Авторы

  • Jahongir Ramazonov
  • Muhabbat Nurmuhammedova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.yoitj.77396

Аннотация

 the article will talk about family and family relations, the leprosy of family-marriage relations, the role of the Mahalla in family relations, economic, legal, psychological spiritual relations, the school of family-upbringing, the environment and adaptation to new conditions


background image

86

YANGI O'ZBEKISTON ILMIY

TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI

www.in-academy.uz

2-JILD 3-SON,2-QISM (YOʻITJ)

PSYCHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF

THE FAMILY INSTITUTE

Ramazonov Jahongir Djalolovich

Doctor of philosophy in psychology (PhD), associate professor

Nurmuhammedova Muhabbat Bahriddinovna

Graduate of the International University of Asia

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15152038

ARTICLE INFO

ABSTRACT

Qabul qilindi:7-mart 2025 yil

Ma’qullandi:18-mart 2025 yil

Nashr qilindi: 30-mart 2025 yil

the article will talk about family and family relations,

the leprosy of family-marriage relations, the role of the

Mahalla in family relations, economic, legal,

psychological spiritual relations, the school of family-

upbringing, the environment and adaptation to new

conditions

KEY WORDS

marriage, social role, social

status,

society,

interpersonal

relationships, family identity.

In the system of social relations, the group's position is derived from its experience and the

activities it conducts. The value system is studied in a separate sociology discipline, but it is

necessary to take into account the evidence that has special significance in Social Psychology.

First of all, different values will have different significance in the impact of values on the

group as well as in the family environment of society. In particular, values such as affection,

consequence, happiness, health correspond to different groups in the general and community,

and these values are considered values in the universal community. But, the values inherent

in the values u200b u200bof the collective phenomenon: labor, education, culture differ from

each other and are assessed differently. The family, in general, is one small community, a

community that is associated with a bond in relation to each other, such as a couple, a brother,

a parent, a kinship. Before marriage, each person performs a role with a position in society

(for example, son, daughter, sister, sister, brother, brother, niece, etc.k.). In marriage - family

relationships, a man and a woman learn to fulfill the role of a husband and wife and try to take

responsibility for this.

One of the best days of the Uzbek people is considered to be the days of the wedding .

But today the number of post-wedding divorces is increasing, the view of young people in

marriage relationships is changing. An analysis of Instagram and telegram channels revealed

that 15-18-year-old teenagers and older teenage girls have negative views on the mask. Let's

dwell in detail on the concepts of marriage and family to determine what is the reason.

The word” marriage " has two distinct lexical meanings in Uzbek. It has long been

known that the mask has a religious content in Asia. The basis of marriage is the rules in

Sharia. The main purpose of the mask is to establish order in the relationship between men

and women and prevent various unpleasant phenomena.

Marriage (Arabic-marriage, courtship of a couple) is a ceremony of formalizing a

couple through Sharia and a contract read by the imamkhatib on this occasion . Sharia

regulates family relations and treats marriage primarily as a contract based on the obligations

and rights of both parties. From the time of the former Union, a new vision of marriage, a form

of secular content, entered. In its secular meaning, marriage is a legally formalized family

union with the mutual consent of a married wife: a couple. Registered with the Office of

writing civil status documents of a man and woman who are married from the moment of


background image

87

YANGI O'ZBEKISTON ILMIY

TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI

www.in-academy.uz

2-JILD 3-SON,2-QISM (YOʻITJ)

marriage to the present day(FHDYO). From this day on, a new family is formed. Religiously,

marriage teaching leads to the birth of a family.

In Social Psychology, a family is a subgroup. This group is based on marriage, and its

members are intertwined with the unity, mutual assistance and spiritual responsibility of

their fast. The main purpose of the idea that a family was a branch of society in the Shoro era

was to control the family and subordinate it to the service of a single party: “a family is an

important form of personal life, formed on the basis of an alliance of couple and kinship ties, a

branch of society (initial group)”[1]. During this period, the family is characterized by

superior sociability and disregard for the freedoms of individuals. In particular, a faceted

family is a value, but in ordinary real life, a family is just a small piece of the whole big

mechanism. The devaluation of the family led to its impoverishment. It is known that in some

cases, a person who was wrongfully accused of being an enemy of the people was required to

be waived from family members, their own parents, or their children. To a certain extent, the

higher education of children of a person who went to prison was allowed only when he gave

up his family. Those who were afraid that such pressure would be known to everyone, on the

other hand, had been hiding the tensions that were taking place in the family for years and

suffered because of it. During the period of independence, conditions were created for

strengthening the family and openly talking about the problems that were happening in

families. On the one hand, the creation of conditions for the family, on the other hand, the

open discussion of problems and the opportunity to solve them in the neighborhoods laid the

groundwork for the strengthening of the family. Now the attitude towards a person not only

as a resource, but also to him was brought to a level of special value. Since this value is formed

in a family environment, a special opportunity should be paid to the family at first. It was the

families established in the early periods of independence that were firmly built according to

statiska (1991 -2005).

It is true that the period of independence coincided with the era of globalization and

Information Technology in the general world. Yesterday, the children, a boon of independence,

grew up today, the period, the system modernized, it was possible to get to foreign countries

and exchange experiences, our young people began to gradually assimilate their culture from

abroad, seeing not only knowledge, funds, skills, experience, but also lifestyle. The traditions,

way of life, ideas and values that make foreign culture unique go back to their own history.

Foreign ideas (same-sex lifestyle, abstinence from children and living for oneself, non-

compliance with the rules to prioritize prostitution, indifference to parents, denial of family

ties) began to spread among our youth as an illusion. As a result, respect for not only family,

but also personal life was lost and became the basis for the emergence of insecurity towards

the family in the growing new generation. From 2007 to 2018, the number of divorces in

Uzbek families was found to be relatively high. The reason for divorces is explained precisely

by the decrease in family value.

So, depending on the social content of the family on its basis, it can be said that it

constitutes a social group – a family in three interactions. These are: marriage, a couple's

relationship as a result of marriage, children as a result of a couple's relationship.

Today, society presupposes the existence of a necessity for modern marriage.

Z.Rasulova has attempted to explain in her research that the necessity of marriage is related

to tabby and social factors[2]. On the one hand it is a natural state, on the other hand it is

social. The only way to meet natural needs, which are counted from the basic needs of a

person, was considered marriage. And as a social factor, one can comment on the role of the

family in society.

The globalization process that is taking place on a global scale today, the influence of

political and social situations does not directly affect the institution of the family either. The

various social situations that arise lead to the breakdown of families. Note that from 2014 to

2020, there was a uniqueness in marriage - family relations. This situation in particular


background image

88

YANGI O'ZBEKISTON ILMIY

TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI

www.in-academy.uz

2-JILD 3-SON,2-QISM (YOʻITJ)

caused divorces in late 2019 and in 2020, manifested in the context of a pandemic. Taking into

account the above, it can be concluded that the psychological factor should also be added

separately to social and natural factors. The socio-psychological factor determines the place of

a person in the family in the process of socialization in society. In some cases, it is also

undeniable that the family has a negative impact on the human psyche, there are situations of

tension in the family, limiting human behavior, freedoms. For example, the reason why US

families are in crisis is because Americans prefer to live freely instead of marrying[3]. This

resulted in an increase in the number of people in society who were left alone without care.

The need for marriage is evident in this regard. The slogan "a happy family is a strong society"

is now a strong society the backbone of the family reason the role of the state in solving

problems arising from work and treatment issues during a pandemic is of particular

importance. In conclusion, we can say that the research carried out on the study of Marriage -

Family Relations of modern Uzbeks is aimed at highlighting ethnopsychological features

(SHoumarov G‘.B., Rasulova Z.A.). Including, it is mentioned that the national image, the

national character was formed precisely in the social environment. Specificity in marriage -

family relations has been identified, and the existing problems in it have not yet found a

solution, despite the fact that they have been studied a lot as an object of ethnopsychological

research. For example, the question of the decline in gender sensitivity, which is related to

gender theory, has not been sufficiently studied. Gender relations lay the foundation for more

integrity violations in the study of the institution of the family.

The

study

of

the

marriage - family problem is carried out on the basis of the integration of a number of areas of

psychology. In this regard, there are specific edges of the methodological direction. The

system of national values as factors for strengthening the family has also not been sufficiently

studied. In modern Uzbek families, the study of marriage-family relations in socio -

psychological studies is gaining importance.

Literature used:

1. Соловьев Н. Семья в советском обществе и её некоторые функии //Культура

семейных отношений: Сборник статей. – М., 1980.- С.7.

2. Rasulova Z.A. Zamonaviy oʻzbeklarning oila-nikoh munosabatlari. - T.: “Oʻzbekiston milliy

eniklopediyasi” Davlat ilmiy nashriyot, 2013. B. 145.

3. Кирьянова О.Г. Кризис американской семьи.- Минск, 1986.- С.45

4. Рамазонов, Ж. Ж. (2020). ОИЛАВИЙ ҚАДРИЯТЛАР ТРАНСФОРМАЦИЯЛАШУВИНИНГ

ИЖТИМОИЙ ПСИХОЛОГИК

ХУСУСИЯТЛАРИ. In

Эффективность применения

инновационных технологий и техники в сельском и водном хозяйстве (pp. 594-596).

5. Djalolovich, R. J., & Qutlimuratovna, M. S. (2024). MUAMMOLI OILALARDA

DESPOTIZMNING VUJUDGA KELISHI SABABLARI, MUOMMOLAR, YECHIMLAR. Science

Promotion, 9(1), 33-39.

6. Ahmedova Z. Bola tarbiyasida psixolog maslahatlari / Z.Ahmedova. – Toshkent: Yangi asr

avlodi, 2018 – 112 b.

7. Ahmedova Z. Oila diplomatiyasi. /Z.Ahmedova. – Toshkent: Spestrum Media Group, 2018 –

128 b. Бестужев - Лада И.В. Алтернативная цивилизация. – М.:Альгоритм. 2003. – 182 с.

8. Ботуин К. Не бойся Дон-Жуана, или как относиться к мужской неверности /К. Ботуин.

– М.:Мирт, 1995.-448 с.

9. Ботуин К. Соблазненная женщина. Почему изменяют жены и что из этого получается.

– М., 1995.

Библиографические ссылки

Соловьев Н. Семья в советском обществе и её некоторые функии //Культура семейных отношений: Сборник статей. – М., 1980.- С.7.

Rasulova Z.A. Zamonaviy oʻzbeklarning oila-nikoh munosabatlari. - T.: “Oʻzbekiston milliy eniklopediyasi” Davlat ilmiy nashriyot, 2013. B. 145.

Кирьянова О.Г. Кризис американской семьи.- Минск, 1986.- С.45

Рамазонов, Ж. Ж. (2020). ОИЛАВИЙ ҚАДРИЯТЛАР ТРАНСФОРМАЦИЯЛАШУВИНИНГ ИЖТИМОИЙ ПСИХОЛОГИК ХУСУСИЯТЛАРИ. In Эффективность применения инновационных технологий и техники в сельском и водном хозяйстве (pp. 594-596).

Djalolovich, R. J., & Qutlimuratovna, M. S. (2024). MUAMMOLI OILALARDA DESPOTIZMNING VUJUDGA KELISHI SABABLARI, MUOMMOLAR, YECHIMLAR. Science Promotion, 9(1), 33-39.

Ahmedova Z. Bola tarbiyasida psixolog maslahatlari / Z.Ahmedova. – Toshkent: Yangi asr avlodi, 2018 – 112 b.

Ahmedova Z. Oila diplomatiyasi. /Z.Ahmedova. – Toshkent: Spestrum Media Group, 2018 – 128 b. Бестужев - Лада И.В. Алтернативная цивилизация. – М.:Альгоритм. 2003. – 182 с.

Ботуин К. Не бойся Дон-Жуана, или как относиться к мужской неверности /К. Ботуин. – М.:Мирт, 1995.-448 с.

Ботуин К. Соблазненная женщина. Почему изменяют жены и что из этого получается. – М., 1995.