International Journal of Pedagogics
157
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijp
VOLUME
Vol.05 Issue06 2025
PAGE NO.
157-159
10.37547/ijp/Volume05Issue06-44
Analysis Of Character Creation Methods In Dramatic Theatre
And Cinema
Zamfira Amirovna Akhmedova
Associate Professor, Head Of The Department Of Dramatic Theatre And Cinema Art, Uzbek State Institute Of Arts And Culture, Faculty
Of Theatre Arts, Uzbekistan
Received:
14 April 2025;
Accepted:
15 May 2025;
Published:
18 June 2025
Abstract:
This article presents a theoretical and practical analysis of the methods of character creation in dramatic
theatre and cinema in Uzbekistan. It emphasizes that creating a character in theatre and cinema acting is not
limited to external appearance or movement but is a process of revealing the actor's inner psychological state,
national spirit, mentality, and the profound depth of the Eastern soul. In theatre, the actor embodies the character
fully through "live" stage performance, while in cinema, it is essential to convey inner emotions subtly and
naturally through the camera. The article examines various acting methods, including those of Stanislavski, Brian
Lenny, and Meyerhold, alongside traditional schools formed within Uzbek theatre arts
—
such as the dramaturgy
of Abdulla Qodiriy, the directing style of Bahodir Yuldoshev, and the creative approaches of actors like Otabek
Mahkamov and Yulduz Rajabova. Furthermore, it explores pedagogical approaches, training sessions, and
practical workshops applied in character development at educational institutions such as the Uzbekistan State
Institute of Arts and Culture and art colleges.
Keywords:
Character creation, dramatic theatre, cinema art, acting methodology, inner psychology, national
theatre school, Uzbek cinema, stage and camera, creative transformation, actor training, directing approach,
artistic image, national expression.
Introduction
Today, among the various branches of art, dramatic
theatre and cinema hold significant relevance as some
of the most powerful means of expressing human
emotions, psychological states, and social essence.
Especially in the context of globalization, the rapid
advancement of information technologies, and the
digitization of artistic tools, the demands placed on
acting skills and methods of artistic expression have
reached a new level.
In Uzbekistan, the fields of theatre and cinema entered
a new stage of development after gaining
independence. The emergence of new dramaturgy,
young directors and actors, and the effort to harmonize
national and modern trends have made the issue of
character creation even more pressing. While stage
acting emphasizes theatrical speech, live expression,
and a folk-inspired manner of delivery, cinema
demands the actor’s ability to convey inner emotions
naturally in front of the camera. Therefore, a deep
analysis of methodological approaches to character
creation, and identifying their interconnections and
distinctions in the context of theatre and cinema, is one
of the key tasks.
This article focuses precisely on that aspect
—
a
theoretical and practical analysis of character creation
methods in theatre and cinema acting, their mutual
influence, and the exploration of their national
features. This study not only contributes to a deeper
understanding of the creative process but also serves
to enhance the training process of young actors.
Literature
Review.
Numerous
scientific
and
methodological works have been produced on the
issue of character creation in dramatic theatre and
cinema, analyzed from the perspectives of acting
mastery, the psychology of the creative process, and
the theory of directing.
The theoretical foundations of character creation are
thoroughly covered in the works of the renowned
Russian theatre figure Konstantin Stanislavski,
particularly in “An Actor’s Work on Himself” and
“Psychotechniques of the Creative Process.”
His system
is based on the actor's entry into character through
International Journal of Pedagogics
158
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijp
International Journal of Pedagogics (ISSN: 2771-2281)
inner emotions and performing naturally on stage. In
contrast, Vsevolod Meyerhold emphasized physical
expression
through
biomechanics
and
plastic
movement, advocating the idea of creating a character
through external physical actions.
In foreign literature, the methods of the American
school
—
represented by Lee Strasberg, Sanford
Meisner, and Stella Adler
—
are extensively discussed,
particularly the concept of “method acting.” These
techniques are considered especially effective in
cinema for expressing internal psychological states.
In national literature, especially through the works and
contributions of A. Qodiriy, Sh. Rashidov, and B.
Yuldoshev, the reflection of Uzbek folk psychology,
national spirit, and cultural essence plays an important
role in character creation. The curricula and
methodological manuals of the Uzbekistan State
Institute of Arts and Culture and art colleges also
highlight contemporary approaches to character
development, including training exercises and
methodological guidelines.
It is noteworthy that modern literature increasingly
emphasizes the integration of theatrical and cinematic
methods
—
so-called hybrid approaches. In the works of
N. Richardson, D. Weston, and M. Chekhov, attention
is given to the multifunctionality of the modern actor,
the ability to adapt to both camera and stage, and the
capacity to work with improvisation and psychological
depth.
The analysis of the literature indicates that for the
successful creation of a character, it is essential to
harmoniously combine theatre and film techniques,
applying
both
traditional
and
contemporary
psychotechnical methods in an integrated manner.
Discussion and analysis. The process of character
creation in dramatic theatre and cinema is based on
entirely
different
conditions
and
technical
requirements.
However,
the
interplay
and
methodological harmony between the two serve as key
factors in developing acting skills.
Stage performance in theatre is live, highly expressive,
and requires direct interaction with the audience,
meaning that the actor must express not only their
external actions but also their internal emotional state.
Therefore, in theatre, methods such as Stanislavski’s
approach of "entering the role from within,"
Meyerhold’s biomechanics, and expressive movement
elements are more commonly used.
In cinema, on the other hand, performance is centered
on naturalness in front of the camera, facial
expressions, eye contact, and the delicate and precise
conveyance of inner emotions. The method acting
technique, particularly developed for cinema, requires
the actor to enter a deep psychological state and
communicate it effectively through the screen.
In the context of Uzbekistan, actors in both theatre and
film actively apply these methods. Today, theatre
actors often participate in film projects, while film
actors appear on theatre stages. This practice helps
expand their character creation skills, increase
flexibility, and enrich their capacity for creative
interpretation.
Experience shows that during theatre training, actors
are initially prepared for stage performance and later
face certain difficulties in adapting to cinematic acting.
For this reason, the introduction of a hybrid training
model that integrates both theatre and film methods is
considered essential. Such training would develop skills
suitable for both media from the outset.
From this perspective, the character creation process is
not merely about performance skills
—
it is a
multifaceted process that
reveals the actor’s
emotional, spiritual, and intellectual potential.
Methodologies. Implementing a Hybrid Training
Model. Integrating both theatre and film-specific
methods in actor training is vital for developing the
versatility required of modern actors. For example,
theatre emphasizes stage movement, vocal control,
expressive gestures, and working with classical
monologues, while film acting prioritizes subtle
expressions in front of the camera, delivering emotions
without exaggeration, and mastering the art of
"presence" within the frame.
A suggested approach in acting classes is the “dual
format” method—
where students perform the same
character first on stage, then adapt it for the camera.
For instance, a monologue from Othello or Ana
Urganchlik could be presented first in a theatrical
setting, then performed facing the camera to
emphasize emotional nuance.
Enhancing Psychological Preparation. Depth and
authenticity of inner emotional states are critical in
character creation. Therefore, actors must develop
control over their emotions and be open in their
collaboration with directors. This can be achieved by
introducing specialized “psychological improvisation”
exercises. One such method is the "Hot Seat"
technique
—
an actor is given a situation (e.g., their child
is critically ill, and they arrive at the hospital) and must
convey the emotion not just through words, but also
through their eyes, breathing, and facial expressions.
This exercise fosters a powerful emotional atmosphere
that is essential for both theatre and film acting.
In Uzbekistan, national values, traditions, emotional
states, and the musicality of the Uzbek language play
an important role in character creation. Particularly in
dramatic works, realistically portraying the spirit of the
people and the mental framework significantly
deepens the expressive power of acting. In actor
training, it is essential to systematize work with
International Journal of Pedagogics
159
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijp
International Journal of Pedagogics (ISSN: 2771-2281)
monologues from the plays of renowned Uzbek
playwrights such as Abdulla Qodiriy, Said Ahmad, and
Erkin A’zam. Add
itionally, incorporating elements from
Uzbek folk oral traditions (proverbs, parables,
anecdotes) as performance material helps actors gain a
deeper understanding of character psychology.
Increasing Improvisation and Creative Exercises. Rather
than simply adapting the actor to the role, it is
important to develop their ability to re-create the
character
from
within,
through
personal
interpretation. Free creative exercises are vital in this
regard. Improvisation helps reveal the genuine creative
process
behind
character
construction.
One
recommended exercise is “one object –
five
characters.” For instance, a single “key” is given, and
the actor must portray it in five different scenarios
(e.g., as a lover's gift, a weapon, a lost item, etc.). This
practice enhances creative thinking and aids in building
multi-dimensional characters.
Establishing a System of Practical Experience Exchange.
Theoretical lessons alone are insufficient to solidify
acting skills. A strong, organic connection must be
established between educational institutions and
professional creative organizations (theatres, film
studios, production centers). For instance, launching
initiatives such as “Young Actor on Stage” or “Students
in the Film Process” would be highly beneficial. Under
such programs, students should participate monthly in
real theatrical productions or film shoots, taking on
small episodic roles. This practical exposure helps
prepare
them
for
real-world
professional
environments.
CONCLUSION
The process of character creation in theatre and
cinema is a multifaceted and complex endeavor, yet it
is rich in creative potential. It requires not only
technical skill from the actor but also psychological
depth, social sensitivity, and an understanding of the
national spirit.
In theatre, expressiveness, stage movement, and
intention are of primary importance, while in cinema,
inner emotion, working with the camera, and
naturalness are the key criteria. The harmonious
integration of methodological approaches from both
fields serves to enhance and perfect acting mastery.
Uzbekistan's national schools of theatre and cinema
possess a unique and rich tradition in this area.
Analyzing their advanced practices, enriching them
with new methods, and effectively implementing them
into actor training systems represent one of the most
pressing tasks of the present day.
REFERENCES
Станиславский К.С. Работа актера над собой. –
Москва: Искусство, 2008.
Мейерхольд В.Э. О театре: Статьи и выступления. –
Москва: Искусство, 1987.
Страсберг Ли. Актёр и метод. –
Санкт
-
Петербург:
Лань
, 2010.
Адлер Стелла. Техника актёра. –
Москва: АСТ, 2011.
Михаил Чехов. О технике актёра. –
Москва:
Вузовская книга, 2009.
Richardson, N. The Actor’s Toolkit: A Practical Guide for
Theatre and Film.
–
London: Routledge, 2017.
Weston, J. Directing Actors: Creating Memorable
Performances for Film and Television.
–
Los Angeles:
Michael Wiese Productions, 2016.
Ўзбекистон давлат драма театри тарихи (таҳр.
Т.Жалилов). –
Тошкент: Санъат, 2015.
Қодирий А. Драматургия ва саҳна тажрибаси. –
Тошкент: Фан, 1992.
Йўлдошев Б. Саҳна ва ҳаёт ўртасида. –
Тошкент:
Ёзувчи, 2004.
Содиқов А. Ўзбек театр санъати тарихи ва ривожи. –
Тошкент: Академнашр, 2020.
Ўзбекистон Бадиий Академияси. Театр таълими
дастурлари ва методик кўрсатмалар. –
Тошкент:
2021.
