Mualliflar

  • Juraeva Zarinakhon Bakhodir kizi

Muallif biografiyasi

  • Juraeva Zarinakhon Bakhodir kizi

    English Language Teacher at Interfaculty
    Department of the English Language, Faculty of Philology,
    National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.yottoro.90549

Kalit so‘zlar:

Key words: Terminology terms system normative approach functional (descriptive) approach systematic approach

Annotasiya

Abstract: The basis of the emergence of terminology in Russia is the founder of the Russian school of terminology Lotte D.S. and he developed his own approach to the study of terms, which he later called normative. In the first half of the twentieth century in Russia Lotte made a significant contribution to the development of terminology. [1]

 

[1] Lotte D.S. “How to work on Terminology (in Russian)” - Nauka, Moscow, 1968


background image

Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyotida tadqiqotlarni o'rni va rivojlanish omillari


https://scientific-jl.com/

18-to’plam 2-son Aprel 2025

336

DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO STUDY THE DEFINITION OF

TERMS IN RUSSIAN TERMINOLOGY

Juraeva Zarinakhon Bakhodir kizi

English Language Teacher at Interfaculty

Department of the English Language, Faculty of Philology,

National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek

Email:

zjuraeva424@gmail.com

Abstract: The basis of the emergence of terminology in Russia is the founder

of the Russian school of terminology Lotte D.S. and he developed his own approach

to the study of terms, which he later called normative. In the first half of the

twentieth century in Russia Lotte made a significant contribution to the

development of terminology.

1

Key words: Terminology, terms system, normative approach, functional

(descriptive) approach, systematic approach

Introduction:

The basis of the emergence of terminology in Russia is the

founder of the Russian school of terminology Lotte D.S. and he developed his own

approach to the study of terms, which he later called normative. In the first half of

the twentieth century in Russia Lotte made a significant contribution to the

development of terminology.

2

Literature review:

In the middle of the last century, terminology in Russia

was recognized as an independent science, and researchers emphasized the specific

characteristics, signs and peculiarities of the term (R.A.Budagov, V.P.Danilenko,

B.N.Golovin, V.M.Leichik, L.A.Kapanadze, K.A.Levkovskaya and others). The

greatest consequence of these stages in the development of terminology was the

convergence of practitioners-terminologists (standardizers, creators of IPS

1

Lotte D.S. “How to work on Terminology (in Russian)” - Nauka, Moscow, 1968

2

Lotte D.S. “How to work on Terminology (in Russian)” - Nauka, Moscow, 1968


background image

Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyotida tadqiqotlarni o'rni va rivojlanish omillari


https://scientific-jl.com/

18-to’plam 2-son Aprel 2025

337

terminology software) and terminologists-linguists

3

.

In the second half of the twentieth century the dynamic development of

terminology continued. Cognitive issues are increasingly the subject of research,

and the practical aspects of this subject are being actively developed. At the

beginning of the 21st century, the development of terminology in Russia was

primarily the exchange of scientific paradigm and the emergence of cognitive

approaches to linguistics in general and terminology in particular.

Analysis and results:

From today we study existing approaches to the

definition of terms and we can classify them as follows.

1.

The normative approach

As shown above, Lotte D.S. was the founder of this approach, describing the

term as "a word, or accompanying word, that has a special meaning, which

expresses and shapes professional understanding, and is used in the process of

knowledge and learning of scientific and vocational objects".

4

He has developed

a number of requirements for the term:

meaning, clarity, systematicness,

motivation, and shortness.

According to Lotte, proponents of the normative approach (Korshunov

S.I.,

5

)have expanded the list of requirements for the term, and noted in their "Short

Methodical Guide to the Development and Regulation of Scientific and Technical

Terminology".

Thus, the proponents of this approach regard the term as a static element,

not a dynamic element of the language, which is why it has been called the "ideal

term" in linguistic literature. However, this theory has since been severely

criticized. For example, in some works there have been attempts to prove that the

term is not always meaningful, that it can express a number of concepts and at the

same time enter different systems of terminology, and so on. The term

requirements are discussed in detail in the next section.

3

.Leychik V.M. Terminologiya lingvisticheskaya / V.M. Leychik // Russkiy yazik. Ensiklopediya

4

Lotte D.S. How to work on Terminology (in Russian) - Nauka, Moscow, 1968, P. 22

5

Коршунов

С

.

И

.

Синонимы

в

технической

терминологии

,

Известия

. -

Москва, 1952

. C - 10


background image

Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyotida tadqiqotlarni o'rni va rivojlanish omillari


https://scientific-jl.com/

18-to’plam 2-son Aprel 2025

338

2.

Functional (descriptive) approach

The founder of this approach is another famous scientist - Vinokur G.O.,

who claimed that "terms are not separate words, but words of a particular

function.

6

At the same time, he explained that the word is a special function that

emerges as a term - naming function. Vinokur G.O. opposed his approach to the

normative approach: the term, As Lotte argues, is studied not in the field of

registration, but in its function and application as a dynamic element of the system

which is susceptible to continuous change. As a consequence, all the Lotte-based

term requirements lose their relevance: as an element of the language system, the

term may change, alter, lose its meaning, have a number of synonyms, antonym,

or move to a category of common vocabulary.

3.

Systematic approach

Proponents of this approach emphasize the fact that the term exists within a

regulated system: “When you know the term, you know its place in the system.

When you know its place in the system, you know the term.

7

Most modern

researchers consider temperament as the basis for the study of the term. For

example, some scholars understand the term "word (phrase), which is an integral

part of the notion of the sign, and of the relevant concepts in this system of

understanding of science and technology.

8

; others see it as "a word or phrase of a

special language section designed to accurately represent specific concepts in the

system of science and technology.

9

At the same time, they say, "the term taken

separately is only what it really is - nothing. It exists only in a system of terms and

is associated with certain relations. Tatarinov V.A. also advocates a similar view,

suggesting that terms create a closed system.

10

Thus, the systematic assimilation

6

Vinokur. G.O. On the phenomena of word formation in Russian technical terminology. Trudy MIFLIV, 1959, C.

3–54

7

Юшманов Н.В. Элементы международной терминологии, Словарь-справочник. Москва, 1968. С.14

8

Кулебакин В.С, Климовицкий Я.А. Работы по построению научно - технической терминологии в СССР,

Москва, 1970. С.19-20

9

Городецкий

Б.Ю.,

Раскин

В.В. Методы семантического исследования ограниченного подъязыка. М. ,

1971. С. 47
10 Татаринов В.А. Теория терминоведения, Москва, 1996


background image

Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyotida tadqiqotlarni o'rni va rivojlanish omillari


https://scientific-jl.com/

18-to’plam 2-son Aprel 2025

339

of the term is a prerequisite for its description.

Within the approaches outlined above, certain differences in interpretation

of the term can be highlighted. For example, some authors describe the term as

having a definition in it: "the word performs a nominative or definitive function,

that is, or is a definitive tool, and then it is simply a sign, or it is a logical definition,

and it is a scientific term.

11

. The academic term emphasizes that the concept is not

as simple as the word, but rather that the concept is defined according to it.

Furthermore, in the dictionaries, the term is not interpreted but described, and the

meaning of the term is the definition of the concept, the definition of which is

defined accordingly. In other words, if there is no definition, the term itself will not

exist.

V.M Leychik also supports this view:

1) The same term may have more than one definition of its meaning; in

interdisciplinary borrowing, a word from general language or a term from another

subject field is borrowed and assigned a new concept.

For example:

“memory” – capacity of the human brain; “memory” –

temporary storage capacity of a computer, “mouse” – small rodent; “mouse” –

computer/operator interface device.

2) The expression of the term in the language may not be uniform;

3) There are many concepts in specific areas that do not have definitions

which are not expressed by language means.

Conclusion:

Considering the theoretical difficulties associated with the

definition of what is terminology and the general conditions for the existence of

technical terms, the conclusion might be drawn that this subject should best be left

in the hands of the subject experts of each field of knowledge who have to resolve

problems of naming and systematic classification, or alternatively that is should

become the responsibility of language planners and organizations charged with

standardization or other regulation of language. However, since it is largely for

11. Виноградов В, В. Из истории русской литературной лексики / / Вестник МГУ, 1947. С.12-13


background image

Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyotida tadqiqotlarni o'rni va rivojlanish omillari


https://scientific-jl.com/

18-to’plam 2-son Aprel 2025

340

sociolinguistic reasons that a specific autonomous activity of terminology has

come into being, it appears necessary to explore the history of this activity and the

various areas of knowledge that contribute to the constitution of what is now

increasingly being considered an independent discipline.

References:

1.

Alain Rey. Essay on Terminology, 1995, John Benjamins

Publishing Co. The Netherlands, Amsterdam.

2.

Arana J., Leon С. The Impact of Terrorism on Tourism

Demand // Annals of Tourism Research. 2008.

3.

Asian A., Kula F., Kaplan M. International Tourism Demand

for Turkey: A Dynamic Panel // Research Journal of International Studies.

4.

BD Beaver A. A Dictionary of Travel and Tourism

Terminology. Second edition. Oxon: CABI Publishing.

5.

Cabré, M. Teresa. “Terminology: theory, methods and

applications”. - John Benjamins Publishing Co. Amsterdam, Netherlands.

1999.

6.

Ceballos-Lascurain H. Tourism, ecotourism and protected

areas: the state of nature-based tourism around the world and guidelines for

its development. Gland: World Conservation Union.