Environmental Impact Assessment and Geological Evaluation of Non-Associated Gas Wells in Forcados-Yokri block, Burutu Area, Delta State, South-south Nigeria.

Abstract

Forcados-Yokri field is situated in Burutu area of Delta State. Its a large oil and gas province holding large volume of recoverable hydrocarbon. A Geological redevelopment was done to harness the abundant gas contained in it. There is urgent need for Nigeria to shift to cleaner source of alternative energy and reduce its carbon footprint, thus, the block was re-evaluated and re-developed for this gas deposit. The field was thus initiated to supplement gas production for domestic reserve and enhance the industrialization of the region and the country. The field has an expected STOIIP and GIIP (AG + NAG) of 2878 MMstb oil and 2298.7 Bscf of gas respectively. Cluster Jackets, 18" x 5.5km Oil Pipeline  12" x 6.4km Gas Pipeline, 33KV Power Cable Back-up, 8" Gas lift line (North Bank Gas Plant-Yokri Flowstation), new cluster jackets, 33kV Cable from North Bank Manifold, 700V Power Control Cable Ring were connected to the main Pipeline Phase 1. More importantly, 6" South Bank to Forcados Terminal fuel gas back-up Line, 8 km and 6“ flow line were also connected to slug catcher at North Bank Gas Processing Facilities with the existing Associated Gas facilities at the CPF. Findings revealed feasible environmental space for gas production with phytoplankton distribution of Bacillariophyceae 52%, Cyanophyceae 33%, Euglenophyceae 7%, Dinophycea 5%, Chlorophyceae 3% with the zooplankton belonged to six (6) taxa; Copepoda, Hydrozoa, Mollusc larvae, Decapod larvae, Rotifera, and Chaetognatha. The study concluded the feasibility and viability of producing the hydrocarbon content of about 291MMstb of oil and 94 bscf of gas in the block area under the prevailing environmental condition.

Source type: Journals
Years of coverage from 2019
inLibrary
Google Scholar
HAC
doi
 
CC BY f
10-24

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
To share
Ibrahim Olanrewaju Ibrahim, Ngozi-Chika CS, Ashioba C, & Ibrahim Bilqees Damilola-Habeeb. (2025). Environmental Impact Assessment and Geological Evaluation of Non-Associated Gas Wells in Forcados-Yokri block, Burutu Area, Delta State, South-south Nigeria. The American Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(8), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajas/Volume07Issue08-02
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus

Abstract

Forcados-Yokri field is situated in Burutu area of Delta State. Its a large oil and gas province holding large volume of recoverable hydrocarbon. A Geological redevelopment was done to harness the abundant gas contained in it. There is urgent need for Nigeria to shift to cleaner source of alternative energy and reduce its carbon footprint, thus, the block was re-evaluated and re-developed for this gas deposit. The field was thus initiated to supplement gas production for domestic reserve and enhance the industrialization of the region and the country. The field has an expected STOIIP and GIIP (AG + NAG) of 2878 MMstb oil and 2298.7 Bscf of gas respectively. Cluster Jackets, 18" x 5.5km Oil Pipeline  12" x 6.4km Gas Pipeline, 33KV Power Cable Back-up, 8" Gas lift line (North Bank Gas Plant-Yokri Flowstation), new cluster jackets, 33kV Cable from North Bank Manifold, 700V Power Control Cable Ring were connected to the main Pipeline Phase 1. More importantly, 6" South Bank to Forcados Terminal fuel gas back-up Line, 8 km and 6“ flow line were also connected to slug catcher at North Bank Gas Processing Facilities with the existing Associated Gas facilities at the CPF. Findings revealed feasible environmental space for gas production with phytoplankton distribution of Bacillariophyceae 52%, Cyanophyceae 33%, Euglenophyceae 7%, Dinophycea 5%, Chlorophyceae 3% with the zooplankton belonged to six (6) taxa; Copepoda, Hydrozoa, Mollusc larvae, Decapod larvae, Rotifera, and Chaetognatha. The study concluded the feasibility and viability of producing the hydrocarbon content of about 291MMstb of oil and 94 bscf of gas in the block area under the prevailing environmental condition.


background image

The American Journal of Applied Sciences

10

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas

TYPE

Original Research

PAGE NO.

10-24

DOI

10.37547/tajas/Volume07Issue08-02

OPEN ACCESS

SUBMITED

19 July 2025

ACCEPTED

24 July 2025

PUBLISHED

01 August 2025

VOLUME

Vol.07 Issue 08 2025

CITATION

Ibrahim Olanrewaju Ibrahim, Ngozi-Chika CS, Ashioba C, & Ibrahim Bilqees
Damilola-Habeeb. (2025). Environmental Impact Assessment and
Geological Evaluation of Non-Associated Gas Wells in Forcados-Yokri
block, Burutu Area, Delta State, South-south Nigeria. The American
Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(8), 10

24.

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajas/Volume07Issue08-02

COPYRIGHT

© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.

Environmental Impact
Assessment and Geological
Evaluation of Non-
Associated Gas Wells in
Forcados-Yokri block,
Burutu Area, Delta State,
South-south Nigeria.

Ibrahim Olanrewaju Ibrahim.

Design and Hydrogeology units, Lower Niger River Basin
Development Authority, Ilorin, Kwara state, Nigeria.

Ngozi-Chika CS

Department of Geology, Dennis Osadebay University, Asaba, Delta
state, Nigeria

Ashioba C

Department of Geology, Dennis Osadebay University, Asaba, Delta
state, Nigeria

Ibrahim Bilqees Damilola-Habeeb

Kulende study center, Force Education Unit, Ilorin, Kwara State,
Nigeria

Abstract:

Forcados-Yokri field is situated in Burutu area

of Delta State. Its a large oil and gas province holding
large volume of recoverable hydrocarbon. A Geological
redevelopment was done to harness the abundant gas
contained in it. There is urgent need for Nigeria to shift
to cleaner source of alternative energy and reduce its
carbon footprint, thus, the block was re-evaluated and
re-developed for this gas deposit. The field was thus
initiated to supplement gas production for domestic
reserve and enhance the industrialization of the region
and the country. The field has an expected STOIIP and
GIIP (AG + NAG) of 2878 MMstb oil and 2298.7 Bscf of
gas respectively. Cluster Jackets, 18" x 5.5km Oil Pipeline
12" x 6.4km Gas Pipeline, 33KV Power Cable Back-up, 8"
Gas lift line (North Bank Gas Plant-Yokri Flowstation),
new cluster jackets, 33kV Cable from North Bank
Manifold, 700V Power Control Cable Ring were
connected to the main Pipeline Phase 1. More
importantly, 6" South Bank to Forcados Terminal fuel


background image

The American Journal of Applied Sciences

11

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas

gas back-up Line,

8 km and 6“ flow line were also

connected to slug catcher at North Bank Gas Processing
Facilities with the existing Associated Gas facilities at the
CPF. Findings revealed feasible environmental space for
gas production with phytoplankton distribution of
Bacillariophyceae

52%,

Cyanophyceae

33%,

Euglenophyceae 7%, Dinophycea 5%, Chlorophyceae 3%
with the zooplankton belonged to six (6) taxa;
Copepoda, Hydrozoa, Mollusc larvae, Decapod larvae,
Rotifera, and Chaetognatha. The study concluded the
feasibility and viability of producing the hydrocarbon
content of about 291MMstb of oil and 94 bscf of gas in
the block area under the prevailing environmental
condition.

Keywords:

STOIIP= Stock Tank Oil Initially In Place,

Zooplankton, AG is Associated Gas, NAG is Non-
Associated Gas, CPF is Central Processing Facility and
GIIP is Gas Initially In Place.

Introduction

1.

Background

Forcados-Yokri field is situated in Burutu Area of Delta
State. It is one of the largest oil fields in the area. A total
of 152 wells have been drilled in the field till date. A
redevelopment strategy for the Forcados Yokri
Integrated block area was initiated to shore up the
hydrocarbon reserve base. The scope of work included
development of total expectation reserve target of
292MMstb (proved reserves of 201 MMstb) of oil and 92
bscf (proved reserves of 52 bscf) of gas. This is expected
to reduce carbon emission and greenhouse gases,
moreso, with the rolling out of compressed natural gas
infrastructure (CNG) by Nigerian government in
collaboration with Nigerian Midstream, Downstream
Petroleum Regulatory Authority to convert vehicles
from Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) based to gas based,
cleaner, safer, cheaper and more environmental friendly
fossil fuel. It is worthy of note that most oil producing

companies in the area are expected to key into the real
geoscientific dynamics shaping the world energy
landscape. Climate change is real and can be partly
traced to burning of oil and gas of which the gas can be
converted to cleaner energy.

Before now, the associated gas is commonly flared with
impunity in Niger Delta area and globally (Doust and
Omatsola 1989 and 1990) which has serious
consequential harm on the ecosystem with attendant
serious public health implication on well-being of
communities and the people. Gas utilization has
increased tremendously in the day-to-day socio-
economic activities in Nigeria as a cleaner fuel ranging
from domestic cooking gas, alternative source of
powering generators to generate electricity, abundant
gas-powered stations, gas fired industries, compressed
natural gas in our vehicles etc. These are due to new
Technological and. Geoscientific innovations springing
up globally to reduce carbon footprint and make the
planet earth more habitable for man (Ibrahim et al
2023). The feasibility (ESIA) of producing the gas deposit
was thus evaluated.

2.

Location

Forcados Yokri field is bounded approximately around
the co-ordinates of 319435mE - 335238mE and
158355mN - 141626mN with area coverage of
244.64sqKm (24464.0 hectares). The block area is
composed of meandering creeks and mangrove swamps
with dredge slots leading to well heads distributed over
the area. The land terrain of the block area is covered by
fresh water swamp

forest in the North Bank - Yokri axis and mangrove
swamp forest in South Bank.

Forcados-Yokri field is a

brown field situated in the coastal swamp area
straddling the mouth of the Forcados River in Burutu
Local Government Area of Delta State (Fig. 1).


background image

The American Journal of Applied Sciences

12

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas

Fig. 1: Geological map of Delta study area, Nigeria

3.

Sampling location and Statistical Analysis

The map showing the study area has shown an
expensive area with vast potential to produce
hydrocarbon in commercial quantity (Figs 1 and 2). The
sampling points were geo-referenced by means of
Global Positioning System (GPS). Purposive sampling
was applied in the selection of study stations, taking into
account tidal influence and regime. Control stations

were located outside the spatial boundary. A number of
statistical tools were employed; the student t-Test
Paired Two Samples for means, and the single-factor
(one-way) Analyses of Variance (ANOVA) adopted. The
t-Test Paired Two Samples for Means was employed to
compare two sets of data (study area and control) while
the single factor ANOVA was eventually not used in this
publication but reserved for an ongoing manuscript to
be published soon.

Table 1: Sampling coordinates for Revalidation of Study block area

S/N

Sample codes

Point X

Point Y

1

AQ1

318722.4562

152599.6653

2

AQ2

318691.9888

151633.6733

3

AQ3

317941.3238

152105.6015

4

AQ4

319494.3507

152077.2955

5

AQC1

318799.9353

153637.2337

6

AQC2

318639.1922

150449.414

7

SW1

318722.4562

152599.6653

8

SW2

318691.9888

151633.6733

9

SW3

317941.3238

152105.6015

10

SW4

319494.3507

152077.2955

The objective was thus to determine statistically,
environmental impacts of existing facilities (e.g
flowstations, manifolds, pipelines and other associated
facilities) on the environment, social and health
components of the area. In essence, it can be vividly said
that the block area in question had its environmental

impact and social assessment to give some details of the
area and allow for further mitigation planning. The
sedimentological evaluation of the study area is typical
of the Niger Delta and as described by previous workers
(Ibrahim et al 2000).


background image

The American Journal of Applied Sciences

13

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas

Fig. 2: Sampling points during the field work to the study area

4.

Materials and Methodology

Materials for the work study included Pipeline Lay
Barges, Drilling Rigs, Piling Rigs, Shuttle boat, Tugboats,
Work barges, Welding Machines, Generator Barges,
Power/Fibre optics, Subsea cable, Estuary flow station
facilities, Cluster Jackets, 18" x 5.5km Oil Pipeline (New
Estuary FS

South Bank), 12" x6.4km Gas Pipeline (New

Estuary FS -South Bank), 33KV Power Cable Back-up
(Forcados Terminal - CPF Ring), Construct 8" Gaslift line
(North Bank Gas Plant - Yokri Flowstation), new cluster
jackets, 33kV Cable from North Bank Manifold

CPF,

700V Power Control Cable Ring Main Pipeline Phase 1.
More importantly, 6" South Bank to Forcados Terminal
fuel gas back-up Line,

8 km and 6 “ flow line to a slug

catcher at North Bank Gas Processing Facilities and
integrating the whole setup to the existing Associated
Gas facilities at the CPF. For the Phase 2 pipeline: New
gas flowline from NAG Well to CPF with

16’’ Export Gas

pipeline-34km

6’’ Bulkline replacement

-105km. Afremo

pipeline repair works 8’’ X 12.2km (Fig. 3).

With

Gas lift pipeline 8” x 20km,

Gas lift spur-

line 4”x 20km were used,

Old Estuary flow station (OEFS)

pig launcher replacement and inter-connecting piping
works with Non-Associated Gas (1 NAG) Well and 4 Oil
well Development. Water based mud (bentonite) and
pseudo oil-based mud (POBM) were used for the upper
and lower sections of the holes respectively for rigidity
to prevent caving. Spent muds and drilling fluids were
generated during drilling and disposed off appropriately
with no harm to the ecosystem. The POBM drill cuttings
were transported to onshore and treated at the Thermal
Desorption Unit (TDU) at Forcados Terminal. The unit
eventually produced solids that are free of Pseudo Oil
Based Mud (POBM). The treated solid is usually about
99.97% pure solid which is within regulatory limits of
NUPRC and were shipped to deep offshore (depth of
water greater than 200ft and distance greater than 12
nautical miles) and dumped. Drilling fluids and chemicals
were continuously recycled/reused.


background image

The American Journal of Applied Sciences

14

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas

Fig. 3: Diagram showing Forcados Non-Associated Gas wells and clusters of hydrocarbon infrastructures.

5.

Description of the Environmental condition of the
area

The purpose of the data acquisition was to establish the
status of the environmental condition of the study area
before the intervention. Data obtained will be useful for
adequate comparative study with previously obtained
data and shall be used for adequate planning. This
comparison provides us information on impacts of
existing facilities such as flow stations, clusters, pipelines
and manifolds on the environment in addition to
determining future impact of proposed block activities
on the environment to further improve on production.
This network of pipelines was similarly advanced by
previous workers, especially around the Sagbara gas
flow station (Ibrahim et al 2023).

5.1 Climate and meteorology

The block area environment lies within tropical swamp
belt of southern Nigeria characterized by heavy rain,
frequent thunder storms, high relative humidity and
relatively moderate temperatures. The rain occur mostly
during the wet season from March to November of each
year, with a monthly average of 199.58 mm reported for
the area. Wind in the area is dominated by SW winds
with speeds of 3.1-4.6 m/s measured during the study
(Table 2). The climate of the study area is tropical and
marked by the rainy and the dry seasons. The rainy
season begins around March and lasts till November,
while the dry season commences in December and lasts

till February of each year. The annual rainfall is in the
order of 2395 mm at an average of 199.58 mm per
month. The relative humidity is typically lowest in
January (69%) and highest in July and August (92% and
93% respectively). The mean relative humidity was
84.1%. The mean monthly air temperatures were similar
and almost the same in some months as in February,
May, July, August, September and October. The average
monthly temperature is 27.6°C (Table 2). The lowest
temperature was in July (26.3°C) and August and
September and the highest was in February (29.3°C) and
December. There are winds blowing from different
directions during the year, namely; Northeast (NE), East
(E), Southeast (SE), South (S), Southwest (SW), West (W),
Northwest (NW) and North (N). The block area
environment is dominated by South-west and North-
east trade winds during the wet and the dry seasons
respectively.

5.1.1 Micro-climatic Data

The average annual rainfall ranges from 3,000-3900 mm
with a monthly mean of 270 mm. The mean annual
maximum temperature is between 26.3-29.3°C, while
the mean minimum temperature is between 22-23°C.
Ambient temperature during the study ranged from
26.3°C- 29.3°C with an average value of 28.8°C. Wind
speed in the study area ranged from 3.1 - 4.6 m/s with a
mean value of 3.9 m/s. The South westerly (SW) wind
was the dominant wind direction in the study area
during the study.


background image

The American Journal of Applied Sciences

15

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas

Table 2: Micro-climate Measurement for the Area

Parameters

AQ1

AQ1

AQ1

AQ1

AQ1

AQ1

Temperature

29

29.3

28.3

28.6

27.2

26.3

Wind Speed

(m/s)

4.2

4.6

3.2

3.6

3.5

3.1

Wind

Direction

SW SW/SS

SW SW/SS

SW/SS

SW

SW

SW/SS

5.2 Air quality and Noise

There were no significant differences between the block
area and control locations in noise and air quality
conditions. Maximum noise levels at the project area
was 69.6dB (A) which is within national regulatory limits
set by NUPRC. However, an increasing trend in noise was
observed when compared with previous data from the
field. The increasing trend is attributed to increasing oil
and gas operations as well as ship traffic in the area.
Other air quality indicators including sulphur dioxide,
nitrogen dioxide, volatile organic compounds and

suspended particulate matter were low and within
national regulatory limits of NUPRC. The particulate
fractions SPM, 10.29

μg/m

3

and 17.49

μg/m

3

(Table 3)

were also within stipulated limits of US Environmental
Protection Agency limit. The increasing trend observed
in SPM was attributed to the current particulate matter
(black smoke) pollution in the Niger Delta area. In
contrast to noise and SPM, VOC showed an apparent
decreasing trend which was attributed to improved
management of associated gas, in line with

government’s

flare down policy.

Table 3: Air quality measurement result

Parameters

AQ1

AQ2

AQ3

AQ4

AQC1

AQC2

P-value

NUPRC Limit

Noise (dB(A)

66.9

68.2

62.4

69.6

69.6

62.1

0.765

80-100

NH

4

(ppm)

0.84

1.22

1.42

1.32

1.14

0.25

0.691

NS

SO

2

(ppm)

<0.01

0.01

<0.01

0.13

0.02

0.01

0.5

0.01

NO

2

(ppm)

0.02

0.02

0.01

0.01

0.12

0.01

0.563

0.08

VOC (ppm)

0.86

1.86

1.77

1.6

1.28

0.56

0.699

NS

SPM (μg/m

3

)

10.29

17.49

14.63

14.23

13.99

10.59

0.813

60-90

H

2

S (ppm)

0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

-

NS

Air quality parameters monitored included sulphur
dioxide (SO

2

), Nitrogen dioxide (NO

2

), Ammonia (NH

4

),

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), Hydrogen Sulphide
(H

2

S) and Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM). Sulphur

dioxide levels ranged from <0.01-0.13 ppm and showed
no significant difference between levels at study area
and those of the control stations. All evaluated samples
showed SO

2

levels lower than NUPRC standard of 0.01

ppm except AQC1 and AQC2 of the control stations.
Nitrogen dioxide concentrations ranged from 0.01-
0.12ppm. There was no significant difference between
values at the study area and the control stations of AQC1
and AQC2. All values were within NUPRC recommended
limits. Volatile Organic Carbon (VOC) values ranged from
0.56

1.86 ppm (Table 3). There was no significant

difference between values at the study area and control.
All stations showed VOC levels were high both within the

tolerant limit of 0,09 ppm. Ammonia (NH

4

) ranged from

0.25-1.42 ppm with no significant difference between
block area and control station, while H

2

S were not

detected in the study area, except for sample AQ1 with
0.01 ppm (Table 3).

5.3 Sediments

Sediments varied from sandy to sand-clay texture
indicating a low affinity for micropollutants including
heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbons. Sediment
pH was mildly acidic which is related to that of overlying
surface waters. Total organic carbon level was measured
to be <1% signifying absence of organic pollution. Redox
conditions were generally positive, a sign of conducive
environment for microbial degradation of organic
matter. Nitrate levels were low particularly around the
proposed project area, indicating active microbial


background image

The American Journal of Applied Sciences

16

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas

assimilation

associated

with

organic

matter

degradation. Levels of heavy metals in sediments were
low and within recommended sediment quality
guidelines. Cadmium concentration (0.97-1.85 mg/kg)
was, however, higher than sediment guideline of 0.99
mg/kg but within historical levels of BDL to 8 mg/kg for
the Niger Delta. The highest cadmium level of 1.85
mg/kg was obtained at the control indicating the
widespread problem of cadmium pollution in the area.
BTEX were not detected in the sediments indicating
absence of recent petroleum pollution. PAH was also not
detected in the sediments. TPH (5.03-44.03 mg/kg) was
significantly higher around the proposed project area
than control indicating low level contamination around
the area, but all levels were below sediment guideline of
50 mg/kg indicating absence of petroleum pollution.
Microbial counts were generally low compared with
normal counts in unpolluted sediments. This conform to
earlier published figures (McDonald et al 2000).

Total fungi was marginally higher around the project
area while hydrocarbon utilizing fungi was only found in
the project area indicating greater microbial activity
around the project area capable of degrading organic
matter including oil. Trending of sediment parameters
showed decrease in pH possibly linked to discharge of
acidic sediments from mangrove swamp forests into the
coastal waters. Similarly, TOC showed decreasing trend
possibly linked to erosion of organic matter deficient
sediments from coastal areas into the water.
Exchangeable cations showed increasing trends which
may be attributed to variations in tidal conditions during
sampling. Heavy metals showed increasing trends.
Although the levels of heavy metals were within
recommended sediment guidelines (except cadmium),
increasing trends in heavy metal is a course for concern
because of their persistence and toxicity and adequate
attention should be paid to pollution control measures
particularly during the proposed NAG well drilling. Total
petroleum hydrocarbons showed increasing trend with
significantly higher levels around the project area
compared to control indicating local sources of
contamination.

5.4 Phytoplankton:

Phytoplankton diversity and density were generally high
(Fig. 4). The phytoplankton followed the order of
dominance: Bacillariophyceae > Cyanophyceae >
Euglenophyceae > Dynophyceae > Chlorophyceae in the
project study area. The dominance of the phytoplankton
by bacillariophytes (diatoms) is usually considered an
indicator of unpolluted environment. There were no
significant differences between the project location and
control in phytoplankton diversity indices including the
Shannon index. Shannon index was generally above 3
indicating unpolluted water shows the distribution of
major phytoplankton taxa in the study project area and
control. The phytoplankton was represented by five
major families namely: Bacillariophyta, Cyanophyta,
Chlorophyta, Dinophyta and Euglenophyta which
conforms with other reports in Nigerian water (Akoma
and Opute, 2010). Similar results was obtained (DeLaune
2009) in a study of the phytoplankton.

Baccillariophyta was the most dominant taxon
constituting 52% of the total phytoplankton density in
the study area and 55% in the control. Diatom
dominance in phytoplankton of Nigerian waters is
widely reported. The major species of Bacillariophyta
include Pleurosigma angulatum (3.28%), Pinnularia
interrupta (2.25%), Thalassiosira sp. (1.23%), Cymbella
ovals (1.94%) and Cyclotella meneghianina (1.86%). The
dominance of diatoms is usually considered an
indication of unpolluted waters. Cyanophyta was the
next dominant family after Bacillariophyta, with 28
species making up 33% of phytoplankton in the project
area and 28% in the control. The Cyanophyta was
dominated by Oscillatoria pseudominma. (2.05%),
Oscillatoria limosa (2.02%), Oscillatoria princeps
(2.00%), Phormidium forseolarum (1.92%), isocystis
planktonica (1.92%), Oscillatoria terebriformis (1.61%)
and Merismopedia elegans (1.59%). The spatial variation
in total phytoplankton density and species count are
presented in Fig 4.25. Phytoplankton density varied
between 1932 cells/l in station SW 2 to 2347 cells/ml in
SW 4 at the project area and from 2373-3224 cells/l at
the control. A total of eighty-seven (87) species of
phytoplankton were recorded in the study area ranging
from 56 species in station SW3 to 64 species in SW4 with
no significant difference between project study location
and control.


background image

The American Journal of Applied Sciences

17

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas

Fig. 4: Phytoplankton population distribution enumerated in the study Forcados area

5.5 Zooplankton:

The zooplankton belonged to six taxa including
copepods, hyrozoa, molluscs, decapods, rotifers and
chaetognths. Zooplankton of the area (Fig. 5) was
dominated by rotifers followed by copepods in the and
control with no significant difference between study
area and control in the diversity indices. Dominance of
rotifers and copepods is usually associated with
unpolluted environments. Shannon index ranged from
2.7 to 3.1 in the project study area and above 3 in the
control indicating moderately polluted conditions in the
project study area (Fig 5). The percentage composition
of zooplankton taxa has revealed Rotifera were the most
dominant with 12 species accounting for 33% of the

zooplankton in the project area and 29% in the control.
Most dominant members of the rotifers included Lecane
climacois (6.14%), Kelicottia longispina (4.78%),
Monomaratta longiseta (4.02%), Euchlanis dilatata (3.
56%) and Keratella testudo (3.11%). Copepods were the
second in dominance with 14 species representing 33%
in this study and 32% as control. They include Cycopina
longicornis (5.91%) Scaphacalanus magus (5.08%),
Calanus finmarchicus (3.49%), Copila mirabilis (2.96%)
and Euchaeta marina (2.89%). Hydrozoa was measured
to be 13% in this study and 20% in control. More
importantly Mollusca L, Decapod L and Chaetognatha all
recorded 7%, 7% and 4% respectively in this assessment
(Fig. 5).

Fig. 5: Zooplankton population distribution enumerated in the study Forcados area

5.6 The Benthics

The benthics of the study area was evaluated to be a
total of fifty-four (54) organisms in the project study
area and 27 organisms in the control. Paleontologic
benthic fauna were largely larval forms including,
polychaetes, crustaceans, gastropod and bivalve
molluscs. The polychaetes with a relative abundance of
52% were the most dominant in the area and while
crustaceans with an abundance of 41% were dominant

in the control (Fig 6). Dean (2009) has reviewed the use
of polychaetes as indicators of pollution in aquatic
environment and has shown that they are very
important indicators of organic enrichment, heavy
metals and hydrocarbons. Their dominance in the
project study area is an indication of a relatively more
polluted sediment conditions compared to the control.
Polycheata, Bivalves, Gastropods and Crustaceans all
recorded values of 52%, 9%, 11% and 28% respectively

Baccillariophyta 52%

Cyanophyta 33%

Euglenophyta 7%

Dinophyta 5%

Chlorophyta 3%

Phytoplankton

Study area

Baccillariophyta 55%

Cyanophyta28%

Euglenophyta 5%

Dinophyta 6%

Chlorophyta 6%

Phytoplankton

Control

Zooplankton

Rotifer 33%

Copepoda 33%

Hydrozoa 13%

Mollusca L 7%

Decapod L 7%

Chaetognatha
4%

Study area

Zooplankton

Rotifer 29%

Copepoda 32%

Hydrozoa 20%

Mollusca L 7%

Decapod L 4%

Chaetognatha
8%

Control


background image

The American Journal of Applied Sciences

18

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas

in this study compared to the control station that
recorded 28%, 1%, 30% and 41% respectively (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6: Recorded Benthics in the study area of Forcados, Delta area

5.7 Fisheries:

Fishes of the study area included both fin and shell
fishes. The shellfishes include the crustaceans namely,
blue swimming crab (Callinectes spp.), the mangrove
swamp crabs (Cardiosoma sp and Sesarma sp), the
shrimps (Penaeus notialis, Parapaeneopsis atlantica and
Palaemonetes africanus) and prawns (Macrobrachium
spp. and Nematopalaemon hastatus). The molluscs
include cockles (Senilia senilis), whelks (Thais sp.),
oysters (Crassostrea gasar) and the periwinkles
(Tympanotonus fuscatus and Pachymelania aurita). The
fin fishes include bonga fish, croakers, gobies, groupers,
grunts, snappers, sole, shad, mullets and tilapias. Fishes
such as the bonga-Ethmalosa fimbriata migrate along
the nearshore-inshore axis in relation to changes in
salinity, food availability and age. Fishing gears of the
area are many and varied, but commonly include
gillnets, tow nets, cast nets, beach seines, lift nets, traps,
hooks and lines, fences and stakes. Fishes are processed
for preservation by gutting or merely washed in water
for smoke-drying (DeLaune 1999

)

.

5.8 Vegetation

Vegetation characteristics reflect a typical fresh water
and mangrove swamp forests that extends from Yakri to
Sikebolon, Ogbotobo and Forcados. The physiognomy of
the fresh water swamp is at different stages of re-
growth with vegetation cover of 75

85% with an

average ranged between 20

26m. The mean tree

density was 900 trees/ha. A total of 33 plant species
belonging to 23 families was recorded in the study area,
common tree species in the swamp forest include Elaeis
guineensis, Alstonia boonei, Ceiba pentandra, lophira
alata,

Pycnanthus

angolensis

among

others.

Microphanerophyes

and

Nanophanerophytes

constituted 70 and 80% of the vegetation respectively.
Common plant diseases in the study area include leaf
spot and mosaic virus caused mostly by Aspergillus,
Fusarium spp and Curalaria spp. The plant tissues
analysis indicated that

the mean concentration of Fe, Zn, Cu and Mn, Cd, Ni,
and Pb were 110.34, 44.82, 4.4 and 90.19, <0.01, 0.06
and 0.14 mg/kg respectively. The results indicate that
there was no toxicity in the plant tissues in the study
area.

5.9 Mangrove Vegetation

This kind of vegetation cover is observed mostly west of
the Forcados tank farm. Mangroves are naturally near
homogenous vegetation systems. They are adapted to
the hostile environmental conditions characterized by
variable

salinity,

hypoxia

(oxygen

deficient),

waterlogged soil strata, tidal pressures, strong winds
and sea waves. Such adaptations include possession of
Stilt roots for

anchorage; prop roots, and root pneumatophores for
dealing with anaerobic mud conditions, and lenticels on
the bark to aid aeration; high water retention in
succulent leaves to keep salt levels diluted;
rhizofilteration to exclude salt during uptake of water;
possession of salt glands for secretion/excretion of salt
onto their leaf surfaces, or bark, or accumulating salt in
older leaves which are discarded as leaf abscission takes
place (Dean, 2009). The combination of these
mechanisms differs from one species to another.
Mangroves (Chinda et al 2007) are among the most
productive terrestrial ecosystems, sustain a huge

Benthics

Polycheata 52%

Bivalves 9%

Gastropod 11%

Crustacea 28%

Study area

Benthics

Polycheata
28%
Bivalves 1%

Gastropod
30%
Crustacea
41%

Control


background image

The American Journal of Applied Sciences

19

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas

hydrobiological system and play a very important role in
stemming coastal erosion and land formation; as well as
providing the quiet back waters for spawning of many
marine species.

6.0 Physicochemical properties of surface water in the
area

The results of physicochemical measurements in surface
waters of the Field area are presented.

6.1 Temperature

Temperature ranged from 27.8 to 29.7oC with no
significant difference between the project location and
control. The measured temperatures are normal for
tropical coastal waters.

Table 4: Summary of results of Physicochemical measurements in surface water of the study area

Parameters

Proposed project area

Control

P values

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Temperature ('C)

27.8

28.8

28.35

29.2

29.7

29.4

0.156

pH

7.5

7.9

7.75

12040

23250

17645

0

Electrical
Conductivity,
μS/cm

13650

42157

26752

12040

23250

17645

0.37

Salinity, ‰

9,9

32.1

20.03

8.2

16.6

12.4

0.18

Total

Dissolved

Solids (TDS), mg/l

7234

22260

14156

6301

12332

9312

0.37

Turbidity, NTU

13.4

81.7

37.1

16.5

19.1

17.8

0.01

Total

Suspended

solids (TSS), mg/l

19.8

34.6

27.9

6301

12322

9312

0.655

Colour, Pt.Co.

25

50

36

40

40

40

0.317

Redox

potential

(±mV)

135.5

184.7

172.3

184.8

186.1

185.45

0.18

Dissolved Oxygen,
mg/l

5.4

5.43

5.42

5.38

5.38

5.38

0.18

Biological Oxygen
Demand
(BOD),mg/l

4.11

8.31

6.01

6.27

6.27

6.27

0.18

6.2 pH, Conductivity, Salinity, Total Dissolved Solids
(TDS)

Hydrogen ion concentration (pH) varied between 7.5
and 7.9 with no significant difference between proposed
project location and control. The pH is normal for
tropical marine waters. According to CWT (2004), the pH
of seawater is usually between 7.5 and 8.4. A study
(Emere 2007) reported that the pH of marine waters is
similar to that of estuarine waters and is usually stable
between 7.5 and 8.5 worldwide. NNPC (1985) reported
a range of 3.1-8.6 for surface waters of the Niger Delta.
Lethal effects of pH on aquatic life occur below pH 4.5
and above pH 9.5. Electrical conductivity, Salinity and
Total Dissolved Solids are interrelated parameters of salt
concentration. Electrical conductivity ranged from

12040 to 42157 μS/cm with significantly higher (P<0.05)

values around the project location compared to control.
The fact that conductivity was higher around the
proposed project area than further offshore at SWC2
may indicate local influence of saline conditions due to
tides or effluent discharges. The observed conductivity
values are typical of brackish waters. Estuaries usually
have electrical conductivity typically from >1500 to

51,500 μS/cm wi

th values increasing as salinity increases

(NSW, 2010).

The levels of salinity (8,2-32.1 ppt) and TDS (6301-22260
mg/l) are also characteristic of brackish waters.
Dissolved oxygen (DO), Oxidation-Reduction Potential
(EH), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and Biochemical
Oxygen Demand (BOD) The levels of DO, EH, COD and
BOD are all indicators of the redox conditions in the
environment. Dissolved oxygen concentrations ranged


background image

The American Journal of Applied Sciences

20

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas

from 5.38-5.43 mg/l with no significant difference
between study locations and control. According to
Chapman (1996) DO concentrations in unpolluted
freshwaters are usually close to, but less than, 10 mg/l.
Concentrations below 5 mg/l may adversely affect the
functioning and survival of biological Community while
levels below 2 mg/l may lead to the death of most fishes.
The observed DO levels are normal in brackish tropical
waters. The moderately lower values may be attributed
to the effect of salinity because the amount of oxygen
that can dissolve in water, decreases as salinity increases
(NOAA, 2017). NNPC/RPI previously reported a range of
2 to 9 mg/l for the Niger Delta area. The present
concentrations are normal for the study area. The redox
potential (EH) ranged from 135.5 to 186.1 mV with no
significant difference between project location and
control. According to previous workers, (Chapman 1996)
surface water containing dissolved oxygen are usually
characterized by a range of EH values between +100 mV
and +500 mV. The observed EH values are in tandem
with the levels of DO in the water.

Chemical Oxygen Demand varied between 9.58 and 18.2
mg/l while BOD ranged from 4.11-8.31 mg/l with no
significant difference between facility location and
control.

According

to

Chapman

(1996)

the

concentrations of COD observed in surface waters can
reach up to 20 mg/l in unpolluted waters indicating that
the waters were unpolluted by organic matter. Also,
NNPC/RPI (1985) reported a range of 1.9 to 2460 mg/l in
the Niger Delta waters indicating that the observed
values are usual for the study area. The BOD values were
also within levels that do not indicate organic pollution.
Typical natural water has a BOD from 0.8 to 5 mg/l.

6.3 Alkalinity

Surface water alkalinity ranged from 220-460 mg/l.
Alkalinity is the measurement of the water's ability to
neutralize acids. It represents the buffering capacity of
water and its ability to resist a change in pH. According
to previous workers, alkalinity of seawater averages 116
mg/l to 127 mg/l with lower values in brackish water.

6.4 Turbidity and Total Suspended Solids (TSS)

Turbidity and TSS are related parameters indicating
particulates load in water. Turbidity ranged from 13.4 to

81.7 NTU while TSS ranged from 24.2 to 34.6 mg/l (Table
4). The USEPA guidelines on suspended solids for the
protection of fisheries resources prescribes values
below 25 mg/l as indication of no harmful effects (Emere
and Nasiru, 2007). In Estuaries, turbidity less than 10
NTU is considered healthy while poor water quality is
indicated by levels above 20 NTU. For most surface
waters, turbidity is usually between 1 NTU and 50 NTU
with possibility of higher values after heavy rains when
the water levels are high while lower values can be
expected in still water where suspended particles have
settled. The observed levels of turbidity and TSS are
indicative of poor water quality but such levels are
commonly encountered in natural tidal waters due to
tide-induced re-suspension of sediments (Chapman,
(1996).

6.5 Nitrates

Nitrate ranged from 0.5-0.6 mg/l with no significant
difference between project location and control (Table
5). Nitrate levels above 22 mg/l in natural water
normally indicates man made pollution (Chapman,
1996). In marine environments, levels of 0.44 to 0.89
mg/l are considered ideal (Alken Murray, 2006)
indicating that the water was unpolluted with regards to
nitrates. Nitrites ranged from 0.1-0.3 mg/l with no
significant difference between project location
compared to control. Nitrites occur in water as an
intermediate product in the biological breakdown of
organic nitrogen, their presence may infer recent input
of organic wastes. According to notable researchers
(Hem, (1985) the level of nitrite considered ideal for
marine fish is between 0.04 and 0.15 mg/l. The observed
levels should be expected because of multiple sources of
organic matter inputs including tidal export from
associated mangrove swamps. Phosphate ranged from
0.013 to 0.09 mg/l with no significant difference
between project area and control. According to
Chapman (1996), phosphorus ranges from 0.02 to 0.06
mg/l (Table 5) in most natural waters. A study by
previous researchers (NNPC research group, 1985) gave
a range of 0.049 to 0.584 mg/l for phosphate in rivers of
southern Nigeria. Present values are therefore normal
for the Niger Delta (Omiema and Ideriah, 2012).


background image

The American Journal of Applied Sciences

21

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas

Table 5: Major Cation and Anion result with control data of the study area

Parameters

Proposed project area

Control

P
values

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Chemical Oxygen Demand
(COD),

mg/l

9.58

18.2

14.35

12.55

12.55

12.92

0.18

Alkalinity, mg/l

400

460

430

220

420

320

0

Bicarbonate (CO

3

2-

) mg/l

488 5

561.2

524.6

268.4

512.4

390.4

0.05

Nitrate, mg/l

0.5

0.6

0.56

0.53

0.57

0.55

0.317

Nitrite (NO

2-

), mg/l

0.01

0.03

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

1

Phosphorus, mg/l

0.02

0.09

0.05

0.013

0.029

0.021

0.655

Phenol, mg/l

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

-

Chloride (Cl

-

), mg/l

4.33

9235

3478.6

4.254

53.18

28.72

0

Sulphate (SO

4

2-

), mg/l

25.08

49.71

34.94

15.97

24.63

20.3

0.043

Na

2+

, mg/l

3546

8461

5929

1953

4333

3143

0

K

+

, mg/l

188.58

443.7

321.6

118.82

223.89


171.36

0

Ca

2+,

mg/l

70.74

109.37

90.95

64.78

87.43

76.11

0.213

Mg

2+,

mg/l

359.11

1280

822.5

287.34

355.39

321.37

0

7.0 Major Anions and Cations

Chloride ranged from 4.25 to 9235 mg/l (Table 5), while
sulphate ranged from 15.97 to 49.71 mg/l with
significantly higher levels at the project location
compared to control. Chloride and sulphate are major
anions which contribute to the salinity of marine waters.
For typical ocean waters, average concentration of
chloride is 19,345 mg/l and that of sulphate is 2,701 mg/l
(Anderson, 2008). These typical ocean levels are usually
diluted in estuaries and in the vicinity of large rivers
discharging into the sea as is typical of the present study
area (Mouth of Forcados River) (Garrison, 2005). It is
worthy of note that (RPI/NNPC 1985) previous workers
reported values of 3 to 18,648 mg/l for chloride and BDL
to 2,796 mg/l for sulphate in waters of southern Nigeria.
The values of chloride and sulphate obtained are normal
for the study area. However, the observation of higher
values of chloride and sulphate within the proposed
project study area compared to control (SWC2) which is
further offshore may indicate local saline intrusion due
to tides or saline discharges. Sodium, potassium, calcium
and magnesium are major cations that contribute to the
salinity of marine waters.

Sodium ranged from 1953 mg/l to 8461 mg/l, potassium
ranged from 118.82 to 443.7 mg/l, calcium ranged from
64.78 to 109.37 mg/l and magnesium ranged from 2.72

to 2.83 mg/l (Table 5)with significantly higher values at
project location compared to control. Levels of major
cations in sea water (Hem, 1985) average 105 mg/l for
sodium, 380 mg/l for potassium, 410 mg/l for calcium
and 1350 mg/l for magnesium. Concentrations of major
cations were within normal levels for nearshore waters.
Lower values compared to average sea water is
associated with riverine dilution. Although SWC2 is the
farthest offshore location and should naturally show the
highest levels of major cations, concentrations at SW2
and SW3 within the study area were the highest. A
similar trend was found in conductivity, chloride and
sulphate levels. This may be attributed to variations in
tidal conditions during sampling or saline effluents from
variable marine operations in the area.

8.0 Heavy metals:

Trends in sediment heavy metals generally followed
those of zinc (Table 5) as observed in the trends of
copper and chromium (Table 5). Heavy metal levels in
sediments increased markedly in a previous study
following an initial decrease from baseline to 2012. Since
there were no significant differences in heavy metal
levels in sediment between the study location and
control, the observed increasing trend cannot be linked
to operations in the study area. Although the levels of
heavy metals were within recommended sediment


background image

The American Journal of Applied Sciences

22

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas

guidelines (except cadmium), increasing trends in heavy
metal is a cause for concern because of their persistence

and toxicity and adequate attention was paid to
pollution control during well drilling.

Table 6: Heavy metal and control result of the study area

Parameters

Proposed Project area

Control

P- values

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Cadmium, (mg/l)

<0.005

<0.005

<0.005

<0.005

<0.005

<0.005

1

Zinc, (mg/l)

0.55

0.62

0.6

0.544

0.57

0.544

0.655

Iron, (mg/l)

0.45

3.68

1.431

0.5

0.64

0.5

0.655

Copper, (mg/l)

0.02

0.04

0.03

0.029

0.032

0.031

0.18

Chromium, (mg/l)

<0.005

<0.005

<0.005

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

1

Nickel, (mg/l)

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

1

Lead, (mg/l)

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

1

Vanadium, (mg/l)

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

1

Arsenic, (mg/l)

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

1

Mercury, (mg/l)

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

-

Barium, (mg/l)

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

-

Magnesium, (mg/l)

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

-

Silver, (mg/l)

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

<0.002

-

9.0 Organics:

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon was characterized and
measured to have a mean of 0.109 mg/l at the study
area (Table 7). This was computed from the maximum
and minimum values of 0.006 mg/l and 0.212 mg/l
respectively. A slightly higher value was obtained as
control (0.361mg/l). THC ie Total Hydrocarbon Content
was averagely measured to be 0.193mg/l. Oil and grease
measurement was moderate (Table 7). BTEX was
evaluated to be <0.001 throughout the study area. The
present EIA study has showed significantly higher levels
in the Non Associated gas content kin the study area

compared to control indicating possible impact from
ongoing operations around the well area. Such
operations may include discharge of deck/ballast
effluents from vessels as well as operational effluents
from existing oil and gas facilities in the area. Although
the present levels of TPH were within sediment quality
guidelines, the increasing trend calls for close attention
to pollution control measures in the area particularly
during the proposed Non associated gas well drilling.
Aliphatic Hydrocarbon measurement recorded 0.241
maximum values and <0.031mg/l.. This is in variance
with what is abtainable with previous workers (Massoud
et al 1999) in the Kuwait oil slik.

Table 7: Organic Petroleum and control results obtained from the area

Parameters

Project study area

Control

P-
values

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Total

Petroleum

Hydrocarbon

(TPH),

(mg/l)

0.006

0.212

0.109

0.361

0.361

0.361

0.18

Total

Hydrocarbon

Content (THC), (mg/l)l

0.118

0.241

0.193

0.29

0.61

0.45±

0.18

Oil and grease (O&G),
(mg/l)

0.112

0.24

0.187

0.261

0.27

0.266

0.18

BTEX, (mg/l)

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

-

PAH, (mg/l)

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

-


background image

The American Journal of Applied Sciences

23

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas

Aliphatic

Hydrocarbon,

(mg/l)

<0.031

0.241

0.124

<0.031

0.305

0.305

0.18

10.0 Mitigation measures:

The following mitigation measures will need be adopted
for negative and adverse impacts on the ecosystem.

• use of wet scrubbers for all emission sources

• use of mufflers for vehicle exhaust.

• ensure that

the cluster is located outside the border of

the navigation fairway in

keeping with government regulations requiring the
fairway to be kept free and open

to water transport traffic

• ensure that Vessel/boat operators observe

recommended speed limits

• ensu

re effective consultation with stakeholders

• ensure commitment and transparent adherence to P

-

GMoU programmes.

• identify and address legacy issues promptly

• support skills acquisition and empowerment schemes

to facilitate occupational

proficiency, productivity and sustainability

11.0 Conclusions

The study concludes on a favorable climatic condition in
the area with adequate technological tools and greater
scientific skills capable to produce the gas deposit for
deeper and better utilization as alternative fuel in
Nigeria and diaspora market to reduce global carbon
footprint. The Environmental Impact Assessment has
thus also provided great opportunities for skilled and
unskilled job creation in the area. All identified adverse
effects most especially the severe pollution of the air are
short-term and will need be mitigated as outlined and
can be reduced or controlled.

More importantly, this assessment will guide the
operators and inhabitants on the need to protect the
environment as much as possible during such
intervention to add value to the community and lastly,
restoration of all sites from oil spill during production
phase will need be attended to in the area to prevent
contamination of the soil, water, air and other vital

ecosystem components that will strengthen the public
health of inhabitants.

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank friends and well wishers for
the encouragement during the most tedious part of this
work. Special thanks to support staffs and Industrial
Training Geoscience students of 2024 and 2025 sets at
Lower Niger River Basin development Authority, Ilorin,
Kwara State for the support in compiling articles and
useful data.

Funding

No external funding has been received during the
preparation, typesetting, compilation and review of
manuscripts or publication of these findings.

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of Interest has been established in the work.

References

1.

Akoma, O. C. and Opute, F. I. (2010).

Phytoplankton

species from Imo river estuary, Nigeria 1: pennate
diatoms

(Diatomaceae,

Eunotiaceae

and

Naviculaceae). Nigerian Journal of Botany 23(2):
343-354.

2.

Awosika L.F., and Folorunsho R. (2002).

An outline

of the different Geomorphology of the Niger Delta
in shelf circulation patterns, observed from Davis
Drifter off the Eastern Niger Delta in the Gulf of
Guinea., 29: 209-218

3.

Billig P, Bendahmane D, Swindale A (1999).

Water

and

sanitation

indicators

measurement

guide.Washington DC. Food and Nutrition Technical
Assistance Project, Academy for Educational
Development: 7

18.

4.

Chapman, D. (Ed.) (1996).

Water Quality

Assessments - A Guide to Use of Biota, Sediments
and Water in Environmental Monitoring -Second
Edition. United Nations Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Organization. World Health Organization,
United

Nations

Environment

Programme.

UNESCO/WHO/UNEP

5.

Chindah AC, Braide SA, Amakiri J, Onokurhefe J
(2007).

Effect of crude oil on mangrove (Rhizophora


background image

The American Journal of Applied Sciences

24

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas

Mangle L.) seedlings from the Niger Delta,
Nigeria.Revista UDO Agricola; 7 (1): 181

194.

6.

Davies O.A., Abowei, J.F.N and Tawari, C.C. (2009).

Phytoplankton Community of Elechi Creek, Niger
Delta, Nigeria-A Nutrient-Polluted Tropical Creek.
American Journal of Applied Sciences 6 (6): 1143-
1152.

7.

Dean, H. K. (2009).

The use of polychaetes

(Annelida) as indicator species of marine pollution:
a review. Rev. Biol. Trop. 56 (4): 11-38.

8.

DeLaune, R. D., Lindau, C. W. and Gambrel, R. P.
(1999).

Effect of Produced-Water Discharge on

Bottom Sediment Chemistry Final Report. OCS
Study, MMS 99-0060. U.S. Department of the
Interior. Minerals Management Service Coastal
Marine Institute Gulf of Mexico OCS Region

9.

Doust H. (1989).

The Niger delta: Hydrocarbon

potential of a major Tertiary delta province, in
coastal lowlands, geology and geotechnology, in
Proceedings of the Kon. Nederl. Geol. Mijnb.
Genootschap, pp. 203-212.

10.

Doust, H., and Omatsola, E. (1990).

Petroleum

Geology of the Niger Delta. Geochemical Society,
London, Special Publications. 50, pp.365.

11.

Emere, M. C. and Nasiru, C. E. (2007):

Macroinvertebrates as indicators of the water
quality of an urbanized stream, Kaduna, Nigeria.
Journal of Fisheries International: 2 (2); 152-157.
Federal Ministry of Health (Nigeria) (FMOH, 2004).
2003 National HIV/AIDS and Reproductive Health
Survey. Federal Ministry of Health Abuja, Nigeria.

12.

Ejedawe, J.E. Coker, S.J.L., Lambert-Aikhionbare,
D.O. Alofe, K.B., and Adoh, F.O. (1984).

Evolution of

oilgenerative window and oil and gas occurrence in
Tertiary Niger Delta Basin. American Association of
Petroleum Geologists, 68: 1744 -1751

13.

Ekwe, A.C. Onuoha, K.M., and Osayande, N. (2012).

Fluid and lithology discrimination using rock physics
modelling and Lambdamurh inversion as an
example from onshore Niger Delta Nigeria, 64: 12-
18.

14.

Hem, J. D. (1985).

Study and interpretation of the

chemical characteristics of natural water 3

rd

edition,

US Geological survey Paper 2254, University of
Virginia, Chalottesville 263p Hydrochemistry and
plankton dynamics of Kuramo lagoon. Life Science
Journal. 5 (3): 50

55

15.

Ibrahim, O.I, Adekeye, O.A, Bale R.B., Babatunde,
W.S

(2020).

Sedimentological,

Depositional

environment and Sequence stratigraphic studies of
OML AB field, Southeastern Niger Delta, Nigeria.
Centerpoint journal (science edition).Vol. 25(1) pp.
181-196.

16.

Ibrahim, O. Ibrahim,

Ibrahim B. D

,

Ngozi-Chika, C.S

,

Adeoye, A.S and

Shaibu S (2024).

Hydrocarbon

prospectivity of selected block wells, Southern
Niger-delta, Nigeria. Discovery nature of Discovery
Scientific Society Journal. eldn 1003. 1: Pp 1-10

17.

Ibrahim, O.I Ngozi-Chika C.S Okanigboan, P.N
Abdulraheem, K.K and Bilqees, D (2023).

Mothballing, Manifold, Pipeline installation and
Impact Assessment in existing Saghara Gas solution
Flowstation Facility, Warri, Niger Delta, Nigeria.
Nigerian Journal of Engineering Science Research
(NIJESR). 6(02), pp.9-23. ISSN: 2636-7114

18.

Massoud, M. S. , Al-Abdalib, F., Al-Ghadbanb, A. N.
and Al-Sarawia, M. (1996).

Bottom sediments of the

Arabian Gulf--II. TPH and TOC contents as indicators
of oil pollution and implications for the effect and
fate of the Kuwait oil slick. Elsevier

19.

McDonald, D. D., Ingersoll, C. G. and Berger, T. A.
(2000).

TEC Development and evaluation of

consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for
freshwater ecosystems. Arch. Environ. Contam.
Toxicol. 39:20-31

20.

Omiema, S. D. and Ideriah T. J. K. (2012).

Distribution of microorganisms in water and
sediment along Abonnema shoreline, Eastern Niger
Delta, Nigeria. Journal of Chemical, biological and
physical sciences.2 (4): 2114-2122

References

Akoma, O. C. and Opute, F. I. (2010). Phytoplankton species from Imo river estuary, Nigeria 1: pennate diatoms (Diatomaceae, Eunotiaceae and Naviculaceae). Nigerian Journal of Botany 23(2): 343-354.

Awosika L.F., and Folorunsho R. (2002). An outline of the different Geomorphology of the Niger Delta in shelf circulation patterns, observed from Davis Drifter off the Eastern Niger Delta in the Gulf of Guinea., 29: 209-218

Billig P, Bendahmane D, Swindale A (1999). Water and sanitation indicators measurement guide.Washington DC. Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Academy for Educational Development: 7–18.

Chapman, D. (Ed.) (1996). Water Quality Assessments - A Guide to Use of Biota, Sediments and Water in Environmental Monitoring -Second Edition. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. World Health Organization, United Nations Environment Programme. UNESCO/WHO/UNEP

Chindah AC, Braide SA, Amakiri J, Onokurhefe J (2007). Effect of crude oil on mangrove (Rhizophora Mangle L.) seedlings from the Niger Delta, Nigeria.Revista UDO Agricola; 7 (1): 181 – 194.

Davies O.A., Abowei, J.F.N and Tawari, C.C. (2009). Phytoplankton Community of Elechi Creek, Niger Delta, Nigeria-A Nutrient-Polluted Tropical Creek. American Journal of Applied Sciences 6 (6): 1143-1152.

Dean, H. K. (2009). The use of polychaetes (Annelida) as indicator species of marine pollution: a review. Rev. Biol. Trop. 56 (4): 11-38.

DeLaune, R. D., Lindau, C. W. and Gambrel, R. P. (1999). Effect of Produced-Water Discharge on Bottom Sediment Chemistry Final Report. OCS Study, MMS 99-0060. U.S. Department of the Interior. Minerals Management Service Coastal Marine Institute Gulf of Mexico OCS Region

Doust H. (1989). The Niger delta: Hydrocarbon potential of a major Tertiary delta province, in coastal lowlands, geology and geotechnology, in Proceedings of the Kon. Nederl. Geol. Mijnb. Genootschap, pp. 203-212.

Doust, H., and Omatsola, E. (1990). Petroleum Geology of the Niger Delta. Geochemical Society, London, Special Publications. 50, pp.365.

Emere, M. C. and Nasiru, C. E. (2007): Macroinvertebrates as indicators of the water quality of an urbanized stream, Kaduna, Nigeria. Journal of Fisheries International: 2 (2); 152-157. Federal Ministry of Health (Nigeria) (FMOH, 2004). 2003 National HIV/AIDS and Reproductive Health Survey. Federal Ministry of Health Abuja, Nigeria.

Ejedawe, J.E. Coker, S.J.L., Lambert-Aikhionbare, D.O. Alofe, K.B., and Adoh, F.O. (1984). Evolution of oilgenerative window and oil and gas occurrence in Tertiary Niger Delta Basin. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 68: 1744 -1751

Ekwe, A.C. Onuoha, K.M., and Osayande, N. (2012). Fluid and lithology discrimination using rock physics modelling and Lambdamurh inversion as an example from onshore Niger Delta Nigeria, 64: 12-18.

Hem, J. D. (1985). Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water 3rd edition, US Geological survey Paper 2254, University of Virginia, Chalottesville 263p Hydrochemistry and plankton dynamics of Kuramo lagoon. Life Science Journal. 5 (3): 50 – 55

Ibrahim, O.I, Adekeye, O.A, Bale R.B., Babatunde, W.S (2020). Sedimentological, Depositional environment and Sequence stratigraphic studies of OML AB field, Southeastern Niger Delta, Nigeria. Centerpoint journal (science edition).Vol. 25(1) pp. 181-196.

Ibrahim, O. Ibrahim, Ibrahim B. D, Ngozi-Chika, C.S, Adeoye, A.S and Shaibu S (2024). Hydrocarbon prospectivity of selected block wells, Southern Niger-delta, Nigeria. Discovery nature of Discovery Scientific Society Journal. eldn 1003. 1: Pp 1-10

Ibrahim, O.I Ngozi-Chika C.S Okanigboan, P.N Abdulraheem, K.K and Bilqees, D (2023). Mothballing, Manifold, Pipeline installation and Impact Assessment in existing Saghara Gas solution Flowstation Facility, Warri, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Engineering Science Research (NIJESR). 6(02), pp.9-23. ISSN: 2636-7114

Massoud, M. S. , Al-Abdalib, F., Al-Ghadbanb, A. N. and Al-Sarawia, M. (1996). Bottom sediments of the Arabian Gulf--II. TPH and TOC contents as indicators of oil pollution and implications for the effect and fate of the Kuwait oil slick. Elsevier

McDonald, D. D., Ingersoll, C. G. and Berger, T. A. (2000). TEC Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 39:20-31

Omiema, S. D. and Ideriah T. J. K. (2012). Distribution of microorganisms in water and sediment along Abonnema shoreline, Eastern Niger Delta, Nigeria. Journal of Chemical, biological and physical sciences.2 (4): 2114-2122