INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN SCIENCE
International scientific-online conference
43
A DISCUSSION OF SIMULTANEOUS INTERPRETATION AND THE
IMPLEMENTATION'S CHALLENGES AND DIFFICULTIES
Shamsiyeva Marjona A’lam qizi
(shmarjona99@gmail.com)
Uzbekistan State World Languages University
Translation Faculty
Department of English translation theory.
Master student on simultaneous interpretation
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13925631
Abstract.
According to the site, translating is a regular task that uses a
variety of techniques and formats. Simultaneous translation or interpretation is
not a novel notion, but is only practical because of the technological gadgets that
allow it. It has been emphasized that simultaneous interpretation enables
legislators and attendees of various meetings to comprehend one another,
converse, and observe the feelings accompanying the speech without wasting
time. The prerequisites and conditions for simultaneous interpretation are
assessed in this article.
Keywords:
simultaneous translation, interpretation, interpreter’s cabin,
text-based interpretation, target language.
I. INTRODUCTION
Over the past century or more, globalization has increased along with
international trade, politics, diplomacy, and sports. Interest in learning foreign
languages, particularly English, and interest in translation are two tendencies
that we see in all developed and emerging nations worldwide. Translation,
according to José Ortega Y. Gasset, is what brings people together. We have to
make it clear today that this is accurate but only if the translation is done by
experts. Translations that take place almost simultaneously with the speaker's
speech are referred to as simultaneous interpretations. Interpreters may usually
be no more than one or two sentences behind the speaker. Occasionally,
simultaneous translation equipment requires interpreters to work in
soundproof booths. Speakers speak into microphones, and the interpreter
listens to them through headphones, translating their thoughts to the
interpreter's console's microphone. In the hall, listeners select the appropriate
audio channel on their receivers in order to hear the translation in a language
they understand. There may be more than one interpreter translating into
different languages. However it may hold possible challenges and specific
methods or tools to ease the process.
II. TECHNOLOGICAL SUPPORT TO TRANSLATORS
INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN SCIENCE
International scientific-online conference
44
The utilization of sophisticated and costly technology by simultaneous
interpreters enables specialists to translate nearly concurrently with the
speaker, saving the speaker from having to halt for translations. There is a
temporal lag between the simultaneous interpreter and the speaker, depending
on the pair of languages, the interpreter's experience, skill level, and personal
traits. It is crucial to keep in mind that every person has a distinct
psychophysiological profile, meaning that various interpreters may employ
simultaneous interpretation in somewhat different ways. The following specific
equipment is needed for simultaneous interpretation: a station or cabin, a
microphone, two sets of headphones for interpreters, and radio headphones
based on the quantity of persons requiring translation. Events (commission
meetings, conferences, seminars, presentations, etc.) with a sizable attendance
in expansive auditoriums (conference halls) are arranged with the aid of
simultaneous interpretation. Every twenty to thirty minutes, two translators (or
sometimes three) alternate seats in the cabins (by agreement). Every hour spent
in the cabin is also reimbursed to each translator. Conference interpretation is
another name for simultaneous or follow-up interpreting at conferences and
other such events (the words conference interpreter and conference
interpreting are more frequently used in English). Speech or presentation
translations (slideshows) can be thoroughly examined (or translated) in
advance if the source text is made available beforehand. If the speaker deviates
from the original text during the translation, for instance, by relating a tale about
what happened to him yesterday on the way to the conference the translator
will make the appropriate corrections. Text-based simultaneous translation is
the name given to this kind of translation. The speaker can read the material on
the slide or make reference to it by saying, "As you see on the slide..." during
reports, seminars, and presentations. In this instance, simultaneous
interpretation from the sheet is largely done by the simultaneous interpreter.
III. SOME ISSUES IN THE TRANSLATION PROCESS
Simultaneous Text-Based Interpreting and Simultaneous Sight Translation
include first auditory perception, followed by a comparison between the
information received and what is visually perceived. The translator translates
using solely aural perception if the information they hear differs from the
written text. The same situation occurs when someone speaks too rapidly and
the interpreter can't process the information soon enough. The translator reads
the translation he has previously completed if he has translated the full text
beforehand and the speaker makes no adjustments. The same situation occurs
INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN SCIENCE
International scientific-online conference
45
when someone speaks too rapidly and the interpreter can't process the
information soon enough. The translator reads the translation he has previously
completed if he has translated the full text beforehand and the speaker makes no
adjustments. In this instance, the majority of his labor consists of reading a
material that has already been translated, so it is not really stressful. In the
current age of abundant knowledge and frequent conferences, simultaneous
interpreters typically go over the speeches or presentation slides in advance,
take notes on technical terms, but do not translate the full texts. Interpreters
anticipate that speakers will respond well and have the necessary expertise,
talents. Interpreters typically dislike writing a lot or don't have the time or
energy to prepare translations in before. Instead, they hope that speakers will
respond well and have the necessary experience, abilities, and speech. Unlike
consecutive interpretation, simultaneous interpretation involves less memory
load, less time separation between the perception and production of speech in
the translation, and no active interpersonal relationships between the
interpreter and conference participants. Simultaneous translations of records
are not usually retained, but occasionally they are. Even the most skilled
translator will always fall behind the speaker while translating simultaneously.
As he finishes translating the previous sentence, he already hears and recalls the
opening of the subsequent one. If at the same time, a big list of names, titles,
numbers are presented in the speech, extra complications develop. And that's
where coworkers always step in to save the day. The person being translated
often has a sheet of paper with all the numbers and names written on it. When
he gets to the correct location, he reads these notes without having to use his
memory too much. The translation is constant in addition to being entirely
correct. One potential issue with simultaneous translation is voice rate. In both
British and American English, the typical speaking pace is between 120 and 150
words per minute. A speech rate of 100–120 words per minute is thought to be
ideal for a simultaneous interpreter. Professional English speakers claim that a
rate of 150–200 words per minute is fast, lowers the quality of the translation,
and increases the likelihood of omissions and errors even for highly experienced
work-synchronized interpreters. Since planned speech has a faster cadence than
unprepared speech, it is simpler to understand and translate the former. The
transitional style of interpretation also referred to as simultaneous consecutive
interpreting seems intriguing and promising. In 1999, M. Ferrari, an EU
translator, recorded a voice fragment on a device while taking translation notes
during sequential interpretation. There was a brief hesitation before he hastily
INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN SCIENCE
International scientific-online conference
46
put on his earbuds and began translating, listening to a passage of speech twice
and consulting his notes as needed. Studies involving this kind of simultaneous
consecutive interpretation demonstrate that double listening improves
translation accuracy (adequacy). For a long time, psychologists assumed that the
same mechanisms functioned in the perception and production of speech. As a
result, a person is still unable to listen and talk simultaneously: the translator
does not listen when he speaks, and he is silent when he listens. On the other
hand, the translator uses a divided attention strategy while translating
simultaneously. An novice translator alternates between speaking in the target
language and the speaker's speech, as well as between looking for a solution and
speaking. Only when the translator possesses speaking abilities that function
without conscious input will the synchronization process work as intended. "By
means of telegraphic perception" . A word's experience is limited to the
understanding of a few syllables that serve as its general . The awareness of a
word is reduced to a few syllables that represent its overall sound contour. It is
crucial to practice achieving this kind of "split" attention, where one attempts to
speak and listen nearly simultaneously. It appears that different areas of the
brain are engaged in this process. According to A. Welford's findings,
simultaneous interpreters become proficient at speaking and listening at the
same time when they learn to tune out their own voice via practice. Scientists
working with psychologists discovered through an experiment that the
translator perceives a large portion of the original speech against the backdrop
of his own speech.
There are various advantages to simultaneous interpretation. In contrast to
sequential interpretation, there are no breaks in the speaker's discourse.
Communication becomes more dynamic as a result. Foreign language
proficiency is popular these days, and many participants prefer to hear lectures
in the native language. When the speaker stops during a consecutive translation
and everyone listens to the translation, these people usually become irritated.
However, when subsequent translation is used, the event's duration is roughly
halved, and multiple languages can be translated at the same time. Simultaneous
interpretation is not without its drawbacks. Compared to successive translation,
more information is lost and the translation is less exact. Simultaneous
interpretation is far more costly for organizers than consecutive: the prices of
simultaneous interpreters are considerable, plus the expense for the rental of
specific equipment as well as the requirement to include at least two
interpreters who know the subject of the event will; Increased stress in
INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN SCIENCE
International scientific-online conference
47
translating because of the requirement to adjust to the distinct accents, pacing,
and speaking patterns there. Interpreters have various conditions that must be
satisfied in order for simultaneous interpretation to be effective. Here are a few
of them: mental and physical endurance, stress resistance, a strong library of
stable constructions, cliches, and phrases in both working languages; quick
thinking in both languages; fast speech; quick reaction with the ability to escape
a difficult situation; a large vocabulary in both working languages; fluency in
speech in both working languages; focus and the capacity to "disconnect" from
outside distractions; automation of speech and language means of expression
(the capacity to swiftly identify equivalents); attentive listening skills; strong
listening abilities (comprehension); encyclopedic knowledge; broad perspective;
Globalization thus necessitates quick and accurate interpretations in order to
manage contemporary enterprises, institutional procedures, and similar
operations. This clarifies why there is such a strong need for excellent
interpretation. Interpretation requires extra tools in addition to other forms of
translation, which means hiring personnel with the necessary skills to utilize all
of these tools and making expenditures are necessary. In addition to the time
required for tool and software updates, there will be a learning curve for people
utilizing these. In addition to outlining the prerequisites for interpretation, the
essay juxtaposes the benefits and drawbacks. While information is lost during
translation and stress is a drawback, interpretations offer a number of benefits,
one of which is the ability to view the speakers' emotions. We may infer from the
information above that interpreters must continuously hone their craft and
remain current with industry advancements.
IV. CONCLUSION
With the advancement of technology the process of interpreting and translating
is getting complicated and easy at the same time demanding being aware of the
latest technological tools. While improving specific soft and communication
skills in regular training specialists may overcome difficulties, namely speed,
dialect, concentration, translation transformation and technological challenges.
References:
1. Anne Karpf (2007). The Human Voice: The Story of a Remarkable Talent
2. Chernov G V (2004) Inference and anticipation in simultaneous interpreting.
A probability-prediction model. Edited by Setton R and Hild A. Amster-
dam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
3. Kalina S. (1992). Discourse Processing and In-terpreting Strategies—an
Approach to the Teaching of Interpreting. New Horizons—Teaching
Translation and Interpreting: Training, Talent and Experience. Am-sterdam
INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN SCIENCE
International scientific-online conference
48
4. Shlesinger M. (2003). Effects of Presentation Rate on Working Memory in
Simultaneous Interpret-ing. The Interpreters’ Newsletter 12. Trieste.
