Авторы

  • Kayumov O.A
  • Gayratova M.Z

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.tbir.109834

Ключевые слова:

Key words: ore losses block ore body well exploration capital construction preparation mining.

Аннотация

Abstract: This article has developed a technology for the gross excavation of complex ore bodies with interlayers and rock inclusions, which provides an increase in the completeness and quality of mineral extraction from the subsoil, ensuring safe treatment conditions and eliminating the likelihood of blast hole destruction.


background image

https://scientific-jl.com/luch/

Часть

-46

_ Том

-6_

июнь

-2025

218

FEATURES OF BULK EXTRACTION OF COMPLEX ORE BODIES

WITH INTERLAYERS AND ROCK INCLUSIONS AT THE

ZARMITAN

DEPOSIT

Kayumov O.A., Gayratova M.Z.

Karshi State Technical University

Uzbekistan, Karshi

E-mail:

oybekqayumov@mail.ru

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4620-6429

Abstract:

This article has developed a technology for the gross excavation

of complex ore bodies with interlayers and rock inclusions, which provides an

increase in the completeness and quality of mineral extraction from the subsoil,

ensuring safe treatment conditions and eliminating the likelihood of blast hole

destruction.

Key words:

ore, losses, block, ore div, well, exploration, capital

construction, preparation, mining.

Introduction.

When developing low-grade deposits, justifying bulk mining

is one of the main and most complex aspects. Bulk and selective mining under the

same geological conditions yield different quantities of ore, varying in quality and

characterized by different costs.

The development of low-grade deposits has several features that must be

considered in calculations. Varying ore thickness leads to changes in system

parameters, primarily in the width of the stoping area. As studies [2-10] show, the


background image

https://scientific-jl.com/luch/

Часть

-46

_ Том

-6_

июнь

-2025

219

economic indicators of the applied mining methods largely depend on the width of

the stoping area. To correctly select system parameters for specific conditions and

compare indicators of selective and bulk mining, it is necessary to first establish

the optimal parameters for stoping operations under a given mining method.

Methods and Results

. The primary parameter to be optimized is the width

of the stoping area. There is an opinion [11] about the need to reduce the width of

the stoping area, but there is no generally accepted methodology to determine the

feasibility of this viewpoint. The optimal width of the stoping area is selected and

justified based on the total national economic costs for extraction and processing

of ore obtained from 1 ton of reserves. The calculation is carried out according to

the formula:

+

+

+

+

+

=

k

k

i

МП

КВ

О

Т

Д

P

A

n

n

q

q

q

q

q

Q

1

max

min,

)

(

)

(

(1)

where n

max

is the maximum possible quantity of extractable metals under given

conditions, kg; n

i

is the quantity of metals from 1 ton of reserves extracted into the

finished product at a given stope width, kg;

k

- is the number of metals extracted.

The quantity of metals extracted into the finished product is determined by

the formula:

,

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

Mn

On

В

n

П

M

O

П

M

O

П

П

Q

Q

Q

n

+

+

+

=

(2)

where

ηП

is the ore mass yield from a unit of reserves in selective mining,

expressed as a fraction;

β

(1...n) is the proportion of each ore grade in the extracted

ore mass, expressed as a fraction; Q

1

,

2

are the costs for obtaining metals per unit

of reserves, in sum;

ε

M

(1...n) and

ε

O

(1...n) are the recovery rates during ore

beneficiation for each grade and metallurgical processing, expressed as fractions;

Q

V

is the cost for obtaining metals per unit of reserves during bulk mining, in sum;


background image

https://scientific-jl.com/luch/

Часть

-46

_ Том

-6_

июнь

-2025

220

To substantiate losses and dilution at different widths of the extraction space,

actual indicators are used or calculations are performed using formulas.

;

О

Ж

О

т

т

т

г

=

,

''

Ж

Ж

О

т

т

т

г

=

(3)

where

г

and

г

'

are coefficients of dilution and admixture, respectively, during bulk

mining; m

O

is the width of the stope, m; m

ж

is the thickness of the ore div (vein),

m.

,

ПЕР

О

ПОСТ

Д

С

т

С

q

+

=

(4)

where

С

пост

the semi-fixed part of costs (expenses for exploration, capital

construction, opening, preparation, and stoping) attributed to a unit of extracted ore

mass, which decreases with an increase in the width of the stoping space, sum;

semi-variable part of expenses (costs for transportation, hoisting, and overhead).

With a constant annual production capacity, these remain approximately constant

per unit of extracted ore mass, in sum.


background image

https://scientific-jl.com/luch/

Часть

-46

_ Том

-6_

июнь

-2025

221

Fig. 1. Flow chart for comparing separate and bulk mining options for

complex ore bodies with interlayers and rock inclusions

1 - Initial data generation unit; 2 - Unit for generating current values of

the stope width; 3 - Unit for comparison and selection of the maximum possible

quantity of metals; 4 - Unit for calculating the amount of metals recovered

into concentrate n; 5 - Unit for calculating the costs of finished products when

operating in optimal modes; 6 - Unit for calculating the amount of metals

obtained through systems when operating in optimal modes n

опт

; 7 - block for

calculating the total costs of metal production Q

В

,, Q

C

(c - metal content in

reserves; to - width of the stope; m - vein thickness)

The costs of processing 1 ton of ore are also approximately constant and

depend little on changes in its metal content.The variable and fixed components

of the costs are determined by analyzing the cost calculation for 1 ton of ore mass

or through special observations in the extraction blocks.Expression (3.1), taking

into account formula (3.4), will have the following form:

+

+

=

k

K

i

ПЕР

О

ПОСТ

A

n

n

С

т

C

Q

1

max

.

min

)

(

)

(

(5)

The minimum value determines the optimal width of the extraction space under

given conditions.

Calculations for comparing selective and bulk mining options can be performed

using a computer. The flowchart of such calculations is shown in Figure 1.


background image

https://scientific-jl.com/luch/

Часть

-46

_ Том

-6_

июнь

-2025

222

CONCLUSIONS

1. A technology for bulk extraction of complex ore bodies with interlayers

and rock inclusions has been developed. This technology ensures increased

completeness and quality of mineral extraction from the subsoil, provides safe

conditions for stoping operations, and eliminates the possibility of blast hole

destruction. The developed technology contributes to the formation of stable

chamber walls. Simultaneously, it eliminates the risk of uncontrolled collapse of

weakened ore and rock masses, reducing the levels of primary and secondary ore

dilution and operational losses.

2. Studies have established the relationship between the cost of extracting 1

ton of ore mass and the width of the stoping space during bulk extraction of

complex ore bodies, taking into account the costs of exploration, capital

construction, development, preparation, and stoping.

3. The bulk extraction of complex ore bodies with interlayers and rock

inclusions has been economically justified, resulting in the development of a block

diagram for comparing various options.

REFERENCES:

1.

Райхель Б.Л. Экономическая оценка угольных месторождений. –

М., Недра, 2003.

2.

Рыков А.Т. Подземная разработка сложных рудных тел. –

М.,

Недра, 2006.

3.

Слабинский В.Т. Учет и анализ в горной промышленности. –

М.,

Недра, 2002.


background image

https://scientific-jl.com/luch/

Часть

-46

_ Том

-6_

июнь

-2025

223

4.

Симаков В.А., Трыкин В.Н. Сравнение раздельной и валовой

выемки руды центрального блока Миргалимсайского месторождения. –

В

кн.: Геология и горное дело. Красноярское кн. изд

-

во, 2003.

5.

Симаков В.А. Графоаналитический метод сравнения вариантов

разработки рудных месторождений. –

Изв. вузов. Геология и разведка, 2001,

№6.

6.

Симаков В.А Годовая производительность рудника. –

М., изд.

МГГРУ, 2008.

7.

Технико

-

экономическая

оценка

извлечения

полезных

ископаемых из недр/ Под ред. М. И. Агошкова. –

М., Недра, 2004.

8.

Типовая методика экономической эффективности капитальных

вложений. –

М., Экономика, 2009.

9.

Типовые методические указания по оценке экономических

показателей потерь полезных ископаемых при разработке месторождений. –

В кн.: Руководящие материалы по охране недр. –

М., Недра, 2003.

10.

Шурыгин Р.И., Миняев Б.Н., Панченко В.И. Экономическая

оценка систем разработки и определения нормативов потерь на медно

-

колчеданных рудниках // Горный журнал

.

Москва

, 2008.

№10

.

С

. 17-19.