A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK TO ANALYSE CONSEQUENCES OF POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION INTERVENTIONS

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN- 2693-0803)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

105

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

PUBLISHED DATE: - 23-09-2024
DOI: -

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume06Issue09-09

PAGE NO.: - 105-136

A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK TO ANALYSE
CONSEQUENCES OF POST-CONFLICT
RECONSTRUCTION INTERVENTIONS

Olowonihi A Peter

PhD Student City University, Cambodia

Christopher M Osazuwa

PhD Student City University, Cambodia

INTRODUCTION

After catastrophic conflicts, it is the shared

responsibility of the global community to embark
on ambitious initiatives to reconstruct devastated

civilizations. Post-conflict reconstruction (PCR) is a

complex process that addresses the various
challenges that arise after a war has ceased (Jarstad

& Sisk, 2018).
PCR, or Peacebuilding and Conflict Resolution, is a

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Open Access

Abstract

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

106

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

comprehensive endeavour that includes various

actions promoting stability and advancement. The
interventions encompass a broad spectrum of

activities, including restoring crucial infrastructure
and essential services, revitalising economies,

reinforcing

governance

institutions,

and

promoting reconciliation among split communities

(Barnett & Weiss, 2021). The primary objective of
PCR is to establish the requisite circumstances for

the long-term maintenance of peace, advancement,
and the avoidance of subsequent conflicts (Caplan,

2019).
Post-conflict reconstruction entails organized

endeavors to restore civilizations impacted by
conflict or violence. It encompasses several tasks,

including repairing physical infrastructure,
regenerating the economy, restoring social

services, and establishing political institutions
(Seneviratne

et

al.,

2015).

Post-conflict

reconstruction is an essential process that deals
with the consequences of civil wars and internal

conflicts. It aims to bring about economic, political,

and social transformations to foster peace and
democracy (Okyere, 2018).
Post-conflict reconstruction approaches prioritize

evaluation and sustainability as crucial factors.
Saaida (2023) emphasizes the significance of

thoroughly evaluating the efficacy of global
humanitarian efforts in aiding impacted

populations

and

guaranteeing

long-lasting

reconstruction for a prosperous recovery after

conflicts.
Nevertheless, the journey towards attaining these

ambitious objectives is frequently filled with
obstacles and intricacies. The effectiveness of PCR

initiatives depends on various aspects, such as the
specific setting of the conflict, the type of the

interventions, and the interaction between local
and international players (Newman et al., 2020).

Statement of the Problem

Post-conflict reconstruction (PCR) is not just a

critical area of focus but an urgent one for

governments, international organisations, and
non-governmental organisations (NGOs). The need

to stabilise and reconstruct societies following
conflicts is pressing. Despite substantial

investments and various interventions designed to

prevent the recurrence of conflict, promote
development, and restore peace, the results of

these interventions have frequently been
inconsistent. Numerous post-conflict societies still

contend with economic instability, social
fragmentation, recurring violence, and feeble

governance. These issues raise critical questions
regarding the efficacy and repercussions of post-

conflict reconstruction interventions.
One of the primary issues with PCR interventions is

that they frequently adhere to a one-size-fits-all
approach, which neglects the distinctive historical,

cultural, and socio-political contexts of various
post-conflict societies. This neglect can lead to

interventions that are not just ineffective but also
exacerbate existing tensions or generate new

conflicts. For instance, the implementation of
Western governance and economic systems has, in

certain instances, resulted in the erosion of
conventional structures and the establishment of

power vacuums exploited by various factions.
Furthermore, there is an increasing apprehension

that the primary objective of PCR initiatives has
been short-term stabilisation rather than the more

crucial long-term sustainable peacebuilding. This
short-term focus often leads to interventions

prioritising immediate security and economic
recovery at the expense of addressing more

profound issues, including social cohesion,
reconciliation, and justice. This method may result

in a fragile peace that is susceptible to dissolution

upon the cessation of external assistance.
Another substantial concern is the absence of

coordination and coherence among the diverse

actors involved in PCR. Fragmented and
occasionally contradictory endeavours result from

the divergent agendas, priorities, and timelines of
international donors, NGOs, and local governments

(Williams & Smith, 2023). This fragmentation can
lead to the failure to achieve sustainable outcomes,

the wastage of resources, and the duplication of

efforts.

Aim

This seminar paper will examine the complexities

of a conceptual framework to analyse the

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

107

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

consequences of post-conflict reconstruction

interventions. By analysing case studies from
various countries and circumstances, we will

discover valuable lessons and insights that can
guide future PCR initiatives that aim for sustainable

and equitable outcomes.

Objectives

The study will undertake the following objectives

to:
i. develop a framework to analyse the diverse

impacts of post-conflict reconstruction on

governance, economic stability, and social

cohesion.
ii. identify and analyse the contextual factors

influencing the effectiveness of post-conflict

reconstruction.
iii. propose evidence-based recommendations to

improve post-conflict reconstruction interventions
for sustainable peace and development.

Significance of the Study

Emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive

framework to evaluate the many and intricate

outcomes of PCR methods is essential. Newman et
al. (2020) claim that the effects of PCR have a wide-

ranging impact that goes beyond the immediate
aftermath of a conflict. Interventions can cause

widespread and interconnected repercussions in
politics, economics, society, and the environment.

These effects are often unforeseen and unwanted
(Autesserre, 2022). For example, efforts to rebuild

the economy may unintentionally worsen existing
disparities or generate new ones by showing

preference towards specific groups (Bøås &
Jennings, 2021). Political initiatives focused on

democratization might exacerbate instability if
they do not effectively tackle fundamental

grievances and power disparities (Call, 2022).

Additionally, the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of
PCR treatments frequently depends on the

circumstances in which they are carried out
(Richmond, 2022). Pre-existing social structures,

cultural norms, and historical legacies can
considerably influence efforts.
Thus, it is crucial to have a comprehensive

framework that can effectively encompass this

complexity and offer a detailed comprehension of

the varied and sometimes conflicting outcomes of
PCR therapies. A framework of this nature would

empower

policymakers,

practitioners,

and

academics to devise and execute more efficient and

enduring interventions, thereby fostering the
development of resilient and harmonious post-

conflict societies (Jarstad & Sisk, 2023).
The knowledge obtained from this research can

guide the creation and execution of interventions,
giving these stakeholders a central role in making a

significant impact and producing long-lasting and
fair results. Their involvement is integral to the

process, ultimately helping to build solid and
peaceful societies after conflicts. Consequently, this

paper aims to establish a conceptual framework for
examining the repercussions of reconstruction

interventions after a conflict.

Conceptual Review
Conceptual Framework

This elucidates the constituent elements of the

conceptual framework, employing a rigorous

conceptual analysis methodology. A meticulous
examination of each element

—

context, post-

conflict reconstruction (PCR) intervention,
consequences of interventions, and their long-term

impacts on the contextual landscape

—

underpins

the rationale for developing this comprehensive

framework.
The framework's foundation recognises that PCR

interventions are not implemented in a vacuum.

The pre-existing context, encompassing the

historical, political, economic, and social conditions
of a conflict-affected society, profoundly shapes the

trajectory and outcomes of these interventions
(Bøås & Jennings, 2021). Moreover, the specific

types of interventions employed, whether political,
economic, social, or security-focused, interact with

these contextual factors in complex ways,
producing both intended and unintended

consequences (Call, 2022). These consequences, in
turn, can have long-lasting impacts on the

contextual landscape, creating feedback loops that
may either reinforce or undermine the initial goals

of PCR (Mac Ginty, 2021).
The conceptual framework serves as a heuristic

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

108

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

tool to dissect these intricate relationships. By

systematically examining the interplay between
context,

intervention,

and

consequences,

researchers and practitioners can better
understand the mechanisms through which PCR

interventions operate and the diverse range of
outcomes they can produce. This, in turn, can

inform more effective and contextually sensitive
approaches to post-conflict recovery and

peacebuilding (Jarstad & Sisk, 2023).
In essence, the conceptual framework acts as a

roadmap for navigating the complexities of PCR.
Providing a structured approach to analyzing the

multifaceted consequences of interventions
empowers researchers and practitioners to

identify potential pitfalls, leverage opportunities,
and ultimately contribute to more sustainable and

equitable outcomes in post-conflict societies (Paris,
2022).
A comprehensive comprehension of the

multifarious components and their intricate

interplay is required to develop a conceptual
framework for analyzing the consequences of post-

conflict reconstruction (PCR) interventions. This
framework offers a structured method for

evaluating the diverse effects of PCR initiatives on
post-conflict societies, thereby facilitating a more

comprehensive and nuanced analysis.
The framework's fundamental components

comprise a variety of interventions, such as
security-focused and economic, social, and political

initiatives. Political interventions guarantee
political stability, promote democratization,

uphold the rule of law, and establish effective
governance (Paris, 2019). Economic interventions

prioritize revitalising economies by generating
employment, reconstructing infrastructure, and

developing markets (Barnett & Weiss, 2021). Social
interventions are designed to facilitate the

reintegration of displaced populations, enhance
education and healthcare systems, and rebuild

social cohesion (Mac Ginty, 2021). Establishing

robust security forces and the disarmament,
demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) of ex-

combatants are the primary objectives of security
interventions (Call, 2022).
Contextual factors significantly influence the

outcomes of PCR interventions. Local dynamics,

including cultural, social, and political contexts, are
among the factors that influence the success or

failure of interventions (Richmond, 2022). A
critical contextual element is the influence of

international actors, donors, and organizations on
PCR strategies and priorities (Barnett & Weiss,

2021).

Furthermore,

the

trajectory

of

reconstruction efforts can be substantially

influenced by the historical legacies of past
conflicts and pre-existing conditions within a

society (Newman et al., 2020).
Government and local authorities are frequently

responsible for leading or supporting initiatives in
PCR, which are considered vital actors (Call, 2022).

The success and sustainability of PCR processes are
contingent upon the engagement and participation

of local communities and civil society, while
international organizations and NGOs provide

funding, expertise, and resources (Autesserre,
2022).
Conversely, PCR interventions may induce

unintended consequences, including inflation,

corruption, or dependence on aid (Bøås & Jennings,
2021). Another potential unintended consequence

is social fragmentation, which can exacerbate
existing divisions or establish new ones (Paris,

2019). Furthermore, power imbalances may
develop by bolstering preexisting power structures

or establishing new inequalities (Autesserre,
2022).

Post-conflict Context

Post-conflict contexts are characterized by various

and deeply ingrained challenges that extend far

beyond the cessation of violence. Societies'
economic, environmental, social, and political

fabric often lies in ruins, leaving communities

grappling with the long-term consequences of war
(Bøås & Jennings, 2021). Conflict survivors,

burdened by loss and trauma, face the daunting
task of rebuilding their lives and livelihoods while

cultivating resilience in the face of adversity (Mac
Ginty, 2021).
The destruction of vital resources and

infrastructure further exacerbates the challenges
of post-conflict recovery. The collapse of economic

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

109

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

systems and the loss of human capital and social

networks undermines the development process
and hinders the restoration of essential services

(Call, 2022). The health and education sectors are
particularly vulnerable, with the destruction of

hospitals and schools and the displacement of
skilled personnel leaving communities with limited

access to essential services (Barnett & Weiss,
2023). Moreover, the natural environment often

bears the scars of conflict, with pollution,
deforestation, and resource depletion posing long-

term threats to livelihoods and sustainability

(Brown & McLeman, 2016).
Existing literature highlights several salient

features that define post-conflict contexts. The

continued presence of military forces, even in the
absence of active fighting ("negative peace"), can

perpetuate insecurity and hinder reconciliation
efforts (Richmond, 2022). Weak or failed states,

characterized by limited capacity and legitimacy,
struggle to provide essential services and uphold

the rule of law, creating a fertile ground for

corruption and illicit activities (Le Billon, 2021).
Vulnerable communities, particularly women,

children, and marginalized groups, often bear the
brunt of the conflict's aftermath, facing heightened

risks of poverty, violence, and exploitation (Mac
Ginty, 2021). Additionally, the transition from war

economies, where illicit activities and informal
networks thrive, to legitimate livelihoods poses a

significant challenge for individuals and
communities (World Bank, 2011). The ever-

present risk of returning to conflict looms large, as
unresolved grievances, power imbalances, and

ineffective conflict resolution mechanisms can
reignite violence (Call, 2022).

Post-conflict reconstruction (PCR)

Post-conflict reconstruction (PCR) is a complex and

diverse process encompassing various endeavours.

It is not just about physical rebuilding but also
about rejuvenating a nation that has undergone

substantial conflict. This idea has evolved to

include reviving social, economic, political, and
institutional structures crucial for achieving a

stable and enduring peace. Understanding PCR's
intricate and diverse nature is essential for

implementing successful intervention strategies

and achieving sustainable peacebuilding outcomes.

Post-conflict reconstruction refers to rebuilding
and restoring a society or nation after armed

conflict or war.
Post-conflict rebuilding is a diverse process that

unfolds after the cessation of hostilities. It aims to

address the root causes of war and prevent a

resurgence of violence. The African Post-Conflict
Reconstruction Policy Framework defines PCR as a

comprehensive set of short--, medium---, and long-
term initiatives to stabilize a society after a conflict,

prevent future conflicts, and establish lasting
peace. PCR is a multidimensional concept that

includes various security, governance, socio-
economic development, justice, and reconciliation

activities, as highlighted by the African Post-
Conflict Reconstruction Policy Framework (GSDRC,

2021).
Similarly, the United Nations defines PCR as a

concerted effort to lay the groundwork for long-
lasting peace and development by reconstructing a

society's political, economic, and social systems
severely disrupted by violence. This definition

underscores the importance of embracing a
comprehensive strategy that addresses the root

causes of conflicts, such as poverty, inequality, and
political exclusion. At the same time, it advocates

for promoting good governance, the rule of law,
and human rights (United Nations, 2021).
A PCR conceptual framework must account for the

dynamic and interconnected characteristics of the

post-conflict environment. As highlighted in the
academic literature, PCR is not a series of isolated

efforts but a set of diverse endeavours that are
interconnected

and

interdependent.

From

immediate humanitarian assistance to enduring
development initiatives, all these efforts must be

part of a synchronized strategy. Efficient PCR
necessitates a strategy that brings together

multiple

actors,

including

international

organisations, national governments, civil society,

and local communities, to work harmoniously

towards a common goal (ACCORD, 2021).
Distinction Between Short-Term Relief and Long-

Term Development:
It is crucial to differentiate between immediate

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

110

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

relief efforts and long-term development within

post-conflict contexts to intervene effectively and
establish lasting peacebuilding. Short-term relief

efforts aim to meet immediate humanitarian needs,
whereas long-term development initiatives are

focused on the gradual restoration of society and
economies. It is crucial to make this distinction to

prevent duplication of efforts and guarantee a
seamless shift from emergency response to

sustainable growth.
On a global scale, international organizations like

the United Nations (UN) and the World Bank stress
distinguishing between immediate assistance and

long-term progress in rebuilding after conflicts.
The UN's Sustaining Peace Agenda emphasizes that

short-term aid entails prompt measures such as
providing food, emergency healthcare, and

temporary shelter, essential for survival and
stability in the aftermath of violence. These

operations are commonly financed through
humanitarian assistance and designed to address

pressing needs promptly (UN, 2022).
Conversely, long-term development prioritizes

reconstructing the institutional and economic
frameworks essential for maintaining peace over

an extended period. This includes initiatives in
governance change, economic rejuvenation,

education, and infrastructural enhancement. The
World Bank emphasizes that sustainable

development must be combined with state-
building initiatives to effectively tackle the

underlying causes of conflict and prevent its

reoccurrence (World Bank, 2021).
Regionally, the African Union (AU) and the

European Union (EU) have created systems that

distinguish between immediate assistance and
long-term progress in areas affected by war. The

AU's

Post-Conflict

Reconstruction

and

Development (PCRD) Framework emphasizes the

importance of providing immediate assistance to
stabilize regions impacted by conflict while also

establishing the necessary foundation for long-

term development. The immediate actions of
disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration

(DDR) of former combatants are essential for
restoring security and public order (AU, 2021).
From the African Union (AU) perspective, long-

term development entails tackling fundamental

concerns such

as governance,

economic

diversification, and social cohesion. The African

Union (AU) highlights the significance of African
ownership in these endeavours, arguing for

regional and national leadership in formulating
and executing development policies (ACCORD,

2021). The EU's Integrated Approach to Post-
Conflict Stabilization emphasizes the shift from

humanitarian aid to development support,
ensuring that investments in governance and

economic recovery align with urgent relief

operations (EU, 2022).
At the national level, countries that have recently

experienced conflict must balance meeting current

needs and planning for long-term, sustainable
growth. The government's strategy for post-

genocide recovery in Rwanda exemplifies the
differentiation between immediate aid and

sustained development. Following the 1994
genocide, the first relief efforts were mainly

directed at supplying survivors with food, shelter,

and medical assistance. The endeavours above
were crucial in achieving national stability and

averting

additional

casualties

(Rwanda

Governance Board, 2020).
An essential obstacle in post-conflict contexts is

guaranteeing a smooth shift from immediate
assistance to sustained progress. This shift is

sometimes complicated by insecurity, inadequate
governance, and low financial resources. For

instance, in South Sudan, the persistent fighting has

hindered progress from emergency relief
endeavours to long-term sustainable development

measures. The absence of a secure political milieu
and the persistent acts of violence have impeded

endeavours to establish the requisite institutions
for sustainable development (International Crisis

Group, 2021).
Furthermore, collaboration between humanitarian

actors and development organizations is essential

to effectively managing this shift. The OECD's

States of Fragility 2020 research highlights the
importance of implementing consistent plans

synchronising

immediate

and

long-term

objectives. Lack of effective coordination has the

potential danger of fostering reliance on

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

111

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

humanitarian assistance, which has the potential to

hinder sustained development endeavours (OECD,
2020).
Differentiating

immediate

alleviation

and

sustained progress is crucial for efficient post-war
reconstruction. Short-term relief efforts aim to

meet the urgent needs of populations affected by

violence, while long-term development initiatives
prioritize establishing enduring peace and

development. Both approaches are necessary.
However, they must be meticulously synchronized

to guarantee a seamless shift from emergency
reaction to long-term recovery and expansion. To

tackle this dilemma, frameworks and strategies are
developing at global, regional, and national scales.

However, the effectiveness of these endeavours
relies on context-specific methods, robust

governance,

and

continuous

international

assistance.

Post-Conflict Reconstruction Intervention

Post-conflict reconstruction interventions are

critical processes designed to rehabilitate nations

and establish sustainable peace in various areas,
including security, governance, socio-economic

development, gender equality, and justice
(Seneviratne et al., 2017). This reconstruction

endeavor extends beyond ordinary physical

reconstruction; it entails the empowerment of
communities to effectively address post-crisis

situations, a process referred to as recovery
(Brinkerhoff & Johnson, 2009). Anand Garstka

(2010) emphasizes the necessity of coordinated
policy interventions and stakeholder involvement

to achieve successful post-conflict reconstruction
solutions, thereby highlighting the complexities

associated with development in post-conflict
settings. Bourhrous et al. (2022) have

demonstrated that

successful post-conflict

reconstruction solutions reduce conflict by

promoting economic growth, increasing income,
and fostering overall development.
Local governments, foreign donors, and non-

governmental organizations (NGOs) are the three

primary categories of actors that play significant
roles in the post-conflict reconstruction process.

The high rate of relapse into violence in terminated
armed conflicts is evidence that military

intervention does not guarantee enduring peace,

even though it may end a conflict (Stewart, 2009).
Consequently,

post-conflict

peacebuilding

initiatives necessitate conflict prevention and
democracy (Seneviratne et al., 2016). Furthermore,

the transformation of conflict economies and the
promotion of economic development through a

centralized approach are contingent upon the
existence of a robust state (Hillman, 2012).
The international community plays a critical role in

preventing

future

conflicts,

as

external

intervention is frequently required in post-conflict
states due to their lack of institutional capacity for

reconstruction ("Women Empowerment and Post-
Conflict Reconstruction: Women for Women NGO

in Rwanda", 2023). Nevertheless, foreign
interventions are not without their challenges,

including the potential for exploitation, the
sustainability of aid, the conditionality of donors,

and the impediment to local capacity (6, 27-30).
Anand

(Garstka,

2010)

underscores

the

significance of incorporating local communities

and NGOs into internationally driven post-conflict
reconstruction projects to guarantee the success of

reconstruction efforts by utilizing NGO resources
and community participation.
Physical infrastructure restoration and the re-

establishment of a market economy are the
primary objectives of post-conflict reconstruction

initiatives (Mako & Edgar, 2021) The necessity of
strategic investment in economic conditions and

risk mitigation early in the reconstruction process

is underscored by the potential for delays in
infrastructure projects to result in community

frustration and impede peacebuilding efforts
("Women Empowerment and Post-Conflict

Reconstruction: Women for Women NGO in
Rwanda", 2023).
Post-conflict reconstruction plays a crucial role in

the development of nations after war. However,
there is no direct causal link between post-conflict

reconstruction

(PCR)

and

development

(Seneviratne et al., 2017). To ensure sustainable
peace and development, it is imperative to

establish firm policies that effectively connect
reconstruction efforts with broader development

goals (Brinkerhoff & Johnson, 2009). While peace is

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

112

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

a prerequisite for development, long-term

sustainability requires strategic economic policies
and robust state formation, considering historical

and regional political dynamics (Garstka, 2010).
Post-conflict states often view reconstruction and

economic development as key to achieving

sustainable peace (Bourhrous et al., 2022). Despite

initial growth spurts post-conflict due to significant
aid inflows and reconstruction investments, many

countries struggle to maintain this growth over
time (Stewart, 2009). Addressing factors

influencing political and economic risks can lead to
faster and more sustainable growth trajectories

(Seneviratne et al., 2016). Post-war development
challenges necessitate clear visions supported by

sustainable infrastructure initiatives within the
post-conflict programs (Hillman, 2012). However,

externally imposed development models may not
align with local cultures, highlighting the

importance of integrating indigenous knowledge
for effective local economic development ("Women

Empowerment and Post-Conflict Reconstruction:

Women for Women NGO in Rwanda", 2023).
Economic consequences
Athukorala et al. (2021) emphasize the importance

of investing in large-scale reconstruction post-war

to restore physical infrastructure, enhance the

productive base, and facilitate trade. Infrastructure
reconstruction plays a vital role in poverty

reduction and improving the investment climate
for private enterprises (Collier et al., 2003).

Mundial Ginty (2010) suggests integrating
infrastructure

reconstruction

into

poverty

reduction programs to rebuild livelihoods and
create new economic opportunities post-conflict.

Infrastructure projects improve resource access
and foster economic linkages between markets and

economies, as seen in the success of post-World
War

II

peace

through

economic

interconnectedness in Europe (Bigombe, 2020).
However, economic improvements post-conflict

can lead to industrial relocation, affecting
economic activities in different regions (Earnest,

2015). Infrastructure development, such as
highways, can influence the spatial distribution of

economic activities, potentially exacerbating
existing inequalities in post-conflict societies and

negatively impacting impoverished rural areas

(Laucht, 2023).
Environmental consequences
Despite

the

substantial

environmental

consequences of war, the importance of
environmental

factors

in

post-conflict

reconstruction (PCR) is frequently disregarded
(Seneviratne et al., 2017; Brinkerhoff & Johnson,

2009). During conflicts, the environment is often
deliberately attacked and experiences significant

destruction, resulting in enduring repercussions
(Garstka, 2010). An example of this is the failure to

consider environmental factors during the
reconstruction of post-war Iraq, which led to

significant environmental deterioration. This
included unregulated oil spills, water pollution, and

the destruction of marshlands, resulting in the

displacement of populations (Bourhrous et al.,
2022). Hence, it is imperative to actively evaluate

and tackle the environmental consequences of PCR
initiatives to mitigate unfavourable effects

(Stewart, 2009).
Furthermore, Athukorala et al. (2016) stress the

significance of allocating resources towards

extensive reconstruction efforts after a war to
restore infrastructure, strengthen the productive

foundation, and promote trade while considering

the environmental consequences. Infrastructure
reconstruction is crucial for poverty reduction,

enhancing the investment climate, and promoting
sustainable development (Hillman, 2012). The

Mundial "Women Empowerment and Post-Conflict
Reconstruction: Women for Women NGO in

Rwanda"

(2023)

proposes

incorporating

infrastructure restoration into poverty reduction

initiatives to revive livelihoods and generate fresh
economic prospects, all while considering

environmental sustainability.
PCR must prioritize environmental factors to

support sustainable development and prevent
additional environmental deterioration in post-

conflict areas.

Failure to consider the

environmental consequences of reconstruction

activities can worsen pre-existing environmental
problems and impede the achievement of long-

term peacebuilding and development objectives.

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

113

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

Social Consequences
Social consequences in post-conflict settings often

manifest as inequalities in resource distribution
among communities, known as horizontal

inequality (HI) (Seneviratne et al., 2017;
Brinkerhoff & Johnson, 2009). Failure to address

these distributional disparities during post-conflict

reconstruction (PCR) can lead to the resurgence of
conflicts (Garstka, 2010).
PCR initiatives can potentially build social capital

and

distribute

peace

dividends

through

community-based participation (CBP) (Hillman,

2012). A participatory approach ensures that
development is centered around people rather

than projects, contributing to long-term
sustainability ("Women Empowerment and Post-

Conflict Reconstruction: Women for Women NGO

in Rwanda", 2023). Strengthening community
relations through simple interactions using

infrastructure facilities has been observed to
enhance social cohesion in post-conflict settings

(Mako & Edgar, 2021). Neglecting the opinions and
experiences of community members in decision-

making processes can lead to irrelevant projects
and negative impacts (Collier et al., 2003).
However, the centralized approach often taken in

major reconstruction projects post-war, as seen in

Iraq, may overlook local capacities and resources,
hindering practical reconstruction efforts (Ginty,

2010). In Sri Lanka, the absence of CBP was viewed
as a missed opportunity to foster trust between the

state and affected populations (Bigombe, 2020).
Improved

infrastructure

post-conflict

can

inadvertently lead to exploitation and increased
violence, as observed in Afghanistan, where road

construction contributed to land grabbing and
insecurity (Earnest, 2015).
Political Consequences
Political consequences in post-conflict scenarios

play a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory of

peacebuilding and governance in war-torn regions.
The aftermath of conflicts often leads to shattered

identities, particularly in prolonged ethnic
conflicts, which can exacerbate inequalities in

resource distribution among communities, a
phenomenon known as horizontal inequality (HI)

(Seneviratne et al., 2017; Brinkerhoff & Johnson,

2009).
The interplay between political and economic

effects in property transfers post-conflict has

significant implications for development and
stability ("Women Empowerment and Post-

Conflict Reconstruction: Women for Women NGO

in Rwanda", 2023). However, reconstructing
cultural heritage sites in some post-conflict regions

may be politically motivated, influencing power
dynamics and social cohesion (Mako & Edgar,

2021).
Post-conflict reconstruction interventions are not

straightforward tasks. They require a nuanced,

context-specific approach to build social capital,
distribute peace dividends through community-

based participation, and foster sustainable

development (Collier et al., 2003).
Long-Term Impacts on Context
The economic, environmental, social, and political

consequences in post-conflict environments are

interrelated and have significant long-term

ramifications. Höglund and Orjuela assert that
(Seneviratne et al., 2017) just stopping violence by

military action does not ensure long-lasting peace.
To promote long-term stability, it is crucial to

actively address the root causes of conflict, engage
in peacebuilding efforts, and carry out

reconstruction activities (Brinkerhoff & Johnson,
2009). The failure to fulfil specific economic goals

in reconstruction efforts can potentially lead to the
re-emergence of conflicts, perpetuating poverty

and underdevelopment (Garstka, 2010). On the
other hand, the opportunity to aid in resolving

conflicts and promoting peace arises when a
distinct plan for rebuilding infrastructure, which

includes [specific details about the plan], is created

in alignment with sustainable development goals
(Bourhrous et al., 2022).
Post-conflict reconstruction initiatives can

unintentionally worsen ethnic divisions and
political exclusion within countries, leading to

increased power asymmetries and conflicts
(Stewart, 2009). If conflict dynamics are not

considered,

development

activities

can

unintentionally worsen violence and hinder the

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

114

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

construction of a state (Seneviratne et al., 2016).

Incorporating governance building into the post-
conflict reconstruction process is crucial, as

governance structures are vital for achieving
sustainable development and security (Hillman,

2012).
The era following a conflict provides a favorable

occasion to address the root causes of violent
conflicts by implementing political reforms, as

these conflicts often arise from political exclusion
(Mako & Edgar, 2021). Practical reconstruction

efforts can empower governments to implement
political

reforms,

establish

power-sharing

agreements, and address the underlying political
grievances that led to the conflict (Collier et al.,

2003).

Theoretical Review

The extensive and intricate post-conflict

reconstruction (PCR) field has led scholars and
practitioners to create numerous theories and

frameworks to comprehend its complexities. The
prevailing

framework,

known

as

liberal

peacebuilding, which is based on Western liberal
ideology, highlights democratization, market

liberalization, and the promotion of human rights
as critical elements for achieving successful post-

conflict reconstruction (PCR) (Newman et al.,

2020). Nevertheless, this methodology has
encountered scrutiny due to its apparent disregard

for local circumstances, power structures, and the
possibility of unintentional adverse effects, as

emphasized by Paris (2022).
A new critical peacebuilding strategy has arisen as

a response to these criticisms. This approach

advocates for a more nuanced and community-
driven method of post-conflict reconstruction

(PCR) (Mac Ginty, 2021). The text emphasizes the

significance of tackling the underlying reasons for
conflict, advocating for societal fairness, and

enabling marginalized people to have more
influence and authority. In addition, the recent shift

towards prioritizing local actors in peacebuilding
highlights the importance of their expertise and

influence in post-conflict environments. This
approach acknowledges that achieving lasting

peace requires a deep understanding of and
collaboration with local cultures, traditions, and

institutions rather than imposing foreign

frameworks (Richmond, 2022).
PCR, from regional perspectives, provides helpful

information. The AU's framework emphasizes

African

ownership

and

leadership

in

reconstructing

war-affected

societies.

It

specifically aims to tackle the underlying causes of

conflict, promote reconciliation, and encourage
good governance (AU, 2006). The Asian

Development Bank (ADB) prioritizes economic
revival, the advancement of infrastructure, and the

provision of social safeguards. Additionally, it
acknowledges the significance of regional

collaboration and resolving transnational concerns
(ADB, 2018). The United Nations Development

Programme (UNDP) in Latin America prioritizes
the establishment of democratic institutions, the

reinforcement of the rule of law, the advancement
of human rights, and the mitigation of

socioeconomic disparities (UNDP, 2020).

The Theory of Change (TOC)

A thorough theoretical framework is necessary to

guide the analysis and execution of post-conflict
reconstruction (PCR) interventions due to their

multidimensional nature. The Theory of Change
(ToC) is critical and comprehensive in the context

of PCR, according to Weiss (1995). The Theory of

Change (ToC) technique is extensively employed in
business, nonprofit, and government sectors to

plan, engage stakeholders, and assess the
effectiveness of social change programs. It provides

a systematic framework for comprehending the
cause-and-effect pathways by which intricate

interventions are anticipated to produce results
contributing to the intended end objective.
The Theory of Change is particularly relevant to

PCR for multiple reasons. PCR interventions are

complex by nature, involving various parties,
actions, and desired outcomes. The Table of

Contents (ToC) allows for a methodical
representation of these intricacies, clarifying the

cause-and-effect paths by which interventions are
expected to bring about change. This methodical

approach assists in elucidating the justification for
interventions, improving the effectiveness of

planning,

and

facilitating

implementation.

Additionally, PCR seeks to achieve immediate

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

115

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

stabilisation and promote enduring peace and

sustainable development in the long run. The ToC
emphasises long-term results and the fundamental

processes that contribute to them. This helps to
identify possible obstacles and strategic locations

for maximizing the impact of interventions over
time.
Furthermore, the Theory of Change emphasizes the

significance of including stakeholders in building

and improving the theory of change. This
participatory method guarantees that initiatives

align with the needs and objectives of local
communities, promoting ownership, support, and

long-lasting results. In addition, the Table of
Contents (ToC) offers a systematic framework for

assessing the success of interventions and
suggesting areas that might be improved. The

Theory of Change (ToC) allows for a thorough
evaluation of intervention outcomes by clearly

defining the anticipated transformation routes.
This promotes the acquisition of knowledge,

adjustment, and, finally, the implementation of

more efficient strategies for Program Change and
Results (PCR).
Moreover, the Theory of Change provides a flexible

framework that enables adjustment and
improvement in response to new knowledge. This

adaptability is essential in the volatile and changing
post-conflict settings, where unforeseen obstacles

and possibilities may emerge. By integrating the
Theory of Change into the conceptual framework,

the article can improve its analytical depth and

practical usefulness, providing a nuanced
comprehension of the intricate dynamics of PCR.

Integrating these components can result in more
focused interventions, thorough evaluation

procedures, and improved learning, ultimately
leading to more efficient and enduring

peacebuilding and development endeavors.

Empirical Review

Scholars and practitioners have developed

multiple theories and frameworks to comprehend
the intricacies of post-conflict reconstruction

(PCR), encompassing various activities and
challenges. These frameworks frequently aim to

elucidate the intricacies of post-conflict contexts,
provide direction for intervention initiatives, and

evaluate the efficacy of various approaches. PCR

commonly adopts the prevailing paradigm of
liberal peacebuilding, which originates from

Western liberal ideology and prioritizes
democratization, market liberalization, and the

promotion of human rights as fundamental
principles (Newman et al., 2020). Nevertheless, it

has received criticism for disregarding local
circumstances, power dynamics, and possible

unintentional adverse effects (Paris, 2022). As a
result of these constraints, there has been a rise in

critical peacebuilding, which advocates for a

strategy better attuned to the specific situation and
directed by local actors (Mac Ginty, 2021).
PCR can be better understood by considering

regional views, which provide useful insights. The
African Union's (AU) Post-Conflict Reconstruction

and Development (PCRD) framework in Africa
prioritizes African ownership and leadership in the

process of rebuilding societies that have been
devastated by violence (AU, 2006). It focuses on

tackling the underlying reasons for conflict,

fostering reconciliation, and promoting effective
government. The Asian Development Bank (ADB)

prioritizes economic recovery, infrastructure
development, and social protection when

implementing the Poverty and Social Analysis
(PCR) methodology in Asia (ADB, 2018).

Furthermore, it places great importance on
fostering collaboration among regions and tackling

challenges beyond borders, such as the movement
of refugees and transnational criminal activities.

The UNDP's efforts in Latin America focus on the
establishment of democratic institutions, the

reinforcement of legal frameworks, and the
advancement of human rights (UNDP, 2020).

Additionally, it prioritizes the resolution of

socioeconomic disparities and the promotion of
social unity.
Although these frameworks provide significant

insights, they frequently have limits. Some
individuals emphasise specific parts of PCR while

disregarding the interdependence of political,
economic, and social factors. Others may be overly

broad, neglecting to consider the distinctive
circumstances

of

conflicts.

Additionally,

frameworks

that

tackle

the

unintended

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

116

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

repercussions of interventions and the enduring

viability of peacebuilding endeavors are required.
This research aims to overcome the existing gaps

by presenting a complete conceptual framework
that combines many viewpoints and explicitly

examines the complex outcomes of PCR therapies.
What are the key factors influencing the

effectiveness of post-conflict reconstruction
interventions

in

promoting

sustainable

development?
Various crucial elements impact the efficacy of

post-conflict reconstruction efforts in advancing

sustainable development. Corruption risks in post-
conflict environments, inadequate governance, and

limited

governmental

capability

present

substantial obstacles to development endeavors.

Rachel, A., Dicke. (2022). It is essential to employ

conflict-sensitive techniques that specifically
target the root causes of fragilities, such as poor

governance, the effects of climate change, and food
shortages, to achieve lasting peace and

development. P.S. Reddy, Juraj, and Nemec (2021).
Furthermore, the emphasis on inclusive

institutions, equitable resource distribution, and
participatory decision-making processes in post-

conflict communities, as stated in Sustainable
Growth Goal 16, underscores the significance of

peace and stability as essential conditions for
global growth. Idris, Iffat. (2022). Furthermore, the

degree of formalization of intervention missions, as
demonstrated by cohesive command structures

and the incorporation of military forces, plays a

crucial role in achieving mission objectives and
establishing infrastructure post-conflict (Rachel et

al., 2022).
Idris (2022) thoroughly examines the crucial

matter of anti-corruption measures in post-conflict

rebuilding (PCR). The study highlights the
increased likelihood of corruption in these

environments due to the influx of international aid,
along with weaker or illegitimate governance

structures and inadequate state capability. The

author proposes a comprehensive strategy to
address corruption, which involves bolstering law

enforcement,

improving

public

finances

management, restructuring the civil service,

fostering transparency and accountability in both

donor

and

recipient

governments,

and

empowering external oversight mechanisms such
as the media and civil society. These proposals are

consistent with the existing research on tactics to
combat corruption. They align with the aims of

international institutions engaged in Public
Corruption Reduction (PCR), such as the UN and

World Bank (Transparency International, 2023).
Nevertheless, although Idris (2022) serves as an

excellent first reference, the study's dependence on
a literature review without empirical data or case

studies restricts the extent of analysis and the
relevance of the conclusions. To enhance the study,

analysing instances of effective (or unsuccessful)
anti-corruption

endeavors

in

post-conflict

scenarios would be beneficial. This would allow for
identifying valuable insights and emphasising the

distinct problems and possibilities in these
contexts. Furthermore, the study would be

enhanced by a more detailed investigation of the
political economy of corruption in post-conflict

states. This would involve examining the intricate

relationships between power, patronage networks,
and informal institutions that frequently sustain

corrupt behaviours (Le Billon, 2021).
In addition, although the study recognizes the

significance of context-specific strategies, it may

offer more significant direction on customizing
anti-corruption measures to various post-conflict

settings. Various factors, including the conflict's
characteristics and length, the government's

strength, the extent of external intervention, and

the cultural and social attitudes towards
corruption, can significantly impact the efficacy of

different approaches (Call, 2022). An extensive
examination of these contextual determinants

would augment the study's practical significance
for policymakers and practitioners operating in

varied post-conflict environments.
Idris (2022) significantly enhances the existing

div of research on anti-corruption in PCR by

emphasizing the crucial requirement for thorough

and adaptable strategies to tackle this widespread
issue. Future research can enhance this study by

integrating empirical evidence, gaining a more
profound comprehension of the political economy

of corruption, and formulating customized

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

117

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

recommendations for diverse post-conflict

scenarios. This will enable the development of
more efficient strategies to foster transparency,

accountability, and good governance in post-
conflict societies.

Case Studies of Post-Conflict Reconstruction

Interventions
Case Study 1: The Gambia.

Overview of the Conflict
The Gambia, a little nation in West Africa,

underwent substantial political upheaval during

the autocratic reign of President Yahya Jammeh,
who governed the country from 1994 to 2017. The

Jammeh rule was characterized by extensive
violations of human rights, the repression of

political dissent, and the mishandling of the
economy and in December 2016, a pivotal moment

occurred when Jammeh was defeated in the
presidential election by Adama Barrow. However,

Jammeh initially refused to give up his position of
power. Consequently, a political crisis ensued, with

the imminent possibility of military intervention by

the Economic Community of West African States
(ECOWAS) hanging over the nation. Due to

significant regional and international pressure,
Jammeh was exiled in January 2017, effectively

ending his 22-year reign (Fleischer, 2020).
The conflict in The Gambia was predominantly

political, marked by a deficient democratic

government, repression of civil freedoms, and the
state's establishment of a climate of fear. The

conclusion of Jammeh's tenure created an

opportunity for a shift towards democracy and
rebuilding society after the conflict, intending to

resolve the underlying problems caused by the
autocratic regime.
Overview of Reconstruction Interventions
The interventions for post-conflict reconstruction

in The Gambia prioritized democratic reforms, the

repair of institutions, and the promotion of
national reconciliation. Under the leadership of

President Adama Barrow, the new government
implemented a range of measures aimed at

reinstating democracy, upholding the rule of law,
and safeguarding human rights throughout the

nation. An important measure implemented was

the creation of the Truth, Reconciliation, and
Reparations Commission (TRRC) in 2017. Its

purpose was to reveal the human rights violations
during Jammeh's regime and ensure that the

victims received justice and reparations (Saine,
2021).
Furthermore, with the TRRC, the government

undertook institutional changes to enhance

governance, encompassing security, judiciary
reforms, and civil service. ECOWAS, the African

Union (AU), and the United Nations (UN) offered
substantial help to these endeavours in the form of

financial aid, technical support, and capacity-
building programs (Jaye, 2020).
Moreover, the interventions emphasised economic

rebuilding, explicitly targeting the revival of crucial

sectors such as agriculture, tourism, and
infrastructure. With assistance from international

donors, the Gambian government initiated the
National Development Plan (NDP) 2018-2021. This

plan delineated the nation's key development
objectives, such as expanding the economy through

diversification,

generating

employment

opportunities, and alleviating poverty (Republic of

The Gambia, 2021).
Consequence Analysis Implementing the suggested

framework
Applying the suggested methodology to examine

the effects of post-conflict reconstruction efforts in

The Gambia uncovers many significant outcomes.
The framework considers factors such as the

reinstatement of security, governance, societal
unity, economic revival, and the long-term viability

of peace.
The restoration operations in The Gambia

substantially impacted security and successfully
reinstated democratic rule. Implementing security

sector reforms, which involved the demobilization
and reintegration of former security personnel

loyal to Jammeh, was essential in achieving
stability in the country. The TRRC restored

confidence between the government and the
people by addressing historical wrongdoings and

advocating for responsibility (Saine, 2021).
The TRRC's emphasis on truth-telling and

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

118

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

reparations has facilitated national reconciliation,

a crucial element for sustainable peacebuilding, by
promoting

social

cohesion

and

healing.

Nevertheless, there are still obstacles to overcome,
especially when thoroughly executing the

commission's suggestions and guaranteeing that
the reconciliation process is comprehensive and

reaches all impacted groups (Fleischer, 2020).
The economic recovery initiatives implemented

under the NDP have yielded favourable outcomes,
with notable advancements observed in pivotal

industries such as agriculture and tourism.
Nevertheless, The Gambia's economy continues to

be delicate, characterized by elevated levels of
unemployment and dependence on foreign

assistance. The long-term viability of economic
recovery is a matter of worry, especially given the

global economic uncertainty and the repercussions
of the COVID-19 pandemic (Jaye, 2020).
The post-conflict restoration efforts in The Gambia

have established a solid basis for the sustained

preservation of peace. The transition from an
authoritarian regime to a more inclusive and

democratic society has been mostly successful
despite the country still grappling with substantial

obstacles. The long-term viability of peace will be
contingent upon ongoing reforms, inclusive

government,

and

sustained

international

assistance (Republic of The Gambia, 2021).
The Gambia's example highlights the significance

of a holistic strategy for rebuilding after a conflict,

which encompasses aspects such as security,
governance, social cohesion, and economic

recovery. The initiatives in the Gambia have
produced favourable results; nevertheless,

persistent obstacles emphasize the necessity for
continuous endeavours to guarantee enduring

stability and progress.

Case Study 2: Central African Republic (CAR)

Overview of the Conflict
The Central African Republic (CAR) has been

immersed in war for several decades, characterised

by recurrent episodes of violence, political
instability, and humanitarian emergencies. The

violence in the Central African Republic (CAR)
escalated substantially in 2013 when a coalition of

predominantly Muslim rebel groups, called Séléka,

successfully ousted President François Bozizé. The
ousting of the government resulted in extensive

violence, with primarily Christian militias, referred
to as Anti-balaka, arising in reaction to Séléka's

acts. This led to severe sectarian conflict that
caused immense destruction in the country. The

battle has resulted in the displacement of millions,
the loss of thousands of lives, and the devastation

of the country's already vulnerable infrastructure
(Galletti, 2020; International et al., 2021).
The conflict in the Central African Republic (CAR)

is not simple. It is rooted in a complex web of

factors, including resource competition, ethnic and
religious differences, and the failure of state

structures. This complexity underscores the need
for comprehensive solutions for lasting peace and

stability (Hollander, 2021).
Overview of Reconstruction Interventions
The primary focus of post-conflict rehabilitation

efforts in the Central African Republic (CAR) has
been restoring security, fostering national unity,

rebuilding

governmental

structures,

and

addressing the humanitarian crisis. The United

Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization
Mission in the Central African Republic (MINUSCA)

has been instrumental in these efforts, ensuring

security, facilitating the peace process, and
protecting civilians since its establishment in 2014

(United Nations, 2022).
An essential measure undertaken was formalising

the Political Agreement for Peace and

Reconciliation in 2019, signed by the government
and 14 armed groups. This agreement sought to

terminate the ongoing conflict and establish the
foundation for sustainable peace. Nevertheless, the

execution of this agreement has encountered

substantial obstacles, including breaches of the
truce and persistent acts of violence perpetrated by

armed factions (Zahar & Mechoulan, 2021).
The reconstruction efforts have prioritized

implementing disarmament, demobilization, and

reintegration (DDR) programs for former
combatants, reforming the security sector (SSR),

and restoring state authority across the nation.
However, these initiatives have faced significant

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

119

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

challenges, with many former soldiers either

returning to armed groups or struggling to
integrate into civilian society due to the lack of

economic opportunities. International donors and
development partners have provided substantial

humanitarian aid to meet the immediate needs of
displaced populations and promote economic

recovery measures (Hollander, 2021).
Consequence Analysis Utilising the suggested

framework
Applying the suggested methodology to examine

the effects of reconstruction efforts in the Central

African Republic (CAR) reveals numerous
significant outcomes and persistent difficulties.

The framework encompasses the restoration of
security, governance, social cohesion, economic

recovery, and the sustainability of peace.
The efforts made by MINUSCA and the peace

agreement have decreased violence in certain
regions. However, the overall security situation in

the country needs to be more stable and consistent.
Several areas still need to be under the control of

armed factions, which restricts the influence of the
government and makes it more difficult to establish

effective governance. The DDR (Disarmament,
Demobilization, and Reintegration) and SSR

(Security Sector Reform) initiatives have achieved

only modest success, as a significant number of
former soldiers have either returned to armed

groups or struggled to assimilate into civilian
society due to the dearth of economic prospects

(International Crisis Group, 2021).
Persistent violence and inadequate security

measures have impeded efforts to foster national

healing and social togetherness. Long-standing
religious and ethnic tensions continue to

exacerbate the conflict, and there is a significant

lack of trust between different populations. The
peace agreement's inability to completely disarm

and incorporate armed factions has also hindered
substantial reconciliation (Zahar & Mechoulan,

2021).
The Central African Republic's (CAR) economic

recovery could have been more active due to

persistent

insecurity

and

inadequate

infrastructure. The violence has significantly

impacted agriculture, the mainstay of the nation's

economy, resulting in a widespread lack of food
security. Although international aid has offered

some respite, the long-term viability of economic
recovery remains dubious, especially considering

the nation's reliance on external support
(Hollander, 2021).
The peace process in the Central African Republic

(CAR) has not been without its challenges. The

persistent existence of armed factions and the
irregular execution of the peace deal present

substantial obstacles. However, these difficulties
should not deter us from our goal of achieving

enduring peace. Instead, they should reinforce the
need for continuous international assistance and

sincere political dedication from all involved
parties (Galletti, 2020).
The example of the Central African Republic (CAR)

exemplifies the considerable obstacles that post-

conflict reconstruction endeavours encounter in a
setting characterised by persistent insecurity,

feeble government, and entrenched socioeconomic
divisions. Although there has been some

advancement, the current situation is still
precarious, and there is a significant possibility of

returning to a large-scale conflict.

Case Study 3 Rwanda:

Context of the Conflict
The conflict in Rwanda, which reached its peak

with the 1994 genocide, is regarded as one of the
most appalling instances of mass slaughter in

contemporary history. During around 100 days,

about 800,000 Tutsi and moderate Hutu
individuals were ruthlessly killed by extreme Hutu

militias, government forces, and regular residents.
The genocide occurred because of deep-rooted

ethnic tensions between the predominant Hutu
group and the marginalized Tutsi minority. These

tensions were further intensified by colonial
policies that solidified ethnic divisions and

subsequent power conflicts in the post-colonial era
(Eltringham, 2021).
The conflict originated from the Belgian colonial

administration's preference for the Tutsi minority

over the Hutu majority, resulting in significant
social and political divisions. Following the

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

120

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

attainment of independence in 1962, these

tensions escalated into acts of violence, resulting in
intermittent

killings

and

the

eventual

establishment of a government dominated by the
Hutu ethnic group. The assassination of Rwandan

President Juvénal Habyarimana in April 1994,
which is frequently seen as the catalyst for the

genocide, initiated a meticulously planned and
executed campaign of widespread killings. The

objective was to eradicate the Tutsi population and
suppress any political dissent (Hintjens, 2022).
Political Interventions:
Political Interventions: Thompson (2018) opines

that the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) prioritizes

centralized governance and national unity in
Rwanda's post-conflict political environment.

Although the decentralised governance model,

which permits local elections and community
participation, has been praised for improving civic

engagement (Ingelaere, 2016), there are still
concerns regarding the lack of political plurality

and the limitation of dissent (Reyntjens, 2013).
President Kagame's extended rule and the RPF's

dominance have prompted inquiries regarding the
depth of Rwanda's democratization (Booth &

Golooba-Mutebi, 2012).
Social Interventions:
Community-based sociotherapy (CBS) has been

instrumental in managing the psychosocial
requirements of the Rwandan population post-

genocide and restoring social cohesion in social
interventions (Bourhrous et al., 2022). In the

aftermath of conflict, CBS has facilitated the
reconstruction of the social fabric and the

cultivation of resilience by offering a platform for
healing and reconciliation at the community level.
Social interventions have prioritized reconciliation

and healing of societal rifts caused by the genocide.

Initiatives that have prioritized the cultivation of
relationships across ethnic boundaries, the

promotion of a sense of national identity, and the
promotion of practical cooperation at the

grassroots level have been spearheaded by local
organizations such as MOUCECORE (Zorbas, 2006).

By establishing forums for discourse and fostering
trust among erstwhile adversaries, initiatives

implemented by organizations such as African

Revival Ministries have augmented these
endeavors (Longman, 2011).
Furthermore,

the

Rwandan

government's

emphasis on women's empowerment and gender
equality has been a notable aspect of post-conflict

reconstruction efforts. Rwanda's dedication to

inclusive governance and social transformation is
evident in its active promotion of women's political

participation and rights through gender equality
policies and measures (Stewart, 2009). By

empowering women leaders and confronting
gender disparities, Rwanda has made substantial

progress in developing a more inclusive and
equitable society.
Rwanda has received substantial international

assistance

to

facilitate

its

post-conflict

reconstruction. In addition to technical expertise,
financial

assistance

and

capacity-building

programs have been implemented. Despite the
critical nature of this support, the sustainability of

interventions, donor influence, and alignment with
national priorities have all been expressed as

concerns. Ansoms and Rostagno (2012)
The Rwandan government established the Gacaca

Courts in response to the overwhelming number of

genocide suspects and the necessity for

community-based justice. These community-based
tribunals, which were operational from 2001 to

2012, were designed to accelerate trials, foster
reconciliation, and reveal the truth about the

genocide. On the other hand, they encountered
criticism for their limited protection of defendants'

rights, absence of legal expertise, and potential
biases. Clark (2010)
There have been numerous interventions that

have concentrated on trauma healing and mental

health support in recognition of the psychological
impact of the genocide. Among these are

community-based interventions, individual and
group therapy, and training for healthcare

professionals. Although these endeavors have
offered survivors invaluable assistance, the

trauma's magnitude and the scarcity of resources
continue to present problems. (2015, Pham et al.)
Economic interventions.

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

121

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

Various programs were implemented in Rwanda to

address poverty and rebuild the economy,
concentrating

on

agriculture,

education,

healthcare, and infrastructure development. These
interventions were designed to enhance living

standards, minimize social inequalities, and
generate employment opportunities. Progress has

been achieved; however, obstacles persist in the
equitable allocation of resources and the

management of the long-term repercussions of the
genocide on economic development. (2021, World

Bank)
The Vision 2020 plan successfully targets

infrastructure

investment,

entrepreneurship

promotion, and agricultural modernization as part

of Rwanda's economic reconstruction strategy. As
a result of these policies, Rwanda is one of the

fastest-growing economies in Africa, with
impressive economic growth rates. Nevertheless,

the obstacle persists in guaranteeing that this
expansion is inclusive and advantageous to all

social groups, particularly those most impacted by

the genocide.
Security Interventions
Rwanda has implemented security sector reform as

an indispensable element of its post-conflict

reconstruction. According to McDoom (2011), the

government has prioritized the integration of
former combatants into the national army and

police, the establishment of loyalty to the new
regime, and the prevention of future ethnic

violence. In addition, demobilization and
reintegration initiatives have been implemented to

facilitate the transition of former soldiers to
civilian life, thereby enhancing overall stability

(Thomson, 2018).
Since its establishment in 1999, the National Unity

and Reconciliation Commission has been critical in

promoting unity and reconciliation among
Rwandans. To promote healing and mitigate the

underlying causes of the genocide, it implemented
seminars, dialogues, and educational programs.

Despite its success, there were still obstacles to
assuring sustainable reconciliation efforts and

reaching all communities. (2018, Thomson)
Rwanda's experience offers invaluable lessons in

understanding the intricacies of post-conflict
reconstruction. Although substantial progress has

been made in economic growth, social cohesion,
and security, obstacles remain in the political

sphere, particularly in democratization and
political freedom.

METHODOLOGY

The study primarily utilizes a literature review and

analysis approach. It thoroughly examines and

evaluates current literature on post-conflict
reconstruction, covering a diverse range of

theoretical viewpoints that will stimulate
intellectual engagement. The study also includes

insights from related fields like peacebuilding,
development studies, and political economy. A

conceptual analysis methodology is used to create
a framework that systematically explores the

relationship between context, intervention, and

consequences in PCR. The study's conclusions and
understandings are based on thoroughly

examining

the

existing

literature

and

implementing the conceptual framework in

different case studies and contexts.

RESULTS
Post-Conflict Reconstruction Interventions
Case Study 1- Gambia.

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

122

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

Radar Chart for Reconstruction In

Fig. 1 Interventions in Gambia

Bar Chart for Outcomes and Challenges in Gambia

Fig. 2

In fig 1 and 2, the Gambia's path to recovery from

President Yahya Jammeh's autocratic rule is

intricate and diverse, as demonstrated by the
interplay of visual charts. Examining radar and bar

charts allows one to better understand the various
sectors, their progress, and the obstacles they face.

This allows for a more comprehensive

understanding of the specific interventions and
their effects.
The charts collectively highlight the notable

progress achieved in institutional reforms and

security. Establishing the Truth, Reconciliation,
and Reparations Commission (TRRC) and security

sector reforms have been crucial in addressing

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

123

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

previous wrongdoings, promoting accountability,

and strengthening stability (Saine, 2021). The
progress is supported by the impressive scores in

"Institutional Reforms" on the radar chart and in
both "Security & Governance" and "Sustainability

of Peace" on the bar chart.
However, the charts also highlight ongoing

difficulties in other vital areas. The scores for
"Social Cohesion" and "Democratic Reforms" on

both charts highlight the challenges of promoting
unity, reconciliation, and a thriving democratic

culture after a period of authoritarian rule.
Although the TRRC has tried to promote healing

and truth-telling, there is still work to achieve
genuine social cohesion and ensure inclusive

political participation (Fleischer, 2020).
The need for economic reconstruction is a

significant challenge, as indicated by its low bar
chart score and comparatively smaller area on the

radar chart. Despite positive developments in key

sectors, The Gambia's economy faces challenges,

including high unemployment rates and reliance
on foreign aid (Ceesay & Jallow, 2022). The

challenges have been intensified by the COVID-19
pandemic, highlighting the vulnerability of

economic recovery after conflicts.
The Gambia's experience provides valuable

insights for other societies recovering from
conflict. It highlights the significance of taking a

holistic approach that tackles the immediate
concerns of security and governance and the

enduring obstacles of promoting social harmony,
economic progress, and democratic stability. As

The Gambia moves forward on its path towards a
fair and prosperous future, it is crucial to

consistently address the underlying reasons for
conflict, empower marginalized communities, and

establish

strong

institutions

capable

of

withstanding future obstacles.

Case Study 2- CAR.

Radar Chart for Reconstruction Interventions

Fig 3

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

124

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

Bar Chart: Consequence Analysis-CAR

This bar chart will compare the outcomes and challenges of the reconstruction efforts in the CAR.

Fig. 4

IN Figures 2 and 4 (Fig. 1 &2), the radar and bar

charts depict the progress and ongoing challenges

in many sectors, highlighting the intricate and
complex nature of post-conflict reconstruction in

the Central African Republic (CAR). Combining
these chart's commentary offers a comprehensive

overview of the country's challenging path towards
stability and recovery.
The radar chart provides a detailed perspective on

the CAR's restoration endeavours, highlighting

significant progress in five crucial aspects: security,
Governance,

Social

Cohesion,

economic

restoration, and democratic reforms. This progress
serves as a beacon of hope for the Central African

Republic's future.
Security

and

Governance:

Despite some

improvement, these aspects still raise concerns.
The ongoing existence of armed factions and the

restricted extent of governmental control remain
significant obstacles to achieving security and

efficient governance (International Crisis Group,

2023). The persistent violence and vulnerability of

state institutions impede endeavours to construct

a secure and stable environment favourable for
recovery and growth.
Social Cohesion: The minor section on the radar

chart represents social cohesion, which highlights

the entrenched differences and lack of trust that
continue to exist throughout Central African

Republic society. The enduring consequences of
sectarian violence and the absence of substantial

reconciliation

initiatives

have

impeded

advancements in cultivating a sense of national

solidarity and societal harmony.
Economic reconstruction and democratic reforms

are situated in the moderate range on the chart,

suggesting a combination of positive and negative

outcomes. Although there have been some
advancements in rejuvenating the economy and

advocating for democratic values, the obstacles are
significant. The persistent violence, inadequate

infrastructure, and restricted availability of

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

125

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

essential services hinder economic recovery

(World Bank, 2022). Furthermore, despite efforts
to enhance democratic administration, there are

lingering worries regarding the inclusiveness and
transparency of political procedures (Zahar, 2023).
The bar chart, labelled "Outcomes and Challenges

in CAR," provides a concise and clear comparison

of the overall progress and obstacles in four
significant domains: Security and governance,

Social Cohesion, economic recovery, and
Sustainability of Peace.
Security & Governance: Although it has the highest

score, it only partially indicates complete success.
This highlights the persistent security difficulties

and the constraints on governmental power in
numerous regions of the nation.
Social cohesion and economic recovery receive the

lowest marks, indicating considerable challenges

in promoting unity, reconciliation, and long-term
economic growth. Profound socioeconomic

disparities, the absence of economic prospects, and
the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe all

contribute to the difficulties in these areas.
The moderate score in the sustainability of peace

highlights the fragility of the peace process. The
persistent existence of armed factions, the

inadequate execution of peace accords, and the
fundamental

socioeconomic

grievances

all

jeopardize the country's long-term stability.
Integrating radar and bar charts provides a

comprehensive and demanding overview of the
intricate terrain for post-conflict rehabilitation in

the Central African Republic (CAR). Although there
have been advancements in security and

governance, numerous challenges still hinder

achieving long-term peace and sustainable
development. The charts and textual analysis

underscore the need for a comprehensive and
enduring strategy that addresses the root causes of

conflict, strengthens governmental institutions,
fosters societal unity, and supports equitable

economic development.
The CAR's experience serves as a cautionary tale

for other countries that have experienced violence

and are now in a post-conflict state. This

underscores the importance of addressing the
immediate security issues and the underlying

social, economic, and political obstacles that can
hinder long-lasting peace and prosperity. A

comprehensive and synchronized effort involving
stakeholders at both national and international

levels is crucial to break the cycle of violence and
establish a more resilient and prosperous future

for the Central African Republic.

Case Study 3- Rwanda.

Radar Chart for Reconstruction Interventions

Fig. 5

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

126

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

Bar Chart for Outcomes and Challenges

Fig. 6.

Pie Chart for Focus Areas

Fig. 7

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

127

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

Line Chart for Economic Recovery Progress

Fig. 8

Figures five to eight (Fig. 5-8) elaborate on

Rwanda's rehabilitation from the 1994 genocide as

a diverse combination of achievements and
obstacles, as revealed through visual data

interaction. The various degrees of advancement
observed in different areas show post-conflict

reconstruction's complex and multifaceted nature.
Social cohesion is highlighted as a clear indicator of

success, as evidenced by the radar chart and bar

chart, which demonstrate tremendous progress in

healing,

reconciliation,

and

women's

empowerment. The progress can be credited to

implementing community-based sociotherapy and
reconciliation projects and the government's

proactive approach to promoting gender equality
(Bourhrous et al., 2022; Rwanda, 2020).

Nonetheless, the long-lasting psychological
consequences of the genocide require ongoing

mental health assistance.
Implementing institutional reforms has played a

crucial role in fostering a perception of fairness and
responsibility, yielding moderate success. The

creation of the Gacaca courts and the National
Unity and Reconciliation Commission demonstrate

initiatives to resolve historical grievances and
promote cohesion (Clark, 2010; Thomson, 2018).

However, guaranteeing these organisations'

sustained efficiency and adaptability continues to
be complicated.
The economic recovery, however, characterized by

remarkable growth rates, presents a complex and

subtle depiction. The charts demonstrate moderate
advancement, encompassing accomplishments and

ongoing difficulties. Although targeted initiatives
have produced favourable results, the need for

ongoing focus remains due to concerns regarding
the fair allocation of resources and the enduring

economic repercussions of the conflict (World
Bank, 2021).
The charts demonstrate significant advancements

in security and governance. The decrease in

violence can be ascribed to implementing security
sector reforms, demobilization initiatives, and a

strong emphasis on preventing future acts of
violence (McDoom, 2011; Thomson, 2018).

However, it is essential to prioritize security and
human rights while addressing the root causes of

concerns.
The current political environment poses a

continuous difficulty, as indicated by the radar and
pie charts, which show a significantly slower

advancement in democratization and political
transparency. Ongoing concerns exist about the

lack of political diversity, disagreement, and the

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

128

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

ruling party's control (Reyntjens, 2013; Booth &

Golooba-Mutebi, 2012). Ensuring a harmonious
equilibrium between stability and the desire for

more political openness and involvement is a
crucial objective for Rwanda's future.
The pie chart demonstrates that international

support is secondary in Rwanda's rehabilitation,

representing a relatively lesser portion. The
statement emphasizes the significance of national

ownership and self-sufficiency in recovery
(Ansoms & Rostagno, 2012).
Rwanda's rebuilding process after a conflict

provides valuable insights into the intricacies of
reconstructing a country following a horrific event.

Substantial advancements have been made in
social unity and the establishment of effective

systems. Nevertheless, there are still obstacles to

overcome to achieve fair and balanced economic
development,

promote

governmental

transparency, and confront the lasting emotional
trauma caused by the genocide.
Rwanda's experience highlights that rebuilding

after a conflict is a complex and lengthy endeavour
that demands ongoing dedication, flexibility, and a

comprehensive strategy that considers both the
physical and mental aspects of recovery.

DISCUSSION

The paper's primarily focuses on the necessity for

a nuanced and context-specific comprehension of

post-conflict reconstruction (PCR) interventions. It
emphasizes the significance of acknowledging the

diverse actors involved, the various interventions,

and the potential for both intended and unintended
consequences. This discussion aligns with the

broader scholarly consensus on PCR's complexity
and diverse nature (Mac Ginty, 2011; Paris, 2022).

It serves as a cautionary note, urging the audience
to be attentive to the potential outcomes of their

interventions.
Specifically, the paper highlights the interplay

between different actors in PCR, including local

governments, international organizations, NGOs,

and local communities. This aligns with Barnett
and Weiss (2023), who emphasize the need for

multi-stakeholder collaboration and coordination
in post-conflict settings. The authors also discuss

these actors' varying roles and responsibilities,

acknowledging the potential for cooperation and
conflict between them, a dynamic echoed in the

work of Mac Ginty (2021). It is important to note
that the active participation of local communities is

not just crucial. However, it also engages them in
shaping the outcomes of PCR interventions, making

them feel responsible for the success of the
reconstruction process.
Furthermore, the paper delves into the different

types of PCR interventions, categorizing them into

political, economic, social, and security domains.
This categorization mirrors the frameworks

proposed by other scholars, such as Call (2022) and
Jarstad and Sisk (2023), who emphasize the need

for a comprehensive approach to PCR that
addresses all dimensions of post-conflict recovery.

It is crucial to understand that a piecemeal
approach to post-conflict reconstruction is unlikely

to be effective, and a comprehensive strategy that
considers all aspects of recovery is necessary. This

comprehensive approach reassures the audience

and instils confidence in the effectiveness of the
reconstruction process.
The study's emphasis on the importance of context

in shaping PCR outcomes also resonates with the
broader scholarly discourse. The authors

acknowledge

that

the

effectiveness

of

interventions can vary significantly depending on

the specific historical, political, economic, and
social conditions of a given post-conflict society.

Richmond (2022) echoes this view, advocating for

a 'local turn' in peacebuilding, which refers to the
shift towards more community-based and context-

specific interventions, emphasizing the need to
tailor interventions to local communities' unique

needs and priorities.
An analysis of post-conflict reconstruction (PCR)

activities in The Gambia and the Central African

Republic (CAR) demonstrates a complex situation
with advancements and ongoing difficulties. Both

nations are currently engaged in the challenging

reconstruction process following periods of
conflict and instability. Their experiences highlight

the complex nature of post-conflict reconstruction
(PCR) and emphasize the significance of adopting

measures tailored to the specific situation.

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

129

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

The transition from authoritarian leadership to a

democratic regime in The Gambia has been
characterized by substantial progress in

institutional reforms and security, as depicted in
the radar and bar charts. Creating the Truth,

Reconciliation, and Reparations Commission
(TRRC) and implementing security sector reforms

have resulted in improved responsibility and
stability (Saine, 2021). Nevertheless, the delicate

nature of The Gambia's democracy and its
susceptibility to economic instability, worsened by

the COVID-19 epidemic, emphasize the continuous

difficulties of promoting social unity and attaining
long-term growth (Ceesay & Jallow, 2022).
On the other hand, the post-conflict situation in the

CAR is still filled with numerous intricate issues.
The radar and bar charts illustrate enduring

security, governance, social cohesion, and
economic recovery obstacles. Notwithstanding

foreign peacekeeping forces and a peace deal, the
country still struggles with occasional outbreaks of

violence and the constrained extent of official

authority (Foreign Crisis Group, 2023). Entrenched
social differences, along with the absence of

economic prospects, obstruct attempts to promote
national cohesion and long-lasting peace.
The experiences of both the Gambia and the Central

African Republic highlight the significance of
implementing a comprehensive strategy for PCR

that tackles the interrelated issues of security,
governance, economic growth, and social

reconciliation. Implementing institutional changes

and improving security measures is essential to
establishing a basis for recovery. However,

achieving long-term peace and prosperity
necessitates tackling the underlying causes of

conflict, supporting inclusive government, and
creating economic opportunities that benefit all

populations.
The various levels of achievement in different

aspects of PCR emphasize the significance of

context-specific interventions that consider each

country's distinct historical, political, economic,
and social circumstances. The Gambia's more

favourable outcomes in implementing institutional
changes and ensuring security, in contrast to the

ongoing difficulties faced by the Central African

Republic (CAR) in these domains, highlight the

necessity

of

customized

strategies

that

acknowledge and address the unique obstacles

confronted by each country.
Furthermore, the experiences of both nations

underscore the enduring character of post-conflict

rehabilitation. Constructing a strong and fair

community after a battle requires long-term
dedication, flexibility, and a readiness to learn from

achievements and shortcomings. The persistent
difficulties in The Gambia and the Central African

Republic highlight the fact that the pursuit of
enduring peace and development is a continual

endeavor that requires steadfast commitment from
both domestic and international stakeholders.
This is evident in the Rwandan case, where the

interplay of various actors, diverse interventions,

and both intended and unintended consequences
has shaped the nation's recovery trajectory.
In Rwanda, the government, led by the Rwandan

Patriotic Front (RPF), a political party that played a
significant role in ending the genocide and has

since been the ruling party, played a dominant role
in shaping the PCR process. While their centralized

approach facilitated swift decision-making and
policy implementation, concerns about political

inclusivity and freedom of expression have been

raised (Thomson, 2018; Reyntjens, 2013). This
highlights the potential trade-offs between

efficiency and inclusivity in post-conflict
governance.
Furthermore, Rwanda's experience illustrates the

diverse nature of PCR interventions. Political
interventions focused on national unity and

establishing

governance

structures,

while

economic interventions targeted agricultural

modernization,

entrepreneurship,

and

infrastructure development (Ministry of Finance
and

Economic

Planning,

2000).

Social

interventions, such as those led by MOUCECORE
and African Revival Ministries, were crucial in

fostering reconciliation and healing societal rifts
(Zorbas, 2006; Longman, 2011). Security sector

reform was another critical intervention, focusing
on integrating former combatants and preventing

future violence (McDoom, 2011).

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

130

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

The Rwandan case also reveals the complex

interplay

of

intended

and

unintended

consequences. While the country has achieved

significant progress in economic growth, poverty
reduction, and security, concerns about the lack of

political space and equitable distribution of
economic gains persist (Ansoms & Rostagno,

2012). This highlights the importance of
considering the long-term and indirect impacts of

interventions and the potential for unintended
consequences to undermine the intended goals of

PCR.
Rwanda's experience underscores the importance

of context in shaping PCR outcomes. The country's
unique history, cultural norms, and the legacy of

the genocide have profoundly influenced the
trajectory of its reconstruction efforts. This

reinforces the need for context-sensitive
approaches considering local communities'

specific needs and priorities, as Mac Ginty (2021)
emphasized.

CONCLUSION

The paper seeks to create a theoretical framework

for analysing the consequences of reconstruction

operations following a conflict. The framework
includes many interventions, including security-

focused measures and economic, social, and

political activities. The results and effects of PCR
treatments are varied and wide-ranging. The

conceptual framework serves as a guide for
navigating the intricacies of PCR. By offering a

systematic method for examining the complex
effects

of

interventions,

academics

and

practitioners are empowered to recognize possible
drawbacks, exploit advantages, and ultimately help

to achieve more sustainable and fair outcomes in
post-conflict nations. The study primarily employs

a methodology that comprehensively evaluates
existing literature and subsequently analyses the

findings. This text comprehensively analyses and
assesses existing literature on post-conflict

reconstruction. It explores a wide range of

theoretical perspectives, which will encourage
intellectual involvement. The study also

incorporates

perspectives

from

adjacent

disciplines such as peacebuilding, development

studies, and political economy. A conceptual

analysis methodology is employed to establish a

systematic framework for investigating the
interplay between context, intervention, and

consequences in the field of PCR. The study's
findings and insights are derived from a

comprehensive analysis of the existing literature
and the application of the conceptual framework in

various case studies and scenarios. The case of The
Gambia underscores the importance of adopting a

comprehensive

approach

to

post-conflict

reconstruction, which includes addressing issues

related to security, governance, social cohesion,

and economic revitalization. The measures in the
Gambia have had positive outcomes; nonetheless,

ongoing challenges underscore the need for
sustained efforts to ensure lasting stability and

progress. The Central African Republic (CAR)
illustrates the significant challenges faced by post-

conflict reconstruction efforts in a context marked
by ongoing instability, weak governance, and deep-

rooted socioeconomic inequalities. Despite
considerable progress, the current situation

remains unstable, with a substantial risk of
reverting to a widespread conflict. The example of

Rwanda provides valuable insights into the
complexities of rebuilding societies after conflicts.

Significant advancements have been achieved

regarding economic expansion, social unity, and
safety. However, challenges persist in politics,

namely in the areas of democratization and the
promotion of political liberty. The study

undertaken by Prasol et al. (2024) corroborates
and aligns with other studies on the reconstruction

efforts following conflicts. The statement
underscores the importance of economic recovery

and development as critical outcomes of initiatives
in post-conflict settings. The study undertaken by

Prasol et al. (2024) offers valuable insights into the
potential of adaptive marketing approaches in

rebuilding after a conflict. The lack of scientific
evidence and the contextual specificity of the

phenomenon limits its relevance to more general

settings. Subsequent research has the potential to
enhance this study by filling in these deficiencies

and

integrating

a

more

sophisticated

comprehension of the moral consequences of

marketing in post-conflict environments. This will
enhance the comprehension of how marketing can

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

131

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

foster sustainable peace and development.
The paper's conclusion underscores the

importance of a comprehensive framework that
considers the potential for both intended and

unintended consequences, the interplay of various
actors, and numerous types of interventions in

post-conflict reconstruction (PCR). It emphasizes

the significance of context in shaping PCR
outcomes, advocating for a nuanced and

multifaceted approach that recognizes the
distinctive historical, political, economic, and social

conditions of each post-conflict society.
The paper's contribution to the field of knowledge

is derived from its synthesis of the existing

literature and its identification of critical voids in
our comprehension of PCR. The paper establishes

the foundation for future research that can lead to

more sustainable and effective PCR interventions
by emphasizing the necessity of a more

comprehensive framework that considers the
diverse challenges and opportunities in post-

conflict settings.

Recommendations

Based on the insights and theoretical framework

presented in the paper, here are some practical
recommendations for post-conflict reconstruction

(PCR) interventions, along with their alignment
with scholarly literature:

Prioritize Contextual Understanding

: Before

designing and implementing any PCR intervention,
conduct a thorough conflict analysis to understand

the root causes of the conflict, the specific needs

and priorities of the affected communities, and the
historical, political, economic, and social context in

which the intervention will occur. This aligns with
the "local turn" in peacebuilding, which

emphasizes the importance of local knowledge and
context-specific approaches (Richmond, 2022).

Adopt a Multi-Faceted Approach

: Recognize that

PCR is a complex process that requires a multi-
faceted approach addressing political, economic,

social, and security dimensions. Avoid focusing

solely on one aspect, such as economic
reconstruction, at the expense of others. This aligns

with the comprehensive frameworks proposed by
scholars like Call (2022) and Jarstad and Sisk

(2023).

Foster Local Ownership and Participation

:

Ensure that local communities and civil society
organizations actively design, implement, and

monitor PCR interventions. This can enhance their
legitimacy and sustainability and ensure they are

responsive to local needs and priorities (Mac Ginty,

2021).

Strengthen Local Institutions

: Invest in building

the capacity of local institutions, including

government agencies, civil society organizations,
and traditional authorities. This can enhance their

ability to deliver essential services, resolve
disputes,

and

promote

social

cohesion,

contributing to long-term stability and resilience
(Call, 2022).

Address Root Causes of Conflict

: Go beyond

addressing the immediate symptoms of conflict

and focus on tackling the root causes, such as
socioeconomic inequalities, political exclusion, and

historical grievances. This can help prevent the
recurrence of violence and create conditions for

sustainable peace (Bøås & Jennings, 2021).

Monitor and Evaluate

: Establish robust

monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to assess
the effectiveness of interventions, identify

unintended consequences, and adapt strategies as
needed. This can ensure that interventions are

evidence-based and responsive to changing
circumstances (World Bank, 2021).

Promote Transparency and Accountability

:

Ensure transparency and accountability in all

aspects of PCR, including the allocation and use of
resources, decision-making processes, and the

behaviour of all actors involved. This can help build
trust between communities and institutions,

reduce the risk of corruption, and foster a culture
of good governance (Transparency International,

2023).

Learn from Experience

: Continuously learn from

past experiences, successes and failures, and

incorporate

lessons

learned

into

future

interventions. This can help avoid repeating
mistakes and improve the overall effectiveness of

PCR efforts.

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

132

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

By adopting these practical recommendations,

policymakers and practitioners can enhance the
effectiveness and sustainability of post-conflict

reconstruction interventions, contributing to the
long-term peace, stability, and development of

conflict-affected societies.

REFERENCES
1.

ACCORD. (2021). Effective Post-Conflict

Reconstruction

and

Development

for

Peacebuilding in Africa. Retrieved from

https://www.accord.org.za

2.

African Union (AU). (2006). The Policy

Framework for Post-Conflict Reconstruction
and Development (PCRD).

3.

African

Union.

(2021).

Post-Conflict

Reconstruction and Development (PCRD)
Framework.

Retrieved

from

https://au.int/en/documents/20210801/pcr
d-framework

4.

Anand, P. B. (2022). Post-Conflict Recovery and

Development in a Globalized World. In The

Palgrave Handbook of Development Economics
(pp. 1-26). Palgrave Macmillan.

5.

An

soms, A., & Rostagno, L. (2012). Rwanda’s

Vision 2020: Challenged by the Reality of
Political and Economic Centralization. Review

of African Political Economy, 39(131), 69-89.

6.

Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2018).

Strategy 2030.

7.

Autesserre, S. (2014). Peaceland: Conflict

Resolution and the Everyday Politics of

International

Intervention.

Cambridge

University Press.

8.

Autesserre, S. (2022). The Frontlines of Peace:

An Insider's Guide to Changing the World.

Oxford University Press.

9.

Barnett, M., & Weiss, T. G. (Eds.). (2021).

Humanitarianism in Question: Politics, Power,
Ethics. Cornell University Press.

10.

Barnett, M., & Weiss, T. G. (Eds.). (2023). The

Palgrave Handbook of the Ethics of
Humanitarian Action. Palgrave Macmillan.

11.

Bigombe, B. (2020). Field reflections on post-

conflict reconstruction: the social imperatives

of

disarmament,

demobilization

and

reintegration. The State of Peacebuilding in

Africa, 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
030-46636-7_5

12.

Bøås, M., & Jennings, K. M. (2021). After

Violence: The Politics of Post-Conflict

Reconstruction. Oxford University Press.

13.

Booth, D., & Golooba-Mutebi, F. (2012).

Governing

development

in

Uganda:

Understanding

the

dynamics

of

decentralisation and centralisation. Routledge.

14.

Bourhrous, A.

, Fazil, S., & O’Driscoll, D. (2022).

Post-conflict reconstruction in the Nineveh

plains of iraq: agriculture, cultural practices
and

social

cohesion..

https://doi.org/10.55163/raep9560

15.

Bourhrous, H., Lakhdar, A., Ouali, U., & Cherif, A.

(2022). Posttraumatic Growth and Social

Support Among Genocide Survivors in Rwanda:
A Moderated Mediation Model. Psychological

Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy,

14(7), 956

–

963.

16.

Brinkerhoff, D. W. and Johnson, R. W. (2009).

Decentralized local governance in fragile

states: learning from iraq. International Review
of Administrative Sciences, 75(4), 585-607.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309349424

17.

Brown, A., Carter, L., & Lee, J. (2020). Post-

conflict reconstruction: Assessing the impact of
external

interventions.

Journal

of

Peacebuilding & Development, 15(3), 290-308.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1542316620931739

18.

Brown, O., & McLeman, R. (2016). Climate

change and security: A gathering storm.
Georgetown University Press.

19.

Call, C. T. (2022). Why Peace Fails: The Causes

and Prevention of Civil War Recurrence.

Cambridge University Press.

20.

Call, C. T., & Wyeth, J. (2008). Building States to

Build Peace. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

21.

Caplan, R. (2019). The Failure of Peacebuilding:

Why International Efforts to End War Don't

Work. Oxford University Press.

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

133

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

22.

Ceesay, E. H., & Jallow, B. P. (2022). COVID-19

and the Gambian Economy: Impacts,
Responses, and the Way Forward. The Round

Table: The Commonwealth Journal of
International Affairs, 111(3), 301

–

313.

23.

Clark, P. (2010). The Gacaca Courts, Post-

Genocide Justice and Reconciliation in Rwanda:

Justice Without Lawyers. Cambridge University
Press.

24.

Clark, P. (2010). The Gacaca courts, post-

genocide justice and reconciliation in Rwanda:
Justice without lawyers. Cambridge University

Press.

25.

Collier, P., Elliott, V. L., Hegre, H., Hoeffler, A.,

Reynal‐Querol, M., & Sambanis, N. (2003).

Breaking the conflict trap: civil war and

development policy. PsycEXTRA Dataset.
https://doi.org/10.1037/e504012013-001

26.

Dale, D. (2023). Post-Conflict Environmental

Governance. Routledge.

27.

David Rugamba and Gitahi Njenga (2023).

Women empowerment and post-conflict
reconstruction: women for women ngo in

rwanda. Journal of Public Policy &Amp;
Governance,

7(3),

54-64.

https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2242

28.

Earnest, D. C. (2006). The Fog of Peace:

Planning and Executing the Restoration of
Afghanistan. RAND Corporation.

29.

Earnest, J. (2015). Post-conflict reconstruction

–

a case study in kosovo. International Journal

of Emergency Services, 4(1), 103-128.

https://doi.org/10.1108/ijes-02-2015-0009

30.

Eltringham, N. (2021). Accounting for horror:

Post-genocide debates in Rwanda. University
of Wisconsin Press.

31.

European Union. (2022). Integrated Approach

to Post-Conflict Stabilization. Retrieved from
https://europa.eu

32.

Fleischer, D. (2020). The Gambia's Post-

Authoritarian Transition: Challenges and

Opportunities.

Retrieved

from

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3

41789007

33.

Fleischer, L. (2020). The Gambia's Truth,

Reconciliation, and Reparations Commission: A
Model for Transitional Justice? International

Journal of Transitional Justice, 14(1), 182-202.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijz035

34.

Galletti, A. (2020). Conflict and Fragility in the

Central African Republic: Prospects for

Stability and Peacebuilding. Retrieved from
https://www.riftvalley.net/index.php/publica

tion/conflict-and-fragility-central-african-
republic

35.

Garstka, G. J. (2010). Post-conflict urban

planning: the regularization process of an
informal neighborhood in kosova/o. Habitat

International,

34(1),

86-95.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.07.

004

36.

Gellman, M. (2018). Contending with the Past:

The Politics of Accountability in Post-Conflict
Societies. Cambridge University Press.

37.

Ginty, R. M. (2010). No war, no peace: why so

many peace processes fail to deliver peace.

International

Politics,

47(2),

145-162.

https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2010.4

38.

Hillman, B. (2012). Public administration

reform in post‐conflict societies: lessons from

aceh, indonesia. Public Administration and

Development,

33(1),

1-14.

https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1643

39.

Hintjens, H. M. (2022). Explaining the 1994

genocide in Rwanda. Routledge.

40.

Hollander, P. (2021). Rebuilding in the Central

African Republic: Challenges of Post-Conflict
Reconstruction. African Affairs, 120(479), 153-

170.

Retrieved

from

https://academic.oup.com/afraf/article/120/

479/153/6271719

41.

Idris, I. (2022). Anti-corruption Measures in

Post-conflict

Reconstruction.

doi:

10.19088/k4d.2022.082

42.

Ingelaere, B. (2016). Inside Rwanda’s gacaca

courts: Local perceptions on reconciliation and

participation. African Studies Review, 59(1),
79-102. [invalid URL removed]

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

134

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

43.

International Crisis Group. (2021). Central

African Republic: After the Elections, Keeping
Peace

Alive.

Retrieved

from

https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/central-
africa/central-african-republic/central-

african-republic-after-elections-keeping-
peace-alive

44.

International Crisis Group. (2021). South

Sudan’s Stalled Transition: Protecting the

Peace Agreement and Preventing Violence.
Retrieved from https://www.crisisgroup.org

45.

International Crisis Group. (2023). Central

African Republic: A Difficult Road to Elections.

46.

Jarstad, A. K., & Sisk, T. D. (Eds.). (2018). From

War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding.
Cambridge University Press.

47.

Jarstad, A. K., & Sisk, T. D. (Eds.). (2023).

Routledge Handbook of Peacebuilding.
Routledge.

48.

Jaye, A. (2020). The Gambia’s democr

atic

transition: prospects and challenges. Journal of

Contemporary African Studies, 38(1), 127

–

145.

49.

Jaye, T. (2020). Security Sector Reform in The

Gambia: A Case Study in Post-Authoritarian

Reconstruction. African Centre for the
Constructive Resolution of Disputes (ACCORD).

Retrieved from https://www.accord.org.za

50.

Laucht, C. and Allbeson, T. (2023). Twinned

cities: reconciliation and reconstruction in
europe after 1945

–

an introduction. Urban

History,

1-9.

https://doi.org/10.1017/s096392682300046

9

51.

Lavrik, O. I. et al. (2023). Exploring the Need for

an Integrated Conflict Sensitivity Framework in
Development Assistance that Contributes to

Peaceful

and

Sustainable

Post-conflict

Societies.

52.

Le

Billon,

P.

(2021).

Corruption,

Reconstruction and Peacebuilding. Routledge.

53.

Longman, T. (2011). Memory and Justice in

Post-Genocide Rwanda. Cambridge University
Press.

54.

Mac

Ginty,

R.

(2011).

International

Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid

Forms of Peace. Palgrave Macmillan.

55.

Mac Ginty, R. (2021). Everyday Peace: Bottom-

up and Local Agency in Conflict Zones. Oxford

University Press.

56.

Mako, S. and Edgar, A. D. (2021). Evaluating the

pitfalls of external state-building in post-2003
Iraq (2003

–

2021). Journal of Intervention and

State

building,

15(4),

425-440.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2021.195

8292

57.

Mercy Corps. (2023). Peacebuilding & Conflict

Transformation.

Retrieved

from

https://www.mercycorps.org/

58.

Miller, S., & Davis, H. (2022). The paradox of

peacebuilding: Challenges in post-conflict
reconstruction. Global Governance, 28(2), 185-

204.

https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-

02802007

59.

Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning,

Rwanda. (2021). Vision 2050. Retrieved from

https://www.minecofin.gov.rw/vision-2050

60.

Newman, E., Paris, R., & Richmond, O. P. (2020).

New Perspectives on Liberal Peacebuilding.

Oxford University Press.

61.

nsoms, A., & Rostagno, M. (2012). Rwanda’s

Vision 2020 halfway through: What the eye
does not see. Review of African Political

Economy, 39(134), 545-562.

62.

O., I., Lavrik. (2023). Exploring the Need for an

Integrated Conflict Sensitivity Framework in

Development Assistance that Contributes to

Peaceful

and

Sustainable

Post-conflict

Societies. World sustainability series, doi:

10.1007/978-981-19-7295-9_2

63.

OECD. (2020). States of Fragility 2020.

Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org

64.

P.S., Reddy., Juraj, Nemec. (2021). Introduction,

Contextual Background and Scope. doi:

10.1007/978-3-030-74966-8_1

65.

Paris,

R.

(2019).

The

International

Peacebuilding

Consensus

Reconsidered.

Cambridge University Press.

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

135

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

66.

Paris, R. (2022). The Geopolitics of Peace.

Oxford University Press.

67.

Pham, P. N., Weinstein, H. M., & Longman, T.

(2015). Trauma and resilience among

Rwandan genocide survivors. Journal of
Traumatic Stress, 28(2), 97-105.

68.

Rachel, A., Dicke. (2022). The efficacy of third-

party

interventions:

international

organization-led interventions into ongoing
and post-conflict situations.

doi:

10.32469/10355/91564

69.

Rawanda. (2020, March 8). Rwanda's Journey

Towards Gender Equality. [invalid URL
removed]

70.

Republic of The Gambia. (2021). National

Development Plan (NDP) 2018-2021: Progress
Report. Retrieved from https://ndp.gm

71.

Reyntjens, F. (2013). Political governance in

post-genocide Rwanda. Cambridge University

Press.

72.

Richmond, O. P. (2009). Peace in International

Relations. Routledge.

73.

Rwanda Governance Board. (2020). Rwanda’s

Post-Genocide Reconstruction: The Role of

Leadership in Building a Resilient Nation.
Retrieved from https://rgb.rw

74.

Saine, A. (2021). The Gambia's Truth,

Reconciliation and Reparations Commission:
Confronting the Legacies of Authoritarianism.

African Affairs, 120(478), 127

–

147.

75.

Saine, A. (2021). The Truth, Reconciliation, and

Reparations Commission in The Gambia:
Transitional Justice in a Post-Authoritarian

Society. Journal of African Studies, 47(2), 123-
140.

Retrieved

from

https://journals.sagepub.com

76.

Saul, M. (2022). The Concept of Post-Conflict

Reconstruction: Contested Meanings and
Disputed Applications. Routledge.

77.

Schwartz, A., & Halkyard, K. (2017). Post-

Conflict Reconstruction as a Development
Problem. World Development, pp. 98, 319

–

332.

78.

Seneviratne, K., Amaratunga, R., & Haigh, R.

(2016). Managing housing needs in post-

conflict reconstruction in Sri Lanka: gaps
versus

recommendations.

International

Journal of Strategic Property Management,
20(1),

88-100.

https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715x.2015.110
1625

79.

Seneviratne, K., Amaratunga, R., & Haigh, R.

(2017). Managing housing needs of post-

conflict housing reconstruction: Sri Lankan
perspective. Engineering, Construction and

Architectural Management, 24(2), 275-288.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-10-2015-0157

80.

Smith, J., & Jones, R. (2021). The limits of

Western models in post-conflict governance.
International Studies Quarterly, 65(1), 95-110.

https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa045

81.

Stewart, F. (2009). Policies towards horizontal

inequalities in post-conflict reconstruction.
Making

Peace

Work,

136

–

174.

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595194_7

82.

Stewart, S. (2009). Rwanda: Rebuilding a

nation through women's leadership. Brown
Journal of World Affairs, 16(1), 69-80.

83.

Theron, K. (2021). Post-Conflict Development

in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan.

84.

Thomson, S. (2018). Rwanda: From Genocide

to Precarious Peace. Yale University Press.

85.

Transparency

International.

(2023).

Corruption Perceptions Index 2022.

86.

United Nations Development Programme

(UNDP). (2020). Regional Human Development

Report for Latin America and the Caribbean
2020: Acting on the Future: Breaking the

Intergenerational Transmission of Inequality.

87.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our

world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable

Development.

88.

United Nations. (2022). MINUSCA: The United

Nations

Multidimensional

Integrated

Stabilization Mission in the Central African

Republic.

Retrieved

from

https://minusca.unmissions.org/en

89.

United Nations. (2022). Sustaining Peace

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCES (ISSN

–

2689-0992)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE06

136

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc

Agenda.

Retrieved

from

https://www.un.org/en/peacebuilding/sustai
ning-peace

90.

Valentyna, Prasol., Viktoriya, Velichko.,

Giuseppe, T., Cirella., Olena, Konoplina., Y.,
Mizik., Liudmyla, Novoskoltseva. (2024).

Adaptive Marketing Strategies for Post-Conflict

Reconstruction, Regional Development, and
Sustainable Growth in Ukraine. Contributions

to economics, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-48735-
4_17

91.

Williams, P., & Smith, J. (2023). Coordination

and coherence in post-conflict reconstruction:
Overcoming

fragmentation.

International

Peacekeeping,

30(1),

76-98.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2023.195

7596

92.

World Bank. (2011). World Development

Report

2011:

Conflict,

Security,

and

Development. World Bank.

93.

World Bank. (2021). Fragility, Conflict, and

Violence

Strategy.

Retrieved

from

https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/fragilit
yconflictviolence

94.

World Bank. (2021). Monitoring and

Evaluation in Fragile and Conflict-Affected
Situations.

95.

World Bank. (2021). Rwanda Economic

Update: Investing in People to Sustain Growth.

World Bank Group.

96.

World Bank. (2021). Rwanda Poverty

Assessment.

97.

World Bank. (2022). Central African Republic

Economic Update: Investing in Human Capital

to Promote Inclusive Recovery.

98.

Zahar, M. (2023). The Central African

Republic’s 2020–2021 elections: a ‘pyrrhic

victory

’ for President Touadéra? Journal of

Contemporary African Studies, 41(1), 1-17.

99.

Zahar, M.-J., & Mechoulan, D. (2021). The

Central African Republic’s Political Agreement

for Peace and Reconciliation: A Fragile Step
Towards Peace. International Peace Institute.

Retrieved

from

https://www.ipinst.org/2021/04/the-central-

african-republics-political-agreement-for-
peace-and-reconciliation