Authors

  • Bekmurodov Mansur Bobomurodovich
    Doctor of Sociology, professor, Head of the Department of Sociology and Psychology of Management, Academy of Public Administration under the President Republic of Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijmef/Volume03Issue11-06

Keywords:

Quality management system

Abstract

A developed competitive environment, in turn, becomes important in determining the competitiveness of suppliers of goods and services that require constant improvement of their quality. Functioning in today's rapidly changing market requires a new look at the issue of quality management. In the article, the author examines the features of the quality management system in the management mechanism of higher education institutions; the relationship between the expected results of its implementation and implementation, as well as conducted a sociological study and presented the results of the analysis in order to study the attitude of the faculty and staff of the university to this management resource.


background image

Volume 03 Issue 11-2023

44


International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN

2771-2257)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

44-50

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

705

)

(2022:

5.

705

)

(2023:

7.

448

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

ABSTRACT

A developed competitive environment, in turn, becomes important in determining the competitiveness of suppliers

of goods and services that require constant improvement of their quality. Functioning in today's rapidly changing

market requires a new look at the issue of quality management. In the article, the author examines the features of the

quality management system in the management mechanism of higher education institutions; the relationship

between the expected results of its implementation and implementation, as well as conducted a sociological study

and presented the results of the analysis in order to study the attitude of the faculty and staff of the university to this

management resource.

KEYWORDS

Quality, management, system, higher education institution, teachers, management, survey, respondent, assessment,

consumer.

INTRODUCTION

The development of an integrated system of processes

and information at the international level, increasing

competition in the context of globalization, a sharp

change in the attitude towards social management in a

beneficial way, enhances social adaptation in the

management system. The perfection of the

management of social processes requires the

improvement of the collection system by re-analyzing

the information of the educational system in the

current conditions. The changes taking place in our

Research Article

PROBLEMS OF IMPLEMENTING A SOCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Submission Date:

November 03, 2023,

Accepted Date:

November 08, 2023,

Published Date:

November 13, 2023

Crossref doi:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijmef/Volume03Issue11-06


Bekmurodov Mansur Bobomurodovich

Doctor of Sociology, professor, Head of the Department of Sociology and Psychology of Management,
Academy of Public Administration under the President Republic of Uzbekistan

Journal

Website:

https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijmef

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.


background image

Volume 03 Issue 11-2023

45


International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN

2771-2257)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

44-50

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

705

)

(2022:

5.

705

)

(2023:

7.

448

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

country in recent years reveal a number of

controversial and pressing problems that have a

theoretical and practical nature and are very important

for the development of the educational system. The

issues of theory, methodology and practice of

managing the quality of education in the context of

changing our current society include priority issues.

The search for the scientific foundations of Education

Management, promising approaches, large-scale

educational activities are one of the main tasks of

modernizing the educational system of our republic.

Research methodology. The purposeful management

of society also provides reliable protection for the

nature of our people from irrationalist moods passed

on as a negative legacy from the past, that is, from a

deep lack of perception of reality, from living in a state

of vagrancy without realizing the processes taking

place, changes, external and internal risks, the famous

sociologist scientist in his treatise M.B.Bekmuradov

[4]. Also, if we want to achieve labor efficiency and

sustainable achievement, we must thoroughly study all

the factors affecting it, both positive and negative, and

create the necessary set of measures. In other words,

it is necessary to optimally control labor processes

using complex methods [5], emphasizes prof.

N.S.Alikariev.

Another of the famous sociologists of our republic is

A.Kholbekov [6] management, in his opinion, is an

activity aimed at regulating social relations, it is a

mental activity that is clearly targeted, planned and

consciously organized in order to achieve the highest

result, spending the least amount of tools (time, effort

and reserves) and requiring control. Targeted

management of the masses and the implementation of

these processes on the basis of national interests and

the proportionality of universal principles will create a

solid foundation for the overall intellectual and

aesthetic, socio-economic development, political and

moral stability of the country.

Of the scientists who made a significant contribution

to the development of Management Science in our

country, M.Sharifkhujaev, Ya.Abdullaevs argued that

management is a choice that requires a certain high art

and skill, making a decision based on that choice and

controlling its implementation, and described it as

follows: “management is a proces

s of choice, decision

-

making and control over its implementation” [7].

Academic S.S.Gulomov believes that “management is

a purposeful management method or management

aimed at the effective organization of Labor. In the

current period, management-reflects the various

requirements for management, that is, the method of

work, the ability to carry out work, the art of correctly

directing the movement of people in joint activities and

the requirements for science, the fulfillment of the set

goal without a stri

ct, administrative requirement” [8].

One of the economists, M.Kh. Saidov [9], in his treatise,

states that according to its nature and description,

management activity has the importance of mental

regulation in the life of society. The more science-


background image

Volume 03 Issue 11-2023

46


International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN

2771-2257)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

44-50

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

705

)

(2022:

5.

705

)

(2023:

7.

448

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

technological, economic and social achievements of

humanity increase, the more the demand for

knowledge in management activities will increase

continuously. “The essence of management is to

ensure that the objective and subjective conditions are

in a ratio and relationship that allows to achieve the set

goal”, he thinks.

M.Kh.Saidov says that the important management

goal of a modern leader is to morally raise his

employees to a high level, to turn them into a spiritually

healthy team, and he emphasizes that management is

always an opportunity to rule over people, but

management should be reasonable. The normal

functioning of any organization depends on the correct

distribution of power in the management system. He

believes that the regulated positions in the

management system are an important condition for

the proper functioning of any structure.

G.M.Kasimov believes that “management is the

implementation of work through management,

teaching how business people work, forming a new

management mindset. Management is understood as

the organization, planning, control, coordination of

interaction

within

the

organization,

the

implementation of processes, relationships, actions

through the use of the firm's potential, to achieve the

goal of firms” [10].

Among the pedagogues, R.Kh.Djuraev, S.T.Turgunov,

"educational management is management organized

on a scientific basis, based on a unique hierarchy: a

leader, a pedagogical team, a team of learners”.

Accordingly, management can be implemented on the

basis of different models: an integrated model, the first

level is management of the activities of the

pedagogical team, and the second level is

management of students' [11]. The need for

management is related to the dynamics of the

managed system. As the management theory

literature states, if any system can always be in the

same state, then there is no need for management. The

meaning of management is to influence the dynamic

system in order to make certain changes. The problems

of reflexive management are covered in the works of

T.M.Davydenko,

B.C.Lazarev,

M.M.Potashnik,

P.I.Tretyakov, T.N.Shamova [12].

In recent years, the most important trend in the

development of educational quality management,

which determines the essence of educational quality

management, is a systematic approach, which is

considered not only a type of methodological research,

but also a modern method of management thinking

that allows providing holistic and integrated

educational management in a complex dynamic

environment.

Analysis and results. Any management system should

not only take into account the official indicators and

activity results, but should turn to the analysis of its real

content. When it comes to quality management in

higher educational institutions, it is clear that an

objective assessment of quality and overall


background image

Volume 03 Issue 11-2023

47


International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN

2771-2257)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

44-50

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

705

)

(2022:

5.

705

)

(2023:

7.

448

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

management efficiency cannot be obtained only on

the basis of the results of checking the necessary

documents, the existence of a set of relevant

educational and methodological documents, etc., and

a comprehensive approach to determining quality

criteria is necessary. The research was conducted in the

higher educational institutions of our republic in

March-October 2022. 612 respondents from higher

educational institutions took part in the research. The

survey questionnaire consisted of 25 questions, mainly

about the university and social, economic and other

conditions, i.e. the attitude of professors and teachers

to the teaching process, the quality of education at the

university, the level of satisfaction with the educational

process, and the problems of evaluating the quality

management system and its effectiveness. Among the

respondents, 74% of professors and associate

professors who have been working at the university for

more than 15 years, 26% of teachers and senior teachers

with 5 years or more of work experience participated.

The age of the respondents was as follows: young

teachers (up to 35 years old) - 46.5%, "mature" teachers

over 35 years old - 53.5%. Males and females accounted

for 38% and 62%, respectively.

“Do you thi

nk there are alternative management

resources to the quality management system (QMS) in

the university?” to our question, we received the

following answers from the respondents: “now there

is no alternative to QMS”

-

20%, “QMS can be used

alongside traditi

onal management methods”

-

50%, “it

is better to use traditional (time-tested) management

methods in the university" -

15%, “the university could

and can function well without QMS”

- 12%, and the rest

of the respondents had difficulty answering. It should

be noted that professors with more than 15 years of

work experience completely denied the need for QMS

in the higher educational institution. In addition, we

believe that the prospects of introducing QMS in the

university are more positively evaluated by young

teachers and university staff.

To the respondents, “how do you think the processes

of reforming higher education in the Republic are

associated with the introduction of a quality

management

system

in

higher

educational

institutions?” we contacted the

question. The answers

were different: 36% of the survey participants "directly

related, because the implementation of QMS is a

mandatory

requirement

of

world

education

standards", 22% "are connected, because the

introduction of QMS is a requirement of the world

community for higher education institutions, and we

also contribute to the world higher education space.

we need to integrate", 13% answered "partially related,

because QMS allows to improve the quality of

education", "not much related, because the quality of

education is not integrally connected with QMS in the

university", 6% answered "not at all related", the

remaining 1% of respondents and they struggled to

answer. Most of the respondents are sure that the

process of reforming higher education in the republic


background image

Volume 03 Issue 11-2023

48


International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN

2771-2257)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

44-50

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

705

)

(2022:

5.

705

)

(2023:

7.

448

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

is connected with the introduction of SMT in the

university.

Another of the main questions of the questionnaire

survey is “what do you think means” consumer

satisfaction " in the QMS at the University? as the so-

called “Consumers will have hig

hly qualified

specialists”, 41% of respondents said that “consumers

as students, parents, employers, the state do not have

an objection to the quality of Higher Education”, 22%

respondents replied that “this is a term derived from

the field of Economics and cannot be related to

education”, while 2% of respondents did not respond.

The consumer today represents a kind of invisible force

for the University, which can significantly affect its

fate. Indeed, for the higher education sector, the

consumer in QMS t is understood as the employer, the

state and society as a whole, as well as the student and

his parents. 22% of respondents, answering the

question posed, obviously did not agree with the

opinion that in higher education the term “consumer”

should be used. After all, when it comes to education,

training, the formation of a worldview, it is difficult to

associate these processes with the concept of

“consumer”. In our opinion, this is due to the fact that

in modern conditions education is interpreted as a

service. However, above we noted that such an

interpretation

should

be

supplemented

with

meaningful features.

Respondents were asked, “What factors can have a

negative effect on the introduction of QMS in the

university?" We asked the question and received the

following answers: “the university does not have a

methodology adapted to the higher education system

for the introduction of QMS”

-

41%, “lack of knowledge

of the management and employees of the university in

the field of QMS”

-

38%, “the university is

not ready to

introduce QMS”

-

56% , “lack of organic communication

between university management and employees”

-

28%, “I have trouble answering”

-

5%, “other factors”

-

2%. In answering this question, experts were not

limited in choosing any factor.

Analyzing the obtained data, we can conclude that all

the above factors can affect the introduction of QMS

in the university to one degree or another. There are

certain difficulties in the direct application of QMS

standards in universities, of course. The system of QMS

standards developed for manufacturing enterprises is

not adapted to the specific characteristics of the

relevant field of education and is not very developed.

We also emphasize that when talking about education,

it is necessary to understand the nature and purpose of

this social phenomenon. Its result is not a technical

product or an inanimate object, but an intellectually

prepared culturally and spiritually formed person.

Respondents were asked “Does the introduction of

QMS in the university affect the improvement of the

quality of education?” when we asked the question,

10% of them "definitely influence”, 31% “have an

influence, because QMS is aimed at satisfying the

needs of consumers”, 39% “only partially influence,


background image

Volume 03 Issue 11-2023

49


International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN

2771-2257)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

44-50

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

705

)

(2022:

5.

705

)

(2023:

7.

448

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

because the quality of education does not depend only

on how effective the management is in the university",

12% marked “no effect, because formalizing and

documenting all processes cannot improve the quality

of education”, 7% marked “no effect at all”, and the

rest struggled to answer.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of the conducted studies made it possible

to formulate the following fundamental principles

necessary for Quality Management in higher

educational institutions:

1.

Quality management should be multi-level, and

its main component should be the education

and development of students. This principle

involves the use of various methods for

determining the quality of education (tests,

questionnaires, etc.).

2.

Quality management programs should include

research and result analysis. The results must

be interpreted, analyzed and maintained.

Hence, quality management will also be useful

in the future, when the results that differ over

time are compared.

3.

Quality management programs must be

realistic. As you can see, quality management

should start with realistic expectations in terms

of achieving the intended goals.

4.

The goals of higher educational institutions

should correspond to its resources.

5.

The main advantage of quality management

results is that it provides information that does

not exist in any other way, but is necessary for

decision-making.

REFERENCES

1.

Address of the president of the Republic of

Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev to the Supreme

Assembly and the people of Uzbekistan. -

Tashkent, 2022. 20 December.

2.

Demyanovich I.V. Integration of the idea of

quality into the management system // Bulletin

of the TOGU. 2018. No. 2 (4).

p. 129.

3.

Grekhova

T.V.

Features

of

project

management

for

building

a

quality

management system in modern organizations:

abstract. diss. ... cand. Social sciences:

22.00.08.

M., 2010.

p. 3.

4.

Bekmuradov M.B. Modern management

sociology/ / textbook. - Tashkent: youth

publishing house, 2020. - p.136.

5.

Alikariev Nuriddin. Comprehensive analysis of

productivity improvements // "Sociology

Sciences" (www.tadqiqot.uz\soci) electronic

journal. №3. Volume 5.

- Tashkent, 2022. DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.0000000.

6.

Kholbekov A. Management sociology. Tutorial.

- Tashkent: Academy, 2007. - P. 88-89.

7.

Sharifkhujaev M., Abdullayev Ya. Management.

- Tashkent, "Teacher", 2001. - P.7.


background image

Volume 03 Issue 11-2023

50


International Journal Of Management And Economics Fundamental
(ISSN

2771-2257)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

44-50

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2021:

5.

705

)

(2022:

5.

705

)

(2023:

7.

448

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

8.

Gulomov S.S. Fundamentals of management/ /

textbook. - Tashkent: Chief Tax Directorate of

the publishing and printing Joint-Stock

Company" Sharq", 2002. - 370 p.

9.

Saidov M.X., Peregudov L.V. "Higher education

management and economics. - Tashkent:

Finance, 2002. - P. 3-7.

10.

Alikarievа Alokhon, Alikariev Nuriddin. Issues

of improving the quality of training of Highly

qualified specialists //International Journal of

Advanced Science and Technology, 29(05),

Retrieved from http: // sersc. Org /journals /

index. Php/IJAST/article/view/10090. Vol. 29,

No.5, (2020), pp. 1600-

1611; Alikarievа Alokhon.

Sociological survey in the implementation of

the Educational quality management system//

Volume-11| Issue-5| 2023 Published: |22-05-

2023|https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8003531

11.

Djuraev R.X., Turganov S.T. Education

management/

/

textbook.

-

Tashkent:

"Successor-Publisher", 2006. - 266 p.

12.

Davydenko T.M. Reflexive management:

theory and practice.

M., 2015; Lazarev B.C.

System development.

M., 2017; Potashnik

M.M. Quality management of education.

M.,

2014; Tretyakov P.I. Adaptive management of

pedagogical systems: Textbook for university

students.

M., 2018; Shamova T.I. Pedagogical

analysis of the lesson in the system of intra-

school management: A manual for directors of

secondary schools, general education. shk.

M., 2018.

13.

Аликариев Н.С., Аликариева А.Н. Олий

таълим сифати менежменти тизимини

ривожлантириш концепцияси//“Социология

фанлари” (www.tadqiqot.uz

\

soci) электрон

журнали. №1. –

Тошкент, 2020. –

Б. 7

-18. DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.26739/2181-9297-2020-1.

References

Address of the president of the Republic of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev to the Supreme Assembly and the people of Uzbekistan. - Tashkent, 2022. 20 December.

Demyanovich I.V. Integration of the idea of quality into the management system // Bulletin of the TOGU. 2018. No. 2 (4). – p. 129.

Grekhova T.V. Features of project management for building a quality management system in modern organizations: abstract. diss. ... cand. Social sciences: 22.00.08. – M., 2010. – p. 3.

Bekmuradov M.B. Modern management sociology/ / textbook. - Tashkent: youth publishing house, 2020. - p.136.

Alikariev Nuriddin. Comprehensive analysis of productivity improvements // "Sociology Sciences" (www.tadqiqot.uzsoci) electronic journal. №3. Volume 5. - Tashkent, 2022. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.0000000.

Kholbekov A. Management sociology. Tutorial. - Tashkent: Academy, 2007. - P. 88-89.

Sharifkhujaev M., Abdullayev Ya. Management. - Tashkent, "Teacher", 2001. - P.7.

Gulomov S.S. Fundamentals of management/ / textbook. - Tashkent: Chief Tax Directorate of the publishing and printing Joint-Stock Company" Sharq", 2002. - 370 p.

Saidov M.X., Peregudov L.V. "Higher education management and economics. - Tashkent: Finance, 2002. - P. 3-7.

Alikarievа Alokhon, Alikariev Nuriddin. Issues of improving the quality of training of Highly qualified specialists //International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(05), Retrieved from http: // sersc. Org /journals / index. Php/IJAST/article/view/10090. Vol. 29, No.5, (2020), pp. 1600-1611; Alikarievа Alokhon. Sociological survey in the implementation of the Educational quality management system// Volume-11| Issue-5| 2023 Published: |22-05-2023|https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8003531

Djuraev R.X., Turganov S.T. Education management/ / textbook. - Tashkent: "Successor-Publisher", 2006. - 266 p.

Davydenko T.M. Reflexive management: theory and practice. – M., 2015; Lazarev B.C. System development. – M., 2017; Potashnik M.M. Quality management of education. – M., 2014; Tretyakov P.I. Adaptive management of pedagogical systems: Textbook for university students. – M., 2018; Shamova T.I. Pedagogical analysis of the lesson in the system of intra-school management: A manual for directors of secondary schools, general education. shk. – M., 2018.

Аликариев Н.С., Аликариева А.Н. Олий таълим сифати менежменти тизимини ривожлантириш концепцияси//“Социология фанлари” (www.tadqiqot.uzsoci) электрон журнали. №1. – Тошкент, 2020. – Б. 7-18. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.26739/2181-9297-2020-1.