SOLUTION OF SOCIAL PROBLEMS IN
MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMY
International scientific-online conference
136
INTERNATIONAL PRACTICES IN HOUSING STOCK MANAGEMENT:
LESSONS FOR DEVELOPING ECONOMIES
Inoyatova Durdona Shokhaydarovna
Associate Professor of the Department of Economics,
Renaissance Educational University
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15393336
Efficient housing stock management is a fundamental component of urban
development and social stability. This paper explores the international practices
of housing stock management in selected countries, including Germany,
Singapore, the Netherlands, and Sweden. By comparing institutional
frameworks, financing mechanisms, regulatory approaches, and public-private
partnerships, the study identifies critical success factors and challenges. The
analysis provides valuable insights for transitional economies, particularly
Uzbekistan, in developing a modern, inclusive, and sustainable housing
management system.
The management of housing stock plays a vital role in ensuring the
livability, safety, and economic efficiency of urban areas. Countries around the
world adopt diverse strategies to address issues of housing availability,
maintenance, affordability, and governance. In many post-Soviet countries like
Uzbekistan, transitioning from centrally managed housing to a more market-
oriented system remains a complex task. Therefore, examining international
experiences can serve as a roadmap for reforms and policy design.
Housing stock management models in advanced economies:
Germany operates one of the most tenant-friendly systems in the world.
Housing cooperatives and municipal housing companies manage a substantial
part of the housing stock. Strong rent control policies and long-term tenancy
rights ensure social stability. Public-private cooperation and subsidies play a
vital role in maintaining housing quality and affordability.
In Singapore, over 80% of the population lives in public housing
administered by the Housing and Development Board (HDB). The government’s
direct intervention, including land acquisition, financing, and construction, has
made housing highly accessible. A unique aspect is the linkage between housing
ownership and the Central Provident Fund (CPF), a mandatory savings scheme.
The Dutch model relies heavily on social housing corporations, which are
independent but strictly regulated by the state. These organizations manage
around 30% of the housing stock and prioritize low- and middle-income
households. Housing is funded through tenant rents, government subsidies, and
regulated loans, ensuring long-term sustainability.
SOLUTION OF SOCIAL PROBLEMS IN
MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMY
International scientific-online conference
137
Sweden’s housing model emphasizes environmental sustainability and
tenant rights. Municipal companies manage public housing, while strong
national policies guide rent setting and construction standards. Sweden’s
housing policy also focuses on integrating renewable energy and eco-friendly
construction.
Table-1
Comparative characteristics of housing stock management models in
selected countries
Uzbekistan can learn several lessons from international housing
management systems:
Institutional Development: Establishing autonomous housing management
agencies or corporations can improve accountability and service quality.
Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): Leveraging private sector expertise
through concessions or management contracts can ensure efficiency.
Regulatory Frameworks: Rent control, tenant protection laws, and
maintenance obligations need modernization.
Sustainable Financing: Introducing housing saving schemes or mortgage-
backed subsidies could make housing more accessible.
Digitalization: Implementation of smart housing management systems,
using GIS and BIM, can enhance transparency and monitoring.
Global best practices in housing stock management highlight the
importance of integrated governance, sustainable financing, and social
inclusiveness. As Uzbekistan continues urbanizing and diversifying its housing
sector, adopting tailored elements from successful international models can
strengthen institutional capacity, housing affordability, and long-term urban
resilience.
