INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805
eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 07 (2025)
38
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING VISUAL AIDS IN PRIMARY SCHOOL LESSONS
Khasanova Asila
3rd year student of Karshi International University
Abstract:
This article analyzes the effectiveness of using visual aids in the primary school
learning process. The study examines the impact of modern visual materials on reinforcing
students’ knowledge, focusing their attention, and enhancing their understanding of the subject.
The analysis revealed that the use of visual aids can make the educational process not only
more engaging but also more effective. The article provides recommendations on the rational
use of visual materials, taking into account the psychological characteristics of primary school
students, as well as mechanisms of perception and memory. Based on pedagogical experience,
methodological approaches, and scientific sources, practical suggestions are presented at the
end of the article.
Keywords:
visual aids, primary education, effectiveness, methodology, psychological
characteristics, learning process.
Currently, the reforms taking place in the field of education require modern pedagogical
approaches. In particular, the primary education stage is considered a crucial period for forming
students’ fundamental knowledge, skills, and competencies. From this perspective, the rational
use of various methods and tools during lessons, especially, the broad application of visual aids
has become one of the most pressing issues today. Visual aids are among the most effective
tools for presenting learning material in an illustrative manner, sparking students’ interest in the
topic, and activating their perception.
Modern primary school students are more inclined to perceive information visually compared to
previous generations. Therefore, teaching should be organized with consideration of their
psychological characteristics, age, perception levels, and memory mechanisms. For this reason,
using colorful images, diagrams, videos, tables, and other visual materials during lessons can
significantly enhance students’ comprehension and retention.
The relevance of this research lies in the fact that
using visual aids can not only improve the
effectiveness of education but also develop students’ independent thinking abilities. Hence,
developing scientifically grounded recommendations for the use of such tools in primary school
lessons is of great importance.
The purpose of this study
is to determine the effectiveness of using visual aids in primary
school lessons and to develop pedagogical recommendations based on the findings.
The research tasks include:
o
Studying the types of visual aids and their impact on students;
o
Analyzing the psychological characteristics of primary school students;
o
Developing a methodology for organizing effective lessons using visual materials;
o
Demonstrating mechanisms for reinforcing students’ knowledge based on practical
recommendations.
The object of the research
is the process of primary educatio
n.
The subject of the research
is the methodological potential and pedagogical effectiveness of
using visual aids during lessons.
INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805
eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 07 (2025)
39
Various opinions have been expressed in scientific research and methodological developments
in this field, which are of great importance in further improving the educational process. In the
field of educational psychology, the famous American scholar Dale Edgar, in his “Cone of
Experience” theory, states that people remember 10% of what they read, 20% of what they hear,
30% of what they see, and 50% of what they see and hear. This theory highlights the crucial
role of visual aids in the learning process. Similarly, Bruner (Bruner, J. S., 1966), in his
research, emphasizes the importance of visual and experiential learning in the development of
children’s thinking.
In the textbooks and methodological guides developed by the Russian scholar N. F.
Vinogradova for primary grades, the use of visual aids holds a special place. She extensively
analyzes the significance of colorful images, diagrams, tables, and graphic illustrations in
developing students’ imagination. According to her, “mental operations in children are formed
through visual stimuli”. Moreover, countries with advanced education systems such as Finland,
South Korea, and Japan extensively utilize visual aids in primary education. For instance, in
Finland, each topic is presented with colorful graphics, models, and real-life examples, which
allows children to apply their acquired knowledge in daily life. A similar approach is used in
South Korea, where short video clips related to each topic are integrated into the lessons.
Russian methodologists such as P. I. Pidkasistiy, V. A. Slastyonin, and M. N. Skatkin highlight
that the use of visual aids in primary education is important not only for explanation but also in
students’ independent activities. They point out that the presence of aesthetic elements, such as
pictures, drawings, videos, and real objects, creates a positive emotional state in students and
enhances their interest in the subject.
In Uzbekistan, several studies have also been conducted on primary education methodology.
For example, O. Q. Tursunova (2019), in her work “Innovative Methods in Primary Education,”
discusses the effectiveness of using visual aids among interactive methods. According to the
author, visual lessons not only increase students’ knowledge levels but also encourage their
independent inquiry and interest. In the same direction, S. S. Jo‘rayev (2021) also emphasizes
in his article the importance of enriching lesson materials with visual aids, taking into account
the psychology of primary school students. It is also worth noting that some researchers caution
against the excessive use of visual aids, which may distract students. In this regard, the
pedagogical scholar D. N. Qodirova (2020), in her studies, emphasizes that visual aids should
be used purposefully and in moderation. She also highlights that the selection of these tools
should be based on the students’ age, the content of the topic, lesson objectives, and grade level.
An analysis of the above literature shows that visual aids are becoming an integral part of the
modern primary education process. However, scientific and methodological research on their
appropriate selection, psychological and didactic justification, and practical implementation
remains relevant. This research aims to enrich existing scientific perspectives and provide
effective practical recommendations.
The following scientific methods were applied in the research in a comprehensive manner:
1.
Analysis and synthesis –
local and foreign literature on the topic was studied, authors’
opinions were analyzed, generalized, and specific conclusions were drawn.
2.
Comparison –
the experiences of different countries were compared with the situation
in Uzbekistan’s primary education system.
INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805
eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 07 (2025)
40
3.
Model-based analysis –
the role of visual aids in education was evaluated based on
Dale Edgar’s “Cone of Experience” theory and Bruner’s staged model of cognitive
development.
4.
Pedagogical observation –
the use of visual aids during primary school lessons was
monitored.
5.
Expert evaluation method –
opinions were collected and analyzed from several
experienced primary school teachers regarding the topic.
The following scientific approaches were utilized in the research:
1.
Systemic approach –
the role of visual aids in the educational process was analyzed
within an integrated system.
2.
Competency-based approach –
the knowledge, skills, and competencies formed in
students through visual aids were evaluated.
3.
Interactive approach –
communication and exchange of ideas between teacher and
student were considered key factors in the use of visual aids.
During the research process, the integration of the following interactive methods with
visual aids was analyzed:
1.
Brainstorming;
2.
Insert method;
3.
Cluster and mind mapping;
4.
Use of digital interactive whiteboards, presentations, and video materials.
The following tools were used in this research:
o
Questionnaire forms – designed to measure students’ perception and comprehension of
lessons based on visual aids.
o
Interview formats – used to conduct conversations with primary school teachers and
collect data based on their experiences.
o
Lesson observation sheets – developed to record students’ activity, participation, and
comprehension levels during lessons.
o
Multimedia slides and video materials – used as key visual aids during experimental
lessons.
o
Statistical data tables – used to compare students’ academic performance and
comprehension outcomes.
Research findings showed that the use of visual aids in primary education is highly effective.
Based on observations, interviews, and analysis of literature, the following key results were
identified:
1.
The impact of visual aids on educational effectiveness.
Observations conducted with
primary school students revealed that their retention of knowledge, interest in the lesson, and
independent thinking were significantly higher in lessons that incorporated visual aids.
Specifically:
In lessons using images, diagrams, and pictures, students demonstrated a 38% faster
comprehension and 46% higher retention compared to text-based materials.
Lessons conducted with multimedia presentations (PowerPoint, video) showed a 20–
25% increase in correct responses to questions.
INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805
eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 07 (2025)
41
The use of interactive tools (interactive whiteboards, visual quizzes) led to a 42%
increase in student participation in answering questions.
2.
Teachers’ opinions.
During the study, interviews were held with 15 primary school
teachers. Among them, 12 specifically highlighted the positive effects of visual aids, citing the
following aspects:
Easier explanation of topics;
Students remain more attentive throughout the lesson;
A supportive environment for developing oral and written speech;
Better adaptability to each student’s level of comprehension.
3.
The effect of different types of visual aids.
The table below shows the impact of
various visual tools on students:
Type of visual aid
Level of interest
Independent thinking Knowledge retention
Simple
image
displays
68%
Moderate
Low
Multimedia
presentations
82%
High
Moderate-High
Interactive
video
materials
87%
Very High
High
Mind
maps
and
clusters
79%
Moderate-High
High
These results indicate that not only the presence of visual aids, but their type also significantly
affects different aspects of student engagement. In particular, interactive videos and mind maps
were found to be highly effective in developing students’ critical thinking and independent
work skills.
4.
Observations from experimental lessons.
Experimental lessons were conducted in two
schools in Karshi city with 3rd-grade classes. In two classrooms, lessons were taught using only
verbal explanations, while in the other two, visual aids were integrated. The outcomes were as
follows:
In the class with visual aids, 25 out of 30 students fully understood the topic, while in
the traditional class, only 17 out of 30 could accurately restate the content.
Students in the visual-aid-supported class also performed significantly better in
completing extracurricular assignments.
These findings align not only with international research but also with the scientific
investigations of Uzbek scholars. For example, in the didactic models of V.A. Slastyonin (2014)
and M.V. Klarin (2000), visual materials are evaluated as components that attract attention,
enhance clarity, and develop analytical thinking in the learning process. In our experimental
lessons as well, students’ retention of knowledge and activity levels were significantly higher,
which serves as practical evidence supporting these theoretical views. This study also
practically confirms the theory of "visual didactics" proposed by M.V. Klarin (2000).
According to this theory, through visual materials, students are more inclined to think
independently, analyze, and generalize the topic. Similar results were observed in our
experimental lessons — students’ participation in discussions, independent understanding of
concepts, and evaluative thinking increased.
INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805
eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 07 (2025)
42
Compared with the views of Uzbek scholars, for instance, T.Kh. Toshboev (2020) emphasizes
that the use of interactive methods, especially visual technologies, in primary education can
develop students’ independent thinking and logical reasoning skills. Our research findings
confirm this view: visual tools transform students from passive listeners into active participants.
Furthermore, in his research, A. Juraev (2018) found that lesson materials based on images and
videos increased comprehension in primary school by 25–30%. In our experiment as well, the
group in which visual tools were used achieved an 80% level of knowledge acquisition, which
once again confirms the relevance and effectiveness of this approach.
At the same time, the limited technical capabilities in some Uzbek schools — particularly the
lack of interactive whiteboards or multimedia tools in certain regions — show that the full
implementation of the visual approach in education faces challenges. From this perspective, Sh.
Mahmudova (2021) emphasizes the need to improve teachers’ competencies in using
information technologies. During our research, it was also observed that some teachers were not
prepared to use technical tools, which practically confirms this viewpoint.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this article once again confirms the necessity of a developmental, motivational,
and interactive approach tailored to the age characteristics of primary school students. The use
of visual tools in lessons not only facilitates the understanding of educational content but also
enhances students’ motivation toward learning and allows for the organization of interactive
and effective lessons. These tools are especially effective in engaging students who have low
academic performance or limited interest in learning. However, the study also showed that
excessive or improper use of visual materials can distract students or lead them away from the
main learning objectives. Therefore, it is essential to use these tools appropriately, purposefully,
and based on sound didactic principles. For the successful implementation of these tools,
methodical approaches, teacher preparedness, and the availability of technical resources are
critical requirements.
Recommendations
1.
Enhancing teachers’ qualifications:
o
Special training sessions and seminars should be organized for primary school teachers.
These should focus on how to select visual tools appropriately for pedagogical purposes and
how to use them effectively.
o
It would be beneficial to establish “methodological centers for visual technologies”
within educational institutions.
2.
Didactically grounded selection of visual tools:
o
Visual materials (images, graphics, videos, infographics) should be carefully selected
based on lesson content, the age characteristics of students, and the complexity of the topic.
o
Visual tools should serve to increase student engagement and develop logical thinking
skills.
3.
Modernizing educational technologies:
o
It is recommended to increase the level of equipment in schools with modern
information and communication technology (ICT) tools — especially through the widespread
introduction of devices like interactive whiteboards, projectors, and tablets.
o
The development and popularization of pedagogical software, visual content platforms,
and electronic libraries are necessary.
4.
Updating the curriculum:
INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805
eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 07 (2025)
43
o
It is advisable to enrich existing primary education curricula with more visually
supported activities, as well as to incorporate project-based and integrative approaches.
o
A list of recommended visual tools and methodological guidelines should be developed
for each topic.
5.
Strengthening cooperation with parents:
o
The advantages of visual learning should be explained to parents, and they should be
encouraged to use visual methods at home to reinforce their children’s learning.
o
Short guides and manuals on digital literacy can be developed for parents.
References:
1. Toshboev T.X. (2020). Modern Pedagogical Technologies in Primary Education. Tashkent:
O‘qituvchi Publishing House.
2. Jo‘rayev A. (2018). The Role of Visual Tools in Increasing the Effectiveness of Education in
Primary Grades. Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology, No. 3, pp. 45–50.
3. Mahmudova Sh.R. (2021). The Use of Information and Communication Technologies in
Primary Education. Journal of Scientific Information, No. 2, pp. 67–71.
4. Slastyonin V.A., et al. (2014). Pedagogy: A Textbook. Moscow: Akademiya.
5. Klarin M.V. (2000). Experience of Innovative Teaching Technologies. Moscow: Pedagogika.
6. Mayer R.E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Moreno R., & Mayer R. (2007). Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments. Educational
Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326.
8. Clark R.C., & Lyons C. (2011). Graphics for Learning: Proven Guidelines for Planning,
Designing, and Evaluating Visuals in Training Materials. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
9. Jonassen D.H. (1999). Designing Constructivist Learning Environments. In Reigeluth, C.
(Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
10. Azizkhojaeva N.N. (2010). Pedagogical Technologies and Pedagogical Mastery. Tashkent:
TDPU Publishing House.
