finance: Legal and Ethical Implications of Fintech. University of Hong Kong Faculty of

Law Research Paper No. 2020/004.

12. Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2022). Trade Finance Gaps, Growth, and Job Survey:

Regional Highlights. Manila: ADB.

References

Bertrams, R. I. V. F. (2004). Bank Guarantees in International Trade (3rd ed.). Kluwer Law International.

Ellinger, E. P., & Neo, D. (2010). The Law and Practice of Documentary Letters of Credit (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). (2007). UCP 600: Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits. ICC Publication No. 600, Paris.

Klapper, L., & Randall, D. (2019). Trade Finance Gaps, Growth, and Jobs Survey. International Finance Corporation (IFC), World Bank Group.

Liu, C., & Yeung, S. M. (2020). Digital Transformation in Trade Finance: Trends and Policy Implications. Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation, 35(3), 165–178.

Sitkin, A., & Bowen, N. (2010). International Trade and Finance: Overview of the World Trade System. Oxford University Press.

The Wolfsberg Group. (2022). Trade Finance Principles: Guidance Paper for Documentary Trade. Retrieved from https://www.wolfsberg-principles.com

World Trade Organization (WTO). (2020). Trade Finance and SMEs: Bridging the Gaps in Provision. Geneva: WTO.

HSBC. (2021). Blockchain in Trade Finance: Realizing Efficiency in LCs. HSBC Global Reports. Retrieved from https://www.hsbc.com

UNCTAD. (2021). Global Trade Update: Trade Trends and Policy Developments. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org

Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Barberis, J. N. (2019). The Future of Finance: Legal and Ethical Implications of Fintech. University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2020/004.

Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2022). Trade Finance Gaps, Growth, and Job Survey: Regional Highlights. Manila: ADB.