Volume 03 Issue 02-2023
27
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
02
Pages:
27-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
676
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
When forming linguodidactic competencies, it is necessary to determine the relationship of communication that has
developed during the training of teachers of the Karakalpak language on the basis of competence-based
communication with other methodological communication.
KEYWORDS
Linguistic competence, methodology, teaching, philologist-student, modeling, exemplary model, behavior, social
conditions, level of education, social activity.
INTRODUCTION
When we analyze the literature, we can see that V.I.
Baidenko, I.V. Blauberg, and E.G. Yudinler distinguish
four levels of analysis: philosophical, scientific,
scientific, and individual methodical [1, 2, 3].
I.A.Zimnyaya determines the result-oriented objective
orientation of teaching and considers the approach
focused on competence. “In any hierarchical structure,
it is described by what defines the ranks in which there
is no lower rank” [4] Therefore, according to the
definition of competence-based approach, it is divided
into systematic, interdisciplinary and business-oriented
approach.
Philosophical
importance
of
systematic
communication, K.A. Abulkhanova-Slavskaya, A.N.
Averyanov, V.G. Afanasyev, I.V. Blauberg, E.G. Yudin,
M.S.Kagan, F.F. Korolev, Yu. According to K.A.
Research Article
THE PROBLEM OF DEVELOPMENT OF LINGUODIDACTIC COMPETENCE
IN TEACHING THE KARAKALPAK LANGUAGE
Submission Date:
February 10, 2023,
Accepted Date:
February 15, 2023,
Published Date:
February 20, 2023
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume03Issue02-06
D.B. Seytkasimov
Ph.D., Associate Professor, Karakalpak State University Named After Berdakh Uzbekistan
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijp
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 03 Issue 02-2023
28
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
02
Pages:
27-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
676
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Abul'khanova-Slavskaya,
the
methodological
orientation of the researches of V.G. Afanasyev, V.P.
Bespalko, I.V. Blauberg, N.V. Kuzmina, E.G. Yudinler is
different from the systematic approach itself. , the
object of learning is viewed as a system, and the
student takes it upon himself to search for adequate
tools for such research. In terms of the methodological
orientation of the scientific studies of the Jews, the
systematic approach is unique in that the object of
learning is seen as a system, and the whole study of it
and the search for adequate tools of such research are
involved in its work. Also, E.G. Yudin considers
phenomena
in
terms
of
their
complexity,
interrelationship and mutual influence of their
constituent parts, and it is necessary to support a
systematic approach.
There is a certain unity in the understanding that the
system is a direct object of management. A system
should be understood as an interconnected unit of
separate elements that create a new sign with its own
characteristics. A system is a whole complex of
interrelated elements, and the change of one of them
changes the others as well. This means that each
system has a number of unique features that cannot be
found in any component element. The elements of the
system together make up its structure, as well as their
interrelationship and mutual influence give the system
the character of integrity.
The system has the following features:
1) the presence of integrative features, i.e. features in
which each element of the system is not separate
(systematic);
2) existence of components - components that make
up the system;
3) the existence of a structure, that is, clear
connections and relationships between separate
elements (compositions, separates);
4) the existence of functional peculiarities of the whole
system and separate elements [5] .
In the modern teaching place, systematic approach is
one of the orientations of scientific and methodical
preparation of pedagogical processes, development of
innovative business, productivity and quality of results,
and they are more visible in the synthesis. The
systematic approach allows to see all objects and
phenomena as a system and is aimed at identifying all
kinds of connections in the object (phenomena),
revealing its integrity, internal connection and working
principles.
According to N.V. Kuzmina, the pedagogic system is
evaluated by a set of interrelated compositional and
functional components [6] that allow young children
and adults to follow the goals of education, training
and education. The characteristic features of the
pedagogical system are the following: this is a complex
of elements that make up the pedagogical system;
systematic
description
of
the
existence
of
interconnections and relationships between system
elements; it is functional that determines the
functioning of the pedagogical system as an integral
part of the system.
Yu.K. Babansky notes the role of the systematic
approach in learning the pedagogical system and
calculates that “the systematic approach, in which all
possible solutions are chosen in a random and
interconnected situation, leads to the selection of the
best option’ [7].
The approach to competence should be described as a
systematic approach, and it should be noted that one
Volume 03 Issue 02-2023
29
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
02
Pages:
27-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
676
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
of the goals of the research is to develop a model of
linguodidactic competencies of the future Karakalpak
language teacher.
According to I.N. Kondakov, we understand a model as
“a picture, a scheme, an object or a description of their
system, in a simple, abbreviated form, the structure,
differences, elements of the learned object, showing
the relations between them and specifying the process
of obtaining information about the object of interest”
[8].
According to A.I. Sannikova, “modeling is a universal
method of learning any material and ideational objects,
phenomena, processes and systems. The model, as a
system of objects or symbols, reproduces the
distinctive features of the original. It is not the direct
result of the experiment, but the opposite of the
phenomenon, it serves as the result of seeing practical
experience in the abstract. In scientific studies,
descriptive and graphical models are used instead of
representative models, performing the role of models”
[9].
The sample model has a prognostic feature, and with
its help, it is possible to show the desired condition of
the learned object and ensure its development in the
desired direction. The modeling method is very
effective for this purpose. Education is traditionally
defined as the creation of a person in the image and
likeness of the culture that existed in a certain
historical period. Culture refers to the behavior and
mind of people, as well as the system of patterns of
objects and phenomena in society, which are
repeatedly produced in the process of the exchange of
children [10].
The development of education is determined by the
socio-political, economic and cultural conditions of
society. The closest are the relationships in the
educational and cultural environment. Education, as a
socio-cultural phenomenon, becomes a decisive factor
of effective interaction with a new reality for a person.
It is almost possible that the educational and
professional education will be replaced by the
individual-oriented education aimed at developing a
multicultural, multilingual person.
The
following
trends
of
modern
education
development are related to this scale:
• each educational level is recognized as an integral
part of the lifelong learning system. This trend is going
to be implemented on a regular basis thanks to the
improvement of the integrated, comprehensive
educational facilities that unite the lyceum, college or
university;
• information technologies, including multimedia and
virtual technologies, are widely introduced to
education. The program using these technologies
significantly changes cognitively oriented education;
• computerization and technolog
icalization of
education - significantly expands the intellectual
activity of students;
• there is a tendency to move from a strictly disciplined
teaching to a flexible, block-modular, contextual
teaching [11]. These types of education mean that the
teacher develops his own
personality,
self-
understanding and self-discipline;
• the mutual relations between the teacher and the
learner will gradually change and become cooperative.
Both the teacher and the learner become subjects of
the educational process with equal rights;
• continuous transition of all levels of education,
continuous transition to public education, taking into
account joint responsibility for educational processes
Volume 03 Issue 02-2023
30
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
02
Pages:
27-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
676
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
and results, ensuring the ability to determine one's
own destiny - effective competence in decision-making
in these areas, constantly changing social, cultural,
educational and professional conditions [12].
Education is an open, unbalanced system, in which it is
possible to distinguish different lower systems based
on various factors of the level of education, age of
students, relationship to religion and the state, socio-
cultural orientation. The factor that creates the
meaning of education is its purpose - development of a
person in the process of education. As a learning
process, it is carried out throughout the entire
conscious life of a person, the goals, content and
technology of education change from the point of
view.
There are two types of teaching:
• The teacher is in the nature of passing on and
encouraging social and cultural experience. Such
training is carried out with the help of technologies
that provide the results of educational results
(knowledge, skills and experiences) with regard to
specially designed content and monitoring of criteria;
• Education is a continuo
us process of human
development from birth to adulthood, it is carried out
with the help of technologies that provide training and
development of competence, experiences, and its
assessment is carried out in terms of monitoring based
on criteria [13].
In the following, we will make the second definition in
the work:
“In the logic of systemic communication, all developed
competences are seen by us as elements of a complete
system of individual differences, here the element that
makes up the system is the g
oal ideal” [14], this can be
explained by the professional profile of the future
Karakalpak language teacher. Using a systematic
approach in modeling, for example, the process of
modeling the linguodidactic competencies of a future
teacher of the Karakalpak language takes into account
the following requirements:
• mark the learned process as systematic;
• checking each component of the system for the
purpose of determining the completeness of its
composition and providing it;
• determine the importance of structural relations
and, if necessary, change and supplement the
structure;
• to understand the work
ing mechanism of separate
parts of the whole organizational system, to control
this mechanism in a scientific way;
• as the most important condition for improving the
educational process, determining the development
tendencies of the system and estimating the degrees
[15].
At the general academic level, the competence area
can be considered in the context of the activity area.
Activity orientation is a theory, the main rule of which
is the position about the leading role of employability
in the process of personality formation. The relevance
of the activity direction ratio is determined by the
following factors:
• intelligence means the degree of activity of a person,
determines his ability to effectively manage his
relations with the outside world;
• Change
s in the modern education system -
humanizing all aspects of human life - emphasize the
importance of personal development.
Volume 03 Issue 02-2023
31
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
02
Pages:
27-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
676
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Effective personal development is possible only in the
process of integrating the reality of parenting, the
experience of previous children, culture, and one's
own constructive experience in social relations.
Although this relationship is characteristic of foreign
educational systems, it can be successfully supported
in our country. This makes the learning process
interesting, informative, and communication-oriented.
The main character of the teaching process is the
student, and he is considered as a reviewer. However,
it is not just thinking, but has sensitivity, and therefore
affective approach fills the educational scene
proposed by cognitive approach. Its purpose is to
create motivational motives for learning. Motivation is
considered as an internal excitement, impulse, feeling
or strong desire that calls a person to action. All people
have innate needs or urges, and their intensity is
determined by the surrounding center. The concept of
motivation refers to the six aspirations or needs of a
person [16]:
•
learning, learning uncertainty;
•
impact and changes on the surrounding center;
•
development and visibility of entrepreneurship,
abilities;
•
flattering by the surrounding center, other
people's bad ideas, opinions and feelings;
•
knowledge, its processing, and internalization of
learning
results,
influence,
activity
and
appreciation, solving contradictions, finding
solutions for systems of training and self-directed
knowledge;
•
enhancing the importance of one’s “self”, its
recognition and acceptance by others.
Researchers identify motivation, as well as other
factors that explain the hierarchy of needs: starting
from the material need for air, water, food, belief that
satisfaction leads to self-fulfillment, self-identity and
self-esteem [17]. However, the six needs listed there
represent the importance of the needs of the largest
category and are related to language teaching.
Motivation can appear in three different ways:
a) on a global scale;
b) degree of condition;
c) degree of responsibility.
Thus, it is possible that the student will be motivated,
but if he is presented with such a boring lesson, it is not
known if he will show it. There are three types of
factors that influence whether motivation is increased
or maintained:
1) factors related to the improvement of the
educational system and its implementation;
2) individual factors, that is, factors related to the
student;
3) socio-cultural factors [18].
The motivation can be of two types: instrumental and
integrative [19]. Looking at the source of motivation -
whether it comes from the student himself or from
other people - both internal and external aspects are
distinguished. This division brings a new dimension to
the dichotomy of “instrumental and integration
motivation”.
Thus, taking affective factors into account allows the
researcher to see the entire process of education. They
play an important role in learning, and it is seen in
choosing materials and tasks that encourage students
to be active, and in finding ways to correct errors that
do not cause confusion; the class takes care of
students' self-esteem, self-confidence and self-esteem;
in order to create favorable conditions for the teacher,
and to suggest the process of self-orientation of the
Volume 03 Issue 02-2023
32
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
02
Pages:
27-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
676
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
chosen poetic orientation, to increase their
individuality, to refer to the theory of learning
methods.
REFERENCES
1.
Baidenko V.I. Competence-based approach to the
design of state educational standards of higher
professional education (methodological and
methodological issues): method, manual. - M.:
Research Center for Quality Problems in Training
Specialists, 2005. - P.66.
2.
Zimnyaya I.A. Key competencies as the result-
target basis of the competency-based approach in
education.
–
M.: Issled. Center for Quality Problems
in Training Specialists, 2004. - P.29.
3.
Blauberg I.V., Yudin E.G. Formation and essence of
the system approach. - M.: Nauka, 1973. - 270 p.;
Blauberg I.V. Philosophical and methodological
problems of system research. Dis. ... Dr. Phil.
Sciences: 09.00.08. - M., 1983. -416p.; Yudin E.G.
Methodological problems of research of self-
organizing systems // Problems of methodology of
system research. - M.: Thought, 1970. - p. 360-361.
4.
Zimnyaya I.A. Key competencies as the result-
target basis of the competency-based approach in
education.
–
M.: Issled. Center for Quality Problems
in Specialist Training, 2004. - P.30:
5.
Belikov V.A. Theoretical foundations for solving
pedagogical problems: a guide for graduate
students and applicants. Magnet, Mrs. ped. in-t. -
Magnitogorsk, 2002. - 40 p.
6.
Kuzmina N.V. Creative potential of a specialist:
acmeological problems of development //
Humanization of education.
–
-No. 1.-S. 41-53.;
Kuzmina N.V. Acmeological theory of improving
the quality of training of education specialists:
monograph.
–
M.: Issled. Center for Quality
Problems in Training Specialists, 2001. - 144 p.
7.
Babansky Yu.K. Problems of improving the
effectiveness of pedagogical research. - M.:
Pedagogy, 1982. - P.11.
8.
Kondakov N.I. Logical dictionary-reference book. -
M.: 1975. - p.360-361.
9.
Sannikova A.I. Development of the creative
potential of students in the educational process:
Concept
and
implementation
experience:
monograph. - M.: Flinta: Science, 2001. - P.90.
10.
Sannikova A.I. Development of the creative
potential of students in the educational process:
Concept
and
implementation
experience:
monograph. - M.: Flinta: Science, 2001. - P. 90 .;
Gaysina G.I. Culturological approach in the theory
and
practice
of
pedagogical
education:
monograph. - M.: Prometheus, 2002. - 316 p.
11.
Verbitsky A.A. Active learning in higher education:
a contextual approach. - M., 1991. - 207 p.
12.
Zeer E.F., Pavlova A.M., Syrmanyuk E.E.
Modernization
of
vocational
education:
competency-based approach. - M.: MPSI, 2005. -
P.17.
13.
Zeer E.F., Pavlova A.M., Syrmanyuk E.E.
Modernization
of
vocational
education:
competency-based approach. - M.: MPSI, 2005. -
P.20.
14.
Zimnyaya I.A. Key competencies as the result-
target basis of the competency-based approach in
education.
–
M.: Issled. Center for Quality Problems
in Training Specialists, 2004. - P.32-32.
15.
Belikov V.A. Theoretical foundations for solving
pedagogical problems: a guide for graduate
students and applicants. Magnet, Mrs. ped. in-t. -
Magnitogorsk, 2002. - 40 p.
16.
Ausubel D.P. Educational psychology: a cognitive
view. - Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968. Original
from the University of Michigan Digitized Jul 14,
2008. - 685 p.
Volume 03 Issue 02-2023
33
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
03
I
SSUE
02
Pages:
27-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
(2023:
6.
676
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
17.
Maslow A.H. Motivation and personality. - New
York: Harper & Row, 1970.
–
369 p.
18.
Polyakov O.G. The role of learning theories and
needs analysis in the design of a profile-oriented
English course // Foreign Languages at School. -
2004. - No. 3. - p. 47.
19.
Gardner R.C., Lambert W.E. Attitudes and
motivation in second-language learning.
–
Newbury House Publishers, 1972. - 313 p.
