Volume 03 Issue 11-2023
34
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
11
Pages:
34-39
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.478
)
(2022:
5.636
)
(2023:
6.741
)
OCLC
–
1368736135
A
BSTRACT
In our country, the importance of future foreign language teachers’ development of “fact
-
checking” skills,
information security skills, ideological immunity, analytical and critical attitude to information is becoming
more and more relevant. Based on this, this article theoretically explains the provision of information-
psychological security in translation materials and the increasing social necessity of it by the formation
and development of “fact
-
checking” skills of foreign language teachers.
K
EYWORDS
“
Fact-
checking”, social necessity, information, information
- psychological safety, methods of ensuring
information security, national mentality, national education, information space.
I
NTRODUCTION
Forming an analytical and critical attitude of
learners to information, protection from the
influence
of
harmful
information
and
interrelationship
of
national
mentality,
Journal
Website:
http://sciencebring.co
m/index.php/ijasr
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Research Article
ENSURING INFORMATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL SECURITY
OF TRANSLATED MATERIALS BY DEVELOPING FOREIGN
LANGUAGE TEACHERS’ “FACT
-
CHECKING” SKILLS
Submission Date:
November 05, 2023,
Accepted Date:
November 10, 2023,
Published Date:
November 15, 2023
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijasr-03-11-07
Khojaeva Malikakhon Nosirjon Qizi
Tashkent State University Of Uzbek Language And Literature Named After Alisher Navoi, Faculty Of
Translation Theory And Practice, Teacher Of The Department Of English Language, Uzbekistan
Volume 03 Issue 11-2023
35
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
11
Pages:
34-39
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.478
)
(2022:
5.636
)
(2023:
6.741
)
OCLC
–
1368736135
improvement of pedagogical mechanisms of
protection of future specialists from the influence
of harmful information on the basis of national
education, development of moral-prophylactic
technologies for the development of “fact
-
checking” skills among
them is important for all
developed countries, including the national
education system of Uzbekistan.
By the 21st century, the momentum
characteristic of the development of information
technologies has moved to the activities of the
mass media and the processes of information
exchange through it. As a result, the event that
happened in a certain place is reaching
information consumers within seconds. This
promptness created an interactive environment
in the society, and the population also had the
opportunity to participate equally in the
information exchange processes. Usually,
consumers of information do not always think
about whether the information they receive or
transmit is correct or incorrect, and do not pay
attention to checking it. In this society, false
information
–
“fake” is increasing [1].
Recently, in the system of social sciences,
scientists and journalists, experts in information
security have been seriously dealing with the
problem of “fake news”. It should be noted that,
until now, no serious literature has been created
on the issue of “fake news” in Uzbekistan, despite
the few graduation qualification theses and
master’s dissertations written in journalism
majors or various trainings, seminars and
trainings organized for media workers.
“Tod
ay, in the legislation of Uzbekistan, there are
norms on protection of human honor, dignity and
business reputation of the Civil Code, and
“Defamation” norms in the Administrative and
Criminal Codes. In Uzbekistan, the guilty usually
get away with fines, the court rarely imposes
prison sentences. “Basically, the punishment is
applied to those who insulted a person in public
and spread slander about him,” says Ishakov. But
based on today's laws, everyone involved in the
spread of false information should be held
accountable, even ordinary citizens who like and
post offensive or false information on their page.
This practice is used in many countries. For
example, in Russia, lawyer Yuriy Ivanov was
found guilty of reposting an article about the
Second World War with Nazi symbols, and in
2018 he was fined 1,000 rubles. In Uzbekistan,
punishment for reposts is still not applied. Only
the author of the fake can be held responsible.
Volume 03 Issue 11-2023
36
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
11
Pages:
34-39
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.478
)
(2022:
5.636
)
(2023:
6.741
)
OCLC
–
1368736135
Users actively commenting, liking, and reposting
them remain unpunished, although, from a legal
point of view, such actions can be evaluated as
efforts to spread unverified information affecting
public institutions, people's lives and safety. On
the other hand, there is no way to deal with
people who support the content of questionable
content. Because of this, you see, there is a legal
tool, the methods of its use have not been
established, because there are ambiguities in the
legal framework.
At the same time, there is also the problem of
searching for an evidence base. The fact is that the
majority of fakes are spread through the Internet,
where it is not always possible to find the source.
In most cases, as soon as the material becomes
"viral", the author removes it from his page
intending to block the source. Therefore, it is
more difficult to catch evil, and it is up to the
victim to prove that the law has been broken.
There is no need to impose additional liability for
fake news propaganda. There is no way to
completely clean the Internet of such content.
“Then what should be done?”
the question arises.
First, it is necessary to improve the existing
mechanism against Internet provocations.
Secondly, it is necessary to control the authors of
fake news more actively [2]. This does not mean
holding everyone accountable one after the other.
The court should deal with those who
intentionally organize conspiracies in society,
whose actions lead to certain negative
consequences.
Experience
shows
that
prosecution is an effective discipline.
From a legal point of view, the conflict between
the mass media of two countries (which we can
observe in the case of Russia and Ukraine) can be
resolved only through an international, for
example, UN court. However, practice shows that
the UN has the right to have any opinion in such
situations, and whether it is true or false, it does
not matter. Because in most cases they agree to be
deceived. Psychologist Ulyana Pereplyotchikova
told UzJournal [3] that certain types of people
cannot stand fake news and that it is easy to
manipulate them. “One day I receiv
ed a message
from a 'friend' who decided to protect me from
danger, in which he shared with me the attention-
grabbing news headlined: “Bananas are infected
with HIV.” I urged him not to spread this
fabrication because it has no basis and told him
briefly about the ways HIV is spread. But my
interlocutor insisted on his words and said, “If
you don't believe, don't believe. “You are alert, so
Volume 03 Issue 11-2023
37
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
11
Pages:
34-39
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.478
)
(2022:
5.636
)
(2023:
6.741
)
OCLC
–
1368736135
you are armed”, the psychologist said.
“Unfortunately, there are many people who want
to share false but attractive information. Who are
these people? Why do they do this? In other
words, it could be you and us. Think back, when
was the last time you searched for a source of
information when you wanted to share some
news? Links, scientific articles, reliable primary
data?
Rarely. Many people say “I don't have time
to deal with this”, “What do I have to do?”, “Where
do I look for something?” and so on. This is not
about people who are engaged in such business,
tricks, money, advertising, anti-
advertising. I’m
talking about those who sincerely rush to warn,
save, help”.
Basically, these are those who consider any
opinion other than their own to be authoritative,
those who are subject to other people's opinions
and do not believe in their own strength. These
are people who are suffering, who cannot be free
from fear, who live in constant anxiety. In
addition, those who want to be involved in
important events, because only in this way they
feel their importance. In part, they make a
statement about themselves in this way, but they
spread messages created by others for fear of
criticism and discrimination. Very trusting and
sensitive people are also active in this kind of
work. There are also people who lack bright
impressions in their lives, and they find the
amount of adrenaline they lack by spreading
various rumors and rumors.
Consumers of today’s fake news
-infested social
networks and news sites are divided into two
categories. Some do not care about various
“attractive” publications, while others believe
everything is written and even help to distribute
them. Unfortunately, there are many of them.
How to avoid becoming a victim of fake news
creators and their willing helpers? Advice to
readers of the news is to recheck their reliability,
consult with experts in the relevant fields, ask
yourself whether you want to become a victim of
someone's tricks or not. And those who seek to
“warn” their acquaintances, relatives and friends
should not only recheck the messages, but also
what prompted them to repost it, do they
understand that with such a step they are taking
responsibility for someone's health, even life, and
even if they want to help, they need to think about
how to do it in the right way that does not harm
anyone.
Today, with the rapid development of Internet
technologies, people are turning more and more
Volume 03 Issue 11-2023
38
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
11
Pages:
34-39
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.478
)
(2022:
5.636
)
(2023:
6.741
)
OCLC
–
1368736135
to the Internet, including social networks, to keep
up with the world of events and world events. A
completely different environment prevails in
social Internet networks: there are no strict rules
and principles of information selection and
distribution typical of traditional mass media, and
information pluralism is significantly stronger.
According to the latest research, 62% of
Americans follow the news through social
networks, and 14% of them consider social
networks to be the main and most important
means of keeping up with the news. By the end of
2016, the number of Facebook users had reached
1.8 billion, and Twitter users had reached 400
million [4]. Today, this number has increased
significantly.
However, Internet technologies cannot always
boast of the reliability of the distributed
information, they can be a convenient tool for the
distribution of false and even false information
along with reliable and correct information. It
cannot be said that false news is always
embellished. For example, during the last US
presidential elections, social networks, which are
popular among the citizens of this country, were
flooded with “slanderous” messages about both
candidates. Research conducted by Cambridge
University scientists shows that 156 of the most
popular social networks have surpassed the
country’s leading news agencies in terms of
audience coverage.
Thus, it can be seen that the Internet is becoming
the most convenient means of spreading lies and
fake news year after year. On the one hand, if
there are no legal rules for accessing information
platforms of social networks and spreading
information on them, on the other hand,
attention-grabbing headlines of fake news
increase interest in them. This, in turn, serves to
increase the income from advertising platforms.
Therefore, this situation is the basis for
describing fake news as a source of wealth, in
addition to fulfilling a political and ideological
function.
From this point of view, it is necessary to study
the state o
f development of “fact
-
checking” skills
of future foreign language teachers, to research
their informational competence in the fields of
specialization, to develop and implement
innovative methods of pedagogical diagnosis.
R
EFERENCES
Volume 03 Issue 11-2023
39
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
11
Pages:
34-39
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.478
)
(2022:
5.636
)
(2023:
6.741
)
OCLC
–
1368736135
1.
Aliev B., Melikulov A. Are you aware of
information attacks? -Tashkent: Spirituality,
2015. -P. 3.
2.
Davronov Z. Scientific knowledge of the
computer //Economics and reporting. -
Tashkent: 2010. #5/6. - P. 59-60.
3.
Information hygiene: why is fake news not
punished
in
Uzbekistan?
https://anhor.uz/uz/society/ahborot-
higienasi-nega-uzbekistonda-feyk-
nyyuschun-zhazolashtey
4.
Gu L. The fake news machine: how
propagandists abuse the internet and
manipulate the public / Threat Encyclopedia.
L.
Gu,
V.
Kropotov,
F.
Yarochkin.
https://www.trendmicro.com
5.
Creation of a Corruption-Free Society in New
Uzbekistan and the Importance of Spiritual
and Enlightenment Reform in this Process
6.
Ismailov T. I. SOCIAL AND LEGAL SOLUTIONS
OF
INSURANCE
MANDATORY
RECOMMENDATIONS //Scientific Bulletin of
Namangan State University. - 2019. - T. 1.
–
no.
3. - P. 152-154.
7.
M. Habibullaev - formation of a civil position
in young people as an effective means of
fighting corruption. News of the National
University, 2022, [1/5] issn
