Authors

  • Yakubova Markhamat Mirakramovna
  • Parpibaeva Durdona Ikrom kizi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.jnci.132992

Keywords:

Keywords: Cesarean section low back pain postpartum complications obstetrical standardization spinal anesthesia maternal health clinical guidelines

Abstract

Abstract. Post-cesarean low back pain is a common but often underestimated complication affecting women's quality of life during the postpartum period. Variations in obstetrical practices, including spinal anesthesia techniques, patient positioning, and perioperative care, significantly contribute to the development of this condition. This article aims to evaluate the effectiveness of standardizing obstetrical protocols to prevent low back pain after cesarean delivery. Through a comprehensive review of clinical studies and practical implementation of unified guidelines in selected maternity centers, the study demonstrates that adherence to standardized protocols leads to a significant reduction in the incidence and severity of post-cesarean low back pain. The findings underscore the importance of multidisciplinary coordination among obstetricians, anesthesiologists, and rehabilitation specialists to enhance maternal outcomes and long-term well-being.


background image

JOURNAL OF NEW CENTURY INNOVATIONS

https://scientific-jl.com/new

Volume–82_Issue-1_August-2025

47

47

STANDARDIZATION OF OBSTETRICAL PRACTICE

IN PREVENTING POST - CESAREAN LOW BACK PAIN

1

Yakubova Markhamat Mirakramovna

2

Parpibaeva Durdona Ikrom kizi

1

Tashkent medical academy neurology and

medical psychology department professor

2

Doctor at Shox International Hospital, independent seeker

Abstract.

Post-cesarean low back pain is a common but often underestimated

complication affecting women's quality of life during the postpartum period. Variations
in obstetrical practices, including spinal anesthesia techniques, patient positioning, and
perioperative care, significantly contribute to the development of this condition. This
article aims to evaluate the effectiveness of standardizing obstetrical protocols to
prevent low back pain after cesarean delivery. Through a comprehensive review of
clinical studies and practical implementation of unified guidelines in selected maternity
centers, the study demonstrates that adherence to standardized protocols leads to a
significant reduction in the incidence and severity of post-cesarean low back pain. The
findings underscore the importance of multidisciplinary coordination among
obstetricians, anesthesiologists, and rehabilitation specialists to enhance maternal
outcomes and long-term well-being.

Keywords:

Cesarean section, low back pain, postpartum complications,

obstetrical standardization, spinal anesthesia, maternal health, clinical guidelines

Introduction.

Cesarean section caesarean section ( cesarean section ) today on

the day pregnancy in conclusion wide applicable surgery from the methods one is
considered . World health storage According to the World Health Organization
(WHO), according to , globally all around 15–25% of births cesarean section cutting
way with done is being increased. However some in countries, especially developing
in the countries this indicator up to 30–40% Uzbekistan This is also the case in the
Republic. indicator high is medical and social reasons with explained.

Cesarean section cutting many women for necessary was life save remaining

practice calculated although, its far term There are also consequences . Among them
one — in the waist area to the surface coming Back pain often from the operation next
immobilization, spine to the step fallen loading , incorrect in case anesthesia ,
anesthesia method selection or patient psycho-emotional status with related to be
possible .

Current cesarean section per day through childbirth world on a scale wide being

used surgery from practices one is considered . World health storage organization to


background image

JOURNAL OF NEW CENTURY INNOVATIONS

https://scientific-jl.com/new

Volume–82_Issue-1_August-2025

48

48

the information according to the world according to every 140 million per year more
children are being born and up to 21 percent of which was part cesarean section through
done [ 1 ]. Some in countries this The indicator is between 30–50% . is the last in years
this indicator increasing [2]. In Uzbekistan , the number of deliveries by cesarean
section is also increasing. done increase cases year gradually increasing This is the
same as the in turn , this of the process far term consequences , including back pain
such as late complications deep requires learning.

A cesarean section next to the waist pain is women between wide widespread ,

but often enough at the level invaluable and incurable problem is considered . Different
research this shows that from caesarean section next in the period up to 45–70% of
women was back pain in the area is observed and this pain some in cases one how
many months or years during preserved remains [3, 4]. Such pains life quality reduces,
baby care to do opportunities limits and psychological to health negative impact shows.

Back pain etiology many factorial to him operation on time back muscles tension,

pain cover received central nerve system sensitivity, incorrect physical activity,
psychological stress, and hygienic wrong situations reason to be possible [5].
Therefore, back pain in evaluation clear and subjective from methods use important
importance has.

Visual analog scale (VAS) is a pain intensity assessment for simple but effective

subjective method is, which is from 0 to 10 was digital scale through pain level
determination opportunity Research this shows that VAS pain level fast and effective
assessment opportunity gives, especially from childbirth next in the period [6]. Thus
together, functional tests – such as the Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI) or
the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) – to assess the patient’s
movement activity and life to the quality of pain how impact showing in evaluation
help gives [7].

Scientists scientific research from cesarean section next the pain VAS in

assessment and functional of tests combined without application further reliable
diagnostic indicators to ensure For example , Lee and co-authors by take visited In the
study , the patients' VAS scale according to pain indicator and MODI scale according
to in motion restrictions between straight away dependency [ 8 ] Similar The results
were reported by Wang et al. others also admit reached are , they are patients
rehabilitation efficiency in evaluation this two of the method combination offer have
reached [9].

With this together, many research from Caesarean section next back pain women

physical activity, div condition storage culture, individual pain sensitivity level and
psychological background with closely dependence emphasizing is coming [10]. So ,
this problem complex requires an approach .


background image

JOURNAL OF NEW CENTURY INNOVATIONS

https://scientific-jl.com/new

Volume–82_Issue-1_August-2025

49

49

This of the problem relevance is that women from birth then to the baby look,

house their work to do, to do one's own health restoration such as many tasks to do
Back pain and this to processes serious barrier to be possible. Therefore, cesarean
section from cutting next back pain reduce or completely prevent to take for obstetrics
of practice every one in the phase clinical to the protocols strict action to do, that is
standardization process current to grow necessary will be.

Materials and methods .

This research in Tashkent specialized childbirth in the

complex take Research 90 people aged 22–42 years old woman patients participation
They pregnancy during medical under observation was and cesarean section cutting to
the operation directed. Patients random in a way two to the group split into:

Group 1 (n=45) – normal obstetrics practice based on cesarean section cutting

carried out;

Group 2 (n=45) – standardized obstetrics protocols based on cesarean section

cutting done .

Standardized approach the following own inside received :
1.

Before the operation was preparation algorithm ( psychological

preparation , physiotherapy measures );

2.

Anesthesia choice according to criteria (spinal vs. epidural approach );

3.

Operation on time patient status anatomical point optimal selection in

terms of ;

4.

From the operation then early mobilization , breathing exercises ,

physiotherapy and special exercises .

Both in the group following criteria according to assessment held :

VAS scale through the waist area pain level (on days 3, 7 and 14);

Anesthesia type and duration ;

Active to move return time ( mobilization );

The pain reducing medicines application deadline and frequency ;

Patients subjective rating (5 -point Likert scale according to ) .

Statistical analysis in SPSS 23.0 program take went . Average values ± standard

deviation as given , intergroup differences Student t- test and χ² test through was
evaluated .

Results.

Research results cesarean section from cutting next back pain decrease

and rehabilitation process in acceleration standardized approach effective that showed
. In group 2 ( standard approach ( pain ) level on the VAS scale noticeable became low
and mobilization deadline shrunk .


background image

JOURNAL OF NEW CENTURY INNOVATIONS

https://scientific-jl.com/new

Volume–82_Issue-1_August-2025

50

50

Table 1.

By VAS pain scores ( mean ± SD)

Evaluation day

Group 1

Group 2

p -value

Day 3

6.3 ± 1.1

4.5 ± 0.9

<0.01

Day 7

5.0 ± 0.8

3.2 ± 0.6

<0.01

Day 14

3.7 ± 0.7

1.9 ± 0.5

<0.001

Table 2.

Mobilization beginning and the pain treatment deadline

Indicator

Group 1

Group 2

p -value

Mobilization ( per hour )

48.1 ± 5.4

28.2 ± 4.7

<0.001

Pain medicine application

deadline

6.5 ± 1.3 days

3.2 ± 1.0 days

<0.001


Subjective assessment to the results According to , 86.7% of patients in group 2

responded to treatment complete satisfaction stated If , in group 1 this The indicator
is 57.8% . organization reached .

Discussion .

Retrieved results this shows that obstetrics in practice every one step

standardization waist of pain weight in reduction important role plays . Operation
process technician aspects standardization , patients psychological and physical
preparation , anesthesia methods when choosing caution with approach , early
mobilization encouragement – these all waist to the field falling stress to reduce service
does .

Medicine in practice being used standard clinical recommendations based on

obstetrics process take to go health storage in the system one diversity provides , errors
and complications level reduces . This and not only patient health , maybe medical
employees of activity quality to increase service does .

Also , pain VAS scale in assessment simplicity and efficiency because of his/her

wide application the patient's status permanent monitoring to do opportunity gives .
Subjective assessments through and rehabilitation individual approach of programs
formation possible It will be.

Conclusion .

Cesarean section from cutting next back pain prevent in receiving

obstetrics of practice every one stage standardization clinical efficiency increases, the
patient's early to recovery opportunity creates and the pain noticeable at the level
reduces . Research results this shows that standardized protocols based on worker
medicine team short within the period high good quality to the result achieves .


background image

JOURNAL OF NEW CENTURY INNOVATIONS

https://scientific-jl.com/new

Volume–82_Issue-1_August-2025

51

51

This approach not only the pain eliminate to do , maybe the patient's psycho-

emotional status recovery , life quality increase and healthy motherhood to provide
service Therefore , the country on a scale obstetrics services uniform standards for
system current to grow necessity current to be remains .

In the future this on the subject national protocols formation , various health

storage in institutions experience exchange and advanced clinical approaches
implementation to do according to extensive affairs take to go necessary .

Literature list:

1.

Abdullaeva DR Standard approach based on cesarean section from cutting then the pain
reduce efficiency // In medicine Innovations . – 2023. – No. 4. – P. 56–61.

2.

Smith J., Brown A. Enhanced recovery protocols in cesarean delivery: A systematic
review // Int J Obstet Anesth . - 2022. - Vol. 50. – P. 85–91.

3.

Omonova Z. Sh. Kesarva from practice then pain syndrome : assessment and prevent to
take Pathways // Obstetrics and Gynecology . – 2021. – No. 3. – P. 43–49.

4.

Wilson R. et al. Comparison of standard vs. enhanced recovery after cesarean section: a
randomized trial // Am J Obstet Gynecol. - 2022. - Vol. 226(5). – P. 487.e1–487.e8.

5.

Akhmedova MX Painless to give birth approach : obstetrics modern standards // Scientific
and practical obstetrics Journal . – 2023. – No. 2. – P. 27–32.

6.

Johnson T., Lee H. Pain management and maternal outcomes after cesarean section: a
review of ERAC protocols // Obstet Anesth Rev. - 2021. - Vol. 45. – P. 201–209.

7.

Rasulova GB Kesarvadan next rehabilitation: early mobilization and physiotherapy role
// Uzbek Medicine Journal . – 2022. – No. 6. – P. 88–93.

8.

Thompson K. et al. Standardizing cesarean section techniques to minimize postoperative
pain // J Obstet Surg. - 2020. - Vol. 39(2). – P. 102–109.

9.

Nuriddinova N. Kesarva from cutting then the pain VAS in assessment and subjective of
the criteria application // Andijan medicine Journal . – 2023. – No. 1. – P. 59–65.

10.

Patel S., Morgan J. Post-cesarean pain and recovery: optimizing outcomes through
evidence-based practices // J Perinat Med. - 2021. - Vol. 49(3). – P. 345–352.

11.

Abdurakhmonova ZI Obstetrics in operations rehabilitation standardization clinical
advantages // Medical in practice news . – 2022. – No. 5. – P. 11–18.

12.

Liu Y., Chen Q. Regional anesthesia and cesarean delivery: implications for postoperative
pain // Chin J Obstet Gynecol. - 2022. - Vol. 58(7). – P. 672–678.

13.

Akhmedov TR Kesarva according to clinical recommendations and their pain syndrome
impact // Tashkent medicine academy Newsletter . – 2021. – No. 4. – P. 39–44.

14.

Garcia M. et al. Implementation of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery: effects on
length of stay and pain management // Birth. - 2023. - Vol. 50(1). – P. 47–54.

15.

Tursunova DK Kesarvadan next complications prevent in receiving protocoled
approaches // Scientific research . – 2023. – No. 2. – P. 14–20.

References

Abdullaeva DR Standard approach based on cesarean section from cutting then the pain reduce efficiency // In medicine Innovations . – 2023. – No. 4. – P. 56–61.

Smith J., Brown A. Enhanced recovery protocols in cesarean delivery: A systematic review // Int J Obstet Anesth . - 2022. - Vol. 50. – P. 85–91.

Omonova Z. Sh. Kesarva from practice then pain syndrome : assessment and prevent to take Pathways // Obstetrics and Gynecology . – 2021. – No. 3. – P. 43–49.

Wilson R. et al. Comparison of standard vs. enhanced recovery after cesarean section: a randomized trial // Am J Obstet Gynecol. - 2022. - Vol. 226(5). – P. 487.e1–487.e8.

Akhmedova MX Painless to give birth approach : obstetrics modern standards // Scientific and practical obstetrics Journal . – 2023. – No. 2. – P. 27–32.

Johnson T., Lee H. Pain management and maternal outcomes after cesarean section: a review of ERAC protocols // Obstet Anesth Rev. - 2021. - Vol. 45. – P. 201–209.

Rasulova GB Kesarvadan next rehabilitation: early mobilization and physiotherapy role // Uzbek Medicine Journal . – 2022. – No. 6. – P. 88–93.

Thompson K. et al. Standardizing cesarean section techniques to minimize postoperative pain // J Obstet Surg. - 2020. - Vol. 39(2). – P. 102–109.

Nuriddinova N. Kesarva from cutting then the pain VAS in assessment and subjective of the criteria application // Andijan medicine Journal . – 2023. – No. 1. – P. 59–65.

Patel S., Morgan J. Post-cesarean pain and recovery: optimizing outcomes through evidence-based practices // J Perinat Med. - 2021. - Vol. 49(3). – P. 345–352.

Abdurakhmonova ZI Obstetrics in operations rehabilitation standardization clinical advantages // Medical in practice news . – 2022. – No. 5. – P. 11–18.

Liu Y., Chen Q. Regional anesthesia and cesarean delivery: implications for postoperative pain // Chin J Obstet Gynecol. - 2022. - Vol. 58(7). – P. 672–678.

Akhmedov TR Kesarva according to clinical recommendations and their pain syndrome impact // Tashkent medicine academy Newsletter . – 2021. – No. 4. – P. 39–44.

Garcia M. et al. Implementation of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery: effects on length of stay and pain management // Birth. - 2023. - Vol. 50(1). – P. 47–54.

Tursunova DK Kesarvadan next complications prevent in receiving protocoled approaches // Scientific research . – 2023. – No. 2. – P. 14–20.