The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
189
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
TYPE
Original Research
PAGE NO.
189-200
10.37547/tajpslc/Volume07Issue05-20
OPEN ACCESS
SUBMITED
23 March 2025
ACCEPTED
19 April 2025
PUBLISHED
22 May 2025
VOLUME
Vol.07 Issue05 2025
CITATION
Tonubari Zigha Bornu. (2025). The Russian-
Ukrainian war; it’s causes,
background and effect. The American Journal of Political Science Law and
Criminology, 7(05), 189
–
200.
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume07Issue05-20
COPYRIGHT
© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.
The Russian-Ukrainian
war; it’s causes,
background and effect
Tonubari Zigha Bornu
PhD Student, City University, Cambodia
Abstract:
This article explores the Russian-Ukraine war,
focusing on its causes, historical background, and
effects on Russia and Ukraine. It examines the historical
and geopolitical factors that contributed to the conflict,
including long-standing historical tensions, territorial
disputes and differing political orientations. The article
provides an in-depth analysis of the events leading up to
the war, such as the annexation of Crimea and the war
in Donbas. Additional
ly, it assesses the war’s impact on
both countries, discussing economic repercussions,
social disruptions, and shifts in national identity. By
analyzing these dimensions, the article aims to offer a
comprehensive understanding of the conflict’s roots
and its ramifications for both nations and the broader
international community. This article examines the
multifaceted causes, historical background, and
significant effects of the Russian
–
Ukrainian war, which
erupted in 2014 and escalated dramatically in 2022. The
conflict is analyzed through various lenses, including
geopolitical, economic, and sociocultural factors. The
research identifies key historical grievances stemming
from the soviet era, including territorial disputes, and
ethnic divisions, that have fueled nationalist sentiments
in both countries. The article further explores the role of
international actors and the impact of geopolitics,
particularly the West’s support for Ukraine and Russia’s
strategic interest in the region. Additionally, the war’s
repercussions on Ukraine and Russia are discussed
focusing on humanitarian crises, economic instability,
etc. The Russian-Ukrainian war, rooted in historical ties
and geopolitical tensions, has profoundly impacted both
nations since its escalation in 2014 and further in 2022.
This conflict arises from Russia's ambitions to maintain
influence over Ukraine, concerns about NATO
expansion, and cultural identities that intertwine the
two nations. The annexation of Crimea marked a pivotal
moment, leading to international condemnation and
sanctions against Russia. The war has resulted in a
significant humanitarian crisis in Ukraine, economic
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
190
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
instability, and a strengthened national identity.
Conversely, Russia faces economic sanctions and
increasing political repression, leading to its diplomatic
isolation. This article examines the complex causes and
multifaceted effects of the war, highlighting its
implications for regional and global stability.
Keywords:
National Identity, Geopolitical Tensions,
NATO
Expansion,
Cultural
Identity,
Political
Repression.
Introduction:
The Russian-Ukraine war, which began in
2014, marks one of the most significant geopolitical
conflicts of the 21st century, reshaping the dynamics
of Eastern Europe and Influencing global politics. This
conflict, rooted in a complex interplay of historical
grievances, geopolitical ambitions, and nationalistic
fervor, has profoundly affected both Russia and
Ukraine. The origins of the war are deeply embedded
in the historical and political developments of the
region. The dissolution of the Soviet Union, the
subsequent independence of Ukraine, and the
fluctuating relations between the two countries set the
stage for a conflict driven by competing interests and
unresolved issues. The annexation of Crimea by Russia
and the ensuing conflict in the Donbas region have
highlighted underlying tensions that extend beyond
immediate territorial disputes.
This article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis
of the Russian-Ukraine war by examining its causes,
historical context, and broader effects on both nations.
It will explore how historical narratives, strategic
interests, and socio-political factors have shaped the
conflict, and assess the impact on the economic
societies and international standing of Russia and
Ukraine. Through this analysis, we seek to better
understand the implications of war and its significance
in the broader framework of international relations.
The Russian-Ukrainian war has emerged as one of the
defining conflicts of the early 21st century, reshaping
the geopolitical landscape of Eastern Europe and
beyond. Rooted in deep historical, cultural, and
political ties, the conflict reflects a struggle for national
identity and sovereignty amid broader global power
dynamics. Following Ukraine's declaration of
independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, the
nation faced the dual challenge of building a
democratic state while managing its relationships with
both Western nations and Russia, its historically
dominant neighbour (Mankoff, 2022).
As Ukraine sought to integrate into European
structures, particularly through aspirations for NATO
and EU membership, Russia perceived these moves as
direct threats to its influence and security. This
perception was amplified by events such as the Orange
Revolution in 2004 and the Euromaidan protests in
2013-2014, which highlighted a growing pro-European
sentiment within Ukraine (Tisdall, 2022). The
culmination of these tensions occurred with Russia's
annexation of Crimea in 2014, an act widely condemned
by the international community and a catalyst for the
ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine (International Crisis
Group, 2023).
The war has triggered a significant humanitarian crisis,
resulting in thousands of deaths and the displacement
of millions, as cities like Mariupol and Kharkiv have
faced devastating assaults (UNHCR, 2023). Additionally,
the conflict has had severe economic repercussions for
both countries, with Ukraine suffering extensive
infrastructure damage and Russia facing international
sanctions that have impacted its economy and global
standing. Politically, the war has led to a resurgence of
nationalism in Ukraine, fostering a more unified national
identity, while simultaneously reinforcing authoritarian
tendencies within Russia as the government seeks to
suppress dissent and rally public support (Sakwa, 2022).
As the conflict continues to unfold, understanding its
complex causes and multifaceted effects is crucial for
grasping not only the future of Ukraine and Russia but
also the broader implications for international relations,
security, and the norms of state sovereignty in a rapidly
changing world.
DEFINITION AND CLARIFICATION OF KEYWORDS
Below are definitions and clarifications of the key terms
related to the article.
‘Russian
-
Ukrainian War’: A protracted conflict that
began in 2014 between Russia and Ukraine, involving
military engagements and political disputes. It includes
the annexation of Crimea by Russia and the ongoing
conflict in Eastern Ukraine, particularly in the Donbas
region. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine began
with the annexation of Crimea in March 2014 and
escalated dramatically in February 2022 when Russia
launched a full-scale invasion. This war has its roots in
historical grievances and geopolitical struggles,
highlighting issues of national sovereignty and territorial
integrity. According to Mankoff (2022), the war
represents a struggle for the future of Europe and the
post-Cold War order.
‘Causes’: Refers to the underlying reasons and factors
that led to the outbreak of the war. These may include
historical grievances, geopolitical interests, nationalist
movements and political decisions.
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
191
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
‘Historical Background’: The historical context and
events that have shaped the relationship between
Russia and Ukraine. This includes the legacy of the
Soviet Union, historical territorial disputes and
previous conflicts.
‘Geopolitics’: The influence of geographic and political
factors on international relations and conflicts. In this
context, it refers to the strategic interests of Russia and
Ukraine, as well as the role of other global powers.
‘Crimea’: Refers to a Peninsula located on the northern
coast of the Blank Sea, which was annexed by Russia
from Ukraine in 2014. This event was a significant flash
point in the conflict and has had substantial
geopolitical repercussions. Annexation of Crimea: The
annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014 was a
significant turning point in the conflict. Following
Ukraine’s shift towards a pro
-European government,
Russia utilized a combination of military force and local
support to claim Crimea, leading to widespread
international condemnation and sanctions. The
annexation is considered a violation of international
law and has been labelled as the first annexation of
territory in Europe since World War II (Baker &
Connolly, 2016).
‘Donbas’: A region in Eastern Ukraine comprising
Donetsk and Luhansk Ablast. The area has been a local
point of armed conflict between Ukrainian forces and
pro-Russian separatists since 2014.
‘Economic Impact’: The effects of the war on the
economics of Russia and Ukraine. This includes
disruptions in trade, changes in economic growth, and
the costs of military engagement. The economic
repercussions of the war are profound for both
Ukraine and Russia. Ukraine has seen its GDP contract
significantly due to the destruction of infrastructure
and loss of industrial capabilities. Conversely, Russia
faces international sanctions that have crippled key
sectors of its economy, leading to a recession and
increasing inflation (World Bank, 2023). The economic
fallout from the war highlights the interconnectedness
of global economies and the consequences of military
conflicts.
‘Social Impact’: The consequences of the conflict on
the societies of Russia and Ukraine. This encompasses
displacement of populations, changes in social
structure and psychological effects on the civilian
population.
‘National Identity’: The sense of collective identity and
nationhood of the people in Russia and Ukraine. War
has influenced national identity by shaping public
perceptions,
cultural
narratives
and
political
ideologies. The war has intensified discussions around
national identity in Ukraine, fostering a strong sense of
unity among its citizens. Many Ukrainians have
embraced a national identity distinct from Russian
influence, which has been bolstered by the shared
experience of resistance against the invasion (Pettis,
2023). This evolving identity has implications for
Ukraine's future political and cultural landscape.
‘International Relations’: The interactions and
relationships between countries on a global scale. The
conflict has impacted Russia’s and Ukraine’s relations
with other nations and international organizations,
affecting diplomatic, economic and military alliances.
The conflict has reshaped global relations, influencing
international alliances and diplomatic strategies.
Countries are reassessing their positions and
relationships based on the evolving security landscape,
with many aligning more closely with the West in
response to Russia's actions. This realignment reflects
broader geopolitical shifts and the challenges of
maintaining a stable international order (Gordon, 2023).
‘Geopolitical Tensions’: Geopolitical tensions are
characterized by rivalries among states over territory,
influence, and resources. In the case of the Russian-
Ukrainian war, Russia perceives Ukraine's Western
alignment as a direct threat to its sphere of influence
and security. This tension reflects broader East-West
divides, particularly following NATO's eastward
expansion post-1991, which Russia views as an
encroachment on its borders (NATO, 2021).
‘NATO Expansion’: NATO's expansion into Eastern
Europe since the end of the Cold War has been a
contentious issue. Countries like Poland, Hungary, and
the Baltic states joined NATO, which Russia sees as a
strategic threat. Ukraine's potential NATO membership
was a significant factor leading to the conflict, as
articulated by Stent (2022), who notes that Russia's
response to NATO's expansion reflects a fear of
encirclement and loss of influence.
‘Cultural Identity’: Cultural identity plays a crucial role in
shaping national consciousness. In Ukraine, the conflict
has accentuated a sense of distinct national identity,
especially among the Ukrainian-speaking population.
The war has prompted many Ukrainians to unify against
perceived Russian aggression, as noted by Ryzhenkov
(2023), emphasizing a shift toward a more cohesive
national identity rooted in democratic values and
European integration.
‘Humanitarian Crisis’: The ongoing conflict has resulted
in a severe humanitarian crisis, with millions displaced
and in need of urgent assistance. The United Nations
estimates that over 8 million people have been
internally displaced in Ukraine, while millions more have
fled to neighboring countries (UNHCR, 2023). The war
has created dire conditions for civilians, leading to
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
192
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
significant challenges in delivering humanitarian aid
and services.
‘Political Repression’: In Russia, the government has
cracked down on dissent and opposition since the start
of the conflict. Political repression has increased, with
measures such as arresting protesters and restricting
media freedom. This suppression is framed as a
necessary defence against Western aggression, as
noted by Sakwa (2022), who argues that this narrative
has been used to justify the regime's authoritarian
practices.
‘International Sanctions’: The response to Russia's
actions has included widespread international
sanctions aimed at isolating Moscow economically and
politically. These sanctions have targeted key sectors,
including finance, energy, and military supplies, aiming
to pressure Russia to withdraw from Ukraine. The
impact of these sanctions has been significant, leading
to a downturn in the Russian economy and
contributing to the war's overall consequences
(Council on Foreign Relations, 2023).
‘Regional Stability’: The war has disrupted regional
stability in Eastern Europe, raising concerns about
security in neighboring countries. The potential for
further conflict and the spillover effects of the war
have led to increased military readiness among NATO
members, particularly those in Eastern Europe, as they
seek to deter any further Russian aggression (Shapiro,
2023).
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The historical background of the Russian-Ukrainian war
is crucial for understanding the current conflict. A
legacy of cultural ties, political struggles, and historical
grievances has shaped the relationship between Russia
and Ukraine. As the war continues to evolve, the
implications of this history remain vital for analyzing
the motivations and actions of both nations in the
context of regional and global politics.
The historical relationship between Russia and Ukraine
can be traced back to the medieval state of Kievan
Rus’, which existed from the 9th to the 13th century
and is considered a common cultural and historical
predecessor to both nations.
(Plokhy, 2017).
During the Soviet period, Ukraine was a significant
Soviet republic. The Holodomor famine of 1932-1933,
a man-made famine that resulted in millions of deaths,
remains a contentious issue and a source of historical
grievance (Applebaum, 2017). With Ukraine’s
independence in 1991, the country faced the challenge
of forging its identity and political direction. The
division between Pro-European and Pro-Russian
factions was evident in the political landscape
(Mikheyev, 2020). The orange Revolution highlighted
the deep divisions within Ukraine, with widespread
protest against electoral fraud leading to the presidency
of Vikto Yushchenko, which strained relations with
Russia (Kudelia, 2016). The Euromaidan protests, driven
by discontent with President Yanu Kovych’s Shift away
from the EU association agreement in favour of closer
ties with Russia, led to his ousting and escalated
tensions with Moscow (Wilson, 2014).
Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2024 was justified by
Moscow as protecting ethnic Russians and Russian
speakers but was widely condemned internationally and
resulted in economics sanctions (Trenin, 2016). The
conflict in the Donbas region began with the Pro-Russian
separatists declaring independence and there have
been Persistent allegations of Russian support for these
groups, exacerbating the conflict (Snyder, 2018). The
conflict is also part of a larger geopolitical struggle
between Russian and Western Countries. Russia views
Ukraine’s Western alignment as a strategic threat and
an encroachment on its sphere of influence (Gressel,
2017).
Early History and Soviet Era
The historical relationship between Russia and Ukraine
is complex, stretching back over a millennium. The
Kievan Rus', which emerged in the 9th century, is often
regarded as the cultural and political predecessor to
both modern Russia and Ukraine. It was centered
around Kyiv and played a pivotal role in the
development of East Slavic civilization. However, the
Mongol invasion in the 13th century fragmented the
region, leading to varying influences from neighboring
powers, including Poland, Lithuania, and the Russian
Empire (Magocsi, 2010).
During the 19th century, Ukraine faced Russification
policies aimed at suppressing Ukrainian language and
culture under the Russian Empire. This era fostered a
growing national consciousness among Ukrainians,
leading to movements for autonomy and cultural revival
(Plokhy, 2015). The aftermath of World War I and the
Russian Civil War saw Ukraine briefly declare
independence, but it was ultimately incorporated into
the Soviet Union in 1922.
The Soviet period brought significant industrialization
and economic growth to Ukraine, but it was also marked
by severe repression. The Holodomor, a devastating
famine in 1932-1933, resulted in the deaths of millions
of Ukrainians and is considered a genocide by many
historians. This tragedy has left an enduring legacy in
Ukrainian memory and has been a source of tension in
its relations with Russia (Applebaum, 2017).
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
193
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
Independence and Political Turmoil
Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991,
Ukraine declared independence. This event was
celebrated by many but also revealed deep divisions
within the country. The population was split between
those favoring closer ties with Russia and those
advocating for a European orientation. The first
presidential elections in 1991 were marked by the
overwhelming support for independence, with over
90% of voters in favor (Karatnycky, 2005).
The post-independence period was characterized by
political instability, corruption, and economic
difficulties. The Orange Revolution in 2004, sparked by
allegations of electoral fraud in the presidential
election, marked a significant moment in Ukraine’s
struggle for democracy. The protests led to a re-run of
the election, resulting in the victory of pro-Western
candidate Viktor Yushchenko (Harrison, 2008). This
movement underscored the desire for democratic
reforms and alignment with Western institutions.
Euromaidan and the Annexation of Crimea
The Euromaidan protests in late 2013 were a direct
response to President Viktor Yanukovych’s decision to
suspend an association agreement with the European
Union in favor of closer ties with Russia. The protests,
which began as a peaceful demonstration, escalated
into widespread unrest and violence, particularly after
the government’s brutal crackdown on demonstrators
in February 2014. Yanukovych ultimately fled to Russia,
leaving a power vacuum (Wilson, 2014).
In the aftermath of the political upheaval, Russia
annexed Crimea in March 2014, claiming to protect the
rights of Russian-speaking populations. This act was
widely condemned by the international community as
a violation of Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial
integrity. The annexation prompted the United States
and European Union to impose economic sanctions on
Russia, further straining relations (Trenin, 2014).
Following the annexation, conflict erupted in Eastern
Ukraine
as
pro-Russian
separatists
declared
independence in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The
situation escalated into an armed conflict that has
persisted for years, resulting in thousands of deaths
and significant displacement (International Crisis
Group, 2021). Despite multiple ceasefire agreements,
including the Minsk Protocols, hostilities continued,
reflecting deep-seated divisions within Ukraine and
ongoing Russian involvement (Piontkovsky, 2020).
The Ongoing Conflict
The situation escalated dramatically in February 2022,
when Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
This marked a significant turning point, as it shifted the
conflict from localized fighting in Eastern Ukraine to a
broader war involving conventional military operations
across the country. The invasion was met with fierce
resistance from Ukrainian forces and widespread
condemnation from the international community
(NATO, 2022).
The response from Western nations included extensive
military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine, as well as
sanctions aimed at crippling the Russian economy. The
conflict has transformed global geopolitical dynamics,
reigniting debates over security, alliances, and the
future of international law (Gordon, 2023). The war has
also prompted a resurgence of nationalism in Ukraine,
strengthening its resolve to maintain sovereignty and
territorial integrity.
CAUSES OF THE WAR
The causes of the Russian-Ukrainian war are
multifaceted, involving geopolitical interests, historical
grievances, identity politics, economic motivations, and
the complexities of statehood. Understanding these
factors is crucial for grasping the ongoing conflict and its
broader implications for regional and global stability.
The causes of the Russian-Ukrainian war are highlighted
under the following headings:
Historical grievances: Historical grievances and cultural
identity issues have longed fueled tensions between
Russian and Ukraine. Ukraine struggle for independence
and its historical connections to both Russia and Europe
have been a long-standing source of conflict (Plokhy,
2017). The historical relationship between Russia and
Ukraine is complex. Many Russians view Ukraine as an
integral part of their historical and cultural identity,
rooted in the shared past of the Kievan Rus. Historian
Serhii Plokhy argues that “Ukraine’s history is deeply
intertwined with Russia’s, leading to a sense of
entitlement among many Russians regarding Ukrainian
territory” (Plokhy, 2015).
Euromaidan Protest: The immediate catalyst was the
2013-2014 Euromaidan protest in Ukraine. the
demonstrations
arose
after
President
Viktor
Yanukovych suspended an association agreement with
the European union opting instead for closer ties with
Russia. This move was seen by many Ukrainians as a step
away from Western Integration, leading to mass protest
and Yanukovych’s ouster (Kuzio, 2014). The Euromaidan
protests were pivotal, representing a public rejection of
Yanukovych’s decision to suspend an association
agreement with the EU in favor of closer ties with
Russia. This uprising led to Yanukovych’s flight to Russia
and was met with a swift response from the Kremlin,
which viewed the loss of a pro-Russian leader as a direct
threat. As noted by Andrew Wilson, “The protests and
subsequent government change were perceived by
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
194
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
Russia as an existential threat to its influence in
Ukraine” (Wilson, 2014).
Russian Geopolitical Interests: Russia’s strategic
interests in maintain influence over Ukraine are a key
factor. The Kremlin views Ukraine as a critical buffer
state and is concerned about NATO’s eastward
expansion. The loss of Ukraine to Western influence
threatens Russia’s regional dominance and security.
(Charap & Colton, 2017).
The desire of Ukraine to integrate with Western
institutions like NATO and the European Union has
been perceived as a direct challenge to Russian
influence. Ukraine's 2010 election of Viktor
Yanukovych, who leaned towards Russia, did not quell
these aspirations. However, his ousting in 2014
following the Euromaidan protests, which favored EU
integration, led to heightened tensions. According to
Mearsheimer (2014), “The West’s decision to expand
NATO and the EU into Eastern Europe was a critical
factor that triggered the crisis”
Annexation of Crimea: In response to the political
upheaval in Ukraine, Russia annexed Crimea in March
2014, following a controversial and internationally
disputed referendum. This move was driven by
Russia’s strategic interests in the Black Sea and its
desire to protect the interests of the Russian-speaking
population in Crimea (Mankoff, 2014).
Pro-Russian
Separatism:
Pro-Russian
separatist
movements in Eastern Ukraine, particularly in Donetsk
and Luhansk regions, declared independence and
engaged in armed conflict with the Ukrainian
government. Russia is accused of supporting these
separatists, though it officially denies direct
involvement (Wilson, 2014).
Economic and Political Influence: Russia’s actions are
also motivated by a desire to assert its influence over
Ukraine’s economic and political t
rajectory. By
destabilizing Ukraine and asserting control over
strategic regions, Russia aims to prevent Ukraine from
integrating further with Western institutions and
markets (Stent, 2016).
Identity and Nationalism: The conflict has intensified
issues of national identity. Ukraine has worked to
establish a distinct national identity, often at odds with
Russian narratives. According to Taras Kuzio, “The
struggle for a distinct Ukrainian identity is central to
the conflict, as many in Ukraine seek to break free from
Russian cultural hegemony” (Kuzio, T. (2015). Ukraine:
A Nation on the Borderland. Journal of Nationalism,
Memory & Language Politics). Ukraine is strategically
significant due to its role as a transit route for Russian
natural gas to Europe. Control over energy resources
has been a key motivation for Russian intervention. As
noted by a report from the International Crisis Group,
“Energy politics and Ukraine’s position as a major transit
route for gas have made the country a focal point of
geopolit
ical competition” (International Crisis Group,
2015).
Weakness of the Ukrainian State: The political instability
and corruption within Ukraine made it vulnerable to
external pressures. The country’s struggles with
governance and economic reforms hampered its ability
to resist Russian influence. Richard Sakwa highlights,
“Ukraine's political fragility provided Russia with
opportunities to exploit divisions and promote
separatism in the east” (Sakwa, 2015).
Military Posturing and Provocations: In the lead-up to
the conflict, Russia increased its military presence along
the Ukrainian border, conducting large-scale exercises
that served as a form of intimidation. The annexation of
Crimea in March 2014 involved swift military action,
reflecting a long-standing strategy of using military force
to achieve geopolitical objectives. According to Michael
Kofman, “The use of hybrid warfare techniques in
Ukraine was a clear indication of Russia’s willingness to
employ military force to achieve its goals” (Kofman,
2016).
EFFECTS OF THE WAR ON BOTH COUNTRIES
The Russian-Ukrainian war has generated profound
effects on both countries, reshaping their political,
economic, and social landscapes. Ukraine faces an
ongoing humanitarian crisis and significant economic
challenges but has also seen a strengthening of its
national identity and military capabilities. Conversely,
Russia has experienced economic sanctions, geopolitical
isolation, and domestic repression, resulting in a
reevaluation of its military strategy and societal
dynamics. The long-term implications of these effects
will shape the future of both nations and influence
regional and global stability for years to come.
The war has had profound and multifaceted effects on
both countries.
Effects of the war on Ukraine
Humanitarian Crisis: The conflict has led to significant
loss of life and widespread displacement. Thousands
have been killed, and millions have been displaced
either internally or as refugees abroad (International
Crisis Group, 2023). The conflict has resulted in a
catastrophic humanitarian crisis. As of early 2023, the
United Nations estimated that over 8 million people
were internally displaced within Ukraine, with millions
more fleeing to neighboring countries. Many cities have
faced widespread destruction, leading to significant
civilian casualties. Reports indicate that tens of
thousands of civilians and combatants have died, with
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
195
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
many more injured (UNHCR, 2023). The war has also
disrupted access to basic necessities, including
healthcare,
clean water,
and
food,
further
exacerbating the humanitarian situation.
Economic Impact: Ukraine’s economy has suffered
substantial damage due to the war. The annexation of
Crimea and the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine
have disrupted trade, caused infrastructure damage,
and led to increased defense spending. Economic
growth has been stunted, and the war has exacerbated
poverty and unemployment (World Bank, 2022). The
war has profoundly disrupted Ukraine's economy. The
World Bank reported a staggering contraction of
approximately 30% in GDP in 2022 due to the conflict
(World Bank, 2023). Key industries, particularly
agriculture
—
which is vital for Ukraine's economy
—
have been severely impacted. The destruction of
infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, and factories,
has hampered economic activities and led to
significant job losses. The agricultural sector, which
relies on exports, faced challenges due to the blockade
of Black Sea ports, affecting global food supply chains.
Political and Social Impact: The war has bolstered
Ukrainian national identity and has driven Ukraine
closer to Western Institutions like the EU and NATO.
The conflict has also led to political instability and
challenges in governance but has strengthened
national unity and resistance. In response to the war,
there has been a notable surge in national unity among
Ukrainians. The conflict has galvanized support for pro-
European policies and has solidified Ukraine's
aspirations for NATO and EU membership. In June
2022, the European Council granted Ukraine candidate
status, marking a significant step in its integration into
European structures (European Council, 2022). The
war has also led to significant political reforms,
including anti-corruption measures and military
modernization efforts, as the government seeks to
align more closely with Western standards
International Relations: The conflict has led to
increased international support for Ukraine from
Western countries, including military aid and economic
assistance. Sanctions imposed on Russia have also
indirectly benefited Ukraine by increasing its strategic
importance to the West (Mankoff, 2022).
Long-term Societal Effects: The psychological impact of
the war on the Ukrainian population is profound. Many
individuals and families have experienced trauma from
displacement, loss of loved ones, and the destruction
of their homes. Mental health professionals report an
increase in cases of PTSD, anxiety, and depression
among affected populations. The World Health
Organization emphasizes the need for long-term
mental health support and social services to address
these challenges (WHO, 2023). Additionally, societal
cohesion may be tested as returning populations
reintegrate into communities.
Military Modernization: The ongoing conflict has
necessitated substantial military reforms in Ukraine.
The country has received extensive military assistance
from Western nations, including the U.S. and EU
member states, leading to improvements in military
training and equipment. This support has transformed
Ukraine’s defense
capabilities, enabling it to conduct
effective counter-offensives and adapt to modern
warfare tactics. As noted by NATO, the level of
coordination and military cooperation with Western
allies has increased significantly (NATO, 2023).
Effects of the war on Russia
Economic Sanctions: Russia has faced significant
economic sanctions from the international community
as a result of its actions in Ukraine. These sanctions have
targeted key sectors, including finance, energy and
defense, leading to economic isolation and reduced
foreign investment (Congressional Research Service,
2023). In response to its actions in Ukraine, Russia has
faced extensive international sanctions from Western
nations, which have severely impacted its economy. Key
sectors, including finance, energy, and technology, have
been hit hard, leading to a contraction of about 2.3% in
GDP in 2022 (IMF, 2023). The sanctions have restricted
Russia's access to global markets, and foreign
investments have plummeted. Inflation rates have
surged, impacting the cost of living for ordinary Russians
and contributing to economic instability.
Domestic Impact/ Repression and Nationalism: The war
has led to a rise in nationalism with Russia, but it has
also caused economic difficulties, including inflation and
a decrease in the standard of living. Increased military
spending has strained Russia’s economy further (Charap
& Colton, 2017). The Russian government has
intensified its crackdown on dissent in response to anti-
war protests and public opposition. Independent media
outlets have been silenced, and many activists have
faced repression or exile. The government has framed
the conflict as a patriotic duty, fostering a narrative of
national unity against perceived external threats. This
has resulted in a rise in nationalist sentiments, with the
state emphasizing the importance of defending Russian
sovereignty (Green, 2023).
International Relations: Russia’s relations with Western
countries and international organizations have been
severely strained. The annexations of Crimea and
support for separatists have led to diplomatic isolation
and a reevaluation of Russia’s role in global affairs
(Stent, 2016).
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
196
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
Geopolitical Strategy: The war has reinforced Russia’s
geopolitical strategy of countering Western influence
in its near abroad. However, it has also highlighted the
limits of Russia’s power and the challenges of
maintaining influence in a destabilized Ukraine
(Wilson, 2014). The war has resulted in significant
geopolitical isolation for Russia. Many countries,
particularly in the West, have imposed strict sanctions
and reduced diplomatic ties. As a consequence, Russia
has shifted its focus towards building closer
relationships with non-Western countries, especially
China and India. This pivot is characterized by
increasing economic cooperation and military
partnerships, which, according to analysts, represent a
long-term strategic shift (Cohen, 2023).
Humanitarian Consequences: The war has also led to
significant humanitarian consequences within Russia.
Many young men have faced conscription, leading to
public protests and unrest in some regions. This
situation has prompted a wave of emigration,
particularly among professionals and young people
seeking to avoid military service. The resultant brain
drain poses a long-
term challenge to Russia’s economic
and technological development (Pomerantsev, 2023).
Military and Defense Strategy: The conflict has
prompted Russia to re-evaluate its military strategy.
The initial expectation of a swift victory in Ukraine has
proven unrealistic, leading to changes in tactics and
military doctrine. Russian military spending has
increased, aiming to modernize its armed forces.
However,
the
war
has
revealed
significant
shortcomings in military logistics, equipment, and
personnel management, raising questions about the
effectiveness of Russia’s military (Galeotti, 2023).
PROSPECT OF THE WAR
The prospect of the war depends on a complex
interplay of diplomatic efforts, military actions,
international influence and external factors within
both Russia and Ukraine and the situations is subject
to significant changes based on these evolving factors.
The prospects of the Russian-Ukrainian war are
uncertain and influenced by multiple factors. Scenarios
range from prolonged conflict and stalemate to
potential shifts leading to Ukrainian counter offensives
or diplomatic negotiations. International support,
economic conditions, and social factors will
significantly shape the future dynamics of the conflict.
Ultimately, achieving lasting peace will require
addressing the deep-rooted issues that led to the war
and fostering a climate of trust and cooperation.
The prospect of the war is uncertain and hinged on
several key factors, which are:
Diplomatic solutions
The potential for renewed diplomatic negotiations
exists:
Negotiations: ongoing diplomatic efforts involve various
international actors, including the United Nations and
regional organizations. Success in negotiations could
lead to a ceasefire or a comprehensive peace
agreement. However, mutual distrust and conflicting
interests complicate these efforts (Charap & Colton,
2017).
Changing Battlefield Dynamics: Significant shifts on the
battlefield could compel both sides to reconsider their
positions. A military stalemate might push both sides
towards negotiations as the costs of conflict increase
(Wilson, 2023).
International Mediation: Increased international
pressure from neutral parties could facilitate dialogue,
focusing on ceasefires and security guarantees (Cohen,
2023).
Trust Issues: A major barrier to negotiations is the lack
of trust. Previous agreements have often been violated,
making it difficult to establish a framework for lasting
peace (Smith, 2023).
Military Developments
Continued Conflict: The war might persist with periodic
escalations and de-escalations. The outcome of the
ongoing battles and strategic decisions will heavily
influence the war’s trajectory. Continued military
support for Ukraine from Western allies and Russia’s
ability to sustain its military campaign are crucial
elements (the Washington post, current military
dynamics in the Russia Ukraine war, August 2024)
Economic Factors
The economic impact on both countries, driven by
sanctions, war cost, and economic instability, will
influence their capacity to continue the war. A
prolonged conflict could exacerbate economic
challenges. Both Russia and Ukraine have suffered
economically. Russia faces international sanctions and
economic isolation, while Ukraine’s economy has been
severely impacted by the war and reconstruction costs,
continued conflict will likely exacerbate economic
difficulties, especially for Ukraine which may struggle
with reconstruction and economic recovery. Russia
could face prolonged economic isolation affecting its
long
–
term economic stability.
Economic hardships might drive both nations toward
peace, particularly if the cost of war becomes on
sustainable for either side.
Domestic Factors
Domestic political situations in Russia and Ukraine play
a crucial role. In Russia, internal dissent or economic
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
197
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
hardship could affect the Kremlin’s strategies (Brown,
2024. In Ukraine, public support and political cohesion
will influence its ability to continue the fight (Petrova,
2024).
Global Alliances
Western support: continued military and economic
support from Western countries will be vital for
Ukraine’s defense (O’ Hara, 2024). Conversely, shifts in
international alliances or support for Russia could
change the conflict’s dynamics (Lee, 2024).
Stalemate and Prolonged Conflict
The ongoing conflict may lead to a prolonged
stalemate, characterized by:
Entrenched Positions: Both Ukrainian and Russian
forces have fortified their positions, particularly in
contested areas like Donetsk and Luhansk. Heavy
fighting has established extensive defensive lines,
making breakthroughs difficult (Galeotti, 2023).
Logistical Challenges: Both sides face significant
logistical issues. For Ukraine, maintaining supply lines
for Western weaponry is critical, while Russia struggles
with re-supply in a hostile environment (Snegovaya,
2023).
Resource Exhaustion: Prolonged conflict can lead to
resource depletion, affecting troop morale and
operational capabilities. A war of attrition may ensue,
where neither side can afford a major offensive
(Cohen, 2023).
Ukrainian Counter offensive Success
If Ukraine can sustain and enhance its counteroffensive
efforts, potential outcomes include:
Territorial Gains: Successful counteroffensives could
allow Ukraine to reclaim territories lost since 2014,
significantly altering the military landscape and
strengthening Ukraine’s negotiating position (NATO,
2023).
Strengthened NATO and EU Aspirations: A military
success could bolster Ukraine’s claims for NATO and EU
membership, as public support for integration into
Western institutions has surged (European Council,
2022).
Increased International Support: A successful
Ukrainian campaign may lead to greater international
military and economic assistance, enhancing Ukraine's
capabilities further (Smith, 2023).
Russian Military Adaptation and Escalation
Russia may respond to challenges by adapting its
military strategy:
Increased Troop Deployments: Russia might mobilize
additional forces, increasing troop numbers on the
front lines and enabling sustained offensives (Sherr,
2023).
Escalation Tactics: Intensified aerial bombardments and
drone warfare could be employed to break the morale
of Ukrainian forces and civilians (Galeotti, 2023).
Hybrid Warfare: Russia may leverage hybrid warfare
tactics, combining conventional military operations with
cyberattacks and disinformation campaigns aimed at
destabilizing Ukraine (Snegovaya, 2023).
International Involvement and Support
International actors will play a crucial role which
include:
Continued Support for Ukraine: Western military,
economic, and humanitarian assistance is vital for
Ukraine’s resilience. NATO allies and EU countries have
shown strong commitment to supporting Ukraine
(NATO, 2023).
Shifts in Global Alliances: If Western support wanes, it
could limit Ukraine's ability to sustain its defense.
Conversely, if Russia faces additional sanctions, it may
seek deeper ties with non-Western countries (Cohen,
2023).
Global Economic Factors: The war's impact on global
energy markets and food security can influence
international responses. Economic pressures may lead
to shifts in policy from affected countries (Sherr, 2023).
Economic and Social Factors
The economic consequences will significantly impact
future prospects:
Ukraine’s Economic Recovery: Post
-war reconstruction
will require substantial international investment. The
EU has indicated willingness to support these efforts,
but stability and governance reforms will be crucial
(World Bank, 2023).
Russia’s Economic Isolation: Ongoing sanctions may
hinder Russia’s economic growth and
lead to domestic
unrest. Economic instability could prompt changes in
public sentiment towards the government (Snegovaya,
2023).
Social Cohesion: Both countries will face social
challenges due to the war. Ukraine must address the
needs of displaced populations, while Russia needs to
manage dissent and societal divisions caused by the
conflict (Smith, 2023).
Humanitarian and Social Implications
The humanitarian crisis continues to escalate:
Crisis Response: Millions of Ukrainians need
humanitarian assistance, and the international
community's response will be pivotal in addressing
these needs (UNHCR, 2023).
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
198
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
Long-term Mental Health Needs: The psychological
impact of the war will require sustained attention.
Many individuals face trauma from violence and
displacement, necessitating robust mental health
services (WHO, 2023).
CONCLUSION
The Russian
–
Ukrainian war, a complex and
multifaceted conflict, has deep historical roots and
profound implication for both nations and the broader
international community. Originating from geopolitical
tensions and longstanding disputes over territory and
influence, the war has dramatically reshaped the
regional landscape.
The Russian
–
Ukraine war has its roots in a complex
interplay of historical grievances, geopolitical, ignited
by Russia’s annexation of Crimea and subsequent
military action, has had profound and far-reaching
effects on both countries, for Ukraine, the war has
resulted in significant human suffering, economic
strain, and a reinforced sense of national identity and
resistance. For Russia, the conflict has led to
international isolation, economic sanctions, and a
strained relationship with the west, while also
heightening nationalist sentiments at home.
The war’s ongoing impact extends beyond immediate
military and economic concerns, influencing global
politics and security dynamics, As the situation,
evolves, the path to resolution remains uncertain,
underscoring the need for sustained diplomatic efforts
and a deeper understanding of the underlying issues to
achieve a lasting peace.
The Russian-Ukrainian war represents a critical
juncture in European and global geopolitics, rooted in
a complex interplay of historical, cultural, and strategic
factors. As the conflict evolves, its ramifications extend
far beyond the borders of Ukraine and Russia,
reshaping international relations and security
dynamics.
First, the war has profoundly altered Ukraine's national
identity, fostering a strong sense of unity among its
citizens against external aggression. This surge in
nationalism has led to increased support for the
government and a renewed commitment to pursuing
closer ties with Western institutions. As stated by
Katchanovski (2018), the war has galvanized a national
narrative centered on independence and democratic
values, contrasting sharply with Russia's authoritarian
model.
Second, the humanitarian crisis resulting from the
conflict cannot be overstated. Millions of Ukrainians
have been displaced, facing dire living conditions both
internally and abroad. The UN estimates that over 8
million people have been internally displaced due to the
conflict, while millions more have sought refuge in
neighboring countries (UNHCR, 2023). This ongoing
crisis necessitates significant international humanitarian
assistance, highlighting the urgency of addressing the
needs of affected populations.
On the economic front, Ukraine's struggle to rebuild
amidst the conflict continues to hinder its development.
The war has devastated key industries and
infrastructure, with losses amounting to billions of
dollars. According to the World Bank, Ukraine's GDP
contracted by approximately 30% in 2022, illustrating
the severe economic toll of prolonged conflict (World
Bank, 2022).
For Russia, the conflict has led to increased international
isolation, with severe economic sanctions imposed by
Western nations. These sanctions have significantly
impacted the Russian economy, leading to a contraction
in GDP and a decline in foreign investment (IMF, 2023).
Additionally, domestic unrest and dissent have been
exacerbated by the war, as many Russians express
discontent with the government’s handling of the
conflict and the resulting economic hardships
(Pomerantsev, 2022).
Ultimately, the Russian-Ukrainian war is a stark
reminder of the fragility of national sovereignty and the
intricate web of international relations. As the situation
unfolds, it underscores the importance of diplomatic
efforts aimed at conflict resolution and the necessity for
a unified international response to uphold the principles
of territorial integrity and self-determination. The path
to peace remains fraught with challenges, but the
pursuit of dialogue and cooperation will be essential in
mitigating the war's long-lasting effects on both Ukraine
and Russia, as well as the broader global community.
REFERENCES
Applebaum, A. (2017). Read famine: Stalin’s War on the
Ukraine Doubleday.
Gressel, G. (2017). The EU and the Eastern partnership:
An International Relations Perspective Routledge.
Kudelia, S. (2016). The Politics of the Orange Revolution.
University of Pittsburgh Press.
Mikheyev, I. (2020) Post-Soviet Ukraine Nationalism and
Identity. Routledge.
Plokhy, S. (2017). The Gates of Europe: A history of
Ukraine. Basic Books.
Snyder, T. (2018). The Road to un-freedom: Russia,
Europe, America. Tim Duggan Books.
Trenin, D. (2016). Russia’s war in Ukraine: A view from
Moscow. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Wilson, A. (2014). Ukraine Crisis: What it means for the
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
199
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
West. Yale University Press.
Mankoff, Jeffery. Russian foreign policy: The return of
great power politics
Rowmary and Littlefield, 2011. This book explores
foreign policy objectives and its historical context,
including its stance towards Ukraine.
Allison, Ray, “Russia, the West and the Ukraine Crisis”
International AffairsVol.89, no-6, 2013, pp. 1255-1271.
This article discusses the geopolitical factors
contributing to the crisis.
Charap, S., & Colton, T. (2017). Everyone Loses: The
Ukraine Crisis and the Ruin of Russia’s Grand Strategy.
The Brookings Institutions
Kuzio, T. (2014). Ukraine: Democratization, corruption,
and the new Russian Imperialism. Praeger.
Mankoff, J. (2014). Russian Foreign Policy: The Return
of Geopolitics. Rowman & Littlegied.
Plokhy, S. (2017). Lost kingdom: The Quest for Empire
and the Making of the Russian Nation. Harvard
University Press.
Stent, A. (2016). The limits of partnership: U.S.-Russian
Relations in the Twenty-first Century. Princeton
University Press.
Congressional Research Service. (2023). Russia’s
economy and the impact of sanctions. CRS Report
R44861.
International Crisis Group. (2023). Ukraine: The
humanitarian impact of the war. Crisis Group Report.
World Bank. (2022). Ukraine Economic Monitor:
Navigating the storm. World Bank Report.
International Crisis Group. (2023). The War in Ukraine:
A Humanitarian Crisis.
Mankoff, J. (2022). The Russia-Ukraine War: A
Historical Perspective. Foreign Affairs.
22.
Sakwa, R. (2022). Russia’s Futures: The Impact
of the Ukraine War on Russian Politics and Society.
Tisdall, S. (2022). Understanding the Roots of the
Russia-Ukraine Conflict. The Guardian.
UNHCR. (2023). Ukraine Situation: Refugee and
Displacement Overview.
Baker, C., & Connolly, K. (2016). The annexation of
Crimea: Law and reality. International Journal of Public
Law and Policy.
Council on Foreign Relations. (2023). Impact of
Sanctions on Russia’s Economy.
Gordon, M. R. (2023). The Geopolitical Implications of
the Ukraine Conflict. The New York Times.
Mankoff, J. (2022). The Russia-Ukraine War: A
Historical Perspective. Foreign Affairs.
NATO. (2021). NATO’s Open Door Policy.
Pettis, M. (2023). Identity and Nationhood in Ukraine.
The Atlantic.
Ryzhenkov, A. (2023). Cultural Identity in Wartime
Ukraine. Journal of Eastern European Studies.
Sakwa, R. (2022). Russia’s Futures: The
Impact of the
Ukraine War on Russian Politics and Society.
Shapiro, J. (2023). Regional Stability in Eastern Europe:
The Impact of the Ukraine Conflict. European Security
Journal.
Stent, A. (2022). Putin's War: The West’s Response and
the Future of NATO. Brookings Institution.
UNHCR. (2023). Ukraine Situation: Refugee and
Displacement Overview.
World Bank. (2023). Ukraine Economic Update: Post-
Invasion Recovery.
Applebaum, A. (2017). Red Famine: Stalin's War on
Ukraine. Doubleday.
Gordon, M. R. (2023). The Geopolitical Implications of
the Ukraine Conflict. The New York Times.
Harrison, E. (2008). The Orange Revolution: A
Comparative Analysis. Nationalities Papers, 36(5), 725-
740.
International Crisis Group. (2021). The Conflict in
Ukraine: A Comprehensive Analysis.
Karatnycky, A. (2005). The Orange Revolution in
Ukraine. Journal of Democracy, 16(2), 13-27.
Magocsi, P. R. (2010). A History of Ukraine: The Land and
Its Peoples. University of Toronto Press.
NATO. (2022). NATO’s Response to the Ukraine Crisis.
Piontkovsky, A. (2020). The Ukrainian Conflict: Causes
and Consequences. European Security Journal.
Plokhy, S. (2015). The Gates of Europe: A History of
Ukraine. Basic Books.
Trenin, D. (2014). Russia and the West: A New Cold
War?. Carnegie Moscow Center.
Wilson, A. (2014). Ukrainian Crisis: What It Means for
the West. Yale University Press.
1. Mearsheimer, J.J. (2014). Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the
West’s Fault. The Atlantic.
Plokhy, S. (2015). The Gates of Europe: A History of
Ukraine. Basic Books.
Kuzio, T. (2015). Ukraine: A Nation on the Borderland.
Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics.
International Crisis Group. (2015). Ukraine: The Burden
of the Past and the Future of the West.
Wilson, A. (2014). Ukraine Crisis: What It Means for the
West. Yale University Press.
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
200
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
Sakwa, R. (2015). Russia Against the Rest: The Post-
Cold War Crisis of World Order. Cambridge University
Press.
Kofman, M. (2016). Russian Hybrid Warfare and Other
Dark Arts. War on the Rocks.
UNHCR. (2023). Ukraine Situation. Retrieved from
UNHCR website
World Bank. (2023). Ukraine Economic Update.
Retrieved from World Bank website
European Council. (2022). EU Leaders Grant Candidate
Status to Ukraine. Retrieved from European Council
website
NATO. (2023). NATO’s Support for
Ukraine. Retrieved
from NATO website
WHO. (2023). Mental Health in Ukraine: Post-War
Challenges. Retrieved from WHO website
IMF. (2023). World Economic Outlook: Countering the
Cost-of-Living Crisis. Retrieved from IMF website
Cohen, A. (2023). Russia's Pivot to the East: Economic
and Political Implications. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved
from Foreign Affairs website
Galeotti, M. (2023). Russia's Military Strategy in
Ukraine: Lessons Learned. Journal of Military Studies.
Retrieved from Journal of Military Studies
Green, A. (2023). Repression and Nationalism in
Russia: The Domestic Impact of the War. Russia
Beyond. Retrieved from Russia Beyond website
Pomerantsev, P. (2023). The Impact of War on Russian
Society: A Humanitarian Perspective. The Atlantic.
Retrieved from The Atlantic website
Cohen, A. (2023). Russia's Pivot to the East: Economic
and Political Implications. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved
from Foreign Affairs website.
European Council. (2022). EU Leaders Grant Candidate
Status to Ukraine. Retrieved from European Council
website.
Galeotti, M. (2023). Russia's Military Strategy in
Ukraine: Lessons Learned. Journal of Military Studies.
Retrieved from Journal of Military Studies.
Sherr, J. (2023). Russia's Strategic Challenges: Military
and Political Implications. The Royal United Services
Institute (RUSI). Retrieved from RUSI website.
Snegovaya, M. (2023). Understanding Russia's War in
Ukraine: Military and Political Dynamics. Carnegie
Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved from
Carnegie website.
Smith, H. (2023). Ukraine's Resilience: Military,
Economic, and Social Challenges. The Atlantic Council.
Retrieved from Atlantic Council website.
UNHCR. (2023). Ukraine Situation. Retrieved from
UNHCR website.
WHO. (2023). Mental Health in Ukraine: Post-War
Challenges. Retrieved from WHO website.
World Bank. (2023). Ukraine Economic Update.
Retrieved from World Bank website.
Wilson, A. (2023). The Future of Ukraine: Prospects for
Peace and Stability. Journal of Conflict Resolution.
Retrieved from Journal of Conflict Resolution.
