Volume 02 Issue 11-2022
21
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
02
I
SSUE
11
Pages:
21-27
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
METADATA
IF
–
5.689
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
This article is devoted to the study of non-verbal intelligence among students of the direction: "Geodesy and
geoinformatics" using Raven's progressive matrices. It presents an analysis of the data received from the subjects in
five series of this test, shows the percentage scale of the degree of intelligence development and the scale of mental
abilities. At the end of the article there are recommendations for the development of non-verbal intelligence.
KEYWORDS
Raven’s progressive matrices, non
-verbal intelligence, logical thinking, mental abilities, the level of intelligence
development.
INTRODUCTION
For students of the direction "Geodesy and
geoinformatics", when compiling maps of the area and
building plans, non-verbal intelligence is required, the
level of development of which was measured by us
with the help of progressive Raven matrices. The ability
to detect this level of development will show
employers how much one or another applicant will be
a qualified employee in the field of geodesy and
geoinformatics.
The aim of the research: to study the level of
development of non-verbal intelligence among
students
of
the
direction
"Geodesy
and
geoinformatics".
Research Article
DIAGNOSTICS OF NON-VERBAL INTELLIGENCE IN STUDENTS OF THE
DIRECTION: "GEODESY AND GEOINFORMATICS "
Submission Date:
November 01, 2022,
Accepted Date:
November 10, 2022,
Published Date:
November 18, 2022
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume02Issue11-04
Olesya Alekseevna Bondarchuk
Lecturer At The Department Of General Psychology, Faculty Of Social Sciences National University Of
Uzbekistan Named After Mirzo Ulugbek, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ijp
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 02 Issue 11-2022
22
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
02
I
SSUE
11
Pages:
21-27
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
METADATA
IF
–
5.689
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
The tasks of the research:
1. Compare with each other the average results
obtained by 5 series of Raven's progressive matrices
among students of the direction "Geodesy and
geoinformatics".
2. Diagnose the degree of intelligence development in
students
of
the
direction
"Geodesy
and
geoinformatics".
3. To identify the level of mental abilities of students of
the direction "Geodesy and geoinformatics".
4. Comparison between the degree of intelligence
development and the level of mental abilities of
students
of
the
direction
"Geodesy
and
geoinformatics".
The object of the research: Students of the National
University of Uzbekistan in the direction of "Geodesy
and geoinformatics".
The subject of the research: Non-verbal intelligence of
students
of
the
direction:
"Geodesy
and
geoinformatics".
Selection: 20 students of the National University of
Uzbekistan in the direction of "Geodesy and
geoinformatics" aged 20-37 years, among them 10
representatives of both sexes participated.
Research hypotheses:
1. Students of the direction: "Geodesy and
geoinformatics" will have a high level of non-verbal
intelligence.
2. Students of the direction: "Geodesy and
geoinformatics" will have the same results on the
percentage scale of the degree of intelligence
development and the scale of mental abilities.
Research method. Raven’s Progressive Matrices
The aim of the technique: the study of logical thinking.
Incentive material: 60 tables (5 series), each of which
lacks one of the figures located at the bottom among
6-8 others. Each series consists of 12 tasks.
To perform series A, it is necessary to analyze the
image structure and establish relationships in the
structure of the matrices. The subject is required to
pick up the missing fragment in order to get a complete
image.
Series B uses the principle of analogy between pairs of
figures. For the correct execution of this series, it is
necessary to determine the axis of symmetry of the
figures to which it is necessary to choose a pair.
Series C - built on the principle of progressive changes
in the figures of the matrices. To cope with each of the
tasks of this series, it is necessary to understand by
which the complication complication of the figures is
going on, adding new elements to them.
To complete the D series, you should find a horizontal
and vertical rearrangement of the figures.
In the last series - series E, it is necessary to find the
principle of analysis and synthesis of figures when
decomposing the figures of the main image into
elements.
Procedure: within no more than 30 minutes, the
subject is presented with cards. The task of the test
taker is to indicate the number of the missing figure on
the questionnaire.
RESULTS
Table 1.
Volume 02 Issue 11-2022
23
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
02
I
SSUE
11
Pages:
21-27
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
METADATA
IF
–
5.689
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
The average results of the subjects for 5 series of
progressive matrices Raven.
А
В
С
D
Е
average
9,8
9,5
8,3
8,4 5,4
Histogram 1.
As can be seen from the above table and histogram, the average number of correct answers among students
decreased, according to the degree of complexity of each of the series of progressive matrices. The lowest number
was obtained for Series E, perhaps the reason for this lies in the fact that the tasks in this series were the most difficult
of all or the subjects did not have enough time to answer all the tasks in this series.
Table 2.
Percentage scale of the degree of intelligence development
0
2
4
6
8
10
А
В
С
D
Е
9.8
9.5
8.3
8.4
5.4
The average results of the subjects for 5 series of progressive
matrices Raven
Volume 02 Issue 11-2022
24
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
02
I
SSUE
11
Pages:
21-27
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
METADATA
IF
–
5.689
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Percent Degree
Quantity
%
95
and
above
1st degree:
especially highly developed intellect of the
subject of the corresponding age group
2
10
75-95
2nd degree:
outstanding intelligence for this age group
5
25
25-74
3rd degree:
average intelligence for this age group
11
55
5-24
4th degree:
below average intelligence.
2
10
5 or less
5th degree:
defective intellectual ability
0
Diagram 1
The above table and diagrams clearly show us non-verbal intelligence above average in only 7 subjects, which is 35%
of the total number of students (1st and 2nd degree), 11 (55%) were diagnosed with an average degree of intelligence
development, and 2 students (10%) is below average, the reason for such results may be the low motivation of some
students to pass this technique.
Table 3.
Scale of mental abilities.
IQ indicators
Level of intelligence development
Quantity
ол-во
%
Over 140
very high, outstanding intelligence
0
2
5
11
2
Percentage scale of the degree of intelligence development
1
2
3
4
Volume 02 Issue 11-2022
25
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
02
I
SSUE
11
Pages:
21-27
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
METADATA
IF
–
5.689
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
More than 121
high, outstanding intelligence
5
25
111-120
outstanding, good intelligence
1
5
101-110
normal, above average intelligence
1
5
91-100
average intelligence
6
30
81-90
weak, below average intelligence
4
20
71-80
small degree of dementia
1
5
51-70
debility dementia
2
10
21-50
imbecility, average degree of dementia
0
0-20
idiocy, the greatest degree of dementia
0
Diagram 2.
On the scale of mental abilities, we got even more
deplorable results compared to the percentage school
of the degree of intelligence development. From the
above table and diagram, we see the correspondence
of the scale of mental abilities with the percentage
scale of the level of intelligence development
according to the above average degree of intelligence
(above average, outstanding, high) of 7 subjects.
5
1
1
6
4
1
2
Scale of mental abilities.
high, outstanding
intelligence
outstanding, good
intelligence
normal, above average
intelligence
average intelligence
weak, below average
intelligence
small degree of dementia
debility dementia
Volume 02 Issue 11-2022
26
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
02
I
SSUE
11
Pages:
21-27
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
METADATA
IF
–
5.689
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Average intelligence on the scale of mental abilities, in
contrast to the percentage, is observed only in 6
people (30%), and weak, below average (below
average, a small degree and debility dementia) in 7
students, which is 35% of all subjects. As we can see, the
presence of a small degree of dementia and debility
dementia in some respondents indicates that they are
not serious about testing.
Below we will clearly show the comparison between
the degree of intelligence development and the level
of mental abilities of students of the direction
"Geodesy and geoinformatics".
Table 4.
Comparison between the degree of intelligence development and the level of mental abilities of students of the
direction "Geodesy and geoinformatics".
above average
average
below
average
degree of intelligence development
7
11
2
scale of mental abilities
7
6
7
Histogram 2
As the above table and histogram show, due to a more
fractional gradation of the scale of mental abilities, we
received lower results on it, compared with the
percentage scale of the degree of intelligence
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
above
average
average
below
average
7
11
2
7
6
7
Comparison between the degree of intelligence development
and the level of mental abilities of students of the direction
"Geodesy and geoinformatics".
degree of intelligence
development
scale of mental abilities
Volume 02 Issue 11-2022
27
International Journal of Pedagogics
(ISSN
–
2771-2281)
VOLUME
02
I
SSUE
11
Pages:
21-27
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2021:
5.
705
)
(2022:
5.
705
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
METADATA
IF
–
5.689
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
development, on average and below average
indicators, but there is no such discrepancy with
respect to a high level of intelligence.
CONCLUSIONS
As recommendations for further work, we would
suggest:
-
motivate the subjects before solving tasks of
progressive matrices;
-
for the development of non-verbal intelligence,
students of the direction "Geodesy and
geoinformatics" should be interested in solving
puzzles, puzzles, Sudoku, etc. as a hobby.
Our first hypothesis that students of the direction
"Geodesy and Geoinformatics" will have a high level of
non-verbal intelligence was not confirmed, only 7
people (35%) had a high level. The second hypothesis,
sounds as follows: "Students of the direction:
"Geodesy and geoinformatics" will have the same
results on the percentage scale of the degree of
intelligence development and the scale of mental
abilities" was confirmed only with respect to indicators
above average.
REFERENCES
1.
Druzhinin, V. N. Experimental psychology / V. N.
Druzhinin - St. Petersburg: Publishing house
"Piter", 2000. - 320 p.
2.
Mitina, O.V. Mathematical methods in psychology:
Practicum / O.V. Mitina
–
M.: Aspect Press, 2008.-
238 p.
3.
Raven's progressive matrices: methodological
recommendations/comp. And the general edition
of O.E. Mukhorodova, T.V. Schreiber. Izhevsk:
Publishing house "Udmurt University", 2011.-70s.
