131
THE FORMATION OF NEW CONCEPTS IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIO-
CULTURAL PROCESSES AND THEIR EXPRESSION IN THE LANGUAGE
SYSTEM
Turaeva Maftuna Akbar qizi
Doctoral student of Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages
Samarkand, Uzbekistan
maftuna-t@samdchti.uz
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15671728
Abstract.
This article analyzes, from a cognitive linguistic perspective, the ways in
which new concepts emerging under the influence of technological, ecological, and political
changes in the 21st century are expressed within the language system. It examines the
semantic fields formed in social consciousness through new lexico-semantic units - such as
neologisms, calques, and conceptual metaphors. Using terms like “greenwashing,”
“intersectionnalité,” and “glottophobie” as examples, the study highlights the role of language
in understanding and articulating social realities.
Keywords:
conceptual change, neologisms, cognitive linguistics, semantic field, social
discourse, language and society, conceptual metaphor.
ZAMONAVIY IJTIMOIY-MADANIY JARAYONLARDA YANGI
KONSEPTLARNING SHAKLLANISHI VA ULARNING TIL TIZIMIDAGI IFODASI
To’rayeva Maftuna Akbar qizi
Samarqand Davlat Chet Tillar Instituti tayanch doktoranti
Samarqand, O’zbekiston
maftuna-t@samdchti.uz
Annotatsiya.
Maqolada XXI asrda texnologik, ekologik va siyosiy o‘zgarishlar ta’sirida
shakllanayotgan yangi konseptlarning til tizimidagi ifodalanish xususiyatlari kognitiv
lingvistika asosida tahlil qilinadi. Yangi leksik-semantik birliklar — neologizmlar, kalkalar va
konseptual metaforalar orqali ijtimoiy ongda shakllanuvchi semantik maydonlar ko‘rib
chiqiladi. “Greenwashing”, “intersectionnalité”, “glottophobie” kabi atamalar misolida tilning
ijtimoiy haqiqatni anglash va ifodalashdagi roli yoritiladi.
Kalit so‘zlar:
konseptual o‘zgarish, neologizmlar, kognitiv lingvistika, semantik maydon,
ijtimoiy diskurs, til va jamiyat, konseptual metafora.
ФОРМИРОВАНИЕ НОВЫХ КОНЦЕПТОВ В СОВРЕМЕННЫХ
СОЦИОКУЛЬТУРНЫХ ПРОЦЕССАХ И ИХ
Мафтуна Акбаровна
Докторант Самаркандского государственного института иностранных языков
Самарканд,Узбекистан
maftuna-t@samdchti.uz
Аннотация.
В статье на основе когнитивной лингвистики рассматриваются
особенности языкового выражения новых концептов, формирующихся под
воздействием технологических, экологических и политических изменений XXI века.
Анализируются семантические поля, возникающие в общественном сознании
посредством лексико-семантических новообразований - неологизмов, калькированных
выражений и концептуальных метафор. На примере таких терминов, как greenwashing,
132
intersectionnalité, glottophobie, раскрывается роль языка в осмыслении и вербализации
социальной реальности.
Ключевые слова.
концептуальное изменение, неологизмы, когнитивная
лингвистика, семантическое поле, социальный дискурс, язык и общество,
концептуальная метафора.
In the 21st century, transformative changes across all spheres of human life—especially
the advancement of digital technologies, artificial intelligence, the expansion of the
information space, and the emergence of global culture—have led to the development of new
concepts. These concepts reflect not only technological phenomena but also profound socio-
ethical, cultural-aesthetic, and psychological transformations.
Linguistic and societal phenomena are intrinsically interlinked, each shaping the other.
Every social process demands new linguistic tools to reinterpret and articulate contemporary
realities. These processes result in structural and semantic innovations within the language.
In turn, language shapes how members of society perceive and respond to these
transformations. Such concepts are frequently expressed through lexical-semantic
neologisms—new words, phrases, calques, and other linguistic innovations—and are
cognitively structured through conceptual metaphors.
Cognitive linguistics offers an effective approach for analyzing the content of emerging
concepts, as it facilitates the exploration of conceptual structures, symbolic systems, and
associated mental models.
Changes across domains do not occur uniformly. Science and technology, in particular,
are developing at a more rapid pace due to their responsiveness to external stimuli and the
dynamic adaptation of linguistic systems. The contemporary technological age, characterized
by information and speed, plays a crucial role in simplifying communication, facilitating
convenience, and enhancing human life. Consequently, terms and concepts related to science
and technology enter the language system swiftly and often influence other domains. New
lexical or semantic units emerge in these fields and spread widely through mass media, digital
networks, and everyday discourse. This not only enriches vocabulary but also renews the
conceptual structure of language. Language thereby becomes not merely a means of
describing reality but also an active socio-cultural mechanism for generating knowledge and
ideas. In this way, technological development strongly drives linguistic evolution.
The rapid development of biotechnology has expanded the sphere of innovation, giving
rise to new technologies and scientific notions, particularly in critical sectors such as
healthcare, agriculture, energy, and environmental protection. Breakthrough concepts in
genetics, ecological sustainability, food security, and renewable energy open new horizons for
humanity. At the same time, these innovations pose complex questions related to ethical
values, data security, and regulatory frameworks. Despite the immense potential of
biotechnology, its sustainable and responsible development requires a balance between
scientific, social, and ethical considerations.
Scientific challenges and their solutions, once disseminated through media, often trigger
public discourse, leading to the formation of new concepts within the sociopolitical domain.
For instance, the politicization of environmental issues highlights the rise of ecological
awareness. The concept of “sustainable development,” formally introduced by the Brundtland
133
Commission of the United Nations in 1987, remains a cornerstone of environmental policy.
Subsequent terms such as “écocide,” “greenwashing,” “écoanxiété,” “animalisme,”
“antispécisme,” and “spécisme” indicate the growing influence of ecological consciousness and
underscore the language's vital role in shaping it.
These are not mere terminological additions; they represent ideological foundations of
social movements, forms of protest, civic activism, and expressions of ecological
responsibility. Thus, ecological concepts act as a mobilizing force, helping to foster global
cooperation and conscious action in response to the environmental crisis.
New concepts are also emerging in the political sphere. Politics is a dynamic and
complex system in which the emergence of new concepts is closely tied to shifts in power
structures, ideological trajectories, and societal demands. Such concepts typically arise when
new socio-political realities demand more precise linguistic articulation.
The formation of political neologisms can be triggered by internal factors—such as
domestic reforms, public dissent, or ideological shifts—or external factors like international
pressures, integration processes, and global challenges. Consequently, the political lexicon
expands, providing essential tools for describing and promoting political organizations,
movements, and initiatives.
These new political concepts aim to capture the multifaceted nature of contemporary
societies. Terms like “populisme,” “gentrification,” and “fracture sociale” not only describe
socio-political phenomena but also illuminate the conditions of specific social groups, political
tensions, and urban disparities.
In the French context, emerging concepts serve as analytical tools for identifying and
discussing pressing societal issues. “Laïcité ouverte” promotes religious freedom and equality;
“islamo-gauchisme” reflects the complex interplay between Islamic values and leftist
ideologies; and “intersectionnalité” examines how overlapping forms of discrimination—such
as racism, sexism, and classism—interact to exacerbate social injustice.
Overall, the formation of new political and social concepts is a response to increasing
complexity and shifts in social consciousness. These concepts function not only as linguistic
elements but also as cognitive tools for understanding and influencing social reality. They
enable public discourse to explore previously neglected or underrepresented issues.
Each new term serves as an important means of advocating for social justice, equality,
and inclusivity. Such terms help to shape new semantic fields in collective consciousness,
laying the foundation for addressing issues at both social and political levels. For example,
“grossophobie” describes discrimination based on div weight and brings visibility to
injustices in areas such as education, healthcare, and employment. Similarly, “glottophobie”
refers to discrimination based on language, dialect, or accent, and amplifies discussions on
social identity, language policy, and cultural equality. These forms of discrimination may be
subtle yet have a significant impact, especially in mass media, education, and recruitment.
Thus, the emergence of new concepts and terms reflects the deepening of social
awareness. They challenge previously accepted norms, provoke discussion, and highlight the
active and creative role of language in the pursuit of social justice and stability.
In conclusion, new concepts are the linguistic and cognitive embodiment of socio-
cultural change. They are the direct outcome of societal renewal, innovative thinking, and
intercultural communication. Analyzing their formation helps us to better understand the
134
intellectual landscape of contemporary society.
References:
Используемая литература:
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar:
1.
Fauconnier G. Mental Spaces. Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Languages. —
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. – 240 p.
2.
François J. Sémantique cognitive et changement lexical // Grandes voies et chemins de
traverse de la sémantique cognitive. – Paris, 2010. – С. 103–145p.
3.
Fuchs C. La linguistique cognitive– Paris : Éditions Ophrys, 2004. – 264 p.
4.
Gaudin F., Guespin L. Initiation à la lexicologie française: de la néologie aux dictionnaires.
—Bruxelles: Duculot, 2000. —233p.
5.
Guilbert L. La néologie lexicale. —Paris: Didier-Larousse, 1974. —128p.
6.
Sablayrolles J.-F. La néologie en français contemporain. Examen du concept et analyse de
productions néologiques récentes. —Paris : Honoré Champion. №4. 2000. - 589 p. (195)
7.
Sablayrolles J.-F., Comprendre la néologie. Conceptions, analyses, emplois. —Limoges :
Lambert Lucas, coll. « La Lexicothèque », 2019, —305 p.
8.
Freund Y., Vernier-Lopin D., Tanet C. Dictionnaire des synonymes, nuances et contraires.
— Paris: France Loisirs, 2005. 1245p.
9.
Garnier Y., Vinciguerra M. Le Petit Larousse illustré. — Paris: Larousse. 2006. —1811p.
10.
Ibragimov X., Mamadaliyev A. va boshqalar. Dictionnaire Français-Ouzbék. — Toshkent,
2008. – 587 b.
11.
Audureau W. D’où viennent les nouveaux mots de la langue française?.. // Le Monde.
2019. —6p.
12.
Audureau W. Flow, tataki, coolitude: d’où viennent les nouveaux mots de la langue
française… // Le Monde. 2022. – 1p.
