Authors

  • U.M. Saydakhmedov
    Acting professor of Tashkent State University of Law Judge, PhD, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume06Issue07-07

Keywords:

Objects of intellectual property protection administrative court

Abstract

In this article, consistent measures are being implemented in our country to improve the results of intellectual activity and the mechanisms of introducing innovations to economic sectors, to create regional brands, to ensure reliable legal protection of intellectual property, in particular, the specific features of considering cases related to intellectual property protection in administrative courts are highlighted. Also, the article provides suggestions and recommendations on improving the legislation to ensure reliable legal protection of intellectual property in administrative courts.


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN- 2693-0803)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE07

25

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

PUBLISHED DATE: - 31-07-2024
DOI: -

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume06Issue07-07

PAGE NO.: - 25-28

ISSUES OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND LEGAL
SUPPORT FOR THE PROTECTION OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS


U.M. Saydakhmedov

Acting professor of Tashkent State University of Law Judge, PhD, Uzbekistan

INTRODUCTION

According to the Constitution of the Republic of

Uzbekistan, the judicial power is considered a

separate branch of the state power and ensures the
implementation of justice.
According to Article 4 of the Law "On Courts", the

main task of the courts is to protect the rights and
freedoms of citizens, state and public interests,

rights and interests of legal entities and individual

entrepreneurs.
Since intellectual property is created as a result of

the intellectual activity of citizens and legal entities,

property rights arise in relation to it, and it is one
of the objects of civil rights, it is important to

protect it through court.
In Uzbekistan, disputes related to the field of

intellectual property belong to the category of

disputes considered in courts of all instances. For
this reason, one of the urgent requirements of

today is to improve the qualifications of judges and

officials of all instance courts in the field.
Accordingly, in 2020, a special training program

was developed in cooperation with the World

Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to
improve the knowledge and skills of the employees

of judicial bodies dealing with disputes in the field,
and according to it, experts from the WIPO, USAID

and other international organizations will hold
relevant training sessions in 2020-2021 was

conducted.
As a result of these measures, the quality of court

proceedings is improving.

Protection of intellectual property through

administrative courts

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Open Access

Abstract


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN- 2693-0803)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE07

26

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

According to the Code of Administrative Court

Proceedings of the Republic of Uzbekistan, one of

the main tasks of administrative court proceedings
is to protect the violated or contested rights,

freedoms and legal interests of citizens and legal
entities in the field of administrative and other

public legal relations.
It is understood from this that the administrative

courts consider the disputes on complaints and
petitions against the actions (decisions) of state

bodies, citizens' self-governance bodies, as well as
the actions (decisions) of their officials arising from

public-legal relations.
According to the decision No. 15 of the Plenum of

the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan
dated May 19, 2018 "On some issues of the

application of procedural law norms by the court of
first instance in the consideration of administrative

cases", administrative courts are subject to cases
related to disputes arising from administrative and

other public legal relations, including the following
cases shown to be:
- on disputes over departmental regulatory legal

documents of administrative bodies;
- on disputes over decisions of administrative

bodies, citizens' self-government bodies that do not
comply with legal documents and violate the rights

and interests of citizens or legal entities protected
by law;
- on disputes over actions (inaction) of officials of

administrative bodies, citizens' self-government

bodies that do not comply with legal documents
and violate the rights and interests of citizens or

legal entities protected by law;
- on disputes over actions (decisions) of election

commissions;
- on the dispute regarding the refusal to perform a

notarial act;
- on disputes over actions (inaction) of a notary

public;
- on disputes regarding refusal to register civil

status documents;
- on disputes over the actions (inaction) of the

official of the div for writing civil status

documents;
- cases of appeals against refusal of state

registration or evasion of state registration within

the specified period.
At the same time, it was noted that the following

cases do not apply to administrative court
proceedings:
- cases on disputes arising from administrative and

other public legal relations, which are determined

by the law to be applicable to the Constitutional
Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the court on

civil cases, the economic and military court;
- the application is submitted to invalidate the

document of an enterprise, organization,

institution that is not an administrative div, or to
find the action (inaction) of its official to be illegal,

or the application (complaint) is submitted to an
administrative div, but the action being

complained about is based on labor relations .
Therefore, in order to have a detailed

understanding of the disputes related to the
activities of administrative bodies considered in

administrative courts, first of all, it is very
important to correctly interpret the concept of

"administrative div".
The concept of "administrative div" is defined in

detail in the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On
Administrative Procedures" adopted on January 8,

2018.
In accordance with Article 4 of this Law,

administrative bodies are bodies authorized to

administer administrative management in the field
of administrative-legal activity, including state

management bodies, local executive authorities,

citizens' self-government bodies, as well as other
organizations authorized to carry out these

activities and specially created commissions are
defined .
Accordingly, the Intellectual Property Agency

(Agency) under the Ministry of Justice of the
Republic of Uzbekistan is also considered an

administrative div, and disputes arising in the
process of its administrative proceedings related to

the registration of intellectual property objects will

be referred to administrative courts.


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN- 2693-0803)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE07

27

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

In general, administrative courts mainly consider

the following cases in the field of intellectual

property:
- Disputes related to the cancellation of decisions of

the Ministry in the processes related to the state
registration of intellectual property objects;
- Disputes regarding the expiry of the period of

validity of the objects of intellectual property and
their use (certificate or patent) previously

registered by the Ministry and declaring them
invalid;
- Disputes related to appeals against the decision

made by the Appeal Board of the Ministry;
- Disputes related to the imposition of fines on legal

entities for violation of the Ministry's legislation in
the field of intellectual property.
At this point, if we talk directly about the processes

of consideration of disputes related to the field of

intellectual property by administrative courts, it
should be noted that the lack of sufficient

knowledge and skills of the judges in conducting
relevant court cases leads to the correct resolution

of the dispute and the prolongation of its
consideration periods.
by the administrative div to refuse the

registration of intellectual property objects, to find

the relevant protection document invalid or to
terminate its validity period, later these decisions

lead to cancellation in administrative courts. One of
the main reasons for this is the insufficient

understanding of the requirements of international
agreements and national legislation in the field,

and misinterpretation of their norms.
It should be noted that until 2021, administrative

courts will also consider cases of administrative
offenses. Decree No. PF-6034 of the President of

the Republic of Uzbekistan dated July 24, 2020
"On additional measures to further improve the

operation of courts and increase the efficiency of

justice" and the Decree of the Republic of
Uzbekistan "In connection with the improvement

of the Institute for Review of Court Decisions"
adopted on January 12, 2021 In accordance with

the Law "On Amendments and Additions to the

Code of Administrative Responsibility" starting

from January 1, 2021, cases related to
administrative offenses were reviewed in criminal

courts.
Until the introduction of this new procedure, the

Agency, the Anti-Monopoly Committee, the State
Tax Committee, the State Inspectorate for Control

in the field of Information and Telecommunications
and the Department for Combating Economic

Crimes in accordance with Articles 177, 177 1 , 177
2 and 178 of the Code of Administrative

Responsibility of the Republic of Uzbekistan
formalized administrative case materials were

submitted to administrative courts for review.
For information, 36 administrative case files were

submitted to administrative courts by the Agency
alone in 2020, and 18 persons were brought to

administrative responsibility based on the relevant
decisions of the courts.

Problems and solutions

The conducted analyzes showed that there are the

following problems to be solved in the protection

of intellectual property through the administrative
court:
1) judges of administrative courts do not have

sufficient knowledge and experience to properly
resolve administrative disputes in the field of

intellectual property;
Therefore, it is necessary to organize appropriate

seminars and trainings for the officials of
administrative courts on the consideration of

disputes in the field of intellectual property and to
develop

appropriate

methodological

recommendations for their use in their activities.
2) there is no uniform approach and practice of

uniform application of the norms of legal
documents for effective resolution of disputes in

the field of intellectual property by administrative
courts;
Based on this, it is necessary to adopt the decision

of the Plenum of the Supreme Court in order to
uniformly apply the legal norms in the field of

intellectual property by all courts of instance.
3) as a result of litigation by citizens and legal

entities in court to protect their rights, the
workload of administrative courts is increasing day


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN- 2693-0803)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE07

28

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

by day, and this primarily causes citizens and legal
entities to spend excessive time and incur financial

costs;
For this reason, it is necessary to widely implement

the procedures for the pre-trial settlement of these
types of disputes, including the study of the

inclusion of the institution of mediation in these
processes.

REFERENCES

1.

Law "On Courts". National database of

legislative information, 07/29/2021, No.
03/21/703/0723

2.

Decision No. 15 of the Plenum of the Supreme

Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated May

19, 2018 "On some issues of application of
procedural law norms by the court of first

instance in handling administrative cases".
https://lex.uz/docs/3761216

3.

Administrative procedures about". Law .

National database of legal documents,
09.01.2018, No. 03/18/457/0525;

References

Law "On Courts". National database of legislative information, 07/29/2021, No. 03/21/703/0723

Decision No. 15 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated May 19, 2018 "On some issues of application of procedural law norms by the court of first instance in handling administrative cases". https://lex.uz/docs/3761216

Administrative procedures about". Law . National database of legal documents, 09.01.2018, No. 03/18/457/0525;