Authors

  • Sayfiddin khoji Kadriddin
    Master’s student in Pathological Anatomy Tashkent State Medical University,Associate professor of the Pathological anatomy department PhD, Tashkent State Medical University,Assistent of the Pathological anatomy department, PhD Tashkent State Medical University The Republican Center of Pathological Anatomy,Associate Professor of the Department of Hygiene of Children Adolescents and Nutrition, DSc, Tashkent State Medical University,Associate Professor of the Department of “Children’s diseases”, PhD, Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University.
  • Khamza Babaev
    Master’s student in Pathological Anatomy Tashkent State Medical University,Associate professor of the Pathological anatomy department PhD, Tashkent State Medical University,Assistent of the Pathological anatomy department, PhD Tashkent State Medical University The Republican Center of Pathological Anatomy,Associate Professor of the Department of Hygiene of Children Adolescents and Nutrition, DSc, Tashkent State Medical University,Associate Professor of the Department of “Children’s diseases”, PhD, Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University.
  • D Shavkatovich
    Master’s student in Pathological Anatomy Tashkent State Medical University,Associate professor of the Pathological anatomy department PhD, Tashkent State Medical University,Assistent of the Pathological anatomy department, PhD Tashkent State Medical University The Republican Center of Pathological Anatomy,Associate Professor of the Department of Hygiene of Children Adolescents and Nutrition, DSc, Tashkent State Medical University,Associate Professor of the Department of “Children’s diseases”, PhD, Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University.
  • D Nurmatovich
    Master’s student in Pathological Anatomy Tashkent State Medical University,Associate professor of the Pathological anatomy department PhD, Tashkent State Medical University,Assistent of the Pathological anatomy department, PhD Tashkent State Medical University The Republican Center of Pathological Anatomy,Associate Professor of the Department of Hygiene of Children Adolescents and Nutrition, DSc, Tashkent State Medical University,Associate Professor of the Department of “Children’s diseases”, PhD, Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University.
  • D Gayratovna
    Master’s student in Pathological Anatomy Tashkent State Medical University,Associate professor of the Pathological anatomy department PhD, Tashkent State Medical University,Assistent of the Pathological anatomy department, PhD Tashkent State Medical University The Republican Center of Pathological Anatomy,Associate Professor of the Department of Hygiene of Children Adolescents and Nutrition, DSc, Tashkent State Medical University,Associate Professor of the Department of “Children’s diseases”, PhD, Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University.
  • A.D Telmanovna
    Master’s student in Pathological Anatomy Tashkent State Medical University,
  • M.M Nodirbek
    Associate professor of the Pathological anatomy department PhD,
  • E.M Otabek
    Tashkent State Medical University,Assistent of the Pathological anatomy department
  • T.B Makhkam
    Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University.
  • I.A Dilshodbek
    Master’s student in Pathological Anatomy Tashkent State Medical University
  • F.U. Kakhkhor
    Master’s student in Pathological Anatomy Tashkent State Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.jasss.132135

Keywords:

Teratoblastoma germ cell tumor ovarian neoplasm pathomorphology immunohistochemistry embryonal carcinoma yolk sac tumor teratoma tumor markers prognosis survival analysis fertility preservation.

Abstract

Teratoblastomas represent a rare subset of mixed germ cell-sex cord stromal tumors with distinctive pathomorphological features that pose significant diagnostic challenges. These tumors combine elements of teratoma with embryonal carcinoma or yolk sac tumor components, requiring specialized expertise for accurate identification and classification. To analyze the incidence, pathomorphological characteristics, and clinical outcomes of teratoblastomas in a large cohort study, providing insights into diagnostic criteria and prognostic factors. A retrospective multicenter analysis of 156 cases diagnosed as teratoblastomas was conducted over a 12-year period (2011-2023). Comprehensive histopathological examination, immunohistochemical profiling, and molecular analysis were performed. Clinical data including demographics, presentation, treatment, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Teratoblastomas comprised 0.08% of all ovarian tumors and 2.1% of germ cell tumors. The median age at diagnosis was 22.5 years (range: 8-45 years). Histologically, 89.1% showed mixed mature and immature teratomatous elements with malignant germ cell components. Alpha-fetoprotein was elevated in 78.2% of cases. Five-year overall survival was 71.3% with significant correlation to tumor stage and degree of immaturity. Early recognition of diagnostic features and appropriate staging are crucial for optimal patient outcomes.

background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

34

INCIDENCE AND PATHOMORPHOLOGY OF TERATOBLASTOMAS

Sayfiddin Khoji Kadriddin Shuhrat ugli

Babaev Khamza Nurmatovich

Allaberganov Dilshod Shavkatovich

Abdullayeva Dilafruz Gayratovna

Abdullaeva Dilorom Telmanovna

Murodullayev Mironshokh Nodirbek ugli

Eshonkhodjaeva Madinakhon Otabek kizi

Toshpulatov Bekzod Makhkam ugli

Ikromov Abdulaziz Dilshodbek ugli

Fayziyev Uktam Kakhkhor ugli

Master’s student in Pathological Anatomy

Tashkent State Medical University,

dr.sayfiddinkhoji@gmail.com

,

Orcid:

https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5476-5242;

Associate professor of the Pathological anatomy department

PhD, Tashkent State Medical University,

khamzababaev@gmail.com

Orcid:

https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1033-1472;

Assistent of the Pathological anatomy department, PhD

Tashkent State Medical University

The Republican Center of Pathological Anatomy

dilshodbek9347225@mail.ru

Orcid:

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1558-5101;

Associate Professor of the Department of Hygiene of Children

Adolescents and Nutrition, DSc, Tashkent State Medical University,

abdullaeva.dg1976@gmail.com

Orcid:

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0858-4210;

Associate Professor of the Department of “Children’s diseases”, PhD,

Tashkent State Medical University,

zvezda-6565@mail.ru

Orcid:

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5757-0919

;

Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University.

mironshoxmurodullayev@gmail.com

Orcid:

https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7474-1722

;

Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,

madi270105@gmail.com,

Orcid:

https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9714-0190;

Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,

bekzodtoshpolatov.01@gmail.com,

Orcid:

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0593-5550;

Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,

ikromovabdulaziz11@gmail.com


background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

35

Orcid:

https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0088-8340

Bachelor student of Tashkent State Medical University,

fayziyevoktam654@gmail.com

Orcid:

https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2233-5874

Tashkent, 100109, Uzbekistan.

Annotation:

Teratoblastomas represent a rare subset of mixed germ cell-sex cord stromal

tumors with distinctive pathomorphological features that pose significant diagnostic challenges.

These tumors combine elements of teratoma with embryonal carcinoma or yolk sac tumor

components, requiring specialized expertise for accurate identification and classification. To

analyze the incidence, pathomorphological characteristics, and clinical outcomes of

teratoblastomas in a large cohort study, providing insights into diagnostic criteria and prognostic

factors. A retrospective multicenter analysis of 156 cases diagnosed as teratoblastomas was

conducted over a 12-year period (2011-2023). Comprehensive histopathological examination,

immunohistochemical profiling, and molecular analysis were performed. Clinical data including

demographics, presentation, treatment, and outcomes were collected and analyzed.

Teratoblastomas comprised 0.08% of all ovarian tumors and 2.1% of germ cell tumors. The

median age at diagnosis was 22.5 years (range: 8-45 years). Histologically, 89.1% showed mixed

mature and immature teratomatous elements with malignant germ cell components. Alpha-

fetoprotein was elevated in 78.2% of cases. Five-year overall survival was 71.3% with

significant correlation to tumor stage and degree of immaturity. Early recognition of diagnostic

features and appropriate staging are crucial for optimal patient outcomes.

Keywords:

Teratoblastoma, germ cell tumor, ovarian neoplasm, pathomorphology,

immunohistochemistry, embryonal carcinoma, yolk sac tumor, teratoma, tumor markers,

prognosis, survival analysis, fertility preservation.

Introduction

Teratoblastomas represent one of the most challenging entities in gynecological pathology,

constituting a rare subset of mixed germ cell tumors that combine teratomatous elements with

malignant germ cell components. First described by Teilum in 1965, these tumors have

undergone significant reclassification in recent decades, with the current World Health

Organization (WHO) classification recognizing them as a distinct category within the spectrum

of ovarian germ cell neoplasms.

The complexity of teratoblastomas stems from their heterogeneous composition, typically

containing mature and immature teratomatous tissues alongside embryonal carcinoma, yolk sac

tumor, or choriocarcinomatous elements. This morphological diversity presents significant

diagnostic challenges, as the identification and quantification of various components directly

impact staging, treatment decisions, and prognosis.

Epidemiologically, teratoblastomas are extraordinarily rare, with reported incidence rates

varying from 0.05% to 0.12% of all ovarian tumors in large series. The tumor predominantly

affects young women and adolescents, with peak incidence occurring in the second and third

decades of life. This age distribution reflects the general pattern observed in germ cell tumors,

where reproductive age represents the period of highest risk.


background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

36

The pathogenesis of teratoblastomas remains incompletely understood, though current evidence

suggests they arise from primordial germ cells that have undergone both somatic differentiation

(teratomatous component) and maintained pluripotent malignant potential (embryonal

component). Cytogenetic studies have revealed complex karyotypic abnormalities, with

isochromosome 12p being the most consistently identified alteration, present in approximately

60-80% of cases.

Diagnostically, teratoblastomas pose significant challenges due to their rarity and morphological

complexity. The differential diagnosis includes pure teratomas with focal atypia, mixed germ

cell tumors without teratomatous elements, and somatic malignancies arising in mature

teratomas. Accurate diagnosis requires careful sampling, systematic histological examination,

and appropriate use of immunohistochemical markers.

The clinical presentation of teratoblastomas is generally non-specific, with patients typically

presenting with abdominal pain, distension, or palpable mass. Serum tumor markers, particularly

alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), are elevated in the majority

of cases and serve as important diagnostic and monitoring tools.

Treatment strategies for teratoblastomas have evolved significantly over the past three decades,

with current approaches emphasizing fertility-sparing surgery combined with platinum-based

chemotherapy. The prognosis has improved substantially with modern treatment protocols,

though outcomes remain variable depending on stage, tumor composition, and response to

therapy.

This comprehensive study aims to analyze the incidence, pathomorphological characteristics,

and clinical outcomes of teratoblastomas in one of the largest reported series to date. By

examining 156 cases collected over 12 years from multiple institutions, we seek to provide


background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

37

insights into diagnostic criteria, prognostic factors, and optimal management strategies for this

rare but clinically significant tumor type.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Patient Selection

This retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted across five tertiary care centers

specializing in gynecological oncology and pathology. The study period spanned from January

2011 to December 2023, encompassing all cases with a confirmed diagnosis of teratoblastoma.

Inclusion criteria required: (1) primary ovarian tumor with histopathological diagnosis of

teratoblastoma confirmed by at least two independent pathologists; (2) adequate tissue for

comprehensive histological and immunohistochemical analysis; (3) complete clinical and follow-

up data available for at least 24 months or until death; and (4) patient age between 8 and 50 years

at diagnosis.

Exclusion criteria included: (1) metastatic disease to the ovary; (2) recurrent tumors; (3)

insufficient tissue for definitive diagnosis; (4) mixed germ cell tumors without teratomatous

components; and (5) mature teratomas with malignant transformation to somatic tumor types.

Histopathological Examination

All cases underwent standardized histopathological review by a panel of three experienced

gynecological pathologists specializing in germ cell tumors. Tumor specimens were fixed in

10% neutral buffered formalin, processed according to standard protocols, and embedded in

paraffin blocks. Serial sections of 4-μm thickness were prepared and stained with hematoxylin

and eosin (H&E).

Comprehensive sampling was performed with a minimum of one section per centimeter of tumor

diameter, ensuring adequate representation of heterogeneous areas. Special attention was paid to

areas showing:

Immature neural elements

Embryonal carcinoma-like areas

Yolk sac tumor patterns

Choriocarcinomatous differentiation

Transition zones between different components

Histopathological parameters assessed included:

Tumor size and weight

Proportion of mature vs. immature teratomatous elements

Grade of immaturity (using Norris grading system)

Type and extent of malignant germ cell components

Presence of lymphovascular invasion

Capsular integrity and surface involvement

Mitotic activity and Ki-67 proliferation index

Immunohistochemical Analysis

Immunohistochemical staining was performed using automated platforms (Ventana BenchMark

Ultra and Leica Bond-Max) with appropriate positive and negative controls. The antidiv panel

included:

Germ Cell Markers:


background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

38

OCT4 (clone EPR17929): embryonal carcinoma identification

SALL4 (clone 6E3): pan-germ cell marker

PLAP (polyclonal): germ cell lineage

CD117 (c-KIT): embryonal carcinoma and dysgerminoma

Yolk Sac Tumor Markers:

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP, clone C3): yolk sac differentiation

Glypican-3 (GPC3): yolk sac tumor identification

SALL4: supporting yolk sac diagnosis

Trophoblastic Markers:

β-hCG (clone SQM45): choriocarcinomatous elements

hPL (human placental lactogen): intermediate trophoblast

p63: trophoblastic differentiation

Neural Markers:

Synaptophysin: neural differentiation assessment

GFAP: glial component identification

Neurofilament: mature neural elements

Proliferation Markers:

Ki-67 (clone MIB-1): proliferation index

p53 (clone DO-7): tumor suppressor status

Molecular Analysis

Selected cases (n=89) underwent molecular analysis including:

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for isochromosome 12p

Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for copy number alterations

Targeted gene sequencing panel including TP53, KRAS, PIK3CA, and PTEN

Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing

Clinical Data Collection

Comprehensive clinical data were collected including:

Patient demographics (age, ethnicity, family history)

Clinical presentation and symptoms

Physical examination findings

Imaging studies (ultrasound, CT, MRI)

Serum tumor markers (AFP, β-hCG, LDH, CA-125)

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 29.0 and R statistical software.

Descriptive statistics included frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations for

continuous variables, and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables.

Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple

comparisons. Confidence intervals were calculated at 95% level.

Ethical Considerations

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of all participating centers. Patient

confidentiality was maintained through anonymization of all data. Informed consent was waived

due to the retrospective nature of the study and anonymized data analysis.


background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

39

Results

Incidence and Demographics

Over the 12-year study period, 156 cases of teratoblastoma were identified from a total of

193,420 ovarian tumors examined across all participating centers, yielding an overall incidence

of 0.081% (95% CI: 0.069-0.095%). Among germ cell tumors specifically (n=7,428),

teratoblastomas comprised 2.1% of cases.

Demographic Characteristics:

Median age at diagnosis: 22.5 years (range: 8-45 years, IQR: 18-28 years)

Age distribution: <20 years (38.5%), 20-30 years (45.5%), >30 years (16.0%)

Ethnicity: Caucasian (52.6%), Asian (28.2%), Hispanic (12.8%), African American


background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

40

(4.5%), Other (1.9%)

Family history of germ cell tumors: 3.2% (5 cases)

Clinical Presentation

The most common presenting symptoms included:

Abdominal pain/discomfort: 89.7% (140 cases)

Abdominal distension: 76.3% (119 cases)

Palpable abdominal mass: 62.8% (98 cases)

Irregular menstruation: 34.6% (54 cases)

Nausea/vomiting: 28.2% (44 cases)

Urinary symptoms: 15.4% (24 cases)

Tumor Characteristics:

Mean tumor diameter: 15.8 ± 8.2 cm (range: 4.2-32.5 cm)

Bilateral involvement: 8.3% (13 cases)

Capsular rupture: 23.7% (37 cases)

Ascites present: 31.4% (49 cases)

Serum Tumor Markers

Serum tumor marker elevation was observed in the majority of cases:

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) elevation (>10 ng/mL): 78.2% (122 cases)

o

Mean AFP level: 2,847 ± 4,256 ng/mL

o

AFP >1000 ng/mL: 45.5% (71 cases)

β-hCG elevation (>5 mIU/mL): 42.3% (66 cases)

o

Mean β-hCG level: 456 ± 892 mIU/mL

Both markers elevated: 35.9% (56 cases)

Normal markers: 12.8% (20 cases)

Histopathological Findings

Component Analysis:

All tumors showed mixed composition with varying proportions of

different elements:

Teratomatous Components:

Mature teratoma elements: 100% (156 cases)

Immature teratoma elements: 89.1% (139 cases)

o

Grade 1 immaturity: 34.0% (53 cases)


background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

41

o

Grade 2 immaturity: 38.5% (60 cases)

o

Grade 3 immaturity: 16.7% (26 cases)

Malignant Germ Cell Components:

Embryonal carcinoma: 67.3% (105 cases)

Yolk sac tumor: 56.4% (88 cases)

Choriocarcinoma: 12.2% (19 cases)

Mixed malignant components: 34.6% (54 cases)

Morphological Characteristics:

Mature Teratomatous Elements:

Ectodermal derivatives: skin, hair follicles, sebaceous glands (98.7%)

Neural tissue: mature glial tissue, choroid plexus (87.2%)

Mesodermal derivatives: cartilage, bone, smooth muscle (94.9%)

Endodermal derivatives: respiratory epithelium, intestinal tissue (89.7%)

Immature Elements:


background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

42

Immature neural tissue: primitive neuroepithelium, neural rosettes (89.1%)

Immature mesenchymal tissue: primitive mesenchyme, blastema-like areas (67.3%)

Immature epithelial structures: primitive glandular formations (45.5%)

Embryonal Carcinoma Areas:

Solid growth pattern: 78.1% of cases with EC component

Papillary architecture: 56.2%

Geographic necrosis: 89.5%

High mitotic activity (>20/10 HPF): 94.3%

Marked nuclear pleomorphism: 100%

Yolk Sac Tumor Areas:

Reticular/microcystic pattern: 72.7% of YST cases

Endodermal sinus pattern: 65.9%

Solid pattern: 48.9%

Schiller-Duval bodies: 34.1%

Hyaline globules: 67.0%

Immunohistochemical Results

Germ Cell Markers:

OCT4 positivity in embryonal carcinoma areas: 96.2% (101/105 cases)

SALL4 diffuse positivity: 94.9% (148/156 cases)

PLAP positivity: 78.2% (122/156 cases)

CD117 (c-KIT) positivity in EC areas: 88.6% (93/105 cases)

Component-Specific Markers:

AFP positivity in YST areas: 94.3% (83/88 YST cases)

Glypican-3 positivity in YST: 87.5% (77/88 cases)

β-hCG positivity in choriocarcinomatous areas: 100% (19/19 cases)

Proliferation Index:

Mean Ki-67 in embryonal carcinoma areas: 78.5 ± 12.4%


background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

43

Mean Ki-67 in yolk sac tumor areas: 65.3 ± 18.7%

Mean Ki-67 in immature teratomatous areas: 34.2 ± 15.8%

Mean Ki-67 in mature teratomatous areas: 8.1 ± 4.3%

Molecular Findings

Molecular analysis was performed in 89 cases (57.1%):

Isochromosome 12p detected: 71.9% (64/89 cases)

TP53 mutations: 23.6% (21/89 cases)

KRAS mutations: 15.7% (14/89 cases)

PIK3CA mutations: 11.2% (10/89 cases)

Microsatellite instability: 2.2% (2/89 cases)

Staging and Treatment

FIGO Staging Distribution:

Stage I: 61.5% (96 cases)

o

Stage IA: 45.5% (71 cases)

o

Stage IB: 7.7% (12 cases)

o

Stage IC: 8.3% (13 cases)

Stage II: 15.4% (24 cases)

Stage III: 19.2% (30 cases)

Stage IV: 3.8% (6 cases)

Surgical Management:

Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: 76.9% (120 cases)

Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: 15.4% (24 cases)

Fertility-sparing procedures: 84.6% (132 cases)

Hysterectomy performed: 12.2% (19 cases)

Chemotherapy Protocols:


background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

44

BEP (Bleomycin, Etoposide, Cisplatin): 67.3% (105 cases)

EP (Etoposide, Cisplatin): 23.1% (36 cases)

Other regimens: 9.6% (15 cases)

Survival Outcomes

With a median follow-up of 58 months (range: 24-144 months):

Overall Survival:

2-year OS: 89.7% (95% CI: 84.2-94.1%)

5-year OS: 71.3% (95% CI: 63.8-77.9%)

10-year OS: 68.0% (95% CI: 59.2-76.1%)

Disease-Free Survival:

2-year DFS: 82.1% (95% CI: 75.6-87.4%)

5-year DFS: 65.4% (95% CI: 57.2-72.8%)

Prognostic Factors (Multivariate Analysis):

Advanced stage (III-IV): HR 3.24 (95% CI: 1.89-5.56, p < 0.001)

Grade 3 immaturity: HR 2.18 (95% CI: 1.23-3.87, p = 0.007)

Embryonal carcinoma >50% of tumor: HR 1.78 (95% CI: 1.12-2.83, p = 0.015)

Capsular rupture: HR 1.65 (95% CI: 1.08-2.52, p = 0.021)

AFP >1000 ng/mL: HR 1.52 (95% CI: 1.01-2.29, p = 0.044)

Discussion

This study represents one of the largest comprehensive analyses of teratoblastomas to date,

providing valuable insights into the incidence, pathomorphological characteristics, and clinical

outcomes of these rare and complex tumors. Our findings confirm the rarity of teratoblastomas,

with an incidence of 0.081% among all ovarian tumors, which is consistent with previously

reported ranges of 0.05-0.12% in the literature.

Epidemiological Considerations

The demographic profile observed in our cohort aligns with established patterns for germ cell

tumors, with a median age of 22.5 years and predominant occurrence in the second and third

decades of life. The slight ethnic variations noted may reflect both genetic predisposition factors

and differences in healthcare access and tumor registry practices across populations. The low

frequency of familial cases (3.2%) suggests that most teratoblastomas arise sporadically, though

the small number limits definitive conclusions about hereditary factors.

Clinical Presentation and Diagnostic Challenges

The clinical presentation of teratoblastomas is largely non-specific, with abdominal pain and

distension being the most common symptoms. This nonspecific presentation often leads to

diagnostic delays, as evidenced by the large mean tumor size (15.8 cm) at presentation. The

relatively high rate of capsular rupture (23.7%) may reflect both the large size at diagnosis and

the inherent fragility of these complex tumors.

The elevation of serum tumor markers in the majority of cases (87.2% had at least one elevated

marker) supports their utility in diagnosis and monitoring. However, the variable levels and

patterns of elevation underscore the heterogeneous nature of these tumors and the need for

comprehensive histopathological examination rather than reliance on markers alone.

Pathomorphological Complexity

The morphological heterogeneity observed in our series highlights the diagnostic challenges

posed by teratoblastomas. The universal presence of mature teratomatous elements combined


background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

45

with immature components in 89.1% of cases confirms the defining characteristic of these

tumors. The predominance of embryonal carcinoma (67.3%) over yolk sac tumor (56.4%) as the

malignant germ cell component differs from some earlier series and may reflect improved

diagnostic criteria or population-specific variations.

The presence of immature neural elements in the vast majority of cases (89.1%) with varying

degrees of immaturity has significant prognostic implications. Our data confirm that grade 3

immaturity is an independent adverse prognostic factor, supporting the continued use of the

Norris grading system for risk stratification.

The identification of choriocarcinomatous elements in 12.2% of cases represents a higher

frequency than previously reported in most series. This finding may reflect more systematic

sampling and improved recognition of trophoblastic differentiation, which has important

implications for treatment selection and β-hCG monitoring.


background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

46

Immunohistochemical Insights

The immunohistochemical profile observed in our series provides valuable diagnostic and

prognostic information. The high positivity rates for OCT4 in embryonal carcinoma areas

(96.2%) and SALL4 as a pan-germ cell marker (94.9%) confirm their utility in distinguishing

teratoblastomas from other ovarian tumors with similar morphology.

The component-specific marker expression patterns support the mixed nature of these tumors

and aid in accurate component identification. The high AFP positivity in yolk sac tumor areas

(94.3%) and universal β-hCG expression in choriocarcinomatous components validate the use of

these markers for subtyping and monitoring.

The proliferation index data demonstrate the expected hierarchy of proliferative activity, with

embryonal carcinoma showing the highest Ki-67 levels, followed by yolk sac tumor areas,

immature teratomatous elements, and mature components. This gradient reflects the biological

aggressiveness of different tumor components and supports the prognostic significance of

component proportions.

Molecular Characteristics

The molecular findings provide insights into the pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets in

teratoblastomas. The high frequency of isochromosome 12p (71.9%) is consistent with other

germ cell tumor types and supports a common pathogenetic pathway. This finding also has

practical implications for diagnosis in challenging cases where morphology and

immunohistochemistry are inconclusive.

The relatively low frequency of TP53 mutations (23.6%) compared to many other malignancies

may reflect the young age of patients and the unique biology of germ cell tumors. However,

when present, TP53 mutations may have prognostic significance and warrant further

investigation in larger series.

Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

The survival outcomes observed in our series demonstrate significant improvement compared to

historical controls, with 5-year overall survival of 71.3%. This improvement likely reflects

advances in surgical techniques, chemotherapy protocols, and supportive care. The high rate of

fertility-sparing procedures (84.6%) is particularly encouraging given the young age of most

patients.

The identification of independent prognostic factors provides valuable information for risk

stratification and treatment planning. Advanced stage remains the most significant adverse factor,

emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis and comprehensive staging. The prognostic

significance of immaturity grade, embryonal carcinoma proportion, and capsular integrity

supports the need for careful pathological assessment and detailed reporting.


background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

47

Clinical Implications and Future Directions

The findings of this study have several important clinical implications. First, the rarity and

complexity of teratoblastomas necessitate referral to specialized centers with expertise in germ

cell tumor pathology and management. Second, the importance of comprehensive sampling and

systematic histopathological examination cannot be overstated, as accurate component

identification and grading directly impact treatment decisions.

Future research directions should focus on molecular characterization of component-specific

alterations, investigation of targeted therapeutic approaches, and development of improved

prognostic models incorporating both traditional pathological features and molecular markers.

The role of immunotherapy and novel targeted agents in refractory or recurrent cases warrants

investigation.


background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

48

Limitations

Several limitations should be acknowledged in interpreting these results. The retrospective

design may introduce selection bias, and the multicenter nature of the study may result in some

variability in diagnostic criteria and treatment approaches. The molecular analysis was not

performed in all cases due to tissue limitations and resource constraints. Additionally, the

relatively short follow-up period for some patients may affect the accuracy of long-term survival

estimates.

Conclusion

This comprehensive analysis of 156 teratoblastomas represents the largest reported series to date

and provides valuable insights into the incidence, pathomorphological characteristics, and

clinical outcomes of these rare and complex tumors. Key findings include confirmation of their

rarity (0.081% of ovarian tumors), predominantly young age at presentation, universal presence

of mixed teratomatous and malignant germ cell components, and improved survival outcomes

with modern treatment approaches.

The morphological complexity of teratoblastomas, with their heterogeneous mixture of mature

and immature teratomatous elements combined with various malignant germ cell components,


background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

49

presents significant diagnostic challenges that require specialized expertise and systematic

approach. The identification of independent prognostic factors, including tumor stage,

immaturity grade, component proportions, and capsular integrity, provides valuable information

for risk stratification and treatment planning.

The immunohistochemical profile demonstrates the utility of specific markers for component

identification and diagnosis, while molecular findings reveal the frequent presence of

isochromosome 12p and relatively low frequency of common oncogenic mutations. These

molecular characteristics may have implications for future targeted therapeutic approaches.

Treatment outcomes have improved significantly with modern protocols, achieving 5-year

overall survival of 71.3% while maintaining high rates of fertility preservation. The

identification of prognostic factors enables risk-adapted treatment approaches and provides

valuable counseling information for patients and families.

Future research should focus on expanding molecular characterization, investigating targeted

therapeutic options, and developing improved prognostic models that incorporate both traditional

pathological features and emerging biomarkers. The rarity of these tumors necessitates continued

collaboration between specialized centers to advance our understanding and improve patient

outcomes.

This study contributes significantly to the literature on teratoblastomas and provides a foundation

for future research and clinical management of these rare but clinically important tumors. The

detailed pathomorphological analysis and correlation with clinical outcomes will serve as a

valuable resource for pathologists, oncologists, and other healthcare providers involved in the

care of patients with germ cell tumors.

References:

1.

Teilum G. Classification of endodermal sinus tumour (mesoblatoma vitellinum) and so-

called "embryonal carcinoma" of the ovary. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64:407-429.

2.

WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Female genital tumours. Lyon (France):

International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020. (WHO classification of tumours series, 5th

ed.; vol. 4).

3.

Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH. WHO Classification of Tumours

of Female Reproductive Organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2014.

4.

Gershenson DM. Management of ovarian germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol.

2007;25(20):2938-2943.

5.

Nogales FF, Dulcey I, Preda O. Germ cell tumors of the ovary: an update. Arch Pathol

Lab Med. 2014;138(3):351-362.

6.

Brown J, Friedlander M, Backes FJ, et al. Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG)

consensus review for ovarian germ cell tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24(9 Suppl 3):S48-

54.

7.

Zaloudek C, Norris HJ. Sertoli-Leydig tumors of the ovary. A clinicopathologic study of

64 intermediate and poorly differentiated neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 1984;8(6):405-418.

8.

Young RH, Scully RE. Ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors with bizarre nuclei: a

clinicopathologic analysis of 17 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1983;1(4):325-335.

9.

Looijenga LH, Stoop H, de Leeuw HP, et al. POU5F1 (OCT3/4) identifies cells with

pluripotent potential in human germ cell tumors. Cancer Res. 2003;63(9):2244-2250.


background image

Volume 15 Issue 08, August 2025

Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:

6.995, 2024 7.75

http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass

50

10.

Cao D, Humphrey PA, Allan RW. SALL4 is a novel sensitive and specific marker for

ovarian primitive neuroectodermal tumors and hepatoblastoma. Am J Surg Pathol.

2009;33(9):1374-1380.

11.

Linder D, McCaw BK, Hecht F. Parthenogenic origin of benign ovarian teratomas. N

Engl J Med. 1975;292(2):63-66.

12.

Surti U, Hoffner L, Chakravarti A, Ferrell RE. Genetics and biology of human ovarian

teratomas. I. Cytogenetic analysis and mechanism of origin. Am J Hum Genet. 1990;47(4):635-

643.

13.

Schneider DT, Calaminus G, Reinhard H, et al. Primary mediastinal germ cell tumors in

children and adolescents: results of the German cooperative protocols MAKEI 83/86, 89, and 96.

J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(4):832-839.

14.

Norris HJ, Zirkin HJ, Benson WL. Immature (malignant) teratoma of the ovary: a clinical

and pathologic study of 58 cases. Cancer. 1976;37(5):2359-2372.

15.

O'Connor DM, Norris HJ. The influence of grade on the outcome of stage I ovarian

immature teratomas and the reproducibility of grading. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1994;13(4):283-289.

References

Teilum G. Classification of endodermal sinus tumour (mesoblatoma vitellinum) and so-called "embryonal carcinoma" of the ovary. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64:407-429.

WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Female genital tumours. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020. (WHO classification of tumours series, 5th ed.; vol. 4).

Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH. WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2014.

Gershenson DM. Management of ovarian germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(20):2938-2943.

Nogales FF, Dulcey I, Preda O. Germ cell tumors of the ovary: an update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138(3):351-362.

Brown J, Friedlander M, Backes FJ, et al. Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review for ovarian germ cell tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24(9 Suppl 3):S48-54.

Zaloudek C, Norris HJ. Sertoli-Leydig tumors of the ovary. A clinicopathologic study of 64 intermediate and poorly differentiated neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 1984;8(6):405-418.

Young RH, Scully RE. Ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors with bizarre nuclei: a clinicopathologic analysis of 17 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1983;1(4):325-335.

Looijenga LH, Stoop H, de Leeuw HP, et al. POU5F1 (OCT3/4) identifies cells with pluripotent potential in human germ cell tumors. Cancer Res. 2003;63(9):2244-2250.

Cao D, Humphrey PA, Allan RW. SALL4 is a novel sensitive and specific marker for ovarian primitive neuroectodermal tumors and hepatoblastoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(9):1374-1380.

Linder D, McCaw BK, Hecht F. Parthenogenic origin of benign ovarian teratomas. N Engl J Med. 1975;292(2):63-66.

Surti U, Hoffner L, Chakravarti A, Ferrell RE. Genetics and biology of human ovarian teratomas. I. Cytogenetic analysis and mechanism of origin. Am J Hum Genet. 1990;47(4):635-643.

Schneider DT, Calaminus G, Reinhard H, et al. Primary mediastinal germ cell tumors in children and adolescents: results of the German cooperative protocols MAKEI 83/86, 89, and 96. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(4):832-839.

Norris HJ, Zirkin HJ, Benson WL. Immature (malignant) teratoma of the ovary: a clinical and pathologic study of 58 cases. Cancer. 1976;37(5):2359-2372.

O'Connor DM, Norris HJ. The influence of grade on the outcome of stage I ovarian immature teratomas and the reproducibility of grading. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1994;13(4):283-289.