Авторы

  • Beknazar Shermanov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.yoitj.65554

Аннотация

In today's world, analyzing the soils of mountain and foothill regions and examining degradation processes using remote sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS) data analysis is essential. These techniques serve as powerful tools for land-use planning, including assessments of land cover, forests, and water resources. This study investigates land cover changes and degradation processes in the mountainous and foothill regions of the Tashkent region, situated in the western part of the eastern Tien Shan mountains. Despite substantial precipitation in the area due to its climate, human encroachment has led to the misuse of pastures, causing significant land use and cover changes. Vacant land and sparse forests have been converted into open land, exacerbating soil degradation due to rainfall. GIS technologies play a crucial role in monitoring these changes and formulating effective strategies for land management.


background image

57

YANGI O'ZBEKISTON ILMIY

TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI

www.in-academy.uz

2-JILD, 2-SON (YOʻITJ)

ASSESSMENT OF DEGRADATION IN MOUNTAIN AND

FOOTHILL AREAS USING GIS TECHNOLOGIES IN PARKENT

DISTRICT, UZBEKISTAN

Shermanov Beknazar Ortikovich

Assistant at the Alfraganus University

https://doi.org10.5281/zenodo.14865910

ARTICLE INFO

ABSTRACT

Qabul qilindi:11-yanvar 2025 yil

Ma’qullandi: 12-yanvar 2025 yil

Nashr qilindi: 13-yanvar 2025 yil

In today's world, analyzing the soils of mountain

and foothill regions and examining degradation

processes using remote sensing and Geographic

Information System (GIS) data analysis is essential. These

techniques serve as powerful tools for land-use planning,

including assessments of land cover, forests, and water

resources. This study investigates land cover changes and

degradation processes in the mountainous and foothill

regions of the Tashkent region, situated in the western

part of the eastern Tien Shan mountains. Despite

substantial precipitation in the area due to its climate,

human encroachment has led to the misuse of pastures,

causing significant land use and cover changes. Vacant

land and sparse forests have been converted into open

land, exacerbating soil degradation due to rainfall. GIS

technologies play a crucial role in monitoring these

changes and formulating effective strategies for land

management.

KEY WORDS

Landslides, Anthropogenic

Impact, Ecological Balance, Land

Use

Planning,

Mountainous

Regions, Sub-Mountainous Regions,

Terrain Changes, Climate Impact.

Introduction

Numerous researchers have analyzed land cover change dynamics in Uzbekistan's

mountainous and foothill regions [1]. These areas have been significantly affected by

inefficient land use due to human and livestock activities, as well as the mismanagement of

pastures. To mitigate these challenges, Geographic Information System (GIS) and remote

sensing technologies can enhance machine learning applications to effectively monitor land

use and land cover changes [2, 3]. These tools have also introduced innovative measurement

techniques and interactive mapping methods to assess recent shifts in natural resources, such

as rangelands and forests, in mountain and foothill areas [4,5].

In the Parkent district, land cover has undergone substantial transformations over the past

two decades [6]. These changes can be studied using satellite imagery, such as Landsat 8 OLI

data [7]. The classification of land cover into distinct categories—based on vegetation type,

water bodies, and soil composition—enables the identification of degraded or at-risk areas [8].

Developing land cover maps using data from 2004 to 2024 provides a foundation for

monitoring and assessing vacant lands and agricultural zones, thereby enhancing the

interpretation of land degradation through remote sensing analysis [9,10].


background image

58

YANGI O'ZBEKISTON ILMIY

TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI

www.in-academy.uz

2-JILD, 2-SON (YOʻITJ)

Understanding land use changes is essential for effective land management and planning. The

creation of monitoring maps using remote sensing and GIS technology allows for the rapid

generation and storage of time-stamped geospatial data for extensive areas [11]. These

technologies also offer predictive capabilities, equipping decision-makers with valuable

insights for machine learning-based analysis [12,13]. Therefore, accurate information on land

use and resource monitoring is crucial for implementing strategies to mitigate land

degradation [14].

Study Area

The Parkent district is situated on the northern slopes of the Eastern Tien-Shan mountain

range, forming the eastern part of Tashkent. This study involved analyzing remotely sensed

land cover images spanning a decade (2014-2024) to propose potential land improvement

measures based on observed changes. The study area extends between latitudes 41°00' N to

41°30' N and longitudes 69°51' E to 71°23' E, encompassing a significant portion of the Ugam-

Chotkal Biosphere Reserve.

The reserve features a well-defined zonation ranging from 550 to 3,500 meters above sea

level, covering the steep slopes of the Chotkal ridge, which are deeply cut by gorges [15]. The

vegetation of the area consists of three main types of fir trees—spruce, hemispherical, and

kurman—forming mixed forests. The understory includes shrubs such as common hawthorn,

Fedchenko's rose, Korolkov’s annali, oblong zirk, many-flowered green, and Tien-Shan

mountain ash.

More than 700 vascular plant species, belonging to 70 families and 280 genera, have been

recorded in the reserve. These include 13 species listed in Uzbekistan's Red Book and 48

endemic species specific to the western region of the Turkistan ridge. Additionally,

researchers have documented 216 species of capped fungi and over 20 medicinal plants, such

as aconite, colchicum, immortelle, valerian, ziziphora, and snake’s head. The area also hosts

over 15 decorative plant species, including veronica, carnations, primrose, tulips, eremurus,

crocuses, iris, and delphinium [16].

Fig. 1.

Study area Parkent districts, Tashkent region

he presence of numerous rare plant species in the study area, along with signs of land

degradation, indicates that this ecosystem is undergoing significant changes. Monitoring land

cover changes is a crucial criterion for assessing degradation levels [17,18]. This process

requires the appropriate application of remote sensing techniques, which enable detailed

analysis by modeling specific remote sensing data indices tailored to areas of interest [19,20].


background image

59

YANGI O'ZBEKISTON ILMIY

TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI

www.in-academy.uz

2-JILD, 2-SON (YOʻITJ)

Advancements in this technology have contributed to the development of GIS, leading to

automation in land cover studies, the creation of measurement systems for collecting land use

information, and a better understanding of land cover transformations [21]. Conducting a

proper analysis of land cover change is essential for evaluating and monitoring the long-term

consequences of land use modifications [22].

Materials and Methods

This study utilizes satellite imagery from the years 2014 and 2024, obtained from the United

States Geological Survey (USGS) Earth Explorer database. The datasets include images from

the Landsat 5 TM (Thematic Mapper) and Landsat 8 OLI (Operational Land Imager), both with

a spatial resolution of 30 meters.

Google Earth Pro was used for preliminary analysis and visual interpretation of the study

area's mountainous landscape. Image classification was carried out using ArcGIS 10.6

software, following a structured data processing workflow. This included assigning borders,

defining the coordinate system, and sub-setting images based on the study area’s polygon

boundaries.

Land classification was performed using supervised classification techniques and the

maximum likelihood algorithm in ArcGIS. The Land Cover Change Index (LCCI) algorithm, a

widely used and recognized method for assessing Landsat satellite imagery, was applied (Fig.

3) [23].

The study identified several land classification categories, including bare land, forests, water

bodies, agricultural areas, and built-up areas. To enhance classification accuracy, 20 training

samples were selected from each land cover category within the study area. The final

classification maps were generated using these training samples to ensure precise land cover

representation (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Flow chart for adopted using ArcGIS methods

Results

A land use and land cover (LULC) index study was conducted using remote sensing data to

map foothill areas and open lands. The index successfully distinguished between these land

types using ArcGIS software, leveraging the distinct spectral responses captured in all bands


background image

60

YANGI O'ZBEKISTON ILMIY

TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI

www.in-academy.uz

2-JILD, 2-SON (YOʻITJ)

of Landsat 5 TM+ and Landsat 8 OLI. The classification process proved to be highly effective in

differentiating between foothill areas and open lands.

The land cover change analysis for the period 2014-2024 identified a combination of forested

and bare land areas undergoing transformation. While significant land cover shifts were

observed in certain regions, large sections of forest and wasteland remained unchanged. Some

of the noticeable land cover changes were linked to agricultural activities. Areas affected by

deforestation were specifically highlighted in the land cover change map to illustrate the

impact of human activities on landscape transformation over the 10-year period (Fig. 4).

Additionally, a relief map of the study area was generated using a Digital Elevation Model

(DEM) file obtained from

earthdata.nasa.gov

. Elevation zones were classified to analyze

changes in land cover based on altitude. The results indicated that forests within the study

area predominantly declined and were replaced by open lands at elevations ranging from

1,000 to 2,500 meters between 2014 and 2024 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Relief map research area using DEM file. (Source: earthdata.nasa.gov)

The

Land Cover Change Index (LCCI)

offers valuable insights into the current state of land

use and land cover. LCCI algorithms assess land conditions at various stages of the growing

season, including early, mid, and late summer. By analyzing LCCI variations throughout the

growing season, it becomes possible to track changes in vegetation and tree cover over time,

providing a clearer understanding of long-term environmental transformations (Fig. 4).


background image

61

YANGI O'ZBEKISTON ILMIY

TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI

www.in-academy.uz

2-JILD, 2-SON (YOʻITJ)

Fig. 4.

Land cover changing map.

However, it is essential to validate high Land Cover Change Index (LCCI) algorithm results by

confirming land cover classifications using Google Earth Pro in the study area. The identified

land cover categories revealed variations in the univariate statistical values of radiation heat

flux parameters, as illustrated in Fig. 3

.

The spatial parameters demonstrated a gradual shift

in values for each factor, as shown in Fig. 2.

The maps in

Fig. 2

depict the distribution range of each parameter under study, with the

average and standard deviation values providing the most accurate results for land cover

classification. Fig. 4 presents a comparative analysis of land cover classes and classification

accuracy. The findings indicate a relative improvement in classification accuracy for all

forested areas, whereas bare land categories exhibited fluctuations in accuracy, with some

showing an increase and others a decrease.

A ten-year period, from 2012 to 2022, was analyzed to examine patterns of land cover change.

In 2012, forests covered approximately 61% of the total study area, while bare and open land

accounted for nearly 28%, and agricultural land made up around 12%. Over the decade, there

was a notable expansion of bare and open land, which increased to 45% of the total area.

Conversely, forest cover declined significantly from 61% in 2012 to 42% in 2022, marking a

19% reduction over the study period. The most pronounced shift was observed in fallow land.

Notably, in 2012, about 32% of the total area consisted of bare and open land, which

expanded by roughly 7% over the decade. These substantial changes emphasize the

importance of continuous monitoring and effective land management to preserve ecological

balance and sustain natural resources.

Conclusions

This study highlights significant land cover transformations in the study area over the past

decade. The application of remote sensing techniques and high-accuracy Landsat data has

proven instrumental in tracking these changes and assessing their impact. The findings

indicate that remote sensing data is valuable in evaluating land cover dynamics. The 10-year

assessment of the mountainous and highland regions reveals a marked decline in forested

areas alongside an expansion of open land, increasing the risk of environmental degradation.

The challenging topography of mountainous and sub-mountainous regions accelerates these

processes. Poor management of open lands may lead to further degradation, including the

depletion of fertile soil layers. Such land cover alterations may contribute to future soil

erosion, flooding, and landslides, potentially becoming recurrent hazards.

The land cover change maps generated in this study can serve as a basis for future landslide

susceptibility mapping in the region. The deforested areas identified highlight the influence of

dynamic anthropogenic activities on land cover changes over the 10-year period. These maps

can aid public authorities and stakeholders in developing natural hazard warnings and land

use planning strategies at the local government level. Additionally, they can support landslide

susceptibility assessments and help policymakers implement land use measures to mitigate

the risks associated with natural hazards. Overall, the results underscore the critical role of

remote sensing methods and precise Landsat data in monitoring and assessing land cover

changes, particularly in mountainous and sub-mountainous regions where such

transformations can lead to severe environmental hazards.

References:

1.

Musaev I, Bokiev A, and Botirova M. 2021. The Value of the Cards in Water Basins with

the Installation of Solar Power Plants in Yangiyul District of Tashkent Province of Uzbekistan.

Ed. L. Foldvary and I. Abdurahmanov.

E3S Web Conf.

, 227, 05004.


background image

62

YANGI O'ZBEKISTON ILMIY

TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI

www.in-academy.uz

2-JILD, 2-SON (YOʻITJ)

2.

Oymatov R. K., Mamatkulov Z. J., Reimov M. P., Makhsudov R. I., and Jaksibaev R. N.

2021. Methodology development for creating agricultural interactive maps.

IOP Conf. Ser.

Earth Environ. Sci.

, 868.

3.

Inamov A., Avilova N., Norbaeva D., Mukhammadayubova S., Idirova M., and Vakhobov J.

2021. Application of GIS technologies in quality management of land accounting in Uzbekistan.

Ed. V. Kankhva.

E3S Web Conf.

, 258, 03014.

4.

Jansen V. S., Kolden C. A., Schmalz H. J., Karl J. W., and Taylor R. V. 2021. Using Satellite-

Based Vegetation Data for Short-Term Grazing Monitoring to Inform Adaptive Management.

Rangel. Ecol. Manag.

, 76, 30–42.

5.

Michez A., Lejeune P., Bauwens S., Lalaina Herinaina A. A., Blaise Y., Muñoz E. C., Lebeau

F., and Bindelle J. 2019. Mapping and monitoring of biomass and grazing in pasture with an

unmanned aerial system.

Remote Sens.

, 11.

6.

Théau J., Lauzier-Hudon É., Aubé L., and Devillers N. 2021. Estimation of forage

biomass and vegetation cover in grasslands using UAV imagery.

PLoS One

, 16, 1–18.

7.

Nguy-Robertson A., Gitelson A., Peng Y., Viña A., Arkebauer T., and Rundquist D. 2012.

Green leaf area index estimation in maize and soybean: Combining vegetation indices to

achieve maximal sensitivity.

Agron. J.

, 104, 1336–1347.

8.

Aslanov I., Khasanov S., Khudaybergenov Y., Groll M., Opp Ch. C., Li F., and Del-Valle E. R.

2021. Land cover-adjusted index for the former Aral Sea using Landsat images. Ed. L. Foldvary

and I. Abdurahmanov.

E3S Web Conf.

, 227, 02005.

9.

Khasanov S., Kulmatov R., Li F., van Amstel A., Bartholomeus H., Aslanov I., Sultonov K.,

Kholov N., Liu H., and Chen G. 2023. Impact assessment of soil salinity on crop production in

Uzbekistan and its global significance.

Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

, 342, 108262.

10.

Aslanov I., Jumaniyazov I., and Embergenov N. 2023. Remote Sensing for Land Use

Monitoring in the Suburban Areas of Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Ed. A. Beskopylny, M. Shamtsyan,

and V. Artiukh.

Springer Int. Publ.

, 575, 1899–1907.

11.

Fadhillah M. F., Hakim W. L., Panahi M., Rezaie F., Lee C. W., and Lee S. 2022. Mapping of

landslide potential in Pyeongchang-gun, South Korea, using machine learning meta-based

optimization algorithms.

Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Sp. Sci.

, 25, 463–472.

12.

Ngandam Mfondoum A. H., Hakdaoui S., and Batcha R. 2022. Landsat 8 Bands' 1 to 7

spectral vectors plus machine learning to improve land use/cover classification using Google

Earth Engine.

Ann. GIS

, 00, 1–24.

13.

Mohammad P., Goswami A., Chauhan S., and Nayak S. 2022. Machine learning

algorithm-based prediction of land use land cover and land surface temperature changes to

characterize the surface urban heat island phenomena over Ahmedabad city, India.

Urban

Clim.

, 42, 101116.

14.

Farmanov N., Amankulova K., Szatmari J., Sharifi A., Abbasi-Moghadam D., Mirhossein-

Nejad M., and Mucsi L. 2023. Crop Type Classification by DESIS Hyperspectral Imagery and

Machine Learning Algorithms.

IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens.

, 16, 1–17.

15.

Babajanov A. R., and Inamov B. N. 2020. Issues of involvement in circulation of unused

agricultural lands in Uzbekistan.

IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci.

, 614, 012131.

16.

Nilufarbegim K., Kizi N., Mukhriddin K., Ugli K., and Temirkulovich U. J. 2020.

Ecotourism—an important factor in sustainable development and environmental protection:

the experience of Uzbekistan.

Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol.

, 29, 1845–1851.

17.

Zhang X., Lei J., Wu S., Li S., Liu L., Wang Z., Huang S., Guo Y., Wang Y., Tang X., and Zhou

J. 2023. Spatiotemporal evolution of aeolian dust in China: An insight into the synoptic records

of 1984–2020 and nationwide practices to combat desertification.

L. Degrad. Dev.

, 1–19.

18.

Yang Y., and United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (Secretariat). 2011.

Combating desertification and land degradation: proven practices from Asia and the Pacific

(Korea Forest Service).

19.

Aslanov I. 2022. Preface.

IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci.

, 1068, 9–11.


background image

63

YANGI O'ZBEKISTON ILMIY

TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI

www.in-academy.uz

2-JILD, 2-SON (YOʻITJ)

20.

Kholdorov S., Jabbarov Z., Aslanov I., Jobborov B., and Rakhmatov Z. 2021. Analysing

effect of cement manufacturing industry on soils and agricultural plants. Ed. A. Zheltenkov

and A. Mottaeva.

E3S Web Conf.

, 284, 02005.

Библиографические ссылки

Musaev I, Bokiev A, and Botirova M. 2021. The Value of the Cards in Water Basins with the Installation of Solar Power Plants in Yangiyul District of Tashkent Province of Uzbekistan. Ed. L. Foldvary and I. Abdurahmanov. E3S Web Conf., 227, 05004.

Oymatov R. K., Mamatkulov Z. J., Reimov M. P., Makhsudov R. I., and Jaksibaev R. N. 2021. Methodology development for creating agricultural interactive maps. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 868.

Inamov A., Avilova N., Norbaeva D., Mukhammadayubova S., Idirova M., and Vakhobov J. 2021. Application of GIS technologies in quality management of land accounting in Uzbekistan. Ed. V. Kankhva. E3S Web Conf., 258, 03014.

Jansen V. S., Kolden C. A., Schmalz H. J., Karl J. W., and Taylor R. V. 2021. Using Satellite-Based Vegetation Data for Short-Term Grazing Monitoring to Inform Adaptive Management. Rangel. Ecol. Manag., 76, 30–42.

Michez A., Lejeune P., Bauwens S., Lalaina Herinaina A. A., Blaise Y., Muñoz E. C., Lebeau F., and Bindelle J. 2019. Mapping and monitoring of biomass and grazing in pasture with an unmanned aerial system. Remote Sens., 11.

Théau J., Lauzier-Hudon É., Aubé L., and Devillers N. 2021. Estimation of forage biomass and vegetation cover in grasslands using UAV imagery. PLoS One, 16, 1–18.

Nguy-Robertson A., Gitelson A., Peng Y., Viña A., Arkebauer T., and Rundquist D. 2012. Green leaf area index estimation in maize and soybean: Combining vegetation indices to achieve maximal sensitivity. Agron. J., 104, 1336–1347.

Aslanov I., Khasanov S., Khudaybergenov Y., Groll M., Opp Ch. C., Li F., and Del-Valle E. R. 2021. Land cover-adjusted index for the former Aral Sea using Landsat images. Ed. L. Foldvary and I. Abdurahmanov. E3S Web Conf., 227, 02005.

Khasanov S., Kulmatov R., Li F., van Amstel A., Bartholomeus H., Aslanov I., Sultonov K., Kholov N., Liu H., and Chen G. 2023. Impact assessment of soil salinity on crop production in Uzbekistan and its global significance. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 342, 108262.

Aslanov I., Jumaniyazov I., and Embergenov N. 2023. Remote Sensing for Land Use Monitoring in the Suburban Areas of Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Ed. A. Beskopylny, M. Shamtsyan, and V. Artiukh. Springer Int. Publ., 575, 1899–1907.

Fadhillah M. F., Hakim W. L., Panahi M., Rezaie F., Lee C. W., and Lee S. 2022. Mapping of landslide potential in Pyeongchang-gun, South Korea, using machine learning meta-based optimization algorithms. Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Sp. Sci., 25, 463–472.

Ngandam Mfondoum A. H., Hakdaoui S., and Batcha R. 2022. Landsat 8 Bands' 1 to 7 spectral vectors plus machine learning to improve land use/cover classification using Google Earth Engine. Ann. GIS, 00, 1–24.

Mohammad P., Goswami A., Chauhan S., and Nayak S. 2022. Machine learning algorithm-based prediction of land use land cover and land surface temperature changes to characterize the surface urban heat island phenomena over Ahmedabad city, India. Urban Clim., 42, 101116.

Farmanov N., Amankulova K., Szatmari J., Sharifi A., Abbasi-Moghadam D., Mirhossein-Nejad M., and Mucsi L. 2023. Crop Type Classification by DESIS Hyperspectral Imagery and Machine Learning Algorithms. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., 16, 1–17.

Babajanov A. R., and Inamov B. N. 2020. Issues of involvement in circulation of unused agricultural lands in Uzbekistan. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 614, 012131.

Nilufarbegim K., Kizi N., Mukhriddin K., Ugli K., and Temirkulovich U. J. 2020. Ecotourism—an important factor in sustainable development and environmental protection: the experience of Uzbekistan. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., 29, 1845–1851.

Zhang X., Lei J., Wu S., Li S., Liu L., Wang Z., Huang S., Guo Y., Wang Y., Tang X., and Zhou J. 2023. Spatiotemporal evolution of aeolian dust in China: An insight into the synoptic records of 1984–2020 and nationwide practices to combat desertification. L. Degrad. Dev., 1–19.

Yang Y., and United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (Secretariat). 2011. Combating desertification and land degradation: proven practices from Asia and the Pacific (Korea Forest Service).

Aslanov I. 2022. Preface. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 1068, 9–11.

Kholdorov S., Jabbarov Z., Aslanov I., Jobborov B., and Rakhmatov Z. 2021. Analysing effect of cement manufacturing industry on soils and agricultural plants. Ed. A. Zheltenkov and A. Mottaeva. E3S Web Conf., 284, 02005.