Авторы

  • Кадиржон Турсунов
    Armed Forces Academy of the Republic of Uzbekistan
  • Немадулла Махмудов
    Armed Forces Academy of the Republic of Uzbekistan
  • Алишер Маматкулов
    Armed Forces Academy of the Republic of Uzbekistan
  • Фаррух Умматкулов
    Armed Forces Academy of the Republic of Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.imjrd.72223

Аннотация

This article examines the issue of determining the resource capacity of structures and buildings using statistical methods. Based on experimental data, mathematical modeling was used to study the durability of objects and their condition under the influence of internal and external forces. The assessment of the degree of damage to buildings and structures under the impact of explosive substances was carried out using the Gaussian normal distribution. Statistical parameters such as the coefficient of variation, arithmetic mean, variance, and standard deviation were determined. The calculation results showed that the mathematical and statistical analysis of random explosion processes corresponds to the experimental data.


background image

INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805

eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 03 (2025)

19

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF RANDOM EXPLOSION PARAMETERS AT VARIOUS

LEVELS OF DAMAGE TO STRUCTURES AND BUILDINGS

Tursunov Kadirjon Mukhammadjonovich

PhD in Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department

Institute of Communications and Information Technologies, Ministry of Defense of the Republic of

Uzbekistan

Makhmudov Nemadulla Akhmatovich

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department

Academy of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Uzbekistan

Mamatkulov Alisher Azamatovich

Researcher Institute of Communications and Information Technologies,

Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Uzbekistan

Ummatkulov Farrukh Murodjonovich

Doctoral student of the Armed Forces Academy of the Republic of Uzbekistan

Abstract:

This article examines the issue of determining the resource capacity of structures and

buildings using statistical methods. Based on experimental data, mathematical modeling was used to

study the durability of objects and their condition under the influence of internal and external forces.

The assessment of the degree of damage to buildings and structures under the impact of explosive

substances was carried out using the Gaussian normal distribution. Statistical parameters such as the

coefficient of variation, arithmetic mean, variance, and standard deviation were determined. The

calculation results showed that the mathematical and statistical analysis of random explosion

processes corresponds to the experimental data.

Keywords:

statistical analysis, mathematical modeling, structural durability, Gaussian normal

distribution, coefficient of variation, arithmetic mean, variance, standard deviation, explosive

processes, building damage.

Using statistical methods, any experimental results can be mathematically modeled. The essence of

mathematical statistics lies in determining all parameters of the probability distribution functions of

random processes (phenomena). To find these parameters and their values, integral calculus and the

solution of differential equations are usually required. Such problems are addressed within the field

of mathematical analysis.

When determining the resource capacity of structures based on experimental data, the mathematical

expectation

�(�)

, the arithmetic mean

, and the behavior of structures and buildings under the

influence of external and internal forces (earthquakes, explosions, loads, pressure, etc.) are analyzed.

In particular, their oscillations or damages of varying degrees are considered, expressed through

deviations from the center of gravity

�(�)

variance and the standard

deviation ( ).

The resource is an indicator that determines how long a structure (building) can be operated and

how long it can continue functioning without interruption. The resource diagnosis is expressed

through the function

−��

. The condition of structures damaged as a result of a random explosion

has been proven to depend on the parameters of the explosive material. However, the degree of

correlation between the constituent components of explosives and their statistical parameters (

�(�)

,

х

,

6

z

coefficients of variation) is not always precisely determinable. The coefficient of variation

6

, expressed as a percentage, represents the ratio of the standard deviation to the arithmetic mean

and is determined by the formula:


background image

INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805

eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 03 (2025)

20

=

�(�)

.

If the mass of the explosive substance

increases and the distance between the charge and the

object

becomes relatively smaller (closer), then the pressure variation coefficient will be higher.

In all statistical distributions (Gaussian, Rayleigh, Student's t-distribution, Fisher-Snedecor,

Weibull-Gnedenko, etc.), three main parameters must be determined: the mathematical expectation

�(�) = �

, the variance of the random variable

�(�)

, and the standard deviation ( ). Among

them, the Gaussian normal distribution stands out due to its high accuracy in diagnosing the degree

of damage to structures and buildings, as well as in scientific research of their physical and

mechanical properties [1-3]. In a series of studies, experiments were conducted in which pressure

was recorded at various distances from the explosion epicenter. The impact of the explosion was

analyzed using a numerical model and subjected to statistical analysis [4].

For random TNT (trinitrotoluene) charges with a mass of

� = 10, . . 30

kg, the correspondence of

building damage points to the Gaussian normal distribution is scientifically analyzed. During the

calculations, the coefficient of variation was assumed to be

= 0,2

and was considered constant

for a series of random explosions.

The density (differential) function of the normal distribution can be expressed in the following form:

� � =

1

�(�) 2�

⋅ exp −

(�−�

)

2

2�

2

(�)

(1)

Here:

( ) — differential (density) function of the Gaussian distribution by mass;

� = ��

— standard deviation;

— unknown mathematical expectation,

= 2.71... — base of the natural logarithm.

Table 1

N

um

be

ro

f

ch

ar

ge

s(

)

Ch

ar

ge

m

as

s

г)

Ra

nd

om

pr

ob

ab

ili

ty

=

4�

+

16

2

�(�)

�(�

2

)

�(�)

�(�)

�(�)

1. 1

20

0.05

1

1

3.

80

16

.1

0

21

.2

0

26

.5

6

5.

2

2. 2

24

0.10

2

4

3. 6

28

0.30

3

9

4. 3

32

0.15

4

16

5. 7

26

0.35

5

25

6. 1

40

0.05

6

36

If this statistical distribution is close to the mean value, the approximate equality

ℎ�(�)

holds. More

precise criteria corresponding to empirical and theoretical distribution laws will be proposed in the

future.
Table 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

0,05

0,10

0,30

0,15

0,35

0,05

2

1

4

9

16

25

36


background image

INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805

eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 03 (2025)

21

Substituting the variable into the formula

� = 4� + 6

, we write the statistical distribution for

and

�²

. Thus:

� � = 0,05 + 2 ∙ 0,10 + 3 ∙ 0,30 + 4 ∙ 0,15 + 5 ∙ 0,35 + 6 ∙ 0,05 = 3,80

� �

2

= 0,05 + 0,40 + 2,70 + 2,40 + 8,75 + 1,80 = 16,1

� � = 4 ∙ � � + 6 = 4 ∙ 3,8 + 6 = 21,2
� �

2

=

2

+12�+36

16

=

1

16

� �

2

3
4

� � +

9
8

= 16,1

� �

2

− 12� � + 36 = 16,1 ∙ 16

� �

2

= 257,6 + 12 ∙ 21,2 − 36 = 476

� � = � �

2

+ � �

2

= 476 − 449,44 = 26,56

� � = 5,15 ≈ 5,2

From this, it follows that:

� � =

1

� 2�

∙ exp  −

(�−�(�))

2

2�

2

.

If

(�−31,2)

5,15

= �

, то

� � =

1

5,15 2�

∙ �

�2

2

= 0,19�

where

=

1
2�

∙ �

�2

2

The values of the function

– are provided in the second table. Using these values, we construct

the third table.

Table 3

� �

ℎ� �

1.

10

-2,15

0,039

0,0075

0,0303

2.

14

-1,38

0,154

0,029

0,117

3.

18

-0,62

0,331

0,063

0,252


background image

INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

SJIF 2019: 5.222 2020: 5.552 2021: 5.637 2022:5.479 2023:6.563 2024: 7,805

eISSN :2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume 12, issue 03 (2025)

22

4.

22

0,15

0,396

0,075

0,301

5.

26

0,92

0,262

0,050

0,200

6.

30

1,69

0,096

0,038

0,1538

Conclusion

The degree of damage to buildings and structures was analyzed using mathematical and statistical

methods. A diagram was constructed to show the relationship between the mass of explosive

substances in the range of [10...30] kg and their quantity (frequency). The analysis demonstrated

that in the case of random explosions with a charge mass ranging from 10 to 30 kg and a number of

1 to 7, the points of destruction of buildings and structures follow the normal Gaussian distribution.

The results of the mathematical and statistical analysis confirmed the correspondence between the

experimental data and theoretical models.

References:

1. Mamatkulov A.A., Kodirov A.A., Makhmudov N.A., Kurbanbaev M.Sh., Tursunov K.M.

Mathematical modeling of strength levels and probability analysis of structural element damage in

buildings under random explosions. *Journal of Mechanics*, No. 3. Tashkent, 2024. pp. 114–119.

2. Belov N.N. et al. Calculation of reinforced concrete structures under explosive and impact loads.

*Northampton – Tomsk*, 2004. 465 p.

3. Belov N.N., Yugov N.T. et al. Calculation of the strength of steel-concrete columns under

explosive and impact loads. *Bulletin of TASU*, No. 2, 2007. pp. 132–138.

4. Mkrtichev O.V. Reliability of multi-element rod systems in engineering structures. Doctoral

dissertation in technical sciences. *Moscow State University of Civil Engineering*. Moscow, 2000.

324 p.

Библиографические ссылки

Mamatkulov A.A., Kodirov A.A., Makhmudov N.A., Kurbanbaev M.Sh., Tursunov K.M. Mathematical modeling of strength levels and probability analysis of structural element damage in buildings under random explosions. *Journal of Mechanics*, No. 3. Tashkent, 2024. pp. 114–119.

Belov N.N. et al. Calculation of reinforced concrete structures under explosive and impact loads. *Northampton – Tomsk*, 2004. 465 p.

Belov N.N., Yugov N.T. et al. Calculation of the strength of steel-concrete columns under explosive and impact loads. *Bulletin of TASU*, No. 2, 2007. pp. 132–138.

Mkrtichev O.V. Reliability of multi-element rod systems in engineering structures. Doctoral dissertation in technical sciences. *Moscow State University of Civil Engineering*. Moscow, 2000. 324 p.