MODERN TEACHING METHODS IMPLEMENTING IN TEACHING EFL LEARNERS IN HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM

CC BY f
439-443
0
To share
Khakimova, M. . (2025). MODERN TEACHING METHODS IMPLEMENTING IN TEACHING EFL LEARNERS IN HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM. Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 1(1), 439–443. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/jmsi/article/view/84256
0
Citations
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus
Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations

Abstract

The article focuses on different approaches to teaching foreign languages in academic institutions. The following approaches are given special consideration: communicative, audio-visual, grammar-translation, the direct method, and audio-lingual. There are numerous approaches to learning a foreign language in higher education today, and each one has unique characteristics. Some are more well-liked and in higher demand than others. The primary strategies for teaching English to students will be covered in this article.

 

 


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 2, 2025

439

MODERN TEACHING METHODS IMPLEMENTING IN TEACHING EFL LEARNERS

IN HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM

Munira Khabibullayevna Khakimova,

senior lecturer of Tashkent University for Applied

Sciences,Uzbekistan -Tashkent ,

munirakhakimova 2575@gmail.com

Annotation:

The article focuses on different approaches to teaching foreign languages in

academic institutions. The following approaches are given special consideration: communicative,

audio-visual, grammar-translation, the direct method, and audio-lingual. There are numerous

approaches to learning a foreign language in higher education today, and each one has unique

characteristics. Some are more well-liked and in higher demand than others. The primary

strategies for teaching English to students will be covered in this article.

Key words:

communicative approach, audio-visual method, audio-lingual method, direct

method, and grammar-translation method.
In the modern world, English is very popular, moreover, this language is the language of

international communication, it is known all over the world. Today there are many modern

methods for teaching English. In addition, new ones are being regularly developed, so now

every teacher can choose the most appropriate work method for himself. We know that we live

in modern age which is based on technology and changes. At the present time everything is

changeable, especially in teaching the English language. You can see that nowadays there is a

great variety of methods of teaching English language.

Historically, the only technology teachers needed a blackboard and a piece of chalk. The

teaching method was to read and translate. Then we can see that whiteboards and markers came

along. Modern teachers use the latest technology and corresponding methodologies which

motivate students in the learning process.Methods of teaching English have developed rapidly,

especially in the previous 40 years. We need these methods very much because of learning

English completely. Each teaching method is based on a particular vision of understanding the

language or the learning process, often using specific techniques and materials used in set

sequence. According to academic research, linguists have displayed that there is not one single

best method for everyone in all contexts and that no one teaching method is superior to the others.

Nowadays when teaching a foreign language in higher education institutions, modern methods

are most often used like:

1. Direct method.
2. Grammar-translational learning method.
3. Audio-visual and audio lingual methods.
4. Communicative language teaching method.
5.Task-/project-/inquiry-based learning method.


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 2, 2025

440

This article will look at each of these methods in detail.

Direct method

of teaching a foreign language is based on the direct involvement of the student

when speaking and listening to the foreign language in common everyday situations. The focus

of this method is on good pronunciation.According to Brown, there are various methods which

can be applied in the teaching learning process. First, it is Direct Method (DM). The basic

premise of DM is that the second language learning should be more like first language learning-

lots of oral interaction, spontaneous use of the language, no translation between first and second

languages, and little or no analysis of grammatical rules.[1;p28] The essence of this technique is

that the teacher pays more attention to studying the spoken language directly, which is used in

everyday life. The developers of this method considered that the intermediate language, that is,

the language in which the teaching is conducted, inhibits the learning of a foreign language. Thus,

students are artificially introduced into the world of the language they are studying. The whole

lesson is conducted in English, the teacher must also give explanations and new topics in English,

only English-language literature should be used.

When teaching English through this method, the role of the teacher is key point in the successful

assimilation of knowledge by students. That is, his speech should be absolutely clear and correct,

the pronunciation should be perfect, as the students will constantly repeat just after the teacher.

The ideal option for a direct teaching method would be to make the teacher a native English

speaker.

Grammar-translation method

Grammar-translational method is the main method in the modern education system. This is a

classic method that has been used for more than a decade. This prevalence is due to the fact that

most of the teachers themselves were trained using this method. The purpose of the grammar-

translation method is to learn how to read and translate using grammatical rules. The basic

approach is to analyze and study the grammatical rules of the language and practice grammatical

structures through the means of translation both into and from the mother. However, it does little

to improve your ability to use the language for oral communication. There are some activities in

this method. For example: The class begins with a reading passage the English literature. Each

student is called upon to read a few lines from the passage, then they translate into their mother

tongue the few lines they have just read. The teacher helps them with suitable translations in case

the lack the required vocabulary. In addition, list the major characteristics of Grammar

Translation Method, as follows: Classes are taught in the mother tongue, with little active use of

the target language, much vocabulary is taught in the form of lists of isolated words,long

elaborate explanations of the intricacies of grammar are given, grammar provides the rules for

putting words together, and instruction often focuses on the form and inflection of words,

reading of difficult classical texts is begun early, little attention is paid to the content of texts,

which are treated as exercises in grammatical analysis, often the only drills are exercises in

translating disconnected sentences from the target language into the mother tongue, little or no

attention is given to pronunciation, and the focus is on accuracy, and not fluency.[2;p. 97]

The disadvantages of this method include the fact that not enough attention is paid to the lexical

part. The study of vocabulary is reduced to the mechanical learning of words. Reading and

translation is done in strict form. In addition, texts offered for reading usually refer to complex

fiction, therefore, the student learns only the literary language. Once in the language environment,

it will be very difficult for him to understand others, even with a good knowledge of the literary

language.

The audiovisual method and audio-lingual method


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 2, 2025

441

The audiovisual method of teaching involves the illustration of speech with appropriate pictures,

that is, students are shown videos, feature films and documentaries in English. In this case, two

perceptual channels of the visual and auditory channels work simultaneously for the trainees, as

a result of which associations arise in the students' heads, which makes it possible to memorize

the language better. The purpose of the methods is to master the living, spoken language. It is

based on the behavioral theory of learning, which told that language, like other aspects of human.

The focus of this method is sentence and sound patterns. The characteristics of this method are

listening and speaking drills and pattern practice only in English. There are some activities in this

method. For example: Dialogues and drills form the basis of Audio-lingual classroom practice.

Dialogues are used for repetition and memorization. Correct pronunciation, stress, rhythm, and

intonation are emphasized. After a dialogue has been presented and memorized, specific

grammatical patterns in the dialogue are selected and become the focus various kind of drill and

pattern-practice exercises. The Audio-lingual method, like the direct method, is also an oral

approach. However, it is very different in that rather than emphasizing vocabulary acquisition

through exposure to its use in situations, the Audio-lingual method drills students in the use of

grammatical sentence patterns [3:p.188]. They added that it was thought that the way to acquire

the sentence patterns of the target language was through conditioning helping learners to respond

correctly to stimuli through shaping and reinforcement. Thus, the audio lingual method refers to

the method that it is compressed on the chain drill to mastery the target language by memorizing

and repeat, and the wrongness of speaking is avoided.

Communicative language teaching method

Communicative language teaching is perhaps the most popular approach among the methods of

teaching ESL today. CLT emphasizes the student’s ability to communicate in real-life contexts.

As a result, students learn to make requests, accept offers, explain things, and express their

feelings and preferences.Additionally, since CLT focuses on teaching language through real-

world assignments and problem-solving, it’s less concerned with grammar accuracy and instead

focuses on fluency.

communicative language teaching makes use of authentic material because it

is important to give them the opportunity to understand how language is actually used outside

the classroom. Students are involved in real life situations tasks that require communication. In

this approach, the teacher sets up a situation, in which students are likely to be involved in real

life. In some activities, the outcomes of them are unknown to the students. The result depends

on their reactions and responses. Thus, they will be kept motivated and they will be kept in

suspense until they finish the activity and see the clear outcome .[4:p.262]
Currently, an increasing number of teachers are turning to the communicative method of learning

English. The object of this method is the speech itself, that is, this method teaches to

communicate in the first place.The communicative method implies a great activity of students.

The task of the teacher in this case will be to involve in the conversation all those present in the

audience. For better memorization and use of the language, it is necessary to download all the

channels of perception.The essence of the communicative method is to create real situations of

communication. When recreating the dialogue, the student has the opportunity to put into

practice all the knowledge gained. A very important advantage of the communicative method is

that it has a huge variety of exercises: here we use role-playing games, dialogues, simulation of

real communication. Communicative Language Teaching -it is interaction, authentic

communication and negotiating meaning through active student such as role play, games,

information gaps.

T

ask-/project-/inquiry-based learning

This teaching strategy for ESL students can sometimes be considered a part of CLT, but it

heavily emphasizes the students’ independence and individuality.

Inquiry-based learning is

a

modern approach that is becoming widely popular in schools all over the world. By asking


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 2, 2025

442

questions and solving problems, with the teacher as a mere learning facilitator, student

motivation and participation in tasks and projects are thought to increase.

Students need to

include some the key aspects of inquiry-based classroom, new knowledge is incorporated

through sensory stimuli by incorporating students’ current and prior understandings.

[5:p.75]Students will be involved and voice their feeling how learning environment will be

implemented. They must also reflect on their experiences and knowledge, as they are constantly

constructing and reconstructing their understanding. One useful strategy for creating links

between existing knowledge and scientific explanations of the natural world is inquiry-based

learning. Opportunities to appreciate and comprehend different types of scientific investigation

should be given to them .[6;p.82-87] One approach that structures learning around projects is

called project-based learning. It is unquestionably founded on difficult issues or challenges that

allow students to learn in a relatively proportionate way by including them in design, problem-

solving, decision-making, or investigative activities. Students can respond to events outside of

the classroom and have the opportunity to work independently on multidisciplinary

challenges.Students' feelings of accomplishment, comprehension of learning, study habits, and

relationships with others in the teaching and learning environment are some of the influencing

elements in achieving instructional goals.[7:p.27-36]

Learning Strategy Training, Cooperative Learning and Multiple Intelligence’s help people,

who are learning English, how to learn this language. Teach learning strategies, cooperation;

activities vary according to different intelligence's. At first, the communicative method was

rejected, but now it again occupies a leading position along with the traditional grammar-

translation method. Most teachers of modern universities prefer these two methods, and they are

often used in combination. The direct method in higher educational institutions is used extremely

rarely, partly due to the lack of real native speakers among teachers, and partly to the fact that the

level of training of students after school is too low. The audiovisual and audio-lingual methods

are not used at all in their pure form, but many university and institute teachers from time to time

conduct classes based on such methods. This allows to diversify the general education program

and interest students.To encourage pupils to utilize the language in authentic communication,

teaching strategies for classroom usage were also necessary. This idea sparked the development

of language use teaching strategies like role-playing, games, information gaps, and other teacher-

developed approaches that can encourage students to use language features for authentic

communication. Therefore, fluency should be assessed before correctness in the evaluation.

REFERENCES:

1.Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy

(2nd ed.),p.28 New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc
2.Setiyadi, B. (n.d.) TEFL II: Modul edisi kedua. Pusat Penerbitan Universitas Terbuka,p.97.
3.Larsen-Freeman, D. 2000. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching; Oxford

University Press. P.187-210

4. Savignon, S. J. (1991). Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL
quarterly, 25(2), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587463.
5.Kirschner, P.A., J. Sweller and R.E. Clark, 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction

does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based,

experiential

and

inquiry-based

teaching

Educ.

Psychol.,

41:

75-86.

http://www.usc.edu/dept/education/cogtech/publica

6.Nuangchalerm, P. and B. Thammasena, 2009. Cognitive development, analytical thinking and


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 2, 2025

443

learning satisfaction of second grade students learned through inquiry-based learning. Asian Soc.
Sci.,5:p.82-87

http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdel

ivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED506511

7.Holubova, R., 2008. Effective teaching methods project-based learning in physics. US-China

Educ. Rev., 5: 27-36.

http://www.teacher.org.cn/doc/ucedu200812/ucedu

20081204.pdf

8. Domashnev A.I. and others. Methods of teaching English in a pedagogical university. M.,

1983.
9. Wallace, Michael J. Training Foreign Language Teachers. Glasgow: Cambridge University

Press, 1991.
10. Sheylz D. Communicativeness in teaching modern languages. [Council for Cultural

Cooperation. Project No. 12 “Studying and teaching modern languages ​ ​ for communication

purposes.”] Council of Europe Press, 1995.

References

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.),p.28 New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc

Setiyadi, B. (n.d.) TEFL II: Modul edisi kedua. Pusat Penerbitan Universitas Terbuka,p.97.

Larsen-Freeman, D. 2000. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching; Oxford University Press. P.187-210

Savignon, S. J. (1991). Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL

quarterly, 25(2), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587463.

Kirschner, P.A., J. Sweller and R.E. Clark, 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential and inquiry-based teaching Educ. Psychol., 41: 75-86. http://www.usc.edu/dept/education/cogtech/publica

Nuangchalerm, P. and B. Thammasena, 2009. Cognitive development, analytical thinking and

learning satisfaction of second grade students learned through inquiry-based learning. Asian Soc.

Sci.,5:p.82-87 http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED506511

Holubova, R., 2008. Effective teaching methods project-based learning in physics. US-China Educ. Rev., 5: 27-36. http://www.teacher.org.cn/doc/ucedu200812/ucedu 20081204.pdf

Domashnev A.I. and others. Methods of teaching English in a pedagogical university. M., 1983.

Wallace, Michael J. Training Foreign Language Teachers. Glasgow: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Sheylz D. Communicativeness in teaching modern languages. [Council for Cultural Cooperation. Project No. 12 “Studying and teaching modern languages ​​for communication purposes.”] Council of Europe Press, 1995.