Volume 15 Issue 03, March 2025
Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:
6.995, 2024 7.75
http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass
316
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM IN THE FIELD
OF INFORMATICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES.
Qodirova Dilnoza Abdusalim kizi
A basic doctoral student at the Termez State Pedagogical Institute.
Abstract:
Assessment is an integral part of any education system and provides valuable insights
into the effectiveness of teaching and learning processes. The assessment system also has its
importance in the field of informatics and information technologies. This article aims to discuss
the significance of the summative assessment system in informatics and information
technologies, for what purpose it was introduced. By understanding the specific features and
applications of the summative assessment system, teachers and policymakers can make informed
decisions to improve educational outcomes.
Keywords:
Summative assessment, formative assessment, education, information technologies,
project work, portfolio.
INTRODUCTION:
The results of the education system can be assessed through its results. It is
constantly changing and improving with new assessment and evaluation rules and subsequent
changes. The assessment process in the education system has been improved over the years. In
Uzbekistan, exams are digitized and take on their responsibilities based on the international
system. In the secondary school period, a new system was introduced based on a model, the final
official assessment, known as the CSE. In connection with the widespread traditional system, it
is not surprising that the traditional assessment system has shown a lack of validity, reliability
and objectivity[1].
Taking into account the global importance of the assessment system, in the resolution of the
President of the Republic of Uzbekistan on February 5, 2025, a number of measures were
developed to create a new education system in our country, digitizing the education system and
minimizing the human factor in it[6]. At the same time, seminars and training courses were also
held for teachers of secondary schools in our country to improve their skills[2].
Summative assessment is a process of formal assessment of the level of mastery of the
competencies established by the state educational standard and curricula at a certain period of
study (sections and chapters of the curriculum, quarter, at the end of the academic year), carried
out using tests, written work, oral interviews, project work, presentation work, practical exercises,
laboratory work, creative work and other similar forms.
In this case, the teacher identifies possible gaps in the student's mastery as a result of summative
assessment, and works with the student to eliminate them. summative assessment by chapter
(hereinafter - BSB) - a process of formal assessment of the level of mastery of the competencies
established at the end of a chapter or section; summative assessment by quarter (hereinafter -
CHSB) - a process of formal assessment of the level of mastery of the competencies established
at the end of a quarter[6].
MATERIALS AND METHODS
: Teaching is no longer just an intellectual process, today
teaching is a logical and digital process. Teachers need to assess individual student performance
using a system such as summative assessment to provide an adapted learning environment in the
Volume 15 Issue 03, March 2025
Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:
6.995, 2024 7.75
http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass
317
classroom. Methods such as standardized online tests, final exams, projects and portfolios are
usually used in this assessment system. This type of assessment is often scored and allows for
comparisons between students or educational institutions. In summative assessment, quantitative
data analysis is used to measure the overall performance of not only students but also teachers.
Standardized and computer-based tests are an important part of summative assessment. These
tests help assess the level of knowledge acquired by students, their level of understanding of
knowledge and the concepts of learning, and due to the help of information technology in the
learning process, the human factor is reduced, resulting in transparency in the education system.
Standardized tests allow for comparison of the overall knowledge level of students and
comparison of students. These tests provide objectivity in assessing the level of knowledge
acquired by students. Final exams are also an important part of summative assessment. These
exams are designed to assess the knowledge acquired by students during the course, semester, or
academic year. Students are required to demonstrate their level of knowledge, understanding,
and skills through these exams, and the level of knowledge is determined without any confusion
or unfairness. Final exams provide expanded and complete results in assessing the level of
knowledge acquired by students. Projects and portfolios are also used as a method of summative
assessment.
Figure 1: Importance of the summative assessment system.
Determining the level of knowledge
- allows you to assess the knowledge acquired by students
in a particular subject or course.
Improving the quality of education
- based on the results, it is possible to improve curricula
and eliminate problems.
Providing motivation
- students see their achievements and shortcomings and strive to study
better.
Volume 15 Issue 03, March 2025
Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:
6.995, 2024 7.75
http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass
318
Ensuring objectivity
- since the assessment is carried out based on standard criteria, it creates
equal conditions for all students.
Analyzing the results
- educational institutions and teachers analyze the overall results of
students and determine future strategies.
Identifying opportunities
- helps determine the areas of interest and talent of students.
Digitalization of the education system
- standardized tests are taken through digital
technologies without the human factor and the result is obtained automatically[2].
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
: . Summative assessments are administered at the end of a
learning period and aim to measure overall achievement and the achievement of specific learning
objectives. These assessments are usually more structured and standardized, such as final exams
or standardized tests. Summative assessments give students grades or ratings that provide a
summary of their performance over a period of time. Summative assessments are used to assess
students’ knowledge at the end of a subject or course, while formative assessments are used to
assess students’ learning throughout the learning process.
Summative assessments are important because they allow students to measure their progress and
achievement. They can also be used to identify areas where students need additional support.
Summative assessments can take many forms, such as tests, quizzes, essays, projects, and
portfolios.
Here are some examples of summative assessments:
A final exam at the end of a course;
A standardized, digitized test at an international level, such as the SAT or ACT[7].
Summative assessment provides school administrators and policymakers with important
information to evaluate the effectiveness of curricula, teaching methods, and educational
programs. Summative assessment is just a few examples of methods used to evaluate the final
results or achievements of students or educational programs. These methods are important in the
wider use of information technology in improving the effectiveness of the educational process,
the level of knowledge acquired by students, and educational programs. Students and teachers
will have the opportunity to improve the quality of learning and determine the level of
knowledge acquired by students with the help of these assessment methods. The study showed
that the methods of assessing students are aimed at assessing only their memory, not their level
of learning, and the area of qualitative assessment of students has also been completely
neglected. Teachers were not satisfied with their work on grading answer scripts because they
had not received adequate training. Our assessment and evaluation system, instead of knowing
the learning, creativity and skills of students, relies only on scores and focuses on memorization
or using traditional methods of obtaining maximum marks. Moreover, assessments are not only
for assessing the performance of students, but also for teachers, and such methods should be
developed in our examination assessment system. The analysis showed that at all stages of
education (as stated in the objectives), unreliable teaching methods, an ineffective assessment
system and a substandard curriculum were used to assess students, which led to students’ failure
to master information technologies, in particular[4].
The level of progress in improving and transforming the education system of Uzbekistan is
increasing day by day. This process requires each of us to have digital technology and specialist
knowledge at the level required by international standards. Students' creativity, individual
Volume 15 Issue 03, March 2025
Impact factor: 2019: 4.679 2020: 5.015 2021: 5.436, 2022: 5.242, 2023:
6.995, 2024 7.75
http://www.internationaljournal.co.in/index.php/jasass
319
differences, potentials and skills provide an environment for students to express their creative
ideas by setting the level of knowledge in the classroom, rather than just memorizing. Students'
learning should reflect the content of the curriculum and textbooks and meet the learning
objectives. It has been modified according to current trends. A well-designed assessment system
is very important for the learning process in the modern education system to avoid just
memorizing, which can strengthen students' analytical and problem-solving skills, which can be
an indicator for improving their knowledge. Summative assessment formats can vary, such as
tests, essays, projects, or exams. It is important that these assessment results are analyzed and
provided with feedback so that they have a positive impact on student development. Summative
assessments are administered at the end of an educational period and aim to measure overall
achievement and mastery of specific learning objectives. These assessments are usually more
structured and standardized, such as final exams or standardized tests. Summative assessments
assign grades or ratings to students, providing a summary of their performance over a period of
time. They serve as an accountability tool to determine whether students have met educational
standards or expectations. In addition, summative assessments provide school administrators and
policymakers with important information to evaluate the effectiveness of curricula, teaching
methods, and educational programs[5].
CONCLUSION:
Summative assessment systems are a valuable tool in evaluating educational
processes. While summative assessment provides a comprehensive assessment of outcomes,
formative assessment offers ongoing feedback and support. Educators and policymakers should
consider the unique characteristics and strengths of both systems to develop effective assessment
strategies that encourage student engagement, support personalized learning, and improve
overall learning outcomes. A balanced approach that incorporates elements of both summative
and formative assessment systems can provide a holistic view of educational effectiveness and
contribute to the continuous improvement of teaching and learning practices.
REFERENCES:
1.
SCIENCE AND INNOVATION INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL VOLUME 2
ISSUE 9 SEPTEMBER 2023 UIF-2022: 8.2 | ISSN: 2181-3337 | SCIENTISTS.UZ
2.The importance of summative assessment.Bristlecone.com.
3. Brookhart, S. M. (2004). Assessment theory for college classrooms. New Directions for
Teaching and Learning, 100, 5-14. doi: 10.1002/tl.165
4.Dixon, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom.
Theory into Practice, 55, 153-159. doi:1080/00405841.2016.1148989
5.Dolin, J., Black, P., Wynne, H., & Tiberghien, A. (2017). Exploring relations between
formative and summative assessment. In J. Dolin & R. Evans (Eds.), Transforming assessment:
Through an interplay between practice, research, and policy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer
International Publishing, pp. 54
6.
www.Lex.uz – O‘zbekiston Respubiikasi Qonun hujjatlari mahmotlari mlliy bazasi.
7. UNESCO (2013). Global Media and Information Literacy Assessment Framework,
http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002246/224655e.pdf.
