JME ISSN: 2751-1707
VOLUME04 ISSUE10
1
UNDERSTANDING THE ICELANDIC CURRENCY CRISIS: CAUSES, IMPACTS, AND LESSONS
LEARNED
Dapontas Dimitrios
University of Central Greece, Address for correspondence: 6 Filikis Eterias Greece 25001, Kalavryta
Achaia Greece
AB O U T ART I CL E
Key words:
Icelandic currency crisis, causes,
impacts, lessons learned, economic collapse,
financial instability, currency depreciation,
banking system, global recession, recovery
strategies, monetary policy, economic reform,
international relations, capital controls.
Received:
22.09.2024
Accepted
: 27.09.2024
Published
: 02.10.2024
Abstract:
The Icelandic currency crisis of 2008
stands as a significant event in economic history,
illustrating the vulnerabilities and complexities of
a small economy in a globalized financial system.
This crisis was precipitated by a combination of
factors, including excessive banking sector
expansion, high levels of foreign debt, and
insufficient regulatory oversight. As Iceland's
three major banks collapsed under the weight of
their liabilities, the Icelandic króna experienced
severe depreciation, leading to soaring inflation
and a loss of public confidence. The aftermath of
the crisis resulted in widespread economic
turmoil, necessitating international assistance and
substantial reforms in financial regulation. This
paper explores the causes of the Icelandic currency
crisis, its far-reaching impacts on the Icelandic
economy and society, and the lessons learned
regarding fiscal management, regulatory practices,
and the importance of robust financial systems.
Ultimately, the case of Iceland serves as a
cautionary tale for policymakers and economists
globally, emphasizing the need for prudent
economic governance in the face of financial
globalization.
INTRODUCTION
The Icelandic currency crisis of 2008 marked a pivotal moment in the nation’s
economic history, characterized by rapid currency depreciation, bank failures, and severe financial
instability. This crisis did not occur in isolation; rather, it was the result of a combination of domestic
and global factors that converged to create a perfect storm. At the heart of the crisis was the collapse of
Iceland's banking system, which had expanded aggressively in the years leading up to the crisis, taking
VOLUME04 ISSUE10
Pages: 6-10
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS
ISSN: 2751-1707
VOLUME04 ISSUE10
7
on excessive risk without sufficient oversight. As a small island nation with a limited economy, Iceland's
vulnerabilities were exacerbated by the global financial turmoil triggered by the subprime mortgage
crisis in the United States.
This introduction sets the stage for an in-depth exploration of the Icelandic currency crisis by examining
its primary causes, including the aggressive expansion of Icelandic banks, the reliance on foreign
borrowing, and the lack of regulatory oversight. Furthermore, it will discuss the immediate impacts of
the crisis on the Icelandic economy, society, and currency, as well as the subsequent measures taken to
stabilize the economy and restore confidence. Lastly, the lessons learned from this crisis will be
highlighted, providing valuable insights into the importance of sound financial regulation, economic
diversification, and the need for resilience in the face of global financial challenges. By analyzing the
Icelandic currency crisis, we gain a deeper understanding of the complexities of modern financial
systems and the critical importance of sustainable economic practices.
METHOD
To analyze the Icelandic currency crisis, it is essential to adopt a comprehensive methodological
approach that encompasses a variety of analytical frameworks. This analysis will draw from both
qualitative and quantitative methodologies, allowing for a robust examination of the factors
contributing to the crisis, its impacts, and the lessons learned from Iceland’s experience. The following
methodologies will be employed: historical analysis, case study analysis, econometric modeling, and
qualitative interviews.
The historical analysis methodology involves examining the socio-economic and political context
leading up to the Icelandic currency crisis of 2008. This method will help identify key events, policies,
and economic conditions that contributed to the crisis. Important aspects to consider include:
Economic Policies: Analyzing the financial deregulation and liberalization policies enacted in the early
2000s, which facilitated rapid expansion in the banking sector. Historical data will be reviewed to
understand how these policies influenced financial institutions and market behaviors.
Banking Sector Growth: Investigating the rapid growth of Iceland's banking sector, which expanded
significantly in size relative to the country's GDP. The historical analysis will focus on the banks'
aggressive expansion strategies and their reliance on foreign debt.
Global Economic Environment: Assessing the impact of the global economic environment leading up to
the crisis, particularly the effects of the 2007-2008 global financial crisis. This analysis will provide
insights into external factors that exacerbated Iceland's vulnerabilities.
The case study analysis will focus specifically on Iceland as a unique instance of a currency crisis. This
methodology allows for a detailed examination of the interrelated factors and outcomes of the crisis.
Key elements to analyze include:
Bank Failures: Documenting the failure of Icelandic banks such as Glitnir, Landsbanki, and Kaupthing,
which led to the collapse of the financial system. The case study will highlight the sequences of events
that led to their insolvency and the government's response.
Currency Depreciation: Analyzing the depreciation of the Icelandic króna and its immediate effects on
inflation, purchasing power, and external debt. The case study will investigate how the depreciation
impacted various sectors of the economy, including imports, exports, and consumer prices.
Policy Responses: Evaluating the policy measures implemented by the Icelandic government and the
Central Bank of Iceland in response to the crisis, including capital controls, fiscal adjustments, and
international assistance.
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS
ISSN: 2751-1707
VOLUME04 ISSUE10
8
The econometric modeling methodology will involve quantitative analysis to evaluate the relationship
between various economic indicators and the currency crisis. This method will utilize statistical
techniques to assess the following:
Financial Ratios: Analyzing key financial ratios of Icelandic banks, such as the loan-to-deposit ratio,
leverage ratios, and liquidity ratios, to identify warning signs prior to the crisis.
Macroeconomic Indicators: Evaluating the relationship between the currency crisis and
macroeconomic indicators such as GDP growth, inflation rates, unemployment rates, and trade
balances. Time-series analysis can help establish trends and correlations among these variables.
Impact Assessment: Using regression analysis to quantify the impacts of the crisis on economic
performance indicators post-crisis. This analysis can help determine the long-term effects on economic
recovery and growth.
Qualitative interviews with key stakeholders, such as policymakers, economists, and financial experts,
will provide valuable insights into the perceptions and experiences surrounding the Icelandic currency
crisis. This methodology will allow for:
Expert Opinions: Gathering perspectives from experts who were involved in the crisis response to
understand decision-making processes, challenges faced, and lessons learned.
Public Sentiment: Assessing the views of Icelandic citizens during and after the crisis to understand the
social implications and public response to government policies.
Comparative Analysis: Conducting interviews with stakeholders from other countries that experienced
similar currency crises to identify common factors and contrasting approaches to crisis management.
RESULTS
The Icelandic currency crisis of 2008 stands as a pivotal moment in the nation’s economic history,
characterized by the dramatic collapse of the Icelandic krona (ISK) and the banking sector. This crisis
not only devastated the country's economy but also prompted significant political and social changes.
Understanding the causes, impacts, and lessons learned from the Icelandic currency crisis provides
valuable insights into the complexities of modern financial systems and the importance of sound
economic management.
The roots of the Icelandic currency crisis can be traced back to several interrelated factors that created
an environment ripe for economic instability.
Rapid Banking Sector Expansion: In the early 2000s, Iceland experienced significant growth in its
banking sector, which expanded rapidly through aggressive international expansion and deregulation.
The three major banks
—
Kaupthing, Landsbanki, and Glitnir
—
grew their assets dramatically, reaching
a level several times larger than the country’s GDP. This expansion was fueled by high
-risk lending
practices and a reliance on foreign borrowing to finance growth.
Excessive Risk-Taking: The banks' aggressive strategies led to excessive risk-taking, including
substantial investments in foreign assets and reliance on short-term funding. The financial institutions
took on high levels of debt without adequate oversight or regulation, which left them vulnerable to
shifts in global market conditions.
Global Financial Environment: The onset of the global financial crisis in 2007-2008 exacerbated the
vulnerabilities within the Icelandic economy. As liquidity dried up and global credit markets tightened,
Iceland’s banks faced severe challenges in refinancing their debts. The depreciation of the krona began
as investors lost confidence in the country’s ability to support its banking sector.
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS
ISSN: 2751-1707
VOLUME04 ISSUE10
9
Weak Regulatory Framework: Iceland's regulatory framework failed to keep pace with the rapid growth
of the banking sector. The Financial Supervisory Authority was ill-equipped to monitor the burgeoning
risk levels, and the lack of adequate regulation allowed risky behaviors to proliferate unchecked. The
absence of a robust safety net, such as deposit insurance or an effective central bank response, further
compounded the crisis.
The impacts of the Icelandic currency crisis were profound and far-reaching, affecting various aspects
of the economy and society.
Currency Depreciation: The value of the Icelandic krona plummeted dramatically, losing about 80% of
its value against major currencies such as the euro and the US dollar. This depreciation led to
skyrocketing inflation, which eroded purchasing power and caused widespread economic hardship for
Icelandic citizens.
Banking Sector Collapse: All three major banks declared bankruptcy, leading to a complete collapse of
the banking system. The government intervened by taking control of the banks and establishing a new
financial framework to stabilize the sector. This intervention was critical in preventing a complete
economic collapse.
Economic Recession: The crisis plunged Iceland into a severe recession, with GDP contracting
significantly. Unemployment rates surged, and businesses faced closures, resulting in high levels of
social distress. The crisis led to a sharp decline in living standards, with many citizens struggling to cope
with rising prices and diminished economic opportunities.
Political Fallout: The crisis triggered significant political upheaval, culminating in mass protests and the
resignation of the government. The public’s dissatisfaction with the handling of the crisis and the
perceived lack of accountability among financial leaders led to calls for political reform and greater
transparency in governance.
DISCUSSION
The roots of the Icelandic currency crisis can be traced to a combination of domestic policy decisions
and external economic factors. In the early 2000s, Iceland underwent significant financial liberalization,
leading to the rapid expansion of its banking sector. The country’s banks began to engage in aggressive
lending practices, often financing their operations through foreign debt. This expansion was facilitated
by a deregulated financial environment and an over-reliance on short-term borrowing, which left the
banks vulnerable to shifts in market sentiment.
One key factor contributing to the crisis was the banks’ exposure to foreign currencie
s. As Icelandic
banks expanded internationally, they accumulated substantial foreign debt, particularly in euros and
Swiss francs. When the global financial crisis began in 2007 and escalated in 2008, access to
international credit markets diminished rapid
ly. The banks’ reliance on short
-term funding became
problematic, leading to liquidity issues. As concerns about the solvency of Iceland’s banks grew,
investors began to pull their capital out, exacerbating the depreciation of the króna and triggering a loss
of confidence in the financial system.
Another critical factor was the overvaluation of the króna prior to the crisis. Policymakers pursued a
monetary policy that maintained an artificially high exchange rate, which negatively impacted Iceland’s
export competitiveness. As the global economy slowed, demand for Icelandic exports declined, leading
to worsening trade balances. The combination of a depreciating currency and increasing import costs
further strained the economy.
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS
ISSN: 2751-1707
VOLUME04 ISSUE10
10
CONCLUSION
The Icelandic currency crisis serves as a cautionary tale of the vulnerabilities inherent in modern
financial systems, revealing the intricate connections between financial deregulation, currency
management, and economic stability. By examining the causes, immediate impacts, and lessons learned
from the crisis, policymakers can develop more resilient economic frameworks that safeguard against
future financial turmoil. Ultimately, the Icelandic experience highlights the critical importance of
prudent regulation, effective monetary policy, and accountability in ensuring the stability and
sustainability of national economies in an increasingly interconnected world.
REFERENCE
1.
According to OECD data, Iceland ranked 6th in terms of per capita GDP world-wide.
2.
The size of the banking sector in Iceland is very large compared to national economy. Banks have
been deregulated in Iceland since 2001.
3.
On the same time the spread between Krona and British Pound interbank rate was over 10%.
4.
Kaminsky G., Lizondo S. and Reinhart C. M. (1998). " Leading indicators of currency crises" , IMF staff
papers,
5.
Kemme D. and Roy S. (2005) "Real Exchange Rate Misalignment: Prelude to Crisis?" William
Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 797.
6.
Copeland L. “exchange rates and international finance”, 5th e
dition, p. 446-447 and p.450-451.
7.
Edwards, Sebastian, (2001), “Does the Current Account Matter?” NBER Working Paper No. W8275.
8.
Sasin M. (2001). "Predicting Currency Crises: the Ultimate Significance of Macroeconomic
Fundamentals in Linear Specifications with Nonlinear Extensions". CASE S&A 224.
9.
Esquivel, Gerardo and Felipe B. Larrain (1998). “Explaining Currency Crises.” Harvard envelopment
Discussion Paper No.666.
10.
Kaminsky G. , Lizondo S. and Reinhart C. M.(1998)
11.
Kaminsky G., Lizondo S. and Reinhart C. M. (1998).
12.
Liargovas P. and Dapontas D. (2008). “Currency crises in transition economies: some further
evidence” Journal of Economic Issues Vol. XLII No. 4 December 2008, pp. 1083
-1099.
13.
95% of the international money transfer is powered by speculation.
14.
Eichengreen B., Rose A. and Wyplosz C. (1995). “Exchange market Mayhem: The antecedents and
aftermath of speculative attacks”, Economic policy Vol.21, pp. 249
-312.
15.
The Krona used to be bonded to Euro until October 8th 2008.
