Authors

  • Musaboev E.I
    Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Virology, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • Abdikhakimov A.N
    Tashkent Regional Branch of the Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Oncology and Radiology, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • Mirzaev Kh.M
    Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • Gafur-Akhunov M.A
    Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • Nishanov D.A
    Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Pathological Anatomy, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • Yigitaliyev A.B
    Fergana Medical Institute of Public Health, Fergana, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijmscr/Volume05Issue02-07

Keywords:

Hepatocellular carcinoma p53 gene suppressor immunohistochemical examination

Abstract

This article is devoted to immunohistochemical studies associated with primary liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma - HCC) developed against the background of chronic viral hepatitis B, C. The topic is relevant, since HCC is one of the aggressive tumors with a high mortality rate, arising as a result of chronic hepatitis B and C, alcoholic or non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases. The study included 30 patients examined in 2020-2023, all of whom were diagnosed with viral hepatitis B or C. In the immunohistochemical study, molecular genetic markers (Ki-67, Bcl-2, VEGF, and p53) were studied. According to the results, in cases of HCC associated with viral hepatitis, high proliferative activity (Ki-67 >20%), apoptosis index (Bcl-2), angiogenesis activity (VEGF), and p53 gene suppressor mutations were observed more often. Molecular-genetic markers in primary liver cancer are important in assessing the aggressiveness of the tumor, the degree of metastasis, and the response to treatment. The research results open up new possibilities for improving the diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized therapy strategies for HCC.


background image

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research

33

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijmscr

VOLUME

Vol.05 Issue02 2025

PAGE NO.

33-42

DOI

10.37547/ijmscr/Volume05Issue02-07



Results of immunogystochemic study in primary liver
cancer developed on the basis of chronic viral hepatitis

Musaboev E.I

Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Virology, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Abdikhakimov A.N

Tashkent Regional Branch of the Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Oncology and Radiology, Tashkent,
Uzbekistan

Mirzaev Kh.M

Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Gafur-Akhunov M.A

Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Nishanov D.A

Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Pathological Anatomy, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Yigitaliyev A.B

Fergana Medical Institute of Public Health, Fergana, Uzbekistan

Received:

14 December 2024;

Accepted:

16 January 2025;

Published:

18 February 2025

Abstract:

This article is devoted to immunohistochemical studies associated with primary liver cancer

(hepatocellular carcinoma - HCC) developed against the background of chronic viral hepatitis B, C. The topic is
relevant, since HCC is one of the aggressive tumors with a high mortality rate, arising as a result of chronic hepatitis
B and C, alcoholic or non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases. The study included 30 patients examined in 2020-2023, all
of whom were diagnosed with viral hepatitis B or C. In the immunohistochemical study, molecular genetic markers
(Ki-67, Bcl-2, VEGF, and p53) were studied. According to the results, in cases of HCC associated with viral hepatitis,
high proliferative activity (Ki-67 >20%), apoptosis index (Bcl-2), angiogenesis activity (VEGF), and p53 gene
suppressor mutations were observed more often. Molecular-genetic markers in primary liver cancer are
important in assessing the aggressiveness of the tumor, the degree of metastasis, and the response to treatment.
The research results open up new possibilities for improving the diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized therapy
strategies for HCC.

Keywords:

Hepatocellular carcinoma, Ki-67, Bcl-2, VEGF, p53 gene suppressor, immunohistochemical

examination. Chronic hepatitis, liver cancer, proliferative activity, apoptosis, angiogenesis mutation.

Introduction:

Relevance of the problem. Primary liver

cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC) is one of the
most aggressive and fatal malignant tumors. The
development of this tumor is associated with chronic

liver diseases, including: viral hepatitis B and C
infections, alcoholic liver disease, non-alcoholic fatty
liver disease [1,2].

In recent years, molecular genetic markers that allow


background image

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research

34

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijmscr

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research (ISSN: 2771-2265)

predicting the course of the disease, the likelihood of
metastasis, and the response to therapy have been
actively studied. The most important markers in
primary liver cancer are Ki-67, Bcl-2, VEGF, and p53.
These biomarkers play an important role in the
mechanisms of: tumor cell proliferation, formation of
new blood vessels (angiogenesis), cell death
(apoptosis), which is very important for determining
their diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment tactics
[3,4,5].

Ki-67 - a marker of tumor proliferation activity - is a
protein expressed in all phases of the cell cycle (except
for the G0 phase) and is an important marker of the
degree of cell proliferation. High Ki-67 expression is
associated with tumor aggressiveness, rapid growth,
and a poor prognosis [6]. Studies show that high Ki-67
expression in HCC is associated with: high mitotic
activity, rapid progression (development), low-grade
differentiated tumors, shortened patient lifespan [7.8],
high Ki-67 levels can be an independent prognostic
marker in the late stages of the disease [9]. Patients are
classified based on Ki-67 expression: patients with high
Ki-67 levels require aggressive treatment methods,
including targeted therapy and systemic treatment
[10].

Bcl-2 - a protein that regulates apoptosis (B-cell
lymphoma 2) - is an anti-apoptotic protein that
prevents apoptosis (natural cell death). Disruption of
apoptosis leads to the survival of cancer cells [11].
Studies show that Bcl-2 expression was detected in 40-
60% of HCC cases. Its high level is associated with:
resistance of cancer cells to apoptosis, low sensitivity
to chemotherapy, and a high risk of relapse [12,13].
Determination of the Bcl-2 level allows predicting the
sensitivity of the tumor to treatment. Bcl-2 inhibitors
(for example, venetoclax) are considered promising
drugs in the treatment of HCC [14].

VEGF - angiogenesis factor (vascular endothelial
growth factor) - the main protein regulating
angiogenesis, stimulating the formation of new blood
vessels for the blood supply of the tumor [15]. High
VEGF

expression

is

associated

with:

active

angiogenesis, high vascularization (blood supply) of the
tumor, a high risk of metastasis, and a shorter patient
lifespan [16,17]. Anti-VEGF therapy (bevatsizumab,
ramutsirumab) is used in the treatment of HCC and
improves the prognosis in patients with high levels of
VEGF [18].

p53 - tumor-suspending protein - is a protective protein

against tumors that controls the cell cycle and regulates
apoptosis. p53 mutations lead to uncontrolled cell
proliferation and cancer development [19]. p53
mutations have been detected in 25-50% of HCC cases.
impaired p53 function is associated with tumor
aggressiveness, therapy resistance, and the risk of
metastasis [20]. determining p53 levels helps predict
treatment response. MDM2 inhibitors (negative
regulators of p53) are considered as promising targeted
therapy for HCC [21].

Thus, molecular genetic markers Ki-67, Bcl-2, VEGF, and
p53 play an important role in the pathogenesis and
development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HC). Their
study will allow improving the diagnosis of the disease
and predicting its course, choosing personalized
therapy, and improving the development of new
targeted drugs for HCC [18,19,20]. Further study of
these biomarkers is necessary for the early detection of
primary liver cancer and the development of effective
treatment strategies.

METHODS

In the study, 30 patients with primary liver cancer
examined and treated at the Republican Specialized
Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Oncology and
Radiology and its Tashkent regional branch underwent
retrospective and prospective immunohistochemical
examination in 2020-2023. In this case, all patients had
a history of viral hepatitis B and C and received
treatment. Later, after chronic hepatitis, he was
diagnosed with primary hepatocellular carcinoma and
hospitalized. In these patients, the results of
histological examination and immunohistochemical
studies were studied. Pathomorphologically, the use of
the immunohistochemical method in hepatocellular
liver cancer, in which the study of molecular genetic
markers is carried out for the first time, reveals its
deeper morphologically significant features in
hepatocellular liver cancer developed against the
background of chronic viral hepatitis B,C, plays a special
role in determining treatment tactics and predicting
the disease.

Biopsies (trepan-biopsy, surgical material) obtained
from all patients were taken from paraffin blocks,
processed for immunohistochemical examination, and
examined by taking sections on a slide. The Ki67, bcl 2,
VHFR, and w p53 genes were studied by
immunohistochemical examination. The conducted
immunohistochemical examination method was
technically carried out as follows (Table No1).

Table No. 1

Stages of immunohistochemical (IHC) examination.

Procedure

Reagents

Duration


background image

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research

35

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijmscr

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research (ISSN: 2771-2265)

1

Prepare sections 4 µm

thick

Polylysine-coated slides

2

Drying sections

Room

temperature

24

hours

3

Drying in a thermostat

T: 55-60°C, 60

minutes

4

Deparaffinization

Ortho-xylene

10 minutes x 3

times

5

Dehydration

96% ethanol

3 minutes x 3

times

6

Rehydration

Distilled water

10 minutes

7

Antigen

retrieval

(Demasking)

Demasking buffer, T:

98°C

30-40 minutes

8

Washing

Tris-buffer solution (pH

7.5)

5 minutes

9

Blocking

endogenous

peroxidase activity

3% hydrogen peroxide

5 minutes

10

Washing

Distilled water

3 minutes

11

Incubate

with

primary

antibodies

Specific antibodies

20-30 minutes

12

Washing

Tris-buffer solution (pH

7.5)

5 minutes

13

Incubate with secondary

antibodies (detection)

Visualization system

20-30 minutes

14

Washing

Tris-buffer solution (pH

7.5)

5 minutes

15

Visualization with DAB

DAB-chromogen

5 minutes

16

Washing

Distilled water

3 minutes

17

Counterstaining

Mayer's hematoxylin

5 minutes

18

Washing

Tap water

1 minute

19

Dehydration

96% ethanol

2

times

x

5

minutes

20

Clearing (Despiriting)

Ortho-xylene

2

times

x

5

minutes

21

Mounting

Balsam, cover slip

For immunohistochemical examination, the expression
of Ki67, Vcl2, VGFR and w p53 monoclonal antibodies
in cells was studied using an immunohistoprocessor
"Bond Leica Australia" (Australia).

In our study, the study of the expression of molecular
structures in liver cancer cells led to the development
of viral hepatitis B, C in hepatocellular carcinoma.

RESULTS

The Ki67 indicator morphologically characterized the

staining of the cell nucleus in

hepatocellular liver cancer as follows: the obtained
results were assessed as a mild, moderate, and severe
positive reaction. The results of the study showed that
out of 30 patients, 5 (16.6%) had a mild positive
reaction, 10 (33%) had a moderate positive reaction,
and 15 (50%) had a high positive reaction. No negative
reaction processes were observed (Table No2).


background image

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research

36

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijmscr

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research (ISSN: 2771-2265)

Table No 2

Ki67 indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma associated with viral hepatitis B, C

Microscopically, liver cells with hyperplasia and
polymorphism of hepatocytes, trabeculae are not
preserved, malignant tumor cells form tumor islands of

polymorphic hepatocytes with pathological mitosis and
cell necrobiosis. The nuclei of tumor cells are stained
dark brown (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. A high degree of positive response to the Ki 67 marker in patients diagnosed with

hepatocellular carcinoma, viral hepatitis B (80%). IHC - Dab chromogen. Ob10. Ok40.

Level

Patients (N=30)

1

<10% low activity

5 (16.6%)

2

10-20% moderate activity

10 (33%)

3

>20% high proliferative activity

15 (50%)


background image

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research

37

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijmscr

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research (ISSN: 2771-2265)



















Figure 2. Degree of proliferative activity of tumor cells when hepatocellular carcinoma

develops against the background of viral hepatitis B.

To determine tumor apoptosis in hepatocellular
carcinoma with viral hepatitis B, the Vcl2 indicator was
studied in 30 patients. In patients, the Vcl2 marker was
used to determine tumor apoptosis, which regulates
cell death by controlling the permeability of the
mitochondrial membrane. The obtained results were
evaluated using the ALLRED method. It looks at how
many percent of the system's cells are positive for their

receptors and how well the receptors appear after
staining. These data are then combined to evaluate the
sample on a scale from 1 to 3. In this case, the minimum
score is 0 (negative), 1 point (low positive 10-30%), 2
points (medium positive 30-60%), 3 points (high
positive 60-100%). Of the 30 selected patients, 4
(13.3%) had a mild positive reaction, 12 (40%) had a
moderate positive reaction, and 14 (46%) had a high
positive reaction (Table 3).

Table No. 3

Positive reaction of the Bcl-2 marker in patients with viral hepatitis B,C in

hepatocellular carcinoma

Microscopically: liver cells with hyperplasia and
polymorphism of hepatocytes, trabeculae are not
preserved, malignant tumor cells form tumor islands of
polymorphic hepatocytes with pathological mitosis and
cell necrobiosis. The cell membranes of malignant
tumors are stained dark brown.

Level

Patients (N=30)

1

<10% low activity

4 (13.3 %)

2

10-20% moderate activity

12 (40 %)

3

>20% high proliferative activity

14(46 %)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Negative reaction

Low positive reaction

Moderate positive

reaction

High positive

reaction


background image

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research

38

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijmscr

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research (ISSN: 2771-2265)

Figure 3. High positive reaction of the Bcl-2 marker in patients diagnosed with viral hepatitis

B in hepatocellular carcinoma. (70%). IHC - Dab chromogen. Ob10. Ok40.
















Figure 4. Level of Bcl-2 marker expression in patients diagnosed with viral hepatitis B in

hepatocellular carcinoma.

The results of w p53 expression in hepatocellular
carcinoma with viral hepatitis B were assessed using
the ALLRED method. It considers what percentage of
system cells are positive for receptors and how well

receptors appear after staining. Then these data were
combined for a sample assessment on a scale from 1 to

3. The minimum score was 0 (negative), 1 point (low

positive 10-30%), 2 points (medium positive 30-60%), 3
points (high positive 60-100%). Of the 30 selected
patients, 7 (23.3%) had a mild positive reaction, 10
(13.3%) had a moderate positive reaction, and 13

(43.3%) had a high positive reaction (Table 4).




0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Negative reaction

Low positive

reaction

Moderate positive

reaction

High positive

reaction


background image

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research

39

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijmscr

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research (ISSN: 2771-2265)

Table No4.

Level of expression of the p53 marker in hepatocellular carcinoma against the

background of viral hepatitis C.

When viewed under a microscope, liver cells with
hyperplasia and polymorphism of hepatocytes,
trabeculae are not preserved, malignant tumor cells

form

tumor

islands

of

polymorphic hepatocytes with pathological mitosis and
cell necrobiosis. The nuclei of malignant tumor cells are
stained dark brown (Fig. 3).

Figure 5. High positive reaction of the p53 marker in patients diagnosed with viral hepatitis B

in hepatocellular carcinoma. (90%). IHC - Dab chromogen. Ob10. Ok40.

Level

Patients (N=30)

1

1 point low position reaction
(10-30%)

7 (23.3 %)

2

2 points average positive reaction
(30-60%)

10 (33.3 %)

3

3 points high positive reaction
(60-100%)

13 (43.3 %)


background image

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research

40

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijmscr

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research (ISSN: 2771-2265)













Figure 6. Level of the p53 marker in patients diagnosed with viral hepatitis C in

hepatocellular carcinoma.

In detected hepatocellular carcinoma of viral hepatitis
C. The obtained results were considered in what
percentage of cells the markers were positive and how
expressive they were after staining. These data were
then combined to evaluate the sample on a scale from

1 to 3. The minimum score is 0 (negative), 1 point (low
positive 10-30%), 2 points (medium positive 30-60%), 3
points (high positive 60-100%). Of the 30 selected
patients, 8 (26.6%) had a mild positive reaction, 12
(40%) had a moderate positive reaction, and 10 (33.3%)
had a high positive reaction (Table 5).

Table 5.

Level of expression of the VGFR marker in patients with viral hepatitis C in

hepatocellular carcinoma

Microscopically: liver cells with hyperplasia and
polymorphism of hepatocytes, trabeculae not
preserved, malignant tumor cells form tumor islands

with

pathological mitosis of polymorphic hepatocytes and
cell necrobiosis. The endothelium of blood vessels is
stained dark brown.

Level

Patients

(N=30)

1

1 point low position reaction
(10-30%)

8 (26.6 %)

2

2 points average positive reaction
(30-60%)

12 (40 %)

3

3 points high positive reaction
(60-100%)

10 (33.3 %)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Negative reaction

Low positive

reaction

Moderate

positive reaction

High positive

reaction


background image

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research

41

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijmscr

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research (ISSN: 2771-2265)

Figure 7. High positive reaction of the VHFR marker in patients diagnosed with viral

hepatitis B in the light cell type of hepatocellular carcinoma. (90%). IHC - Dab chromogen. Ob10.

Ok40.














Figure 8. The level of the VHFR marker in patients with viral hepatitis C in hepatocellular

carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

In our study, 30 patients were selected for
immunohistochemical examination of patients with
viral hepatitis B, C diagnosed with hepatocellular
carcinoma. The results obtained in all patients were
evaluated as a percentage of the marker of
proliferative activity of Ki 67 tumor cells.

The obtained results were assessed as mild, moderate,
and severe positive reactions. Of the 30 observed

patients, 5 (16.6%) had a mild positive reaction, 10
(33%) had a moderate positive reaction, and 15 (50%)
had a high positive reaction. No negative reaction
processes were observed.

For the purpose of detecting tumor apoptosis Bcl-2 in
hepatocellular carcinoma with identified viral hepatitis
B, C. Of the 30 selected patients, 4 (13.3%) had a mild
positive reaction, 12 (40%) had a moderate positive
reaction, and 14 (46%) had a high positive reaction.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Negative reaction

Low positive

reaction

Moderate

positive reaction

High positive

reaction


background image

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research

42

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijmscr

International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research (ISSN: 2771-2265)

In hepatocellular carcinoma with viral hepatitis B, out
of 30 patients selected for the gene suppressor - p53, 7
(23.3%) had a mild positive reaction, 10 (33.3%) had a
moderate positive reaction, and 13 (43.3%) had a high
positive reaction.

VHFR, a signaling protein produced by cells to stimulate
angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma with viral
hepatitis C, was studied.

Of the 30 selected patients, 8 (26.6%) had a mild
positive reaction, 12 (40%) had a moderate positive
reaction, and 10 (33.3%) had a high positive reaction.

The results of the study showed that in hepatocellular
carcinoma developed against the background of viral
hepatitis B, C, the indicators of molecular genetic
markers Ki 67, Bcl-2 gene-suppressor p53 and VEGF are
high, which are considered factors negatively affecting
the tactics and prognosis of its progression.

REFERENCES

Bruix, J., Reig, M., & Sherman, M. Evidence-based
diagnosis, staging, and treatment of patients with
hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology, 2019.
156(2),

411

421.

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.065

Craig, A. J., von Felden, J., Garcia-Lezana, T.,
Sarcognato, S., & Villanueva, A. Tumour evolution in
hepatocellular

carcinoma.

Nature

Reviews

Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2020. 17(3), 139

152.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-019-0229-4

El-Serag, H. B., & Rudolph, K. L. Hepatocellular
carcinoma:

Epidemiology

and

molecular

carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology, 2017. 132(7), 2557

2576. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.02.063

Fan, B., Malato, Y., Calvisi, D. F., Sun, H. C., & Wang, X.
W. Ki-67 expression as a prognostic marker in
hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer, 2020. 20(1),
1123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07620-2

Faivre, S., Rimassa, L., & Finn, R. S. Molecular therapies
for hepatocellular carcinoma: What can we target?
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2020. 17(7), 409

423. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-020-0377-8

Forner, A., Reig, M., & Bruix, J. Hepatocellular
carcinoma. The Lancet, 2018. 391(10127), 1301

1314.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30010-2

Guichard, C., Amaddeo, G., Imbeaud, S., & Letouzé, E.
Integrated analysis of somatic mutations and focal
copy-number changes identifies key genes and
pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature
Genetics,

2019.

44(6),

694

698.

https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2256

He, G., & Karin, M. NF-

κB and STAT3 –

Key players in

liver cancer. Cell Research, 2019. 29(8), 574

586.

https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2019.32

Hoshida, Y., Villanueva, A., Kobayashi, M., Peix, J., &
Chiang, D. Y. Gene expression in hepatocellular
carcinoma. Cancer Research, 2017. 78(2), 250

257.

https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1725

Ikeda, M., Sung, M. W., Kudo, M., et al. Atezolizumab
plus bevacizumab in hepatocellular carcinoma. New
England Journal of Medicine, 2021. 383(24), 2424

2434. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1915745

Kudo, M. Targeted and immune therapies for
hepatocellular carcinoma: Predictions for 2025.
Oncology,

2019.

97(Suppl

1),

131

141.

https://doi.org/10.1159/000503045

Lee, J. S., & Thorgeirsson, S. S. Genetic profiling of
hepatocellular carcinoma: Classification and prognosis.
Hepatology,

2019.

70(4),

1419

1432.

https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.30878

Lin, D. C., Mayakonda, A., Dinh, H. Q., et al. Genomic
and epigenomic heterogeneity of hepatocellular
carcinoma. Cancer Research, 2020. 80(10), 1914

1925.

https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-1725

Llovet, J. M., Kelley, R. K., Villanueva, A., et al.
Molecular pathogenesis and systemic therapies for
hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature Reviews Clinical
Oncology,

2021.

18(10),

595

613.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-021-00574-6

Mak, L. Y., Cruz-Ramón, V., Chinchilla-López, P., et al.
Global epidemiology, prevention, and management of
hepatocellular carcinoma. The American Journal of
Gastroenterology,

2021.

116(3),

457

478.

https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001051

Sherman, M. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Screening and
diagnosis. Clinical Liver Disease, 2018. 22(1), 61

74.

https://doi.org/10.1002/cld.784

Sun, H. C., Zhuang, P. Y., Qin, L. X., et al. VEGF and
hepatocellular carcinoma angiogenesis. Journal of
Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2020. 146(6),
1517

1526.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-

03172-y

Tang, Z. Y. Hepatocellular carcinoma

Causes,

diagnosis, and treatment. The Lancet Oncology, 2018.
19(11), 1300

1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-

2045(18)30337-0

Villanueva, A. p53 mutations and liver cancer
progression. Hepatology, 2021. 74(2), 1047

1056.

https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31783

Yang, J. D., Hainaut, P., Gores, G. J., et al. A global view
of hepatocellular carcinoma: Trends, risk, prevention,
and management. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &
Hepatology,

2018.

16(10),

589

604.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-019-0186-y

References

Bruix, J., Reig, M., & Sherman, M. Evidence-based diagnosis, staging, and treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology, 2019. 156(2), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.065

Craig, A. J., von Felden, J., Garcia-Lezana, T., Sarcognato, S., & Villanueva, A. Tumour evolution in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2020. 17(3), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-019-0229-4

El-Serag, H. B., & Rudolph, K. L. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology, 2017. 132(7), 2557–2576. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.02.063

Fan, B., Malato, Y., Calvisi, D. F., Sun, H. C., & Wang, X. W. Ki-67 expression as a prognostic marker in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer, 2020. 20(1), 1123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07620-2

Faivre, S., Rimassa, L., & Finn, R. S. Molecular therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: What can we target? Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2020. 17(7), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-020-0377-8

Forner, A., Reig, M., & Bruix, J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. The Lancet, 2018. 391(10127), 1301–1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30010-2

Guichard, C., Amaddeo, G., Imbeaud, S., & Letouzé, E. Integrated analysis of somatic mutations and focal copy-number changes identifies key genes and pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature Genetics, 2019. 44(6), 694–698. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2256

He, G., & Karin, M. NF-κB and STAT3 – Key players in liver cancer. Cell Research, 2019. 29(8), 574–586. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2019.32

Hoshida, Y., Villanueva, A., Kobayashi, M., Peix, J., & Chiang, D. Y. Gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Research, 2017. 78(2), 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1725

Ikeda, M., Sung, M. W., Kudo, M., et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in hepatocellular carcinoma. New England Journal of Medicine, 2021. 383(24), 2424–2434. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1915745

Kudo, M. Targeted and immune therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: Predictions for 2025. Oncology, 2019. 97(Suppl 1), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503045

Lee, J. S., & Thorgeirsson, S. S. Genetic profiling of hepatocellular carcinoma: Classification and prognosis. Hepatology, 2019. 70(4), 1419–1432. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.30878

Lin, D. C., Mayakonda, A., Dinh, H. Q., et al. Genomic and epigenomic heterogeneity of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Research, 2020. 80(10), 1914–1925. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-1725

Llovet, J. M., Kelley, R. K., Villanueva, A., et al. Molecular pathogenesis and systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2021. 18(10), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-021-00574-6

Mak, L. Y., Cruz-Ramón, V., Chinchilla-López, P., et al. Global epidemiology, prevention, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2021. 116(3), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001051

Sherman, M. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Screening and diagnosis. Clinical Liver Disease, 2018. 22(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/cld.784

Sun, H. C., Zhuang, P. Y., Qin, L. X., et al. VEGF and hepatocellular carcinoma angiogenesis. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2020. 146(6), 1517–1526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03172-y

Tang, Z. Y. Hepatocellular carcinoma – Causes, diagnosis, and treatment. The Lancet Oncology, 2018. 19(11), 1300–1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30337-0

Villanueva, A. p53 mutations and liver cancer progression. Hepatology, 2021. 74(2), 1047–1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31783

Yang, J. D., Hainaut, P., Gores, G. J., et al. A global view of hepatocellular carcinoma: Trends, risk, prevention, and management. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2018. 16(10), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-019-0186-y