Authors

  • Dauletnazarova Ainura Kayirbayevna
    Basic doctoral student of the Ajiniyaz NSPI, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume05Issue06-61

Keywords:

Discursive competence dialogic repetition speech skills

Abstract

This article describes pedagogy in the development of discursive competence of students of higher educational institutions and analyzes scientific research conducted in this field.  


background image

International Journal of Pedagogics

225

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijp

VOLUME

Vol.05 Issue06 2025

PAGE NO.

225-228

DOI

10.37547/ijp/Volume05Issue06-61



Methodology for Developing Students' Discursional
Competence

Dauletnazarova Ainura Kayirbayevna

Basic doctoral student of the Ajiniyaz NSPI, Uzbekistan

Received:

22 April 2025;

Accepted:

18 May 2025;

Published:

20 June 2025

Abstract:

This article describes pedagogy in the development of discursive competence of students of higher

educational institutions and analyzes scientific research conducted in this field.

Keywords:

Discursive competence, dialogic repetition, speech skills, communicative text, speech communication,

reasoning.

Introduction:

In world practice, special attention is paid

to the fact that the development of information and
communication

technologies

increases

the

comprehensive competitiveness of countries, creates
broad opportunities for collecting and summarizing
large volumes of information, and organizing
management at a strategic level. In particular, the
study of the features of the discursive competence of
primary school teachers is of great importance.

Discours from the Latin "discursus" - "running left and
right, movement, circular movement, conversation,
conversation" - speech, the process of language
activity, methods of speaking through the Internet
system.

Researchers O.I.Kucherenko, N.P.Golovina studied the
problems of discursive competence, E.V.Musnitskaya
studied the formation of professional speech skills, and
A.I.Ivanchenko studied the speech skills of students.

In world research, the problems of discourse analysis
have been studied by such scholars as Z.Klemencevich
[1], U.Mukarovsky [2], O.Essen [3], N.Yu.Shvedova [4],
M.L.Mikhlina [5], T.G.Vinokur [6], but the state of
discourse in the school classroom in pedagogical
education and the problems of its assessment have not
been studied.

Scholars such as S.Boymirzaeva, L.Raupova [7],
B.Urinboev [8], A.H.Hazratkulov and G.Toirova [9]
conducted research related to the concepts of
discourse,

communicative

text,

and

speech

communication.

According to researcher G. Bekimbetova, discursive
competence includes the development of oral or
written speech, the ability to construct sentences. For
this, he considers the use of various syntactic and
semantic means, the ability to understand the thoughts
and messages of another person) [10].

Provides students with deep knowledge, as well as
opportunities

to

develop

critical

thinking,

collaboration, creativity, and approach skills. Including
leading in revealing creative energy between students
and teachers, which led to increased student
engagement and improved learning outcomes for
everyone [11].

In the study of the problem of forming the speech
abilities of a future teacher, S.N.Mitina, in addition to
personal communicative skills, also includes knowledge
of the basic concepts of linguistics in the analyzed
concept [12].

This term was first introduced into circulation in the
article "Discourse Analysis" by the American researcher
Z. Harris [13]. In our scientific community today, it has
become customary to keep the concept of "discourse"
closer to the term "dialogue." However, the term
discourse is a high-volume phrase existing in colloquial
speech, therefore, it is a direction about the
relationship with existing phrases. On the contrary, as
a result of discursive analysis, new specific linguistic
aspects of the sentence as a language unit were also
studied [14].

L.Raupova's monograph "Discursive Interpretation of


background image

International Journal of Pedagogics

226

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijp

International Journal of Pedagogics (ISSN: 2771-2281)

Dialogic Speech," published in 2010, can be considered
as a presentation to those interested in the field of the
manifestation of content and forms that move to the
plane of expression in dialogic speech as discourse [15].

We observed that it was given by E.V.Sawyer: "Speech
competence, in other words, discursive, is associated
with the ability to create and understand various types
of speech." Moreover, discourse is understood as a
"complex communicative phenomenon that includes
the participants of communication (and their
characteristics), as well as the social context that
provides insight into the process of producing and
perceiving the message" [16].

In discourses, that is, in speech competence, a specific
person realizes, analyzes, and translates the results of
the accumulated subjective content, regulates
themselves and their personal experience. Therefore,
speech competence is also called "discursive
competence" in some sources [17].

In our opinion, the basis of discursive competence is
speech competence. In this regard, L.I. Kirilina,
emphasizing that speech competence encompasses
the set of knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary for
creating one's own programs of speech behavior
corresponding to the goal, field, and communication
situation, identifies the following linguistic factors in
the formation of speech competence:

a) knowledge of the basic concepts of speech linguistics
- styles, types of speech, structure of description,
reasoning, narration, methods of connecting words
and sentences in the text;

b) skills and abilities of text analysis;

c) communication skills - skills and abilities of speech
communication in relation to various spheres and
situations of communication, taking into account the
addressee and style [18].

N.N.Romanova and A.V.Filippova note that in the

concept of speech mastery, "in this language, it is
necessary to be able to speak correctly, fluently, and
dynamically

in

the

form

of free

practical

communication, both dialogue and monologue, to
understand well the speech that is heard and read,
including the ability to produce and understand speech
in any functional style. Speech competence is related
to language competence, broad speech practice, a
large volume of reading literature of various genres,
and defines communicative competence [19].

Regarding discourse, Professor V.I.Tolstykh notes that
"a person needs dialogical discourse in order to fully
understand their place and level of ability in life. It is
precisely this need that contributes to the formation of
a person as a specific character, a specific type" [20].

Professors Sinclair and Coulthard of the University of
Birmingham (throughout the text - Sinclair, Kaulfard)
analyzed colloquial discourse in school lessons at the
university, viewing discourse as a teacher-student
speech model, and studied the structure of discourse in
school classrooms as a preliminary study [21].

In our view, the characteristic essence of speech
competence is that it has a discursive character and
reflects the qualities of the verbal behavior of learners.
Speech competence simultaneously serves as a
reflection and activation mechanism for internal
experience in professional activity. A person's
conceptual and emotional experience is mainly
manifested, transmitted, and received through sign,
gesture communications. The development of
discursive competence of future primary school
teachers is manifested in speech perception, logical
and expressive forms of speech activity, influence on
partners, and other processes.

We aimed to identify the following features in the
development of discursive competence of students in
pedagogical higher educational institutions. (Fig. 1)


background image

International Journal of Pedagogics

227

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijp

International Journal of Pedagogics (ISSN: 2771-2281)

So, we can make the following proposals for the
development of students' discursive competence:

a) the educational process in pedagogical universities
should be organized in such a way that the process of
forming the student's speech competence is more
effective;

b) the successful formation of speech competence
should be one of the main tasks not only in the study of
special subjects related to speech activity, for example,
the subject "Teacher's Speech Culture," but also in all
other subjects studied by students in accordance with
the curriculum;

c) any academic discipline in the professional training
of a future teacher should be aimed at developing
students' speech activity.

Thus, based on the considerations regarding the
discursive competence of future primary school
teachers, we come to the following conclusions:

1. Discursive competence serves as a linguistic factor in
bringing

speech-thinking

activity,

vocabulary,

intellectual and potential to the level of a competent
national personnel.

2. The effective use of unique and appropriate speech
abilities by future primary school teachers to express
their intentions, thoughts, and inner experiences for
specific purposes is a great symbol of students'
communicative abilities.

3. Discursive competence, by its content and essence,
performs the tasks of acquiring certain knowledge,
receiving and transmitting information, communicative
communication, and stimulating (motivation). B
functions are interconnected, and in a certain speech

process, one can transition into the other.

REFERENCES

Klemensievicz Z. Zarus ksladni polskiej, Warszawa,
1957

Mucarousky U. Dialog a monolog w “Lesty filologicke”,

Praha, 1940. -

№ 6.

Essen

O.

Grundzuge

der

hochdeutschen

Satzintonation, Hamburg

Шведова Н.Ю. Очерки по синтаксису русской
разговорной

речи:

Автореф.

дисс

д

-

ра

филол.наук.

-

М.: 1958.

Михлина М.Л. Из наблюдений над синтаксисом
диалогической речи: Автореф. дисс ... канд.
филол.наук.

-

Л.: 1955.

Винокур

Т.Г.

O

некоторых

синтаксических

особенностях диалогической речи в современном
русском языке. :Автореф. дисс ... канд. филол.наук.

-

М.: 1953.

Боймирзаева

С.

Ўзбек

тилида

матннинг

коммуникатив

-

прагматик

мазмунини

шакллантирувчи категориялар. Филол. фан. д

-

ри

дис. автореф. ‒ Тошкент,

2010. ‒ Б. 21; Раупова Л.

Диалогик

дискурсдаги

полипредикатив

бирликларнинг социопрагматик тадқиқи. Филол.
фан. док

-

ри. ... дис. ‒ Тошкент, 2012. ‒ Б. 53.

Ўринбоев Б. Ўзбек тили сўзлашув нутқи синтаксиси
масалалари. ‒ Тошкент, 1974.

Ҳазратқулов А.Ҳ.

Диалогик нутқ синтаксисининг

баъзи хусусиятлари (диалогик бирлик ҳақида
методологик кўргазма). ‒ Қарши, 1978. ‒ Б. 36;
Тоирова Г. Нутқий мулоқотнинг лисоний вербал ва
лисоний

новербал

воситалари

хусусида

De

ve

lop

stud

en

ts' d

iscursive c

om

p

ete

n

ce

G

oals f

or

the

d

eve

lop

m

en

t

of

stud

en

ts'

d

iscursive c

om

p

ete

n

ce

ar

e

d

ef

in

ed

b

elow

.

student knowledge is a specific

tool.

the student's learning activity is

its expression.

the basis of various

interpersonal relationships lies

in speech activity.

contributing to the formation of

a student as a subject of

professional activity


background image

International Journal of Pedagogics

228

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijp

International Journal of Pedagogics (ISSN: 2771-2281)

(саломлашиш мисолида) // БухДУ илмий ахбороти,

2018

. ‒ № 1. ‒ Б. 67

-74.

Bekimbetova G.R. Diskursiv kompetensiya asosida
talabalarning lingvistik kompetensiyasini rivojlantirish
metodikasi // Ilm sarchashmalari.

Urganch davlat

universitetining ilmiy-nazariy, metodik jurnali. 2023, -

№9. –

B.83-85. (13.0

0.00; №31).

Зимняя И.А. Психологические аспекты обучения
говорению на иностранном языке. М., МГУ, 1998, c.

142.

Митина С.Н. Проектирование в формировании
речевой компетенции будущего учителя // Высшая
школа. 2004. № 5. С. 32

-35.

Harris Z.S. Analyse du discours // Languages, 1969.

№13. –

P. 8-45

Dubois J., Giacomo M. et al. Dictionnaires de
linguistique.

Paris: Larousse, 1973.

516 p

Раупова Л. “Диалогик нутқнинг дискурсив талқини”.

-

Т.: 2010.

Сойфер Э.В. Создание и восприятие дискурса в
условиях управляемого общения на иностранном
языке // Казанская лингвистическая школа:
традиции и современность. Казань, 2003. С.70

-75

Жуманазаров У.У. Таълимни рақамлаштириш
муҳитида бўлажак инглиз тили

ўқитувчиларининг

лингвистик

компетенциясини

ривожлантириш.

Педагогика

фанлари

доктори

(DSc)

илмий

даражасини олиш учун ёзилган диссертация.
Жиззах –

2021.25-

б

Кирилина Л. И. Современные технологии обучения
русскому языку как средство повышения каче

-

ства

образования

в

условиях

модернизации

и

профессиональная компетентность учителя //
Современные наукоемкие технологии. 2005. № 6. С.

82-88

Романова Н. Н., Филиппов А. В. Словарь. Культура
речевого общения: этика, прагматика, психология.
М., 2010. С. 17

4.

Толстих В.И.С чего начинается личность: сборник.

-

М., 1984.

-

С.99.

Sinclair, J. McH., and R. M. Coulthard. 1975. Towards an
Analysis of Discourse. -Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- 265 p.

References

Klemensievicz Z. Zarus ksladni polskiej, Warszawa, 1957

Mucarousky U. Dialog a monolog w “Lesty filologicke”, Praha, 1940. - № 6.

Essen O. Grundzuge der hochdeutschen Satzintonation, Hamburg

Шведова Н.Ю. Очерки по синтаксису русской разговорной речи: Автореф. дисс … д-ра филол.наук. - М.: 1958.

Михлина М.Л. Из наблюдений над синтаксисом диалогической речи: Автореф. дисс ... канд. филол.наук. - Л.: 1955.

Винокур Т.Г. O некоторых синтаксических особенностях диалогической речи в современном русском языке. :Автореф. дисс ... канд. филол.наук. - М.: 1953.

Боймирзаева С. Ўзбек тилида матннинг коммуникатив-прагматик мазмунини шакллантирувчи категориялар. Филол. фан. д-ри дис. автореф. ‒ Тошкент, 2010. ‒ Б. 21; Раупова Л. Диалогик дискурсдаги полипредикатив бирликларнинг социопрагматик тадқиқи. Филол. фан. док-ри. ... дис. ‒ Тошкент, 2012. ‒ Б. 53.

Ўринбоев Б. Ўзбек тили сўзлашув нутқи синтаксиси масалалари. ‒ Тошкент, 1974.

Ҳазратқулов А.Ҳ. Диалогик нутқ синтаксисининг баъзи хусусиятлари (диалогик бирлик ҳақида методологик кўргазма). ‒ Қарши, 1978. ‒ Б. 36; Тоирова Г. Нутқий мулоқотнинг лисоний вербал ва лисоний новербал воситалари хусусида (саломлашиш мисолида) // БухДУ илмий ахбороти, 2018. ‒ № 1. ‒ Б. 67-74.

Bekimbetova G.R. Diskursiv kompetensiya asosida talabalarning lingvistik kompetensiyasini rivojlantirish metodikasi // Ilm sarchashmalari. – Urganch davlat universitetining ilmiy-nazariy, metodik jurnali. 2023, -№9. –B.83-85. (13.00.00; №31).

Зимняя И.А. Психологические аспекты обучения говорению на иностранном языке. М., МГУ, 1998, c. 142.

Митина С.Н. Проектирование в формировании речевой компетенции будущего учителя // Высшая школа. 2004. № 5. С. 32-35.

Harris Z.S. Analyse du discours // Languages, 1969. – №13. – P. 8-45

Dubois J., Giacomo M. et al. Dictionnaires de linguistique. – Paris: Larousse, 1973. – 516 p

Раупова Л. “Диалогик нутқнинг дискурсив талқини”. - Т.: 2010.

Сойфер Э.В. Создание и восприятие дискурса в условиях управляемого общения на иностранном языке // Казанская лингвистическая школа: традиции и современность. Казань, 2003. С.70-75

Жуманазаров У.У. Таълимни рақамлаштириш муҳитида бўлажак инглиз тили ўқитувчиларининг лингвистик компетенциясини ривожлантириш. Педагогика фанлари доктори (DSc) илмий даражасини олиш учун ёзилган диссертация. Жиззах – 2021.25-б

Кирилина Л. И. Современные технологии обучения русскому языку как средство повышения каче-ства образования в условиях модернизации и профессиональная компетентность учителя // Современные наукоемкие технологии. 2005. № 6. С. 82-88

Романова Н. Н., Филиппов А. В. Словарь. Культура речевого общения: этика, прагматика, психология. М., 2010. С. 174.

Толстих В.И.С чего начинается личность: сборник. -М., 1984. - С.99.

Sinclair, J. McH., and R. M. Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse. -Oxford: Oxford University Press. - 265 p.