Ta'lim innovatsiyasi va integratsiyasi
50-son_1-to’plam_Avgust -2025
147
ISSN:3030-3621
ANALYSIS OF THE REASONS FOR DELAYED SURGICAL TREATMENT
IN PATIENTS WITH CONGENITAL CATARACTS.
Gulmira Begjanova Mirzabek qizi
Toshkent viloyati Yuqori Chirchiq tumani KTMP
Oftalmolog chifokori
+998 91 303 89 44
Annotation:
Delayed surgical intervention in patients with congenital cataracts
can lead to irreversible visual impairment, particularly amblyopia. This article explores
the underlying reasons for the postponement of cataract surgery in infants and young
children, highlighting socio-economic, systemic, and clinical barriers. By analyzing
relevant literature and clinical data, the study aims to identify key factors contributing
to delays and proposes strategic interventions to optimize early detection and timely
treatment.
Keywords:
Congenital cataract, delayed surgery, pediatric ophthalmology,
amblyopia, visual development, barriers to healthcare, early intervention, pediatric
surgery.
Congenital cataracts are a significant cause of childhood blindness globally. The
timely detection and surgical removal of cataracts in infants is critical for the normal
development of vision. The first few months of life are a sensitive period for visual
maturation, and any obstruction to the visual axis during this period can result in
amblyopia, which may become irreversible if not addressed promptly.
Despite advancements in diagnostic and surgical techniques, many children with
congenital cataracts undergo surgery later than the recommended period. Delayed
surgical treatment is associated with poor visual outcomes and increased burden on
families and healthcare systems. Understanding the factors contributing to such delays
is essential for developing targeted public health strategies and improving pediatric
ophthalmologic care.
Congenital cataracts refer to opacities in the lens present at birth or developing
shortly after, which can lead to significant visual impairment if not addressed promptly.
Early surgical intervention, ideally within the first few weeks to months of life, is
crucial to prevent amblyopia (lazy eye), strabismus, nystagmus, and long-term vision
loss. However, delays in treatment are common, particularly in developing regions, and
can result in poorer visual outcomes. Analysis of available studies reveals that delays
stem from a combination of socioeconomic, systemic, educational, and healthcare
access issues, with multifactorial causes often overlapping.
Key Reasons for Delayed Surgical Treatment
Ta'lim innovatsiyasi va integratsiyasi
50-son_1-to’plam_Avgust -2025
148
ISSN:3030-3621
Delays can be categorized into two phases: Delay-1 (time from caregiver
recognition to initial consultation) and Delay-2 (time from consultation to surgery).
The following analysis draws from prospective studies, primarily in India, where
delays are well-documented due to high prevalence and resource constraints. In
developed countries like the USA and Europe, such delays are less common owing to
routine newborn screening, better awareness, and accessible healthcare, but when they
occur, they may relate to subtle presentations or comorbid conditions requiring
preoperative optimization.
Socioeconomic and Educational Factors
Low socioeconomic status and parental education levels are major contributors,
leading to unawareness and delayed recognition.
- Unawareness or lack of knowledge about the condition: Parents may not
recognize symptoms like leukocoria (white pupil) or believe nothing can be done,
accounting for 26.28% of Delay-1 cases in one rural Indian study.
Similarly, low parental education correlates with later surgery (p < 0.01 in
univariate analysis), as illiterate or minimally educated caregivers (e.g., 26.92% of
family heads illiterate) are less likely to seek timely care.
- Cost of treatment: Financial barriers, including surgery and travel expenses,
cause 20.51% of Delay-1 and 24.35% of Delay-2, exacerbated by low household
incomes (e.g., 48.71% <5546 INR/month).
This is compounded in families with multiple siblings, where resource allocation
may prioritize other needs.
- Parental occupation and age: Fathers in low-wage jobs are linked to delays (p
< 0.01), and older parents may face mobility or awareness issues.
- Gender discrimination: Girls are 1.9 times less likely to present early, with only
40% of surgical cases being female despite equal incidence, reflecting biases in
resource-poor settings.
Healthcare Access and Systemic Barriers
Geographical and infrastructural issues hinder prompt care, especially in rural
areas.
- Distance from facilities: 95% of patients live >50 km from hospitals (30.7%
>200 km), contributing to 8.33% of Delay-1 and 14.74% of Delay-2.
Regional variations show higher delays in northern/central India (mean age at
surgery 81.4 months) vs. southern/western (32.4 months).
- Lack of newborn screening: Routine screening is absent in many developing
regions, with only 13.46% screened at birth, leading to missed early detection.
- Long waiting times for anesthesia/surgery: General anesthesia queues delay
30.33% of cases, with median Delay-2 of 4 months.
Ta'lim innovatsiyasi va integratsiyasi
50-son_1-to’plam_Avgust -2025
149
ISSN:3030-3621
- Limited specialist access: Uncertainty about where to seek care affects 15.38%
of Delay-1.
Family and Behavioral Factors
Personal and familial dynamics play a role in procrastination.
- No family support or competing responsibilities: Caring for other family
members causes 4.48% of Delay-1 and 5.76% of Delay-2; lack of support contributes
2.56% of Delay-1 and 13.46% of Delay-2, particularly in bilateral cases (31.52%).
- Fear of surgery or child's young age: Parental reluctance due to fear (8.33%
Delay-2) or perceiving the child as too young (14.10% Delay-2).
- Seeking second opinions or reluctance: Parents delaying for confirmation or
hesitation affects some cases.
- Number of siblings: Fewer siblings increases delay risk (OR: 4.69 for early
surgery with ≥2 siblings).
Medical and Diagnostic Factors
Missteps in diagnosis or patient health can extend timelines.
- Misdiagnosis or misleading by practitioners: 8.33% of Delay-1 due to
misdiagnosis; 11.24% misled by local doctors.
- Self-treatment attempts: 5.76% try home remedies first.
- Systemic ill health: Child's comorbidities delay 14.61% of surgeries.
- Cataract laterality: Unilateral cases (14% of presentations) are often detected
later than bilateral (86%), as symptoms are less obvious.
Category
Reason
Prevalence/Notes
Socioeconomic
Cost
20-24% across delays; linked to low
income
Low
education/unawareness
26% Delay-1; p < 0.01 correlation
Access
Distance/geography
8-15%; regional variations (e.g., 81
months in north vs. 32 in south)
Waiting times
30% due to anesthesia queues
Family/Behavioral Lack of support/fear
2-14%; higher in bilateral cases
Gender bias
40% girls vs. 60% boys presenting
Medical
Misdiagnosis/ill health
8-15%; 11% misled by practitioners
Impacts and Recommendations
Delays beyond 1 year are associated with increased strabismus, nystagmus, and
amblyopia, reducing visual acuity.
In contrast, intentional short delays (e.g., 4-8 weeks) may reduce glaucoma risk,
but prolonged unintended delays worsen prognosis. To mitigate, strategies include
Ta'lim innovatsiyasi va integratsiyasi
50-son_1-to’plam_Avgust -2025
150
ISSN:3030-3621
expanding newborn screening, community education, subsidized care, and improved
rural access. In developed nations, emphasis on multidisciplinary management for
complex cases could further minimize rare delays.
The findings confirm that multiple, often overlapping, factors contribute to the
delayed surgical treatment of congenital cataracts. The most prominent factor is late
diagnosis, often due to the absence of routine red reflex screening and lack of caregiver
awareness. In resource-constrained settings, economic hardship and logistical
challenges further exacerbate delays.
An important observation was the insufficient linkage between primary care and
specialized centers, leading to missed opportunities for early intervention. Although
systemic illnesses (e.g., congenital infections or prematurity-related complications)
play a role, these account for a smaller proportion of delays compared to preventable
social and structural barriers.
Conclusion
Delayed surgical treatment for congenital cataracts remains a prevalent issue
with significant implications for childhood visual health. The main reasons for delay
include:
To reduce delays in surgical management of congenital cataracts, the following
strategies are recommended:
Mandatory neonatal red reflex screening as part of routine postnatal care.
Parent and community education campaigns focusing on early signs and urgency
of treatment.
Training primary healthcare workers in early identification and referral
protocols.
Establishing regional pediatric ophthalmology centers with mobile screening
units.
References.
1.
Trivedi R.H., PeterseimM.M., Wilson M.E. Jr. New techniques and technologies
for pediatric cataract surgery. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2005; 16 (5): 289—293.
2.
Аветисов Э.С., Кащенко Т.П., Шамшинова А.М. Зрительные функции и их
коррекция у детей. М.: Медицина; 2005.
3.
Круглова Т.Б., Кононов Л.Б. Особенности расчета оптической силы
интраокулярной линзы, имплантируемой детям первого года жизни с
врожденными катарактами. Вестник офтальмологии. 2013; (4): 66–69.
4.
Круглова Т.Б., Кононов Л.Б. Особенности экстракции врожденных
катаракт с имплантацией ИОЛ у детей первого года жизни. Российская
педиатрическая офтальмология. 2008; (4): 32–35.
5.
Круглова Т.Б., Кононов Л.Б., Егиян Н.С. Особенности экстракции
врожденных катаракт с имплантацией ИОЛ у детей первого года жизни.
Ta'lim innovatsiyasi va integratsiyasi
50-son_1-to’plam_Avgust -2025
151
ISSN:3030-3621
Российский общенациональный Офтальмологический Форум. М.; 2010; 2:
334–338.
6.
Катаргина Л.А., Круглова Т.Б., Егиян Н.С. и др. Федеральные
клинические рекомендации: диагностика, мониторинг и лечение детей с
врожденной катарактой. Российская педиатрическая офтальмология.
2015;3:55-57.
7.
Боброва Н.Ф. Современное состояние проблемы хирургического лечения
врожденных катаракт у детей. Вестник офтальмологии.2005; (2): 45–47.
