Authors

  • Yigitali Tursunov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.science-research.87869

Keywords:

Chronic prostatitis CP CPPS diagnosis EPS alpha-blockers antibiotics UPOINT classification pelvic pain TRUS microbiology

Abstract

Chronic prostatitis, particularly chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS), remains a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in clinical urology. It is a multifactorial syndrome with overlapping inflammatory, infectious, neurogenic, autoimmune, and psychosocial components. The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive clinical and laboratory evaluation of chronic prostatitis, focusing on modern diagnostic protocols and treatment approaches. The study included clinical data from 80 patients with symptoms lasting longer than three months, and combined both traditional and innovative diagnostics, such as PCR-based pathogen identification, EPS analysis, and transrectal ultrasound. The results show that a personalized, phenotype-based approach, especially using the UPOINT classification, enhances therapeutic outcomes. Antibiotics remain effective in selected cases, but alpha-blockers, physiotherapy, and anti-inflammatory agents also play vital roles. The study highlights the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and long-term patient monitoring.

background image

620

ResearchBib IF - 11.01, ISSN: 3030-3753, Volume 2 Issue 5

MODERN APPROACHES TO THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF CHRONIC

PROSTATITIS: A CLINICAL AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS

Tursunov Yigitali Rajabovich

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15421008

Abstract. Chronic prostatitis, particularly chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS),

remains a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in clinical urology. It is a
multifactorial syndrome with overlapping inflammatory, infectious, neurogenic, autoimmune,
and psychosocial components. The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive clinical
and laboratory evaluation of chronic prostatitis, focusing on modern diagnostic protocols and
treatment approaches. The study included clinical data from 80 patients with symptoms lasting
longer than three months, and combined both traditional and innovative diagnostics, such as
PCR-based pathogen identification, EPS analysis, and transrectal ultrasound. The results show
that a personalized, phenotype-based approach, especially using the UPOINT classification,
enhances therapeutic outcomes. Antibiotics remain effective in selected cases, but alpha-
blockers, physiotherapy, and anti-inflammatory agents also play vital roles. The study highlights
the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and long-term patient monitoring.

Keywords: Chronic prostatitis, CP/CPPS, diagnosis, EPS, alpha-blockers, antibiotics,

UPOINT classification, pelvic pain, TRUS, microbiology


Introduction:

Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is one of the

most prevalent and frustrating urological conditions encountered in men under 50. Although not
life-threatening, it significantly impairs quality of life and presents a broad spectrum of clinical
symptoms ranging from pelvic pain, urinary frequency, urgency, and painful ejaculation to
psychological distress, including anxiety and depression.

The pathophysiology of CP/CPPS is complex and incompletely understood. The

condition is classified as type III prostatitis by the NIH, and further subclassified into IIIA
(inflammatory) and IIIB (non-inflammatory) types. While type II chronic bacterial prostatitis has
a clear infectious etiology, most CP/CPPS cases lack identifiable pathogens. Therefore,
treatment is often empirical, multifactorial, and prolonged.

Modern medicine has introduced a variety of tools and methodologies to improve

diagnosis and patient stratification. Among them are advanced imaging, molecular diagnostics
(e.g., PCR), and validated symptom questionnaires like NIH-CPSI. Similarly, treatment options
have expanded from empiric antibiotic therapy to include alpha-blockers, anti-inflammatory
agents, phytotherapy, behavioral therapy, and pelvic floor physiotherapy.

This study aims to assess current approaches to the diagnosis and management of chronic

prostatitis using clinical and laboratory data, and to explore the effectiveness of multimodal
treatment strategies.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective observational study conducted at a tertiary urology clinic over a

period of 18 months (January 2023 – June 2024). A total of 80 male patients aged between 25
and 55 years with symptoms of chronic pelvic pain syndrome lasting for more than 3 months
were included.

Inclusion Criteria:

a.

Male patients aged 25–55 years

b.

Symptoms of pelvic or perineal pain >3 months


background image

621

ResearchBib IF - 11.01, ISSN: 3030-3753, Volume 2 Issue 5

c.

No evidence of urinary tract infection or cancer

Exclusion Criteria:

a.

History of recent urological surgery

b.

Active sexually transmitted infection

c.

Neurological disorders affecting bladder function

Clinical Assessment Tools:

a.

NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI)

b.

International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

c.

Physical examination including digital rectal exam (DRE)

Laboratory Investigations:

a.

Urinalysis and urine culture

b.

Four-glass Meares–Stamey test and simplified two-glass test (VB1 and VB3)

c.

Expressed Prostatic Secretion (EPS) analysis (leukocyte count and culture)

d.

PCR testing for Chlamydia, Ureaplasma, Mycoplasma, and other uropathogens

e.

Semen analysis and culture (selective)

Imaging and Functional Tests:

a.

Transrectal Ultrasonography (TRUS) for prostate volume and echogenicity

b.

Uroflowmetry and post-void residual urine estimation

Treatment Groups

:

Patients were stratified based on UPOINT classification and divided into four therapeutic

groups:

1. Group A: Antibiotic + alpha-blocker
2. Group B: Alpha-blocker + phytotherapy
3. Group C: Anti-inflammatory + physiotherapy
4. Group D: Multimodal treatment (based on UPOINT)
Follow-ups were conducted at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-treatment, with re-evaluation of

symptoms using NIH-CPSI and clinical examination.

Results

a.

Demographics:

b.

Mean age: 39.5 ± 8.7 years

c.

Duration of symptoms: Mean 7.2 months

d.

Type IIIA: 37 patients (46.25%)

e.

Type IIIB: 43 patients (53.75%)

Common Symptoms Reported

:

a.

Perineal/pelvic pain: 100%

b.

Dysuria: 56%

c.

Painful ejaculation: 42%

d.

Erectile dysfunction: 39%

e.

Lower back pain: 34%

Laboratory Findings

:

a.

Positive leukocyte count in EPS: 38 cases (mostly type IIIA)

b.

Positive PCR for Ureaplasma urealyticum: 22 patients

c.

Positive culture: 18 cases (low-grade bacterial flora)

d.

TRUS abnormalities (prostate calcifications, hypoechoic zones): 47 patients


background image

622

ResearchBib IF - 11.01, ISSN: 3030-3753, Volume 2 Issue 5

Treatment Efficacy

:

a.

Group D (multimodal): 74% showed >50% improvement in NIH-CPSI score

b.

Group A: 61% improvement

c.

Group B: 48% improvement

d.

Group C: 53% improvement

Side Effects

:

Mild orthostatic hypotension in 6 patients on alpha-blockers
Gastrointestinal complaints in 4 patients on NSAIDs

Discussion

The study confirms that chronic prostatitis is a heterogeneous syndrome that requires a

comprehensive diagnostic approach and individualized therapy. The traditional view of
prostatitis as a purely infectious disease is outdated. Our data supports the use of the UPOINT
system, which allows for categorization based on urinary, psychosocial, organ-specific,
infection-related, neurologic/systemic, and tenderness domains.

Alpha-blockers, especially tamsulosin, remain effective for urinary symptoms.
Antibiotics were beneficial only in PCR-positive or EPS-positive patients, reinforcing the

importance of microbiological confirmation before prescribing antimicrobials. Phytotherapeutic
agents like quercetin and Serenoa repens showed moderate benefits in inflammatory types, with
good tolerability.

Pelvic floor physiotherapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) were essential for

patients with pelvic floor dysfunction and anxiety-related symptoms. This highlights the
psychosomatic interplay in CP/CPPS and the importance of interdisciplinary care involving
urologists, psychologists, and physiotherapists.

The biggest improvements were seen in the group receiving multimodal therapy tailored

to their UPOINT profile, emphasizing that no single treatment fits all. Long-term management
and patient education remain crucial in achieving sustained remission.

Conclusion

Chronic prostatitis/CPPS is a multifactorial syndrome that requires a personalized and

structured approach to diagnosis and treatment. Laboratory evaluations, particularly PCR
diagnostics and EPS analysis, play a key role in differentiating inflammatory and infectious
components. Treatment should be based on symptom phenotype, and the UPOINT system is an
effective tool for guiding therapy.

A combination of alpha-blockers, anti-inflammatory agents, physiotherapy, and patient

education yields the best outcomes. Future directions should focus on better understanding the
neuroimmune mechanisms of CP/CPPS and integrating emerging therapies such as microbiome
modulation and neuromodulation.

REFERENCE

S

1.

Долиев, М. Н., Тулакова, Г. Э., Кадырова, А. М., Юсупов, З. А., & Жалалова, Д. З.

(2016). Эффективность комбинированного лечения пациентов с центральной
серозной

хориоретинопатией.

Вестник

Башкирского

государственного

медицинского университета, (2), 64-66.

2.

Andryev S. et al. Experience with the use of memantine in the treatment of cognitive

disorders //Science and innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. D11. – С. 282-288.


background image

623

ResearchBib IF - 11.01, ISSN: 3030-3753, Volume 2 Issue 5

3.

Antsiborov S. et al. Association of dopaminergic receptors of peripheral blood

lymphocytes with a risk of developing antipsychotic extrapyramidal diseases //Science
and innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. D11. – С. 29-35.

4.

Asanova R. et al. Features of the treatment of patients with mental disorders and

cardiovascular pathology //Science and innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. D12. – С. 545-
550.

5.

Begbudiyev M. et al. Integration of psychiatric care into primary care //Science and

innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. D12. – С. 551-557.

6.

Bo’Riyev B. et al. Features of clinical and psychopathological examination of young

children //Science and innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. D12. – С. 558-563.

7.

Borisova Y. et al. Concomitant mental disorders and social functioning of adults with

high-functioning autism/asperger syndrome //Science and innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. –
№. D11. – С. 36-41.

8.

Ivanovich U. A. et al. Efficacy and tolerance of pharmacotherapy with antidepressants in

non-psychotic depressions in combination with chronic brain ischemia //Science and
Innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. 12. – С. 409-414.

9.

Nikolaevich R. A. et al. Comparative effectiveness of treatment of somatoform diseases

in psychotherapeutic practice //Science and Innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. 12. – С. 898-
903.

10.

Novikov A. et al. Alcohol dependence and manifestation of autoagressive behavior in

patients of different types //Science and innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. D11. – С. 413-
419.

11.

Pachulia Y. et al. Assessment of the effect of psychopathic disorders on the dynamics of

withdrawal syndrome in synthetic cannabinoid addiction //Science and innovation. –
2023. – Т. 2. – №. D12. – С. 240-244.

12.

Pachulia Y. et al. Neurobiological indicators of clinical status and prognosis of

therapeutic response in patients with paroxysmal schizophrenia //Science and innovation.
– 2023. – Т. 2. – №. D12. – С. 385-391.

13.

Pogosov A. et al. Multidisciplinary approach to the rehabilitation of patients with

somatized personality development //Science and innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. D12. –
С. 245-251.

14.

Pogosov A. et al. Rational choice of pharmacotherapy for senile dementia //Science and

innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. D12. – С. 230-235.

15.

Pogosov S. et al. Gnostic disorders and their compensation in neuropsychological

syndrome of vascular cognitive disorders in old age //Science and innovation. – 2023. –
Т. 2. – №. D12. – С. 258-264.

16.

Pogosov S. et al. Prevention of adolescent drug abuse and prevention of yatrogenia

during prophylaxis //Science and innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. D12. – С. 392-397.

17.

Pogosov S. et al. Psychogenetic properties of drug patients as risk factors for the

formation of addiction //Science and innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. D12. – С. 186-191.

18.

Sedenkov V. et al. Clinical and socio-demographic characteristics of elderly patients with

suicide attempts //Science and innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. D12. – С. 273-277.

19.

Sedenkov V. et al. Modern methods of diagnosing depressive disorders in neurotic and

affective disorders //Science and innovation. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. D12. – С. 361-366.


background image

624

ResearchBib IF - 11.01, ISSN: 3030-3753, Volume 2 Issue 5

20.

Zukhridinovna, Z. D. (2022). Modern aspects of neuroprotective treatment in

hypertensive retinopathy.

21.

Jalalova, D., Raxmonov, X., & Shernazarov,

F. (2022). THE ROLE OF C-REACTIVE

PROTEIN IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF VISUAL VASCULAR DISEASES IN PATIENTS

WITH ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION.

Science and Innovation, 1(8), 114-121.

22.

Jalalova, D., Raxmonov, X., & Shernazarov, F. (2022). SIGNIFICANCE OF

ENDOTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF RETINOPATHY IN
PATIENTS WITH AH AND WAYS OF ITS CORRECTION. Science and Innovation,
1(8), 101-113.

23.

Jalalova, D., Axmedov, A., Kuryazov, A., & Shernazarov, F. (2022). COMBINED

DENTAL AND EYE PATHOLOGY. Science and innovation, 1(8), 91-100.

24.

Саттарова, Х. С., Жалалова, Д. З., & Бектурдиев, Ш. С. (2011). Причины слепоты и

слабовидения при сахарном диабете. Академический журнал Западной Сибири, (6),
27-28.

25.

Arunachalam, S. (2008). The science race continues in Asia. Current Science

(00113891), 94(7).

26.

Zukhriddinovna, Z. D. (2022). Development of Classification Criteria for Neuroretinal

Ischemia in Arterial Hypertension. Central Asian Journal of Medical and Natural
Science, 3(3), 59-65.

27.

Жалалова, Д. З., & Исмоилов, Ж. Ж. (2024). ТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКОЕ ОБОСНОВАНИЕ

ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ ЭНДОТЕЛИНА-1 И Д-ДИМЕРОВ В КРОВИ И СЛЕЗНОЙ
ЖИДКОСТИ ПАЦИЕНТОВ С ГИПЕРТОНИЧЕСКОЙ АНГИОРЕТИНОПАТИЕЙ.
AMALIY VA TIBBIYOT FANLARI ILMIY JURNALI, 3(3), 294-299.

28.

Киселева, Т. Н., Ежов, М. В., Аджемян, Н. А., Танковский, В. Э., & Ильина, Н. В.

(2016). Особенности регионарного глазного кровотока при артериальной
гипертензии I-II степени и субклиническом атеросклерозе. Российский
офтальмологический журнал, 9(3), 26-33.

29.

Жалалова, Д. З., Кадирова, А. М., & Хамракулов, С. Б. (2021). Исходы

герпетических кератоувеитов на фоне лечения препаратом «офтальмоферон» в
зависимости от иммунного статуса пациентов. междисциплинарный подход по
заболеваниям органов головы и шеи, 103.

30.

Дроздова, Е. А., & Хохлова, Д. Ю. (2015). Морфометрическая характеристика

макулярной зоны у пациентов с окклюзией вен сетчаткипо данным оптической
когерентной томографии. Медицинский вестник Башкортостана, 10(2 (56)), 64-67.

31.

Jalalova, D., Axmedov, A., Kuryazov, A., & Shernazarov, F. (2022). СОЧЕТАННАЯ

СТОМАТОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ И ГЛАЗНАЯ ПАТОЛОГИЯ. Science and innovation,
1(D8), 91-100.

32.

Zhang, S., & Melander, S. (2014). Varicose veins: Diagnosis, management, and

treatment. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 10(6), 417-424.

33.

Жалалова, Д. З., & Бабаев, С. А. (2024). РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ ОЦЕНКИ УРОВНЯ

ЭНДОТЕЛИНА-1 И Д-ДИМЕРОВ В СЛЕЗНОЙ ЖИДКОСТИ У ПАЦИЕНТОВ С
АРТЕРИАЛЬНОЙ ГИПЕРТЕНЗИЕЙ. AMALIY VA TIBBIYOT FANLARI ILMIY
JURNALI, 3(3), 300-307.


background image

625

ResearchBib IF - 11.01, ISSN: 3030-3753, Volume 2 Issue 5

34.

Zukhriddinovna, Z. D. (2022). Development of Classification Criteria for Neuroretinal

Ischemia in Arterial Hypertension. Central Asian Journal of Medical and Natural
Science, 3(3), 59-65.