International Journal Of Literature And Languages
32
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijll
VOLUME
Vol.05 Issue05 2025
PAGE NO.
32-34
10.37547/ijll/Volume05Issue05-09
Grammatical and Lexical Analysis of Dialects of Uzbek
Turaeva Dildora Anvarovna
3 Course doctoral student (DSc), Uzbekistan
Received:
13 March 2025;
Accepted:
09 April 2025;
Published:
11 May 2025
Abstract:
The article discusses the organization of the examination process for determining the grammatical and
lexical characteristics of territorial words. On the basis of a number of methods in organizing the process of
linguistic expertise of anonymous, problematic correspondence on social networks, it was thought about the
emergence of conclusions and stops that are relevant for the judicial system. As a result of the tsuhuncha of
contactology in Areal linguistics, it has been reported that the mixing of several sister languages and its occurrence
of territorial specificity in speech.
Keywords:
Contactology, dialectal zone, extensional taxonomy, focus dialect, sheva, taxon, text authorization,
authorship expertise, linguistic expertise, dialectology, areal linguistics, linguistic geography.
Introduction:
In Uzbek linguistics, there are developed
directions called dialectology, areal linguistics and
linguistic geography. Each of them has its own mission.
Linguistic geography is a branch of areal linguistics, and
this field studies the history and foundations of the
occurrence of phonetic, grammatical, lexical mixtures
in their speech as a result of the spread of linguistic
phenomena to different regions, the direct grazing of
peoples, their inhabitation in a nomadic way. Through
this, the linguistic geography of the people, that is, the
linguistic Atlas, is formed. By studying the features of
the language, the history of their origin, the perfect and
reliable history of the people is determined. This
branch is relevant for areas such as geography, history,
ethnosociolinguistics, ethnolinguistics. This area wraps
up the territorial features of lexical wealth.
METHODOLOGY
Dialectology is derived from the Greek word dialectos,
which studies the existing dialects and dialects of a
language. Dialect-sheva, logos
—
means doctrine, that
is, a doctrine about sheva.[1: 74] this area deals with
tasks such as the formation of lexical, grammatical,
phonetic
classifications
of
the
dialect,
the
determination of their relationship to the literary
language, the identification of their distribution areas.
In linguistic expertise, the analysis of dialects and
dialects is carried out in texts related to text
authorization. Through this, aspects of the addressee
such as place of residence, age, gender, level of
knowledge, Curry of profession can be identified. It is
equally important in forensic examinations such as
correspondence, authorship. That is, the purpose of
carrying out these examinations is to identify the
author of the anonymous text and, through it, to find
solutions to crimes related to speech that lead to the
benefit of a number of societies.
Analysis of grammatical signs of dialect variants.
This correspondence was taken from the message
“mother beats teacher” of the @portal24_official
profile of the Instagram site. The script is in the krill
Alphabet.
Problem
words:
xotindi,
uzini,
tarbiyalashkerak. Uzini, tarbiyalashkerak
there is a technical error in the words. Since the
correspondence is in the krill Alphabet, the letter o '
may not be present on the keyboard, and it can also be
said that the co-writing of two words was the result of
a desire for quickness, compactness.
In the word xotindi -ni is used in the form of the
agreement -di. The application of-in the form of the
International Journal Of Literature And Languages
33
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijll
International Journal Of Literature And Languages (ISSN: 2771-2834)
proceeds agreement-di, - ti is the scientist S.According
to ashirboyev's interpretation, it is used in all
singarmonistic dialects: tog‘ni ~ тавдь ~
tavdi, yigitlarni
~ джъгъттэрдъ ~ zigittardi, otni ~ атть ~ att'i,
mehnatkashni ~ мъйнэпйкэштъ ~ mijnatkasti. The
variant -
дъ/тъ ~
- di/ - ti is also used in the Fergana
group dialects: uyni-
уйдъ ~ ujdi, ishni ~ ъшть ~ isti . So,
the use of the -di form -ni xotindi in the -di style is
associated with Fergana and its surrounding areas, and
this form helps to reveal the regional characters of the
author of the anonymous text.
Analysis of lexical signs of dialect variants
. Dialect
variants are a not the norm unit, they are considered
territorial delimitation. In linguistic expertise, the
analysis of dialects includes such tasks as identifying
the author of the text, finding regional characters,
semantic analysis of units that negatively affect the
rights and interests of mankind in correspondence. For
example, the following correspondence is in the social
network Instagram, @kun.uz the profile was taken
from a message on the topic “imprisonment for eating
ice cream of a mother's child in the United States:
Writing form-electronic printing;
Type of writing-in the Latin alphabet;
Problem units: xolat, bo’sa, bormi;
Semantic expression: desire, analogy.
Does it have the word attract attention. It has a lexical
meaning-to be, to exist. In the sentence, however, the
concept is not necessarily expressed. -mi was an
interrogation-surprise burden that also did not serve as
a interrogator in the sentence. This unit is a dialect-
related word used in and around Tashkent, which is
equivalent to the concepts of qani in the literary
language, edi when it was. In addition there is a spelling
error in the word xolat: instead of the h throat
exclamation, the x deep tongue back exclamation is
used. S.Ashirboyev believes that the H consonant
adapts to the physiological nature of the x consonant in
most dialects, but in northern Uzbek dialects, Kipchak
dialects, it has a consonant pronunciation . In the case
of bo’sa, it is written on the basis of the phonetic
phenomenon of the fall of the consonant l from the
stem. Semantic expression in a sentence has the nature
of desire, comparison. Because the topic of the
message was about the state of the United States, the
addressee put the states of Uzbekistan and the United
States in a parallel relationship. This means that
comparison, comparison, comparison represent modal
characters.
In Areal linguistics, there is a concept called
contactology, which means that a particular language is
in contact with another language, with its dialects. In
particular, a deeper study of the features of the
Bukhara dialectal zone shows that, in addition to its
internal features, external factors are also important.
As you know, this zone has a complex linguistic
composition. Bukhara City, a number of surrounding
districts: Kogon, Gijduvon, Vobkent and others Tajik,
Olot, Karakul and some village dialects belong to the
Oghuz dialect, while a number of dialects are qarluq
dialects. The area is also strongly influenced by the
Turkmen language, but it is now weakened. In this
place, the function of a heterogeneous taxon is
performed by Tajik and Turkmen languages . For
example, in words such as zubonsho’rvo, gashtakoshi,
gap-gashtak, the influence of Tajik is felt. Zubon is a
language meaning equivalent to the essence of a soup
ma
de from zubonsho’rvo language. Gashtak means to
wander in Tajik. The meaning of the word Gap-gashtak
is equivalent to the ceremonial name of the women's
procession.
CONCLUSION
In general, the analysis of territorial units is typical for
anonymous texts. This process is of criminalistic
importance and is carried out in the coherence of
authorology and linguistic expertise. In this case, the
expertise of authorship is concerned with identifying
the author of the text and distinguishing between
identifiable characters. And in the process of linguistic
expertise, text authorization is determined, and the
colloquial purpose of the addressee in the
correspondence is analyzed: units that negatively affect
human rights, such as calling, slander, threat, insult,
manipulation. In the process of examination, the text is
analyzed
phonetically,
lexically,
grammatically,
syntactically, stylistically. Both examinations serve
equally in the fact that the analysis has a perfect
solution.
REFERENCES
Ashirboyev Samixon. 0‘zbek dıalektologıyası // darslik
// Т.: Navro’z nashriyoti, 2016.
-136 b.
Mengliyev B.R., Toʻrayeva D.A. Methods of linguistic
examination by anonymous letters in the uzbek
language // Berlin Studies Transnational Journal of
Science
and
Humanities.
http://berlinstudies.de/index.php/berlinstudies/articl
e/v iew/29/29Volume 1, Issue 1.2,
–
Berlin, 2021.
Pages: 101-105.
International Journal Of Literature And Languages
34
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijll
International Journal Of Literature And Languages (ISSN: 2771-2834)
Saidov Y. O’zbek dialektologiyasi: o’quv qo’llanma, —
Buxoro : "Sadriddin Salim Buxoriy" Durdona nashriyoti,
2022. - 74 b.
Ashirboyev S. Areal lingvistikada takson tushunchasi
talqini. Oltin bitiglar
—
Golden scripts 2021/1 ISSN
2181-9238, - b.119-133.
Джураев, А.Б. Теоретические основы ареалного
исследования узбекоязычного массива.
Ташкент:
Фан. 1991.
Nabiyeva D.A., Zokirova H.R. O‘zbek tili fonetikasi.
o‘quv
-
uslubiy qo‘llanma. –
Andijon, 2016.
–
b. 6. (105)
Шоабдураҳмонов Ш. Ўзбек адабий тили ва халқ
шевалари.
-
Тошкент, 1962. –Б.128.
Toʻrayeva D.A. Oʻzbek tilidagi shaxsiy
yozishmalarda
noadabiy fonetik unsurlarning lingvistik ekspertizasi
//Til va adabiyot ta’limi. –
Toshkent, 2021. № 6. –
B. 17-
19 (10.00.00; № 9).
Musulmonova K.X. O’zbek tili yozma matnlarini
lingvistik ekspertiza qilish jarayoni, bosqichlari va
metodla
ri: Filol. fan bo‘yicha fals.dokt. (PhD)… diss. –
Qo‘qon, 2022. –
132 b.
Toʻrayeva D.A. Shaxs xarakterining nutqda voqelanish
mexanizmi//Soʻz san’ati. Ilmiy jurnal. –
Toshkent, 2020.
№ 1. –
B. 42-
48. (10.00.00; № 31).
Toʻrayeva D.A. Shaxsiy yozishmalarda qoʻllangan
noadabiy undosh tovushlarning hududiy xususiyatlari.
// Oʻzbek amaliy tilshunosligi va lingvodidaktikasi
masalalari. Respublika ilmiy-amaliy anjumani. 2021. 20-
oktabr.
–
B. 67-70.
O‘zbekiston
Respublikasining
Jinoyat
-protsessual
kodeksi, 185-modda.
