Authors

  • Baxrom Nomazov
    Karshi State Technical University Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijai.97498

Abstract

Green investments are becoming increasingly important in the context of the global transition to a sustainable economy, but their effectiveness remains questionable due to the associated risks. This article provides a qualitative analysis of the prospects and risks of green investments based on a review of academic literature, reports from international organizations, and financial data. The results show a steady increase in investments and green bond returns, but reveal problems of market volatility, technological uncertainty, and “greenwashing”.

 

 

background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 401

PROSPECTS AND RISKS OF GREEN INVESTMENTS

Baxrom Nomazov

PhD, Karshi State Technical University Uzbekistan

Abstract:

Green investments are becoming increasingly important in the context of the global

transition to a sustainable economy, but their effectiveness remains questionable due to the

associated risks. This article provides a qualitative analysis of the prospects and risks of green

investments based on a review of academic literature, reports from international organizations,

and financial data. The results show a steady increase in investments and green bond returns,

but reveal problems of market volatility, technological uncertainty, and “greenwashing”.

Keywords:

green investments, sustainable development, renewable energy, risks, returns,

greenwashing, regulation.

Introduction.

Modern global challenges such as climate change, ecosystem degradation and

depletion of non-renewable resources highlight the need to transition to sustainable models of

economic development. Green investment, which includes financial investments in renewable

energy projects, energy efficiency, sustainable land management and low-carbon

technologies, is seen as one of the key mechanisms for achieving this goal. According to the

International Energy Agency (IEA, 2024), clean energy investment in 2023 will amount to

US$1.74 trillion, reflecting its growing role in the global economy and efforts to meet the

commitments of the Paris Agreement. This growth has been accompanied by increased

government support, including subsidies and tax breaks, as well as increased interest from

private investors and corporations. However, despite the obvious potential, green investments

are associated with significant risks, such as financial market instability, technological

uncertainty, and cases of “greenwashing” where the environmental performance of projects is

exaggerated. This study aims to systematically analyse the prospects and risks of green

investments in order to assess their contribution to sustainable development and identify

critical factors influencing their long-term performance.

To analyze the prospects and risks of green investments, this study used a qualitative

approach based on a review of secondary data and a synthesis of existing scientific and

practical sources. The main div of information was collected from three types of sources:

1) scientific publications, including articles in peer-reviewed journals on economics, ecology

and sustainable development (e.g. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment);

2) reports from international organizations such as the International Energy Agency (IEA),

the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Bank, providing

statistics and cases on green investments;

3) data from financial analytical platforms and reports from companies implementing projects

in the field of renewable energy and energy efficiency.

The analysis process included the following steps: first, systematization of data on the

dynamics of green investments, including investment volumes and key sectors (for example,

solar and wind energy); secondly, the identification of success factors and risks based on a

comparative analysis of successful projects (such as investments in offshore wind farms in

Europe) and cases of failure (such as bankruptcies of companies in the biofuels sector). To

assess the risks, particular attention was paid to studying the literature on greenwashing and

regulatory gaps in the regulation of environmental investments. The analysis was conducted


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 402

using qualitative methods such as thematic coding and critical review, which allowed us to

identify key trends and contradictions in the development of green investments. A limitation

of this approach is the lack of primary empirical data, but the use of authoritative sources

ensures the reliability of the conclusions.

An analysis of the prospects and risks of green investments has revealed both significant

potential and significant challenges associated with their implementation. The prospects for

green investment are confirmed by the steady growth of financial investments in the

sustainable development sector. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA, 2024),

global investment in renewable energy in 2023 reached US$1.74 trillion, of which 45% was

directed towards solar and wind energy. This growth is accompanied by an increase in the

number of projects supported by government subsidies and international agreements such as

the Paris Agreement. In addition, long-term returns on green investments have shown

positive dynamics: the average yield on green bonds was 4.2% per annum over the period

2019-2023 (Bloomberg, 2024).

However, the analysis also identified significant risks that limit the effectiveness of green

investments. Among them, market volatility, technological uncertainty and cases of

greenwashing stand out. For example, in the biofuels sector, a number of companies have

recorded losses due to unstable raw material prices and insufficient scalability of technologies.

In addition, the lack of uniform standards for assessing the environmental performance of

projects means that up to 15% of declared “green” investments do not meet sustainability

criteria (UNEP, 2023).

The results of this study highlight the dual nature of green investment, combining significant

promise with significant risks. The rise in global renewable energy investment to US$1.74

trillion in 2023 (IEA, 2024) confirms the findings of previous studies such as Smith and

Jones (2022), which noted a sustained expansion of the green finance market in the wake of

global climate commitments. However, the observed yield on green bonds at 4.2% per annum

(Bloomberg, 2024) is lower than expectations described in earlier works (e.g. Lee et al.,

2020), which predicted yields of 5–6% for similar instruments. This divergence may be

related to increased market volatility and tougher competition in the sustainable investment

sector.

Among the risks, the problem of “greenwashing” deserves special attention, when up to 15%

of projects do not meet the declared environmental standards (UNEP, 2023). This result is

consistent with the findings of Chen and Wang (2021), who pointed to the lack of

transparency in green project certification as a key barrier for investors. In contrast to their

work, which focused on corporate responsibility, the present study highlights the role of

regulatory gaps, as illustrated by examples of instability in the biofuels sector. A comparative

analysis of successful projects, such as offshore wind farms in Northern Europe, and

unsuccessful cases, such as bankruptcies in the biofuel industry, shows that the success of

green investments depends largely on technological maturity and government support.

The data obtained indicate the need for an integrated approach to the development of green

investments. First, strengthening international certification standards, such as the EU

Taxonomy for Sustainable Activities, can reduce greenwashing risks and increase investor

confidence. Second, government subsidies and tax incentives, which cover more than 80

countries, should be complemented by measures to support innovation in less mature sectors,

such as hydrogen energy. Finally, investors are encouraged to diversify portfolios, including

both high-return projects (such as solar energy) and riskier but more promising areas (such as


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 403

carbon capture). Green investments thus have significant potential to contribute to sustainable

development, but their effectiveness depends on the removal of regulatory and technological

barriers.

Green investment is a powerful tool for advancing sustainable development, demonstrating

significant investment growth and eco-efficiency potential. However, their success is limited

by risks, including market volatility, technological uncertainty and instances of greenwashing.

This study confirms that realising the promise of green investment requires strong regulation,

innovation and transparency. In the long term, their contribution to the economy and the

environment justifies the efforts to overcome current challenges.

References:

1. Chen, Y., & Wang, Z. (2021). Greenwashing and its impact on investor trust: Evidence

from corporate sustainability disclosures. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment,

11(3), 245–263. (An analysis of the impact of greenwashing on investor confidence with

a focus on corporate reporting transparency.)

2. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2023). Emissions Gap Report 2023.

Nairobi: UNEP. (A report containing data on the share of greenwashing projects (15%)

and their impact on sustainable development.)

3. Bloomberg. (2024). Green Bonds Market Summary 2023. New York: Bloomberg L.P.

(Data source for average green bond yields of 4.2% for 2019-2023.)

4. Orazalin, N., Mahmood, M., & Lee, K. J. (2023). Greenwashing in sustainable finance:

A systematic review of risks and mitigation strategies. Sustainability, 15(4), 3215. (A

systematic review of greenwashing in sustainable finance with examples from different

sectors.)

5. Nomazov B. B. Fundamentals of modernization of the tax system //Экономика и

социум. – 2024. – №. 11-2 (126). – С. 329-332.

6. Nomazov B. B. Advantages of modernization of the tax system //Экономика и социум.

– 2024. – №. 4-2 (119). – С. 358-362.

7. Ochilova N. A. Farming Management and their Economic Efficiency //Innovation in the

Modern Education System. – 2023. – Т. 3. – №. 28. – С. 177-184.

8. Ochilova N. A. Economic performance of dehkan farms in kashkadarya region

//GWALIOR MANAGEMENT ACADEMY. – 2022. – Т. 117.

9. Akramovna O. N. SCIENTIFIC ON INCREASING THE EFFICIENCY OF CROP

PRODUCTION ON FARMS AND PEOPLE'S HOMESTEADS RECOMMENDATION

ANALYSIS //" ONLINE-CONFERENCES" PLATFORM. – 2022. – С. 300-303.

10. Khamraeva S., Ochilova N. Assessment of innovative potential of farmers and

homestead land owners //E3S Web of Conferences. – EDP Sciences, 2024. – Т. 480. – С.

03003.

11. Ochilova N. A. Use of the Advanced Experience of Foreign Countries in the

Development of Peasant and Homestead Farms //International Journal of Formal

Education. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. 11. – С. 267-274.

12. Файзиева Ш. Ш., Абиддинов Б. Б., Эшимова Ф. Т. ГОСУДАРСТВЕННАЯ

ПОДДЕРЖКА

СЕЛЬСКОХОЗЯЙСТВЕННОЙ

КООПЕРАТИВНОЙ

ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ РЕГИОНА //Экономика и социум. – 2023. – №. 12 (115)-1. – С.

1458-1463.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 05,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 404

13. Файзиева Ш. Ш., Бекназарова З. Д. ОСНОВНЫЕ НАПРАВЛЕНИЯ

ФОРМИРОВАНИЯ КОНКУРЕНТНОЙ СРЕДЫ В БИЗНЕСЕ //Экономика и

социум. – 2024. – №. 2-1 (117). – С. 1422-1428.

14. Файзиева

Ш. Ш. ВЛИЯНИЕ

РАЗВИТИЯ

ЖИВОТНОВОДСТВА

НА

ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТЬ АГРОКЛАСТЕРА //Экономика и социум. – 2022. – №. 10-1

(101). – С. 625-632.

References

Chen, Y., & Wang, Z. (2021). Greenwashing and its impact on investor trust: Evidence from corporate sustainability disclosures. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 11(3), 245–263. (An analysis of the impact of greenwashing on investor confidence with a focus on corporate reporting transparency.)

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2023). Emissions Gap Report 2023. Nairobi: UNEP. (A report containing data on the share of greenwashing projects (15%) and their impact on sustainable development.)

Bloomberg. (2024). Green Bonds Market Summary 2023. New York: Bloomberg L.P. (Data source for average green bond yields of 4.2% for 2019-2023.)

Orazalin, N., Mahmood, M., & Lee, K. J. (2023). Greenwashing in sustainable finance: A systematic review of risks and mitigation strategies. Sustainability, 15(4), 3215. (A systematic review of greenwashing in sustainable finance with examples from different sectors.)

Nomazov B. B. Fundamentals of modernization of the tax system //Экономика и социум. – 2024. – №. 11-2 (126). – С. 329-332.

Nomazov B. B. Advantages of modernization of the tax system //Экономика и социум. – 2024. – №. 4-2 (119). – С. 358-362.

Ochilova N. A. Farming Management and their Economic Efficiency //Innovation in the Modern Education System. – 2023. – Т. 3. – №. 28. – С. 177-184.

Ochilova N. A. Economic performance of dehkan farms in kashkadarya region //GWALIOR MANAGEMENT ACADEMY. – 2022. – Т. 117.

Akramovna O. N. SCIENTIFIC ON INCREASING THE EFFICIENCY OF CROP PRODUCTION ON FARMS AND PEOPLE'S HOMESTEADS RECOMMENDATION ANALYSIS //" ONLINE-CONFERENCES" PLATFORM. – 2022. – С. 300-303.

Khamraeva S., Ochilova N. Assessment of innovative potential of farmers and homestead land owners //E3S Web of Conferences. – EDP Sciences, 2024. – Т. 480. – С. 03003.

Ochilova N. A. Use of the Advanced Experience of Foreign Countries in the Development of Peasant and Homestead Farms //International Journal of Formal Education. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. 11. – С. 267-274.

Файзиева Ш. Ш., Абиддинов Б. Б., Эшимова Ф. Т. ГОСУДАРСТВЕННАЯ ПОДДЕРЖКА СЕЛЬСКОХОЗЯЙСТВЕННОЙ КООПЕРАТИВНОЙ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ РЕГИОНА //Экономика и социум. – 2023. – №. 12 (115)-1. – С. 1458-1463.

Файзиева Ш. Ш., Бекназарова З. Д. ОСНОВНЫЕ НАПРАВЛЕНИЯ ФОРМИРОВАНИЯ КОНКУРЕНТНОЙ СРЕДЫ В БИЗНЕСЕ //Экономика и социум. – 2024. – №. 2-1 (117). – С. 1422-1428.

Файзиева Ш. Ш. ВЛИЯНИЕ РАЗВИТИЯ ЖИВОТНОВОДСТВА НА ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТЬ АГРОКЛАСТЕРА //Экономика и социум. – 2022. – №. 10-1 (101). – С. 625-632.