125
Issue 6(41), Volume 1 | ISSN 3030-377X | 31.03.2025
SCIENCE SHINE
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
THE LINGUISTIC AND COGNITIVE CHALLENGES OF SIMULTANEOUS
INTERPRETATION: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS
Nizamova Lobar Sayfulla qizi
Oʻzbekiston Davlat Jahon tillari universiteti, Tarjimonlik fakulteti Sinxron tarjima
mutaxassisligi 2-kurs magistranti
f.f.d prof.
Samigova Xushnuda Botirovna
Tarjimonlik fakulteti Ingliz tili tarjima nazariyasi kafedra
Abstract:
Simultaneous interpretation (SI) is a cognitively demanding and
linguistically complex process requiring interpreters to manage real-time speech
input, reformulate messages across linguistic structures, and maintain coherence
under time pressure. This article explores the primary linguistic and cognitive
challenges faced by simultaneous interpreters, highlighting the intricate interplay
between language processing, memory constraints, and strategic adaptation.
Аннотация:
Синхронный перевод (СП) — это когнитивно сложный и
лингвистически насыщенный процесс, требующий от переводчиков обработки
речевого потока в реальном времени, реформулирования сообщений с учетом
различий в языковых структурах и сохранения связности под давлением
времени. В данной статье рассматриваются основные лингвистические и
когнитивные трудности, с которыми сталкиваются синхронные переводчики,
подчеркивая сложное взаимодействие между обработкой языка, ограничениями
памяти и стратегической адаптацией.
Abstrakt:
Sinxron tarjima (ST) — bu tarjimonlardan real vaqt rejimida nutq
oqimini qayta ishlash, xabarlarni turli til tuzilmalari bo‘ylab qayta shakllantirish va
vaqt bosimi ostida mantiqiy izchillikni saqlashni talab qiluvchi murakkab kognitiv va
lingvistik jarayondir. Ushbu maqolada sinxron tarjimonlar duch keladigan asosiy
lingvistik va kognitiv qiyinchiliklar tahlil qilinib, tilni qayta ishlash, xotira
cheklovlari va strategik moslashuv o‘rtasidagi murakkab o‘zaro bog‘liqlik yoritib
beriladi.
Keywords:
Simultaneous interpretation, cognitive challenges, linguistic
complexity, real-time processing, memory constraints, speech rate, lexical selection,
language structures, anticipation strategies, cognitive load, processing speed,
multilingual interpretation, specialized terminology, paraphrasing techniques,
accuracy and coherence.
126
Issue 6(41), Volume 1 | ISSN 3030-377X | 31.03.2025
SCIENCE SHINE
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
Ключевые слова:
Синхронный перевод, kогнитивные трудности,
Лингвистическая сложность, Обработка в реальном времени, Ограничения
памяти, Скорость речи, Лексический выбор, Языковые структуры, Стратегии
предвосхищения, Когнитивная нагрузка, Скорость обработки, Многоязычный
перевод, Специализированная терминология, Техники перефразирования,
Точность и связность.
Kalit so‘zlar:
Sinxron tarjima, kognitiv qiyinchiliklar, lingvistik murakkablik,
realvaqtda qayta ishlash, xotira cheklovlari, nutq tezligi, so‘z tanlash, til strukturalari,
oldindan taxmin qilish strategiyalari, qayta ishlash tezligi, ko‘p tilli tarjima, maxsus
terminologiya.
Introduction
Simultaneous interpretation (SI) is a highly specialized mode of oral translation
in which an interpreter listens to a spoken message in one language and renders it into
another in real-time, with minimal delay. Unlike consecutive interpretation, which
allows for pauses between segments of speech, SI requires near-instantaneous
comprehension, processing, and reformulation. Given the real-time nature of SI,
interpreters must navigate a complex set of challenges that extend beyond linguistic
competence. The process demands rapid decision-making, an exceptional memory
span, and the ability to manage divided attention. The two primary obstacles
interpreters face are
linguistic complexity
—the difficulty of conveying meaning
accurately between languages with different syntactic, lexical, and cultural
structures—and
cognitive overload
, which arises from the simultaneous execution of
listening, processing, and speech production. This article aims to explore the
linguistic and cognitive difficulties inherent in simultaneous interpretation through
both theoretical and empirical perspectives. It will examine the cognitive mechanisms
involved in SI, the linguistic obstacles interpreters encounter, and the strategies
employed to mitigate these difficulties. By analyzing these challenges, the discussion
will contribute to a deeper understanding of the cognitive and linguistic demands of
SI and inform best practices for interpreters in diverse professional settings.
12
Cognitive Load and Processing Constraints in Simultaneous Interpretation.
Simultaneous interpretation (SI) is one of the most cognitively demanding linguistic
tasks, requiring interpreters to
listen, process, and articulate speech in real-time
without pauses or revision opportunities. Unlike written or consecutive translation, SI
12
Moser-Mercer, B. (2000).
Simultaneous Interpreting: Cognitive Potential and Limitations
(p. 47). Interpreting, 5(2),
John Benjamins Publishing.
127
Issue 6(41), Volume 1 | ISSN 3030-377X | 31.03.2025
SCIENCE SHINE
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
imposes an
immediate and irreversible cognitive burden
, forcing interpreters to
segment speech input while simultaneously formulating an equivalent output. This
intricate process not only requires linguistic proficiency but also demands an
exceptional level of executive control
, as interpreters must suppress interference
from the source language while maintaining fluency in the target language. The
overlapping nature of
listening, processing, and production
places interpreters in a
state of continuous cognitive juggling, increasing the risk of information loss, errors,
or semantic distortions.
Cognitive Overload and Working Memory Limitations. Baddeley’s Working
Memory Model provides a foundational framework for understanding the cognitive
constraints of SI. The phonological loop, responsible for short-term retention of
auditory information, is stretched to its limits as interpreters must store and
manipulate incoming speech while formulating an output. Meanwhile, the episodic
buffer plays a crucial role in integrating information across modalities, aiding in the
contextual reconstruction of utterances that may be syntactically or lexically
incongruent between languages. Given the finite capacity of working memory,
interpreters often struggle with lexical retrieval and syntactic restructuring,
particularly when faced with terminologically dense or complex discourse. Studies
suggest that cognitive overload in SI leads to a higher incidence of omissions,
distortions, and approximations, as interpreters are forced to allocate their mental
resources selectively. The interplay between memory constraints and linguistic
processing necessitates advanced coping mechanisms, such as chunking strategies,
paraphrasing techniques, and selective condensation of speech content.
13
Divided Attention and Multitasking in SI. One of the defining cognitive
challenges of SI is divided attention, as interpreters must simultaneously comprehend
input while generating coherent output. This extreme form of dual-task processing
requires interpreters to inhibit source-language interference, manage syntactic
reformulation, and ensure semantic accuracy, all within milliseconds. The extent of
cognitive load is further exacerbated in fast-paced speech, domain-specific
terminology, and idiomatic expressions, where interpreters must strike a delicate
balance between accuracy and processing efficiency. Neurolinguistic research
utilizing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has provided compelling
evidence regarding brain activation patterns in SI. Studies indicate heightened
activity in the prefrontal cortex, which governs executive functions such as working
13
Mikkelson, H., & Jourdenais, R. (2015).
The Routledge Handbook of Interpreting
(p. 212). Routledge.
128
Issue 6(41), Volume 1 | ISSN 3030-377X | 31.03.2025
SCIENCE SHINE
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
memory and attentional control, as well as in the left superior temporal gyrus, which
is involved in auditory processing and linguistic comprehension. These findings
suggest that SI relies on distributed neural networks, where the brain must
continuously adapt to fluctuating demands in linguistic and cognitive processing.
14
One of the most effective mechanisms for reducing cognitive load in SI is
anticipation
, a process in which interpreters use
contextual, syntactic, and prosodic
cues
to predict upcoming speech patterns. Chernov’s
Probability Prediction Model
posits that interpreters develop an
implicit probabilistic framework
based on their
linguistic knowledge, situational context, and speaker behavior, allowing them to
preemptively formulate target-language equivalents before hearing the full utterance.
Anticipation in SI is particularly relevant in
high-context languages
, where meaning
is often conveyed through
discourse markers, prosodic variations, and cultural
conventions
. By leveraging
predictive processing
, interpreters can mitigate the risk
of cognitive overload by preparing lexical or structural adjustments in advance.
However, excessive reliance on anticipation carries inherent risks, as
unexpected
shifts in discourse, ambiguities, or false cognates
may lead to interpretive errors.
The cognitive challenges in SI stem from the
simultaneous execution of multiple
high-order linguistic and cognitive functions
. From the constraints of
working
memory and divided attention
to the complexities of
anticipatory processing and
neural activation
, SI places an extraordinary burden on interpreters. Understanding
these constraints not only sheds light on the
cognitive architecture underlying SI
but also informs training methodologies aimed at
enhancing processing efficiency
and accuracy
in professional interpreters. As technological advancements continue
to evolve, future research must explore
how AI-assisted tools, neurocognitive
training, and adaptive processing strategies
can further optimize simultaneous
interpretation performance.
Structural Differences Between Languages. One of the most fundamental
linguistic challenges in SI is navigating the syntactic and morphological disparities
between the source and target languages. Unlike written translation, where
interpreters have time to analyze and restructure sentences, SI requires on-the-spot
adjustments to maintain coherence while adhering to the grammatical norms of the
target language. Word Order and Syntactic Variability: Languages follow different
syntactic patterns, such as subject-verb-object (SVO) in English and subject-object-
verb (SOV) in Japanese, creating significant challenges in real-time sentence
14
Moser-Mercer, B. (2000).
Simultaneous Interpreting: Cognitive Potential and Limitations
(p. 47).
Interpreting
, 5(2),
John Benjamins Publishing.
129
Issue 6(41), Volume 1 | ISSN 3030-377X | 31.03.2025
SCIENCE SHINE
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
construction. Interpreters must anticipate sentence endings in verb-final languages
while ensuring a natural flow in the target language. Morphological Complexities:
Some languages, like Turkish and Finnish, use agglutinative morphology, where
multiple affixes modify a root word, requiring interpreters to decompose and
reconstruct meaning effectively. Conversely, isolating languages like Chinese rely
more on word order and particles, which may necessitate syntactic reordering in
interpretation. Gender and Case Systems: In languages like German or Russian,
grammatical gender and case markings influence word endings and sentence
structure, creating additional cognitive load for interpreters working into a language
with fewer or no such distinctions.
Lexical and Semantic Challenges. The lexical complexity of simultaneous
interpretation arises from the fluidity of meaning, requiring interpreters to make
instantaneous semantic decisions while ensuring contextual accuracy. Polysemy and
Homonyms: Words with multiple meanings pose a high risk of misinterpretation,
especially when the context is ambiguous or evolving rapidly. For example, the
English word
bank
can refer to a financial institution or a riverbank, demanding
immediate contextual evaluation in SI. False Cognates and Loanwords: Some words
appear similar across languages but have distinct meanings, leading to potential
errors. For instance, the English word
actual
(meaning "real") and the Spanish
actual
(meaning "current") can cause confusion in high-stakes diplomatic or legal settings.
15
Additionally, loanwords often carry slightly different connotations in different
languages, requiring careful handling. Terminology and Jargon: Specialized fields
such as medicine, law, and diplomacy use technical terms that may lack direct
equivalents in the target language. Interpreters must quickly retrieve or approximate
terminology without distorting meaning. Preparation through terminology research
and glossaries is essential in overcoming these challenges.
Idiomatic Expressions and Cultural References. Cultural references and
idiomatic expressions pose a major obstacle in SI, as they often lack direct
translations and may carry context-dependent meanings. Metaphors and Proverbs:
Expressions like
"kick the bucket"
(meaning "to die") or
"raining cats and dogs"
(meaning "heavy rain") cannot be translated literally. Interpreters must either find an
equivalent idiom in the target language or paraphrase to retain meaning. Culturally
Embedded Phrases: Diplomatic and political discourse often contains historical or
literary references unfamiliar to the target audience. Interpreters must decide whether
15
Mikkelson, H., & Jourdenais, R. (2015).
The Routledge Handbook of Interpreting
(p. 212). Routledge.
130
Issue 6(41), Volume 1 | ISSN 3030-377X | 31.03.2025
SCIENCE SHINE
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
to explain, adapt, or omit these references based on their relevance and audience
familiarity. Case Studies on Diplomatic SI Failures: Misinterpretation of idioms has
led to misunderstandings in international relations. A well-documented example is
the mistranslation of Soviet Premier Khrushchev’s phrase
"Мы вас похороним!"
into English as
"We will bury you!"
, which was perceived as a nuclear threat rather
than the intended meaning of "We will outlast you economically."
Register and Formality Shifts. Simultaneous interpreters must adjust their
language based on the social and institutional context, ensuring that tone, politeness,
and formality are preserved across languages. Professional vs. Informal Tone: In
legal, political, or medical settings, precise terminology is critical, whereas in more
casual interactions, dynamic equivalence may be more appropriate. Honorifics and
Formal Speech Patterns: Languages like Japanese and Korean use complex honorific
systems, which must be adapted into languages with fewer formal distinctions (e.g.,
English).
16
Legal and Political SI Challenges: In courtroom or diplomatic settings,
word choice carries legal and political implications, making it essential to maintain
neutrality while adhering to institutional norms. The linguistic challenges of
simultaneous interpretation arise from structural, lexical, cultural, and contextual
complexities, requiring interpreters to possess exceptional linguistic dexterity and
adaptability. Successfully managing these challenges involves a combination of
preparation, cognitive strategies, and real-time decision-making, underscoring the
high-level expertise required in SI. Future research in AI-assisted interpretation and
neurolinguistic training may offer further insights into optimizing linguistic
processing in simultaneous interpretation.
Speech Rate and Time Constraints in Simultaneous Interpretation. Simultaneous
interpretation (SI) demands rapid cognitive processing to keep pace with the
speaker’s delivery while ensuring accuracy and coherence. Among the most critical
challenges interpreters face are
high speech rates, time constraints, and the need to
balance fluency with fidelity
.
This section examines the impact of fast speech on SI,
the role of decalage in maintaining synchronization, and the strategies interpreters use
to condense or expand speech effectively. Interpreters often encounter speakers who
deliver speeches at an exceptionally high rate
,
making it difficult to process, translate,
and produce speech in real time. The challenges associated with high-speed speech
include:
16
Schwieter, J. W., & Ferreira, A. (2017).
The Handbook of Translation and Cognition
(p. 290). Wiley-Blackwell.
131
Issue 6(41), Volume 1 | ISSN 3030-377X | 31.03.2025
SCIENCE SHINE
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
Reduced comprehension time
: Faster delivery shortens the
time
available for cognitive processing
, making it harder to grasp complex ideas or
technical terminology.
Lexical retrieval difficulties
: Interpreters must select the most
appropriate words rapidly, increasing the risk of
semantic inaccuracies or
approximation
.
Risk of omissions and distortions
: When speech is too fast, interpreters
may unintentionally
omit minor details
or
simplify complex structures
to keep up.
Strategies for Managing High Speech Rates. To maintain quality and prevent
cognitive overload, interpreters employ several strategic techniques:
Chunking
: Breaking speech into smaller,
meaningful segments
for
easier processing and reformulation.
Paraphrasing
: Reconstructing sentences
with simpler structures
to
maintain flow while preserving meaning.
Omission and Prioritization
: Eliminating redundant or
non-essential
information
to ensure core messages are conveyed.
Anticipation
: Using
predictive strategies
to guess upcoming content
based on
linguistic patterns and context clues
.
Decalage
, or the
ear-voice span
, refers to the
time lag between listening and
speaking
in SI. The length of decalage directly influences interpretation quality and
varies based on speech complexity, interpreter skill, and context.
17
Short decalage (1–3 seconds)
:
Used in
high-speed speech scenarios
where delays lead to excessive
cognitive load.
Helps
maintain
real-time
synchronization
but
may
limit
comprehension
, leading to
literal or less refined translations
.
Long decalage (4–8 seconds)
:
Allows for
better sentence structuring and contextual understanding
.
Increases
accuracy
but risks falling behind, especially in
rapid
exchanges
like diplomatic debates.
Balancing Accuracy and Fluency Under Time Pressur. Interpreters must strike a
balance between maintaining fidelity to the speaker’s words and ensuring fluent
delivery. A key challenge is avoiding lag accumulation, which can cause:
Information backlog
, where the interpreter struggles to keep up.
17
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990).
Language Comprehension as Structure Building
(p. 113). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
132
Issue 6(41), Volume 1 | ISSN 3030-377X | 31.03.2025
SCIENCE SHINE
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
Sentence fragmentation
, leading to unnatural and disjointed speech.
Excessive reliance on anticipation
, increasing the risk of
semantic
distortions
if the interpreter misjudges speaker intent.
Condensation: Shortening Messages Without Losing Meaning
Interpreters often need to
compress information
while preserving essential
meaning. This technique is particularly useful when:
The speaker
delivers lengthy, redundant phrases
that can be
simplified without altering intent
.
The target language requires
more concise phrasing
due to syntactic
differences.
Interpreters must keep pace
without sacrificing coherence
.
Examples of condensation:
Original (English)
:
The p
rimary objective that we
are aiming to achieve today is to find a sustainable and long-term solution.
Condensed (French)
:
Notre objectif est de trouver une solution durable.
(
Our goal
is to find a sustainable solution.
)
Expansion: Adjusting Speech Length to Preserve Speaker Intent
In contrast, interpreters may
expand messages
when: The
target language
lacks a direct equivalent
and requires
additional explanation
. The
speaker's
phrasing is too condensed
, making interpretation difficult to follow. Cultural
adaptation necessitates
contextual clarification
for better audience comprehension.
Examples of expansion:
Original (Chinese)
:
面子
(
miànzi
, meaning “face” in
the cultural sense of reputation and social standing).
Expanded in English
:
Preserving one's dignity and social reputation in interactions with others.
Challenges in Multilingual and Specialized Contexts.
Simultaneous
interpretation (SI) becomes significantly more complex when conducted in
multilingual and specialized settings. These environments—such as the United
Nations (UN), European Union (EU), and World Trade Organization (WTO)—
require interpreters to manage multiple languages, diverse accents, and specialized
terminology, all while maintaining accuracy and fluency. This section examines the
challenges interpreters face in multilingual institutions and specialized domains, as
well as strategies for overcoming these obstacles.
18
The Complexity of Switching Between Languages and Accents. Multilingual
institutions often operate with multiple working languages, requiring interpreters to:
Switch rapidly between languages: In large international organizations, interpreters
18
De Groot, A. M. B. (2011).
Language and Cognition in Bilinguals and Multilinguals: An Introduction
(p. 85).
Psychology Press.
133
Issue 6(41), Volume 1 | ISSN 3030-377X | 31.03.2025
SCIENCE SHINE
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
often work with two or more active languages, increasing cognitive strain. Handle
diverse accents and dialects: Variations in pronunciation, intonation, and regional
speech patterns can affect comprehension. Navigate code-switching and mixed-
language discourse: Some speakers may blend languages within the same speech,
forcing interpreters to adapt dynamically. These challenges are intensified by time
constraints, as interpreters must make split-second lexical and grammatical decisions
while maintaining coherence.
Multilingual conferences use
relay interpretation
, where: One interpreter
translates from the
original language into a shared intermediary language
(e.g.,
English or French). Other interpreters then translate from this
relay language
into
their target languages. This system helps manage
rare language pairs
but introduces
potential
information loss
due to multiple layers of interpretation. To
mitigate
errors
, interpreters:
Engage in pre-session language briefings
to align with
colleagues.
Rely on shared glossaries and reference materials
to ensure
consistency.
Use predictive listening and anticipation
to compensate for potential
delays in relay interpretation.
Specialized interpretation requires a
deep understanding of field-specific
terminology
. The difficulty arises from:
Medical interpretation
: Complex anatomy,
pharmaceuticals, and diagnoses require precision to
prevent medical errors
.
Legal
interpretation
: Differences in
legal systems and terminology
between countries can
create challenges in courtroom and contract interpretation.
Technical interpretation
:
Industries like
engineering, IT, and finance
use highly specialized jargon,
necessitating continuous learning. Failure to master domain-specific terminology can
result in
misinterpretation with serious consequences
, such as
legal
misrepresentation or medical malpractice
. To ensure accuracy, interpreters:
Conduct extensive terminology research
before assignments, using reference
materials, legal codes, or medical textbooks.
19
Develop personal glossaries
containing technical terms, acronyms, and context-specific expressions.
Leverage
digital tools
like
term banks (e.g., IATE for EU terminology)
and
speech
recognition software
to facilitate terminology retrieval. Preparation is particularly
crucial for
high-stakes interpreting
, where even
minor lexical inaccuracies can
lead to significant consequences
.
Conclusion
19
Lee, T. H. C. (2002).
Cognitive Constraints in Simultaneous Interpreting
(p. 57).
Interpreting
, 6(1), John Benjamins
Publishing.
134
Issue 6(41), Volume 1 | ISSN 3030-377X | 31.03.2025
SCIENCE SHINE
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
Simultaneous interpretation (SI) presents a unique intersection of
linguistic
complexity and cognitive demands
, requiring interpreters to process, translate, and
articulate speech in real time. Throughout this discussion, we have examined the
major
cognitive constraints
, including
working memory limitations, divided
attention, and cognitive overload
, as well as
linguistic challenges
such as
structural differences between languages, idiomatic expressions, and domain-
specific terminology
. Additionally, we explored how
speech rate, multilingual
environments, and specialized contexts
further complicate the interpreting process.
Looking ahead,
artificial intelligence and machine learning
will likely play an
increasingly significant role in
reducing cognitive strain and improving real-time
interpretation accuracy
. However, despite these technological advancements,
human expertise remains irreplaceable
, particularly in
handling cultural nuances,
pragmatic adaptation, and ethical considerations
. As SI continues to evolve,
interpreters must embrace
continuous learning, technological integration, and
cognitive resilience
to navigate the ever-changing demands of the profession.
References:
1.
Christoffels, I. K., & de Groot, A. M. B. (2004).
Components of
simultaneous interpreting: Comparing interpreting with shadowing and paraphrasing.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(3)
, 227-240.
2.
Fantinuoli, C., Marchesini, G., Landan, D., & Horak, L. (2022).
KUDO Interpreter Assist: Automated real-time support for remote interpretation.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.01800
.
3.
Gerver, D. (1976).
Empirical studies of simultaneous interpretation: A
review and a model. In R. W. Brislin (Ed.),
Translation: Applications and Research
(pp. 165-207). Gardner Press.
4.
Kurz, I. (1993).
Cognitive constraints in simultaneous interpreting.
Interpreting, 1(1)
, 77-100.
5.
Moser-Mercer, B. (2000).
Simultaneous interpreting: Cognitive
potential and limitations.
Interpreting, 5(2)
, 83-94.
6.
Riccardi, A. (2005).
On the evolution of interpreting strategies in
simultaneous interpreting.
Meta: Journal des traducteurs, 50(2)
, 753-767.
7.
Seeber, K. G. (2011).
Cognitive load in simultaneous interpreting:
Existing theories—new models.
Interpreting, 13(2)
, 176-204.
8.
Setton, R. (1999).
Simultaneous Interpretation: A Cognitive-Pragmatic
Analysis
. John Benjamins Publishing.
135
Issue 6(41), Volume 1 | ISSN 3030-377X | 31.03.2025
SCIENCE SHINE
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL
9.
Samigova Kh. B., Abdullayev F.K. Rhethoric in the English and Uzbek
languages//International Journal of research and Development. India, EPRA, 2020.
6.222-233. (№№ 23) (SJIF Impact factor 7.001).
10.
Самигова Х. Инглиз ва ўзбек тилларида экспрессивликнинг ифода
этилиши. Монография. Рига/ Латвия, Lambert Academy, 2019.
11.
Tommola, J., & Hyönä, J. (1990).
Mental load in simultaneous
interpreting: An on-line pilot study.
The Interpreters' Newsletter, 2
, 25-37.
12.
Vogler, N., Stewart, C., & Neubig, G. (2019).
Lost in interpretation:
Predicting untranslated terminology in simultaneous interpretation.
arXiv preprint
arXiv:1904.00930
.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233520925_Simultaneous_inte
rpreting_Cognitive_potential_and_limitations
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303200836_Simultaneous_inte
rpreting_A_cognitive_perspective
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Components-of-simultaneous-
interpreting%3A-Comparing-Christoffels-
Groot/436d83da60f882a3e5dae2bac9cf991ffc8b1c9c
